Question: Lance Dunbar caught a lot of balls late in the Week 1 game. Dez is out for at least six weeks. Will Dallas use Dunbar consistently enough as a WR to be a viable RB2 in PPR? I worry because his production mostly came near the end of the game and because he didn't get any carries so it seems like his usage is almost exclusively as a receiver. Are people starting him with confidence in Week 2?
So let me preface by saying I went WR heavy in both my main leagues, so I'm thin at RB...Also, I play in a 0.5 PPR league.
I'm all-in on Dunbar. He got some decent targets in week 1. Yes. The Cowboys were often playing from behind...but I think it's also reflective of what their offense will be. Let's look at it like this...With Dez out, I think most would agree this WR corps isn't scary to anyone. Williams /= Dez. Beasley isn't the answer either. Witten will continue to be an outlet like he always was, but he's not the threat. If you were a team faced with the Cowboys, and you know they have a good line, why wouldn't you start to stack the box? None of those WR's are going to beat you deep regularly.
So...if you stack the box, traditional backs like Randle and McFadden are going to have a much harder time. Put in a guy like Dunbar, who can line up at RB, then shift out to the slot, covered by a LB in what is now a mis-match, and you've got a lot more flexibility.
Basically, I'm banking on Dez's absence leading to more teams selling out against the Dallas run...which will make them want a more flexible RB. I'm not saying Dunbar is THE man in Dallas. I still would rather own Randle...but considering I can get Dunbar as a FA now, and I'd have had to spend an early/middle round pick for Randle, I'm OK with Dunbar.
He'll be involved in my committee backfield (Ellington, Ivory, Crowell, Duke Johnson, and Jennings)...I'll probably play match-ups with all of them.