I’ll take the over..........ouch!While I'm hopeful, I'm also aware of the situation. Detroit's running game was historically bad last year. They averaged only 76.3 rushing yards per game, 32nd in the league. The 2nd worst team average since 2012. Now, that just means there isn't much competition for carries (Abdullah hasn't done much as a pro and is consistently hurt, and Blount turns 32 this year) - but they simply don't run much. Only 363 rushing attempts to 570 passing attempts.
So, have they done enough on their defense to be able to run the ball more in the 2nd half of games? Do they have a legit third receiving option (other than Riddick) to keep defenses from stacking the box?
Over under 1,000 yards from scrimmage?
I guess the one silver lining is that there is a new regime with Matty Patty. Hopefully he will invigorate some life into the offense rather than being the same old thing there.While I'm hopeful, I'm also aware of the situation. Detroit's running game was historically bad last year. They averaged only 76.3 rushing yards per game, 32nd in the league. The 2nd worst team average since 2012. Now, that just means there isn't much competition for carries (Abdullah hasn't done much as a pro and is consistently hurt, and Blount turns 32 this year) - but they simply don't run much. Only 363 rushing attempts to 570 passing attempts.
I've been complaining to myself for a couple years now that Theo has played out his utility. As good as he is at that one thing.. it just seems predictable now.Reports he’s getting a lot of passes thrown his way. Some are questioning Theo’s role.
Lions second-round RB Kerryon Johnson has shown well in pass protection throughout training camp.
Observing practice on Friday, Chris Burke of The Athletic said Johnson "didn't bat 1.000" during pass-protection drills, though he was probably somewhere in the ".800 range." Johnson knows that his performance in pass protection will go a long way toward determining how the Lions use him in year one. "You have to protect the quarterback or you’re not going to play long," said the rookie. "They pay these guys a lot of dollars to stand back there and I’ve got to give them that time." Despite making a strong first impression, the 21-year-old's fantasy appeal is hindered by the presence of big back LeGarrette Blount and pass-catcher Theo Riddick.
Source: The Athletic
Aug 3 - 1:22 PM
I always felt like the problem is Theo and Ameer were the same player.I've been complaining to myself for a couple years now that Theo has played out his utility. As good as he is at that one thing.. it just seems predictable now.
Would be nice to have a back that is a legit threat to both run and receive.
Riddick in pretty strong on pass protection though. Not sure on Kerryon.
Yea, they're both satalite backs although before his injury I'd still argue Abdullah was destined for a bit more.I always felt like the problem is Theo and Ameer were the same player.
Taylor decker was injured most of last yearWhile I'm hopeful, I'm also aware of the situation. Detroit's running game was historically bad last year. They averaged only 76.3 rushing yards per game, 32nd in the league. The 2nd worst team average since 2012. Now, that just means there isn't much competition for carries (Abdullah hasn't done much as a pro and is consistently hurt, and Blount turns 32 this year) - but they simply don't run much. Only 363 rushing attempts to 570 passing attempts.
So, have they done enough on their defense to be able to run the ball more in the 2nd half of games? Do they have a legit third receiving option (other than Riddick) to keep defenses from stacking the box?
Over under 1,000 yards from scrimmage?
WAY under..Cooter is a lousy coach when it comes to calling run plays..they didn't rank 32nd last year just because..this guy is a lesser Brian Schottenheimer and thats really bad..While I'm hopeful, I'm also aware of the situation. Detroit's running game was historically bad last year. They averaged only 76.3 rushing yards per game, 32nd in the league. The 2nd worst team average since 2012. Now, that just means there isn't much competition for carries (Abdullah hasn't done much as a pro and is consistently hurt, and Blount turns 32 this year) - but they simply don't run much. Only 363 rushing attempts to 570 passing attempts.
So, have they done enough on their defense to be able to run the ball more in the 2nd half of games? Do they have a legit third receiving option (other than Riddick) to keep defenses from stacking the box?
Over under 1,000 yards from scrimmage?
As mentioned up thread, I'm trying to divorce the historical lack of a running game in Detroit post-Barry Sanders from the fact that there is a new sheriff in town and that things may be different. Cautious optimism here, as there have been other sheriffs in town, too, and things didn't seem to change.Love the kid. Hate the situation.
Glasgow at center is what will be the difference. Raiola played at 280 a lot of his career, Swanson also is under 300. Glasgow will be a difference maker, ragnow can just do his thing at LG, and decker is healthy. If I were drafting now I think I move kJ up quite a bit based on camp reports (some of that is also a result of others moving down). Seems to have a clearer path to production than it looks and he’s looking pretty dynamic so far.As mentioned up thread, I'm trying to divorce the historical lack of a running game in Detroit post-Barry Sanders from the fact that there is a new sheriff in town and that things may be different. Cautious optimism here, as there have been other sheriffs in town, too, and things didn't seem to change.
Thanks for the insights. I think the biggest factor then is how much work KJ is going to get - is he going to cede goal line duties to Blount and a substantial amount of passing game work to Riddick. If KJ is going to be used considerably more than a frequent 1st/2nd down guy in obvious running situations, then there could be some meaningful upside here.Snorkelson said:Glasgow at center is what will be the difference. Raiola played at 280 a lot of his career, Swanson also is under 300. Glasgow will be a difference maker, ragnow can just do his thing at LG, and decker is healthy. If I were drafting now I think I move kJ up quite a bit based on camp reports (some of that is also a result of others moving down). Seems to have a clearer path to production than it looks and he’s looking pretty dynamic so far.
I'm not worried about the historical lack of a running game because I believe in the OL upgrade and believe talent can dictate change. As you just stated, I'm more worried about Blount and Riddick being worked in enough to really hurt his floor/ceiling. If I could get Johnson in rounds 7+ I'd be on board and that may be possible in some leagues. But I'm not currently on board with spending starter capital on him.zamboni said:As mentioned up thread, I'm trying to divorce the historical lack of a running game in Detroit post-Barry Sanders from the fact that there is a new sheriff in town and that things may be different. Cautious optimism here, as there have been other sheriffs in town, too, and things didn't seem to change.
I think he’s a value, and perhaps hoping for a rb2 this year is the ceiling, but for dynasty I’m all aboard. I think Blount will get some short yardage work and riddick will get some 3rd down work (but KJ has been getting some of that already as well) but KJ is versatile and his presence doesn’t telegraph run/pass, something the staff has mentioned (although I don’t have the quote handy).I'm not worried about the historical lack of a running game because I believe in the OL upgrade and believe talent can dictate change. As you just stated, I'm more worried about Blount and Riddick being worked in enough to really hurt his floor/ceiling. If I could get Johnson in rounds 7+ I'd be on board and that may be possible in some leagues. But I'm not currently on board with spending starter capital on him.
Agreed - he's a guy you can't pass three-down starters over for him. But if you're talking about the rookie crop, he's got just as much path to three-down work than anyone not named Saquon Barkley.I'm not worried about the historical lack of a running game because I believe in the OL upgrade and believe talent can dictate change. As you just stated, I'm more worried about Blount and Riddick being worked in enough to really hurt his floor/ceiling. If I could get Johnson in rounds 7+ I'd be on board and that may be possible in some leagues. But I'm not currently on board with spending starter capital on him.
These unanswered questions are what’s keeping me from partaking at his current ADP.Thanks for the insights. I think the biggest factor then is how much work KJ is going to get - is he going to cede goal line duties to Blount and a substantial amount of passing game work to Riddick. If KJ is going to be used considerably more than a frequent 1st/2nd down guy in obvious running situations, then there could be some meaningful upside here.
Yeah, I agree, didn't like the way he held the ball on that 57 yard run. If he had given us a nice Heisman pose after he did that 360 twist then I would be all in on him.https://twitter.com/Lions_Insider/status/1028136931744534528
Here's his big run. It was called back on penalty.
Based solely on this run, I am out on this guy. Breaks free against scrubs, and really didn't look comfortable. Holding the ball weird, he doesn't look like a natural runner.
If he kills it, good for him and his owners, but I'm going after different backs.
Yep, it's kind of a laughable statement by me.Yeah, I agree, didn't like the way he held the ball on that 57 yard run. If he had given us a nice Heisman pose after he did that 360 twist then I would be all in on him.
He kind of did, just got called back.targeting in most formats at his current ADP...I'm glad he didn't break a long one last night.
true...but he avoided Saquon type hype IMHO based on Twitter reaction.He kind of did, just got called back.
Hopefully only we sharks will know about it though- the common masses will just see the box scores.He kind of did, just got called back.
I might add that the holding that got called was questionable. Showed good vision and jump cut, got down to the 5 but reversed field and ran out of gas by the time he got there.He kind of did, just got called back.
I thought he looked a little off after that 360 spin he did, almost like he thought he was going to get blasted and was slowing for it, then realized he still had open field. Rookie, first preseason game, I can forgive the awkwardness. Not saying he is a special talent but he has all the qualities of a 3 down back.Yep, it's kind of a laughable statement by me.
Still, it's the way I feel. Special backs that break free, they don't look like that to me.
I'm not trying to convince anyone.
Lions RB Kerryon Johnson finished with seven carries for 34 yards and four catches for 33 yards in Friday's preseason opener versus the Raiders.
Johnson was far and away the most impressive offensive player on the field for Detroit as the Lions played him for 40 snaps in his preseason debut. He began the game as Detroit's third-down back behind LeGarrette Blount but shouldered the load for a majority of the second half. Johnson exploded upfield for a 57-yard run that was negated for holding and even flashed versatility at one point when he was stuck behind the line of scrimmage but performed a Barry Sanders-like juke and spin to prevent loss of yards. Ameer Abdullah added 4-16-1 and worked ahead of Johnson Friday.
Related: Lions
Aug 11 - 10:32 AM
I'm not real sure the "starter" tag means much in today's NFL. There are just too many specialist type of backs and Detroit is loaded with them. Kerryon will have a lot more value to Detroit than i think he will to FF this year. He'll move the chains, catch a few balls, and punch in a few TDs. The key is, I think he'll do it more efficiently than the "feature" backs they have had in the last decade or so.Patricia relationship or not, I can’t see Blount keeping him off the field. And Abdullah? Come on. Starter by W4 and will have some big weeks. He has a dangerous QB to put him position to score.
Sorry I wasn’t clear. To me a fantasy starter by W4 is what I meant. Happy as my RB2.I'm not real sure the "starter" tag means much in today's NFL. There are just too many specialist type of backs and Detroit is loaded with them. Kerryon will have a lot more value to Detroit than i think he will to FF this year. He'll move the chains, catch a few balls, and punch in a few TDs. The key is, I think he'll do it more efficiently than the "feature" backs they have had in the last decade or so.
Ahh, gotcha. I'd be a lot happier having him as an upside RB3. Too many mouths this year but I think he's got good potential down the road.Sorry I wasn’t clear. To me a fantasy starter by W4 is what I meant. Happy as my RB2.
100% agree. Gonna be a great player for the Lions but I’m tempering my expectations in fantasy. But won’t shy from grabbing him at the right price.I'm not real sure the "starter" tag means much in today's NFL. There are just too many specialist type of backs and Detroit is loaded with them. Kerryon will have a lot more value to Detroit than i think he will to FF this year. He'll move the chains, catch a few balls, and punch in a few TDs. The key is, I think he'll do it more efficiently than the "feature" backs they have had in the last decade or so.
Intreresting. Did you watch all his carries? He look great. Smooth catching passes and turning upfield for YAC, never brought down by the first tackler, was able evade tackles with a stuff arm and jump cuts, used his blockers well. He just doesn't have breakway speed.https://twitter.com/Lions_Insider/status/1028136931744534528
Here's his big run. It was called back on penalty.
Based solely on this run, I am out on this guy. Breaks free against scrubs, and really didn't look comfortable. Holding the ball weird, he doesn't look like a natural runner.
If he kills it, good for him and his owners, but I'm going after different backs.