Pass.
Sing it sister!!Pass.
I don't want running backs from Alabama, quarterbacks from Arkansas, or WR from Schwäbisch Hall Unicorns.
Everyone knows that.
Vikings had to go to Germany to find a guy that knew less about route running than Cordarelle Patterson.6th round pick by the Vikings.. Plenty of room on that roster for opportunity
If I was a betting man, I'd put my "better route runner" money on the BellringerVikings had to go to Germany to find a guy that knew less about route running than Cordarelle Patterson.
thanks for your unwanted opinion negative nancyTerrible spot. He's probably a good blocker though.
HOTTAKE: Vikings run the ball a lot.Terrible spot. He's probably a good blocker though.
That sure looked like some top notch competition he was playing against in Germany. I can just picture him at his first practice saying,..."Hey, where are all the 5'8" white defensive backs?I think @petekrum needs to do an instant analysis on this pick..
Somehow I sense "Vikings" will play well in Germany.The Vikings have a lot of fans in Europe so I see this pick as extending good will to the international fan base.
Yeah and they already called the rest of this draft a stinker when they traded out of the 3rd for 2017 picks.Somehow I sense "Vikings" will play well in Germany.
Yeah and they already called the rest of this draft a stinker when they traded out of the 3rd for 2017 picks.
Then when they pick in the 4th round they take a guy named Willie Beavers. Because that is hilarious.
Then they draft Brothers because thats who you laugh with.
Then they draft Mo-Bo because they just don't give a fo
At least that is the way it looks to me.
Reminds me of when I have draft picks left but I know I wont have roster space for them, so I just take players I intend to cut and hope someone else picks up. Because thats funny.
The NFL draft is still a better metric for projecting NFL success than any model that these articles put forth. The harvard article's model ranks all non WRs with a spearman rank correlation coefficient of ~.35 based on only combine data and ranks WRs with an effective coefficient of 0 again purely using combine data. A coefficient of 1 is perfect ordered and a coefficient of zero can be considered randomized. The NFL draft ranks players with a coefficient of ~0.75 for all players, including WRs.
Saying combine data has ABSOLUTELY NO RELEVANCE in evaluating WRs is junk science.Here is a reddit string discussing college WR market share and the irrelevance of combine data in regards to WR. Not other positions, but WR specifically. Correlation for other positions was not strong with combine measurements either, but it at least had some relevance, while for the WR position specifically it had none.
Why would they cut CP? I would keep him strictly for his return ability. I wouldn't pay him much to stay next year though.Bye bye CP.
The Vikings knew Patterson was a long term project. From what I have heard he has been working on route running a WR skills this offseason.Why would they cut CP? I would keep him strictly for his return ability. I wouldn't pay him much to stay next year though.
Use science to refute these claims that have been found repeatedly by people doing such studies.Saying combine data has ABSOLUTELY NO RELEVANCE in evaluating WRs is junk science.
It's more than that. Norv kills WR.HOTTAKE: Vikings run the ball a lot.
Let me get my notebook.
Yeah it probably has nothing to do with the Vikings OLine inability to pass protect.It's more than that. Norv kills WR.
Different game then. Norv has no imagination. It's a pretty bad draft I'd only be interested in picks 1.01-1.03. This guy is 2-3 years away in GB. It will be his second contract after he leaves the vikes that he makes any noise if he does.Yeah it probably has nothing to do with the Vikings OLine inability to pass protect.
BTW, Michael Irvin never finished lower than 2nd in the NFL in receiving yards under Norv.
I would read but I am not a subscriber.
That's a lot of commentary on something you haven't read.I would read but I am not a subscriber.
The study sorts players into types based on BMI.
Right away I am seeing this 'science' as being flawed because of this use of this flawed measurement. Not to mention the inaccuracy of the combine data itself which makes the whole process in my view a colossal waste of time.
But that is what people build narratives around. So I do not expect that to change.
Just out of curiosity why are the players separated into four different types?
I am guessing the reason for that is to over fit the data. Whatever these studies show they are not looking at the whole WR sample size the way the studies that I cited do. So you are not making an apples to apples comparison.
Ha. PeteKromm laughs at your MOBO loveThat sure looked like some top notch competition he was playing against in Germany. I can just picture him at his first practice saying,..."Hey, where are all the 5'8" white defensive backs?
Well I have read a lot of other things pertaining to stuff like this and I would like some of my life back.That's a lot of commentary on something you haven't read.
Ignorant about what?People who are saying wasted pick are just plain ignorant about the situation. He is a project and like Patterson we will see after few years will he be able make it. He has all the physical tools to be an NFL caliber receiver, but as a wasted pick, most of sixth round picks are wasted picks. I'm rooting for this guy to make it, seems like a good fellow.
Thanks. Ignorant about what a sixth rounder is worth. Sixth rounders are just one round away of being free agents anyone can sign. I would any time welcome a player with great skill set and physical tools to my team instead of drafting a guy that does not poses those elements. So what comes to wasted pick- I think it's just hard to bet against a horse that hasn't showed what he is worth. Let's wait and see.Andy Dufresne said:Ignorant about what?
If most sixth round picks are wasted picks, and he's a sixth round pick with LESS experience than most sixth round picks, then isn't it MORE likely he was a wasted pick?
At least it's less of a waste as a 6th rounder than Patterson was as a 1st.
I'll say this though - your English is pretty good.
What great skill set are you referring to?Thanks. Ignorant about what a sixth rounder is worth. Sixth rounders are just one round away of being free agents anyone can sign. I would any time welcome a player with great skill set and physical tools to my team instead of drafting a guy that does not poses those elements
http://www.nfl.com/draft/2016/profiles/moritz-boehringer?id=2556261What great skill set are you referring to?
Brock Lesnar too!The Vikings seem to be making a habit of this.
Remember Babatunde Aiyegbusi? The 6'9" 350lb tackle from Poland last year?
You'd be excused if you don't.
Those aren't skills. Those are his physical tools you referred to.http://www.nfl.com/draft/2016/profiles/moritz-boehringer?id=2556261
Exceptional combination of size, speed and short-area quickness.
Babs just signed with the WWE!!The Vikings seem to be making a habit of this.
Remember Babatunde Aiyegbusi? The 6'9" 350lb tackle from Poland last year?
You'd be excused if you don't.
The train is still in the station and plenty of tickets still available.First! First! And (maybe) First!