dgreen
Footballguy
@ffmail4me and @Sidewinder16 had some good input here. I'll also add that "need" is a short-term thing. DE/Edge rusher may not be a need right now, but it could be next year or the year after or the year after. At some point it will be a need. But, if you draft a great talent like Chase Young (let's just assume he is a great talent who will succeed) then you've helped that future need even if it's not a current need.MikeApf said:DGreen I know you definitely understand football, so I'm not challenging your thinking but just wondering what you would do in this situation to address offensive line. I feel with a young QB we are trying to develop, there is some level of urgency to provide a running game and QB protection in 2020 or we may ruin the kid. So, I am not saying OL simply to "win now" but even to develop for the future. You know?
Think about all the teams that draft for that all-important QB need. So many teams reach for a QB because that's what they need. They pass on some great players just to try to get that QB. And then the next year they still have a need at QB and they have a need at whatever player position they passed on the year before. Or, on the flip side, notice how GB drafted Aaron Rodgers despite keeping Favre around another three years. They used their first round pick on BPA and he sat for three years. Had they focused on immediate need, who knows where the franchise would've been post-Favre.
"Need" is a good tiebreaker in the draft. For example, if the Redskins have Chase Young and the best LT, whoever that is, with similar ratings and they are basically indifferent to who they want, and they believe they can't trade down and still get the LT, then go ahead and draft him. It's still a BPA situation with a "need" tiebreaker. BPA is Best Player Available, but it doesn't have to be singular. It can be pick one of the Best Players Available because the reality is that some players are probably rated so closely that they are virtually equal in value.
I'm a fan of using FA to fill needs. But, I'll also say I don't think the Redskins should be looking at "need" only in terms of positions. Their "need" is for youth and culture change. They have some good pieces to start a rebuild and I think they should look for even more.