What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

The US Prepares for War with Russia (1 Viewer)

ren hoek

Footballguy
https://www.newsweek.com/exclusive-cold-war-back-focus-iran-military-prepares-war-russia-1485088

During the height of tensions with Iran last year, the United States conducted an unprecedented series of war games. Over five months, from May until the end of September, 93 separate military exercises were held, with forces operating continuously in, above and around 29 countries.

The games, which practiced everything from ground platoon tactics to cyber warfare, weren't held in the Mideast and weren't directed at Tehran. They were directed against Moscow—and constituted the most intense uninterrupted set of drills since the end of the Cold War.

The activity was the culmination of a buildup that began after Russia seized Crimea from Ukraine in March 2014. Though American armed forces were fighting several "hot wars" and engaged in crisis deployments in response to both Iran and North Korea, the shift to practicing "high end" warfare tasks dominated. The focus was also undeniably anti-Russia,with the number of European games ten times the number of China-related drills held at the same time.

"In the shadow of the deteriorating European security environment, the size and scope of NATO and Russian military exercises have increased significantly—even dramatically," a NATO parliamentary committee reported in October. The committee worried that NATO doesn't possess sufficient ground troops in Eastern Europe to deter Russian inference or attack. It also pointed to Moscow's own high-profile war games, many involving scenarios that include the use of nuclear weapons in a European war.

While the conventional view is one of Russian advantage, the new figures show that the United States and its European partners far outstrip Moscow. These "persistent heel-to-toe" operations, as the military calls them, where one exercise begins as another ends, emphasize rapid aircraft deployments and dispersal to forward bases. Much of the emphasis last year was on fighter aircraft and bomber scatterings, showcasing Western geographic advantages while also demonstrating combined air operations refined in two decades of Middle East fighting.

These operations and exercises, then-NATO Commander Army Gen. Curtis Scaparrotti told Congress last Spring, were meant to "introduce operational unpredictability to our adversaries." The question is: at what cost? That is, are we provoking the very thing NATO hopes to avoid—a new Cold War? Or more concretely, in putting the two sides on a path where escalating military exercises and the intermingling of forces increases tensions while also providing more and more opportunities for miscalculation.

'100,000 Tons of International Diplomacy'

From the day former national security advisor John Bolton stepped to the microphone last May to announce that B-52 bombers and the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln were being rushed to the Middle East because of "troubling and escalatory indications and warnings" coming from Iran, Europe was already on pace to break all records regarding military activity.

The Lincoln was in the Mediterranean Sea and was operating with the aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis, the first time two carrier strike groups had conducted dual operations in the Trump administration. On the day of Bolton's announcement, Lincoln-based F/A-18F Super Hornet fighters flew 700-mile bombing runs to targets in Romania. The next day, Super Hornets flew again, this time 1,000-mile missions from the Ionian Sea west of Greece and traversing Eastern Europe to Lithuania.

There, the Navy strike fighters worked with ground spotters to practice bombing, less than 500 miles from Moscow. "We are showing the world that we ... are prepared and capable of executing missions in our allies' airspace on short notice," said Navy Lt. Cmdr. Stephen Gay, coordinator of the exercise.

U.S. Ambassador to Russia Jon M. Huntsman Jr. was on the Lincoln during the operation. "Each of the carriers operating in the Mediterranean at this time represent 100,000 tons of international diplomacy," the former Utah Governor said.

Finished with its mock bombing of Russia, the Lincoln canceled a scheduled port call in Croatia and set sail for the Persian Gulf. By the time it steamed south through the Suez Canal and around the Arabian Peninsula to take up station off the Iranian coast, no fewer than seven separate NATO war games were held: Arrow and Bold Quest in Finland, Spring Storm in Estonia, Formidable Shield off the coast of Scotland, Immediate Response in Croatia, Hungary and Slovenia, Stolen Cerberus VI in Greece, and Erciyes in Turkey. And in those two weeks, a dozen Florida-based F-16C fighters arrived in the United Kingdom and the newest F-35 Lightning II jets deployed from Utah to Northern Italy, the latter for the first time.

No European deployments were canceled or delayed because of Iran, according to a senior European Command official who was not authorized to speak on the record. And not only were U.S. aircraft operating close to Russian airspace. Starting in May, the air forces of nine different NATO nations deployed to forward bases in the Baltic states, Poland and Romania on "air policing" missions.

The exercises and deployments were taking place under an umbrella Pentagon program called the European Deterrence Initiative (EDI). Started after the Crimea crisis, EDI has built up a NATO ground presence in the three Baltic states and Poland, enhanced the air defense of the Baltics, southeastern Europe and Iceland, and accelerated air deployments from the United States under both "bomber assurance" and "theater security" programs.

Last March, the Trump administration requested $5.9 billion to fund EDI, a 10 percent reduction from the previous year—which some observers saw as a sign of Donald Trump's personal softness on Russia. Calling the Russian threat to Europe "real and growing," Army Gen. Curtis Scaparrotti, the outgoing top officer for NATO, told Congress that he was "not comfortable yet with the deterrent posture" on the continent.

"We're looking at increased burden-sharing," Pentagon Deputy Comptroller Elaine A. McCusker told reporters, echoing the president's many statements that the rich European nations should contribute more towards their defense, lessening the American bill.

But the fine print showed that there was no real reduction. The cut was actually the result of completed construction and other "nonrecurring" costs that stabilized EDI at a steady level. And the amount dedicated to exercises and training more than doubled from the previous year, from $291 million to $609 million.

On December 4, after a marathon eight months in the Middle East, the USS Abraham Lincoln transited the Strait of Hormuz to return home. The Iran crisis was still brewing and would further escalate with the killing of Iranian Gen. Qassem Soleimani a month later. The crisis deployments Bolton had announced included a total of six bombers in two groups, both of which had come and gone. A battalion-sized Marine Corps force had also left the region. Emergency ground deployments totaled fewer than 10,000 troops, the majority in Patriot anti-air and missile defense units. Air Force aircraft had augmented the Lincoln's air wing on the scene. Three squadrons of F-15E Strike Eagles, F-35A Lightning IIs, and F-22 Raptors, constituted the totality of the anti-Iran movements.

During the same time, nine American squadrons of fighter aircraft deployed to Europe for anti-Russian war games, according to Pentagon documents. During the third week in June, when Iran shot down an American drone, exercise Anatolian Eagle was in full swing in Konya, Turkey. Though Turkey abuts Iran, the exercise, funded bythe European Defense Initiative, had a wholly NATO European focus.

As two oil tankers were hit with limpet mines in the Persian Gulf, special operators from ten nations were skulking about as a part of exercise Trojan Footprint 19, one that took place across Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania and in the Black Sea. In northern waters, Baltic Operations (BALTOPS) brought together 50 ships and 40 aircraft of 18 NATO nations, plus Sweden and Finland. A total of seven NATO war games were underway, including Iron Wolf in Lithuania; Dragon 19 in Poland; Swift response in Croatia, Bulgaria and Romania; and Strike Back and Saber Guardian in Bulgaria.

Overall, more than 50,000 NATO and allied military personnel were in action against Russia. U.S. Air Force F-35 fighters deployed to both Finland and Norway for the first time. Joining them were Louisiana-based B-52 bombers that had forward deployed to England and flew mock bombing runs against Russia simultaneously over the Baltic and Black Sea regions.

Heel to toe, exercise Dynamic Mongoosecommenced in Norwegian Arctic waters with the completion of BALTOPS. Exercise Sea Breeze also got underway in the Black Sea to augment Dynamic Mongoose. While Ukraine was on everyone's lips in Washington because of House impeachment hearings, a total of 32 ships and 24 aircraft from 19 countries were operating in and around that Black Sea nation.

None of this took place without a Russian response. The very week of Bolton's Iran announcement, a Hungarian fighter operating in Lithuania intercepted a Russian Federation Air Force plane flying without a transponder signal. Russian sent its own bombers to flyalong the western coast of Alaska and the Aleutian Islands. At the end of May, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said that Moscow was concerned about NATO's increased activities near its borders.

Russian news agency TASS reported that the number of Russian air intercepts had increased ten times over the past three years. Meanwhile, NATO scrambles had increased 300 percent, according to classified U.S. Air Force documents. When a Russian Su-24 Fencer fighter-bomber dangerously buzzed a Spanish Navy ship operating in the Baltic, NATO issued a vigorous protest.

As the May exercise season started, Air Force Gen. Tod Wolters took over command of NATO from Gen. Scaparrotti. One of his first orders of business was to sit down withthe Russian Chief of General Staff, General Valery Gerasimov to discuss "deconfliction" of military activity. Wolters told reporters just days before the Spanish incident that American "deterrence" activity had tempered Russian behavior, that there had been a reduction in Russian "unprofessional behavior.

The two generals met again in Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan, on July 10th for what were more sobering talks, according to military officers who were privy to the discussions. That same day, the Ukrainian Navy reported that a Russian destroyerintruded into the Sea Breeze restricted area during live-fire artillery drills, creating "an emergency situation." When NATO radioed the destroyer with a warning, according to a Ukrainian Navy's statement, the Russian ship "pretended to be experiencing communications problems." Russia's Black Sea fleet said Ukrainian claims were untrue. The Cold War was back. 

 
My plan is simple: don’t repeat past mistakes. 

Build up our troops in Ukraine. The invasion needs to begin in March or April. We have to reach Moscow before September. Forget about St Petersburg/Leningrad; we don’t need it. We don’t need the southern oil fields either. Moscow is everything. Napoleon’s plan, not Hitler’s because we can supply our army and he couldn’t. 

 
Time running out on the last US-Russia nuclear arms treaty

Time is running out on an arms control treaty that, if it’s allowed to expire, will leave the world with no legal restrictions on U.S. and Russian nuclear weapons for the first time in nearly half a century.

If President Donald Trump doesn't extend the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty — only remaining U.S.-Russia arms control pact — or succeed in negotiating a replacement treaty, it will expire on Feb. 5. That's just 16 days after Trump begins a second term or his successor is sworn into office.

Russia has offered to extend New START for up to five years, but Trump is holding out. He thinks China, which is expected to double its stockpile of nuclear weapons in the next decade, should have to sign on to a nuclear arms control accord, too. //

But Trump has accused Russia of not living up to agreements. He cited Russian violations in his announcement Thursday that the U.S. would withdraw from the Open Skies Treaty. While the U.S. has officially given its required six-month notice of withdrawal, Trump hinted that he may reconsider and stay in the pact.

Trump also blamed Russian violations for his decision last year to pull out of the 1987 Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty that banned production, testing and deployment of intermediate-range land-based cruise and ballistic missiles.

Russia's Foreign Ministry on Friday accused the U.S. of aiming to dismantle security pacts. Withdrawing from the Opens Skies Treaty "fully fits into (the U.S.) line on the destruction of the entire complex of agreements in the field of arms control and confidence-building in the military field," the ministry said.

 
You need to drop the anti-anti-Trump position if you really feel this way. That’s all I’ll say on this. I’ve been posting about Russia’s Return for some time now. Putin’s been after the return of the Cold War since at least 2006.
The "anti-Trump" position just spent 3 years acting like the email leaks were an act of terrorism.  There's a thread on it here, 'was the russian interference worse than 9/11'.  They attacked Trump from the right on Russia policy, badgering him to escalate sanctions and acting like he was a 🐈 if he didn't.  The NYT literally ran a cartoon depicting Trump & Putin as gay lovers.  They became friends with neocons like Bill Kristol and David Frum, who've thirsted for a new cold war since the last one ended. 

You should know, you seem to align with the extreme pro-NATO military hawks. I don't ever see you criticize the 'nevertrump' neocons.  The proxy wars in Venezuela, Iran, Syria, Ukraine, and now China are all leading us down this path and very few of your "anti-trump" brigade appears to give a ####.  They were too busy pushing asinine conspiracy theories to notice the Trump admin was ratcheting up tensions with Russia.

I was one of the people saying Trump's talk of peace with Russia was one of the few good things about his foreign policy.  I begged people to please embrace sanity.  I don't think the relationship could have ever gotten this bad without the TrumpRussia conspiracy trash.  Now we're facing the prospect of a very real nuclear arms race between the US and Russia.  So don't put it on me now that Trump is following through with 'get tough on russia' policy that Trump resisters have been begging for.  

 
The "anti-Trump" position just spent 3 years acting like the email leaks were an act of terrorism.  There's a thread on it here, 'was the russian interference worse than 9/11'.  They attacked Trump from the right on Russia policy, badgering him to escalate sanctions and acting like he was a 🐈 if he didn't.  The NYT literally ran a cartoon depicting Trump & Putin as gay lovers.  They became friends with neocons like Bill Kristol and David Frum, who've thirsted for a new cold war since the last one ended. 

You should know, you seem to align with the extreme pro-NATO military hawks. I don't ever see you criticize the 'nevertrump' neocons.  The proxy wars in Venezuela, Iran, Syria, Ukraine, and now China are all leading us down this path and very few of your "anti-trump" brigade appears to give a ####.  They were too busy pushing asinine conspiracy theories to notice the Trump admin was ratcheting up tensions with Russia.

I was one of the people saying Trump's talk of peace with Russia was one of the few good things about his foreign policy.  I begged people to please embrace sanity.  I don't think the relationship could have ever gotten this bad without the TrumpRussia conspiracy trash.  Now we're facing the prospect of a very real nuclear arms race between the US and Russia.  So don't put it on me now that Trump is following through with 'get tough on russia' policy that Trump resisters have been begging for.  
Sorry, I deleted my post before your response, I didn't mean to give you a hard time.

But Open Skies, START is a disaster, the INF, the JPCOA.... it's absurd to boffsidez this. Democrats at least would have preserved the traditional arms framework that was such a huge victory for everyone, US, Russia, China, the world. This is a disaster. There's no comparison, if you care about this issue you have to rationally oppose Trump with all your might. And now the discussion to re-begin nuclear arms testing.... these people are fg dangerous morons.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ren I know you feel about the ultimate goal on this like I do. I see that, I feel that, I appreciate it. Nobody else would likely give a damn enough to top post about this, so thanks. Didn't mean to convey the wrong message, so that's why I deleted my post. Anyway, take care, and thank you for caring about peace.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sorry, I deleted my post before your response, I didn't mean to give you a hard time.

But Open Skies, START is a disaster, the INF, the JPCOA.... it's absurd to boffsidez this. Democrats at least would have preserved the traditional arms framework that was such a huge victory for everyone, US, Russia, China, the world. This is a disaster. There's no comparison, if you care about this issue you have to rationally oppose Trump with all your might. And now the discussion to re-begin nuclear arms testing.... these people are fg dangerous morons.
What makes you so sure?  I think you give them too much credit.  Dems have dragged Republicans through the mud and called them traitors for not enforcing sanctions on Russia hard enough (which the EU opposed).  The Russia hawks wanted Hillary over Trump.  Clinton was talking about a nofly zone over Syria, how do you figure that would have gone over for world peace?  It was a Dem State Dept. that backed a proxy war in Ukraine, which was an insanely provocative gesture.  

They've demagogued Russia for years now.  Nancy "all roads lead to Putin" Pelosi.  Is the Democratic House not passing $700B military budgets for Trump and giving him everything he could possibly ask for, including his beloved Space Force?  If they have reservations about Trump's foreign policy I sure wish they'd quit tossing him billions of dollars to run it however he sees fit.  

 
Ren I know you feel about the ultimate goal on this like I do. I see that, I feel that, I appreciate it. Nobody else would likely give a damn enough to top post about this, so thanks. Didn't mean to convey the wrong message, so that's why I deleted my post. Anyway, take care, and thank you for caring about peace.
Thanks Saints- easy to forget that we want the same things.  Best wishes to you too.  

 
I found this to be one of the most dangerous aspects of Trump’s swinging gate maneuver in Syria. It added chaos and opportunities for conflict. Good luck to everyone.

Ren, also, I’m not sure if you saw or need a link but another story out of Woodward’s book is that Trump wanted to have Assad assassinated but Mattis refused. 
Wish it came as a surprise at this point.  Didn't know that, thanks.  

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top