OrtonToOlsen
Footballguy
Which statement?white racists were not the only violent ones FYI
the above was a good statement .......... imagine if Trump had said the same words? ya'll would have went BONKERS on him
Which statement?white racists were not the only violent ones FYI
the above was a good statement .......... imagine if Trump had said the same words? ya'll would have went BONKERS on him
ANTIFA / BLM makes white supremacist rallies look like pansiesNo, but they were the only ones that said: "jews will not replace us" and "blood and soil" I'm sure a few them are good people that only mouthed the words without actually saying them out loud.
from the ACLU .... if Trump had said the same things he'd have been grilled. Well, he was going to be anyway, but stillWhich statement?
See, this is how I know you are a bigot and a racist.ANTIFA / BLM makes white supremacist rallies look like pansies
I am highly skeptical of your numbers. That is all.We don't have much time to get this right. I'd say right now the nazis have won over about 15%-20% of the population. They are definitely well over 10%. I think if they hit 25% they can spur a revolt regardless of what is going on. I don't know if you've ever seen psychology experiments done on nazism but once their belief system get rolling it can convert a lot of people very quickly. Its highly highly dangerous.
Absolute bull ####.from the ACLU .... if Trump had said the same things he'd have been grilled. Well, he was going to be anyway, but still
I would have called Trump an idiot for saying that, just like I think you are being an idiot saying that.white racists were not the only violent ones FYI
the above was a good statement .......... imagine if Trump had said the same words? ya'll would have went BONKERS on him
LOL keeping painting the lies and name calling if you want, don't bother me much.See, this is how I know you are a bigot and a racist.
ask the Berkeley campus that ... I don't think they do know, and in fact after Charlottesville several events were canceled, including one at Texas A&MANYBODY WITH AN 8TH GRADE EDUCATION UNDERSTANDS THAT'S HOW FREE SPEECH WORKS.
so the ACLU are idiots ...I would have called Trump an idiot for saying that, just like I think you are being an idiot saying that
No, they pretty much bat 1.000. I thought you were referring to your quote:so the ACLU are idiots ...
white racists were not the only violent ones FYI
I'll add, it Trump had quoted the ACLU it may have been the first intelligent words uttered from his stupid mouth. I am not confident he could even adequately read their statement from a teleprompter.so the ACLU are idiots ...
See this is the reason why we need stricter guns laws.We don't have much time to get this right. I'd say right now the nazis have won over about 15%-20% of the population. They are definitely well over 10%. I think if they hit 25% they can spur a revolt regardless of what is going on. I don't know if you've ever seen psychology experiments done on nazism but once their belief system get rolling it can convert a lot of people very quickly. Its highly highly dangerous.
That's not what you said at all.ask the Berkeley campus that ... I don't think they do know, and in fact after Charlottesville several events were canceled, including one at Texas A&M
I don't even think racists groups should be given permits to rally to be honest - ALL racist groups, not just the whites ones
typical Democrat logic - make law abiding people suffer for the criminal actions all the while, criminals buy their guns or steal them etc and these new strict gun laws do nothingSee this is the reason why we need stricter guns laws.
David Duke, Richard Spencer, Sebastian Gorka, Stephen Miller...who has NOT spoke out against hate and bigotry other than the ACLU ?
name me someone
Based on that logic, why have any laws? Criminals will only break them.typical Democrat logic - make law abiding people suffer for the criminal actions all the while, criminals buy their guns or steal them etc and these new strict gun laws do nothing
ask Chicago how its going
Never heard of any of them except Duke ... you seem very well tied to white supremacist groups. Do you expect they themselves to disavow themselves?David Duke, Richard Spencer, Sebastian Gorka, Stephen Miller...
Never heard of any of them except Duke ... you seem very well tied to white supremacist groups. Do you expect they themselves to disavow themselves?
Dickies - truthfully what did Trump say wrong in this speech? Yes, he went off track on media and such, typical Trump .... but he said all the right things, condemning hate groups, speaking to American's as one group not splintered and separated .... don't believe what CNN and the left tells you to believe
http://time.com/4912055/donald-trump-phoenix-arizona-transcript/
This highlights my problem with him. He is just checking the boxes and managed to miss a few on his first attempt.OK now, I mean -- so they were having a hard time with that one, because I said everything. I hit him with neo-Nazi. I hit them with everything. I got the white supremacists, the neo-Nazi. I got them all in there, let's say. KKK, we have KKK. I got them all. So they're having a hard time.
Two of those guys are/were on Trump's staff.Never heard of any of them except Duke ... you seem very well tied to white supremacist groups. Do you expect they themselves to disavow themselves?
I've now asked at least six times for evidence of counter-protestors initiating violence in Charlottesville and have yet to get anything in response. Until you can provide some, the bolded is just another lie.white racists were not the only violent ones FYI
the above was a good statement .......... imagine if Trump had said the same words? ya'll would have went BONKERS on him
That's not a conclusion at all, never did I say some gun laws were needed.Based on that logic, why have any laws? Criminals will only break them.
Guys...shhh...listen...it's almost like he's...like he's trying to communicate with us!That's not a conclusion at all, never did I say some gun laws were needed.
The analogy you're looking for is anytime there is a threat or chance of death, more laws are needed.
They are not. We need one law really for violence ... don't murder. That's it. Don't matter the tool you use to do it ... and then to enforce that law to use as a deterrent, you need exceptionally harsh penalty if its broken.
Pass 10,000 gun laws .......... and only criminals and police will have guns and crime will sky rocket
if he hadn't, CNN would have said he hadn't named themThis highlights my problem with him. He is just checking the boxes and managed to miss a few on his first attempt
Funny thing is, actual evidence proves the exact opposite.Pass 10,000 gun laws .......... and only criminals and police will have guns and crime will sky rocket
Sorry, but if you don't even recognize the names Stephen Miller and Sebastian Gorka you don't get to act like you know the president and his White House better than we do.if he hadn't, CNN would have said he hadn't named them
but nowhere in that speech did he do anything but say racism is unacceptable, violence is unacceptable ..... American's together, first.
not racist like liberals would have you believe, not at all
you can't google and search for yourself ?I've now asked at least six times for evidence of counter-protestors initiating violence in Charlottesville and have yet to get anything in response. Until you can provide some, the bolded is just another lie.
He didn't need to name any of the groups as far as I'm concerned. Just a strong statement against them.if he hadn't, CNN would have said he hadn't named them
but nowhere in that speech did he do anything but say racism is unacceptable, violence is unacceptable ..... American's together, first.
not racist like liberals would have you believe, not at all
Oh, come on...Never heard of any of them except Duke ... you seem very well tied to white supremacist groups. Do you expect they themselves to disavow themselves?
Sorry, that's not how it works. You can't make an unsupported statement and then claim it's on me to prove it's untrue. Burden's on you to support your own assertion. That's how it works. Always has, always will.you can't google and search for yourself ?
violence follows antifa / BLM .... its what happens ..... they went to Charlottesville to crash another rally and destroy it. Now me? I don't care that they did, I got no use for white racists ......... but call it what it was.
until you can prove it wan't maybe I can say you are lying?
I'll say this - this guy has a legitimate, long-running internet presence that fits with everything he's said to describe himself (a 48-year-old hunter from Arkansas.) I believe he is who he says he is, if for no other reason than taking over an existing internet presence like that is supremely weird even for Eminence.Oh, come on...
Is this Eminence?
You think Eminence alone elected Trump?Oh, come on...
Is this Eminence?
Fair enough. I honestly hadn't noticed him before he threw his beanie into the ring in the politics subforum. I will say, the bar for supremely weird has recently been raised quite a bit around here, though.I'll say this - this guy has a legitimate, long-running internet presence that fits with everything he's said to describe himself (a 48-year-old hunter from Arkansas.) I believe he is who he says he is, if for no other reason than taking over an existing internet presence like that is supremely weird even for Eminence.
Heh. I wish. Then it'd be a lot easier to throw Trump out on his can.You think Eminence alone elected Trump?
And Spencer was the organizer of the rally that was cancelled at A&M - that @Stealthycat referenced in a previous post.Two of those guys are/were on Trump's staff.
Do try and keep up.
Dude...watch the footage of the speech. He is literally making light of checking all the hate groups off the list like it is a ####### joke or something. "Oh hey..oh yea, the KKK..see, I mentioned them"if he hadn't, CNN would have said he hadn't named them
but nowhere in that speech did he do anything but say racism is unacceptable, violence is unacceptable ..... American's together, first.
not racist like liberals would have you believe, not at all
fake new, you know it, everyone knows itCan we ban this troll already?
Sorry, that's not how it works. You can't make an unsupported statement and then claim it's on me to prove it's untrue. Burden's on you to support your own assertion. That's how it works. Always has, always will
I am not a troll .... the name calling and labeling goes on and on because I have a different viewWhat?
he did it to gig at the media .......... look, I think it was tacky and unpresidential for him to delve off into media attack land ..... but he never ONCE supported hate groups (black or white) in any wayDude...watch the footage of the speech. He is literally making light of checking all the hate groups off the list like it is a ####### joke or something. "Oh hey..oh yea, the KKK..see, I mentioned them"
How can you watch this and not see it?
to stop that rally, to disrupt that rally ... that was the reason they showed. Like I said, I'd just as soon Charlottesville not allow it, but ACLU stepped in and forced it and so they had to allow those few hundred there
but think it through - slowly ..... a few thousand who didn't have a rally permit descended on a few hundred that did ... and knowing the violence that follows ANTIFA and BLM you're going to try and sell that those few hundred were causing the violence?
Sure ... yeah ... that makes sense. prove BLM and ANTIFA didn't ... that's on you
This is actually false. The counter-demonstration did have a permit, and the Unite the Right group did not have a permit (though they had an injunction from a court that allowed them to have the demonstration.)to stop that rally, to disrupt that rally ... that was the reason they showed. Like I said, I'd just as soon Charlottesville not allow it, but ACLU stepped in and forced it and so they had to allow those few hundred there
but think it through - slowly ..... a few thousand who didn't have a rally permit descended on a few hundred that did ... and knowing the violence that follows ANTIFA and BLM you're going to try and sell that those few hundred were causing the violence?
Sure ... yeah ... that makes sense. prove BLM and ANTIFA didn't ... that's on you
example of free speech being squashed because of threats of violence from BLM & ANTIFA ?And Spencer was the organizer of the rally that was cancelled at A&M - that @Stealthycat referenced in a previous post
No, the labeling happens because the things you're saying are demonstrably false and/or clearly misinformed. Which usually means someone is just on a fishing trip.I am not a troll .... the name calling and labeling goes on and on because I have a different view