Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
You may want to ask yourself why this is the case. Trump and his team have largely been quiet other than to cast out blanket "witch hunt" allegations. The only thing I can think of that Trump directly refuted was the whole SS thing..... and it was such trivial moment that was more about his temperament than the allegations being laid out.
His attorneys would what? His attorneys thus far have not been faring so well when it comes to the stuff at MAL. I think Democrats are fine with any of this going to court...part of which is because trump's attorneys seem to be in over their head everywhere you look.
This is just flat out wrong. Special Committees have been convened in the House and Senate since the beginning of the Republic as one of the legislature's fundamental duties relates to oversight. Over any number of key important issues/events.
Couldn't believe it and denying the results based on zero evidence are two different things. I still can't believe it, to be honest. But I am not going to attack the integrity of any election without evidence. That is the fundamental difference.
Just FYI, this is exactly how liberals feel about conservatives constantly yammering about CRT, grooming, etc.
Not just liberals
Fair. At least we can agree it's dumb from both sides.
It went far, far, beyond 'o my gosh, I just can't believe it!'. Matt Taibbi just wrote about how this has been memory holed. It's astonishing. If you're angry and depressed about what happened on 1/6 you have to also realize the years-long sniping at the 2016 results are partially to blame. The 1/6 crashing of the Capitol didn't just happen, there was a long runway leading up to it. So many from all across the political spectrum are guilty.
Exactly. How easily they forget. But then again, hypocrites gonna' hyprocrite.
But...but...but....but what again?
LOL
fb.watch
Warming up the crowd...
"During early voting in Arizona's Pima County, an election observer was told to put away binoculars; another was caught looking at private voter data, and another was asked to stop making comments about “fraudulent elections,” according to a September report by the county recorder's office reviewed by Reuters. State law forbids voter intimidation and obstructing election workers."This could be fun and awful at the same time come November:
'Stop the steal' supporters train thousands of U.S. poll observers
In the hallway a group prayed for "evil to descend" on the "election team," said the county's Republican clerk Chuck Broerman. The election watchers had showed up to observe a five-day recount of votes for four Republican candidates who claimed the primary was fraudulent in a contest where they...www.yahoo.com
Choose the party that allows actual elections to count, so you can have your vote count next time?
Everyone’s vote counts. There are more elections that affect your everyday life than the president.
The point is that everyone's vote won't count in the future if people like Doug Mastriano, Kari Lake, Mark Finchem, et.al. are elected this go round.
60 percent of the country believes in the intellectual equivalence of the moon landing was a hoax
This is exactly why we need ranked choice voting
Of course you do
Do you think the D’s put the country first?
Just maybe if people voted for better candidates in the primaries, a lot of this can be avoided. People can’t be bothered, so here we are.
This seems like a deflection. Fact is, the GOP is running candidates this year that have outright stated they will overturn election results they don't like. Those candidates simply cannot be allowed to win, regardless of party or other policy beliefs.
Can you link to a few of those?
Those people are nuts also and don’t deserve the time of day. That doesn’t earn D’s my vote when I hate their entire platform.
I’m Doug Mastriano, and I get to appoint the secretary of state, who’s delegated from me the power to make the corrections to elections, the voting logs, and everything. I could decertify every machine in the state with the, you know, with the stroke of a pen via my secretary of state. I already have the secretary of state picked out. It’s a world-class person that knows voting integrity better than anyone else in the nation, I think, and I already have a team that’s gonna be built around that individual.
The nicest thing I can say about the Dems at this point is, "at least they are attempting to self serve themselves within the confines of our democratic principles"....seriously, that's where the bar has been set at this point...it's pathetic.
Compared to the GOP, yes.
I don’t see much difference between the two.
You vote against the election deniers to fix the party you love for the future. You follow and support Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger.( country over party)
Not much can be done when outside money is dictating elections now. Some of it is from the other party to get the preferred candidate knowing they won’t win.
No. Election Denier = somebody who still does not accept the results of the election and believe Trump won.
@NorvilleBarnes and @BladeRunner do you accept the results of the 2020 election and do you view Biden as your legitimate president?
yes and Yes, but I've answered this before. Multiple times. Well, if I recall correctly, anyways.
The number of candidates the Democrats actually helped win is highly exaggerated.
The fact that they are even doing it can't be loud enough.
I remember all the posters in 2016-17 saying "Not my President". Sad
