worrierking
Footballguy
I can't find any news on him. Any word coming from Seattle about his chances for returning this season?
Not sure but no news prob bad news in this case.I can't find any news on him. Any word coming from Seattle about his chances for returning this season?
Well seeing as Caroll said there was a setback maybe it did.His leg could fall off and Carroll will say he’s looking pretty good.
Exactly, “set back” in Carroll terms means he may be close to death.Well seeing as Caroll said there was a setback maybe it did.
From “unbelievably ahead of schedule” to don’t know when he’s going to get on the practice field in 4 days.Exactly, “set back” in Carroll terms means he may be close to death.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3m5qxZm_JqMThe General said:His leg could fall off and Carroll will say he’s looking pretty good.
Carson broken his leg. He had a few nice runs and a receiving TD in the 4 games he played in. Then got hurt.Does Carson have any fantasy value? There's only 2 instances where I can see him being worth rostering.
1. Penny gets hurt.
2. Penny is shockingly bad and they go back to Carson next year after admitting it was a mistake. I don't think this is likely, but he couldn't beat out Donnel Pumphrey last year, all 165 lbs of him. It's possible Penny flames out quickly, but with 1st round pedigree he's going to get an extremely long leash.
I felt that way too. Crazy that a team that just lost a bunch of key players, already had glaring holes on the OL, and had very little draft capital would feel the need to address RB of all positions. An RB that can't block at that. Poor Russ.I held on to Carson all year last year in my auction keeper. I thought he might come back for the stretch and be an asset this year. They could not have made it worse for his value. In my mind Seattle needed to upgrade their line first before finding a star tailback. Maybe that's the Carson owner in me speaking!
Was also very surprised at the pick. Also a Carson owner. Too bad he never got the chance. As bummed as I am think how he feels.worrierking said:I held on to Carson all year last year in my auction keeper. I thought he might come back for the stretch and be an asset this year. They could not have made it worse for his value. In my mind Seattle needed to upgrade their line first before finding a star tailback. Maybe that's the Carson owner in me speaking!
If you believe this to be true, he’s actually in a pretty good place. Seattle seems to be one of the places that goes with the best player rather than the highest pick or paid player. No doubt that they will try to get Penny on the field but if Carson is the better back he’ll get touches. Enough to be a FF stud? Who knows.Slider said:He's better than Penny. He won't get a chance to prove it but he'll get a job somewhere.
Based upon the information we have I have no idea how anyone could come to the conclusion that Carson >>Penny.Slider said:He's better than Penny. He won't get a chance to prove it but he'll get a job somewhere.
Their size is pretty even, accord to their NFL.com combine profile. Carson is listed at 6’0 218 and Penny is 5’11 220. In one of the links above it does say that Carson add 10 pounds with his off-season trainer.Based upon the information we have I have no idea how anyone could come to the conclusion that Carson >>Penny.
Carson is smaller, slower, and never performed near to Penny's level in college.
In what way has Carson shown to be better than Penny?
He succeeded in the pros? Looked much better as a pro than he did in college?Based upon the information we have I have no idea how anyone could come to the conclusion that Carson >>Penny.
Carson is smaller, slower, and never performed near to Penny's level in college.
In what way has Carson shown to be better than Penny?
49 rushes for 208 yards (4.2) and 7 catches for 59 yards (8.4).He succeeded in the pros? Looked much better as a pro than he did in college?
Carson was a nobody who impressed all through camp and stuck on the 53. That's amazing. Then he became the clear starter and performed well behind an average at best O-line. Until Penny does anything I think Carson is better.49 rushes for 208 yards (4.2) and 7 catches for 59 yards (8.4).
I guess that is better than he performed in college. But, again based upon the information we have I have no idea how anyone can draw the conclusion that Carson>>Penny.
Carson may turn into a better pro than Penny but, right now everything supports the notion that the All-American first round draft pick who beasted on over 500 touches being the better player by a wide margin.
He lasted four games (something that seems to be trending with him) did nothing special on the field and beat out Eddie Lacy, Thomas Rawls and a bunch of scrubs.Carson was a nobody who impressed all through camp and stuck on the 53. That's amazing. Then he became the clear starter and performed well behind an average at best O-line. Until Penny does anything I think Carson is better.
Well you clearly value RB's drafted by college pedigree. I don't.He lasted four games (something that seems to be trending with him) did nothing special on the field and beat out Eddie Lacy, Thomas Rawls and a bunch of scrubs.
He was just good enough for the Seahawks to invest a first round draft pick on his replacement.
He may actually be a better NFL back than Penny but nothing that has happened so far points to that conclusion.
The easy answer is "That's great, I'm sure you'll get a lot of value from Wayne Gallman"Well you clearly value RB's drafted by college pedigree. I don't.
I hate when people do this. Have I asked you if you own Carson in any capacity? No because it doesn't matter if your goal is to have an honest discussion about a player.Edit: Did you draft Penny or something? To say a nobody (scrub to start with) beat out Lacy and Rawls really minimizes what he did. And to be so sure that Penny is doing great seems like you are Seattle's GM or you drafted Penny.
While I definitely agree with you that Penny is likely going to be the starter and better pro (and the Seahawks spending a first round pick strongly argues that they believe so as well), it's silly to so completely dismiss Carson's actual performance in NFL games.49 rushes for 208 yards (4.2) and 7 catches for 59 yards (8.4).
I guess that is better than he performed in college. But, again based upon the information we have I have no idea how anyone can draw the conclusion that Carson>>Penny.
Carson may turn into a better pro than Penny but, right now everything supports the notion that the All-American first round draft pick who beasted on over 500 touches being the better player by a wide margin.
I am not completely dismissing Carson.While I definitely agree with you that Penny is likely going to be the starter and better pro (and the Seahawks spending a first round pick strongly argues that they believe so as well), it's silly to so completely dismiss Carson's actual performance in NFL games.
Not only is 4.2 YPC far better than anything else the Seahawks were able to get from anyone else behind such an awful OL, but Carson passed the eye test (both in the preseason and in the regular season). PFF gave him a grade of 82.5 for his first 4 games, higher, at the time, than any rookie RB other than Hunt. Carson was 7th among all RBs with an elusive rating of 60.6.
Until Penny shows he can make NFL tacklers miss, not everything points to him being better than Carson.
Again, I'm not trying to argue that Carson will start or have a better career, but Carson's play shouldn't be totally ignored, either. The early buzz on Carson from the OTAs is that he's both bigger and faster. This is a situation at least worth monitoring.
Ok well then I read you wrong I guess. Seems we almost agree. ?And let me be very clear: I have stated in virtually (not literally) every post that I fully acknowledge Carson may be a better pro.
I have never stated that Penny is better.
Not really. I still believe Penny will be the better player (and that there is no objective data to dispel that notion) I simply acknowledge that my belief does not, and will not, make it a fact.Ok well then I read you wrong I guess. Seems we almost agree. ?
That's completely good. But do you understand the fundamental problem I have with your position?I'll agree Penny has a better shot because they drafted him so early. I'll also stick with my opinion that Carson is a better player.
Not at all. I like Carson better because he was a 7th round pick and beat out everyone then looked great in his little bit of work. Penny was a 2nd or 3rd rd pick that Seattle took surprisingly in the first. Barkley is clearly a generational talent and was a top player in the draft.That's completely good. But do you understand the fundamental problem I have with your position?
You are giving Carson the benefit of the doubt based upon ~50 NFL touches and beating out a mediocre, at best, group of players, and calling him the better player when Penny has had zero touches in the NFL.
By your reasoning Carson is also better than Saquon Barkley. I will never argue with anyone who says, based upon the info we have, Barkley>>>Penny would you honestly say Carson>>Barkley if Barkley was drafted by Seattle?
Lacy ate his way out of the job and Rawls was also a scrub/nobody who was injured so I'm not sure how impressive it was. It's not even like Carson tore up the league - he did pretty good in a very limited sample size, that's all.To say a nobody (scrub to start with) beat out Lacy and Rawls really minimizes what he did.
Or we could say "First round pick Rashaad Penny".I think we can all find an article that suggests a player was first round talent but were taken round 2-3.
I suppose we can say "consensus 2-3rd rounder" to appease you
Or "San Diego State 1st round pick Rashaad Penny"Chaka said:Or we could say "First round pick Rashaad Penny".
No. He's just first round pick Rashaad Penny.Or "San Diego State 1st round pick Rashaad Penny"
You see Marshall Faulk while I see Ronnie Hillman. To be successful I think Penny needed a a decent O-line where he only needs to chip, which Seattle doesn't have. In regards to pass blocking he is a borderline liability. Bad at cut blocks, regularly caught off balance, gets knocked backwards, drops his head, etc...
Depends on Pete Carroll and his commitment to his "best player on the field ethos" - Remember everyone expected Matt Flynn to start because how much they paid him when Wilson won the job even though he was a 3rd round pick. For sure Seattle wants Penny to win the job....but I think he will have to win the job, and that isn't certain at the moment.
Here's what I think most people get wrong. Teams don't spend any picks for players they don't plan to use, but often it's just doesn't work that way. You get a player on camp and he just does not do what you scouted him to do. Dorsett was a first round pick for Colts and you just don't draft a player unless you plan to use the guy. I bet Colts had big plans how to use Dorsett, but Dorsett just wasn't good enough. Same might go for Penny, he was excellent in College, but no one knows how soon he will pick up NFL offense. Pete said that Seahawks season ended when Carson was injured. I bet he doesn't want to experience the same thing again... here's where Penny comes in. If Carson is not able to carry the load or if Penny shows that he's elite during training camp, Pete will play Penny. If Penny goes through learing curve, Pete has chance to give Penny time, while Carson wrecks havoc in NFLDr. Dan said:You don't spend a 1st round draft pick (when you don't pick again until round 3) unless you plan to use the guy. And it very much could be Carson beats him out, but smart money is on this is Penny's job to lose.
this is going to be a fun schtick throughout the preseason... how do I justify my bogus Penny rookie ranking? I know I subtly talk about Carson in the offseason and then I’ll still have a 50/50 shot Penny fails. You going to head over to the Burkhead thread and praise him next? How about Samaje Perine? Still some life to be had over there. Maybe pump up Carlos Hyde while we’re busy making suggestions rookies won’t live up to their draft positions based on OTA’s and own personal prejudices. Your ranking of Penny was the worst and most egregious thing I’ve seen this entire offseason. Even if he fails that line of thinking that you’re so good you can put a first round RB in the second round of a rookie draft rankings is laughable. Literally no reputable source agreed with you. The best fantasy, daily and best ball minds all had Penny in their top 4. It makes FBG’s look like a joke.Carson isn't going to go away easily. It's just OTAs, but unlike Rawls, he's healthy and fully over his rookie-year ending injury already. At least one beat report said he's the most impressive back out there from a physical standpoint. He's also probably a better pass blocker than Penny, which we know is important for rookie backs seeing the field. I won't be surprised at all if Carson and Penny have similar value this year, and Carson is good enough to make this a long-term RBBC