Manziel or Pettine?pettine clearly just hates manziel. id imagine that hes just a total dickbag and sucks at practice and in the film room.
Here's ONE guy the NFL missed out on. Keep that resume handy!Yeah, never hear of millionaires making foolish decisions. Pretty sure millionaires been calling the shots for years in Cleveland, so we should just trust them and their glorious track record.
I might be going out on a limb here, but I'm going to say it's because this...is a...football message board. You see, football message boards are places where people with..."zero information"... gather to give their opinions about...football. If being an NFL coach was the prerequisite for posting, FBG would be an awfully lonely place.It's pretty clear that these football people, who are paid millions, believe that McCown is better than Manziel as of 9-22-15. Don't know what makes any of you superior decision-makers with virtually zero information. Ego, maybe?
theres plenty of information. mccown sucks at nfl football. manziel, may or may not suck at nfl football. the logic from there is pretty simple.It's pretty clear that these football people, who are paid millions, believe that McCown is better than Manziel as of 9-22-15. Don't know what makes any of you superior decision-makers with virtually zero information. Ego, maybe?
it would also be pretty boring if all of these inept franchises and coaches all of a sudden started making the right decisions. but since most nfl coaches and front offices have proven to be imbecilic button mashers, theres plenty to criticize.I might be going out on a limb here, but I'm going to say it's because this...is a...football message board. You see, football message boards are places where people with..."zero information"... gather to give their opinions about...football. If being an NFL coach was the prerequisite for posting, FBG would be an awfully lonely place.It's pretty clear that these football people, who are paid millions, believe that McCown is better than Manziel as of 9-22-15. Don't know what makes any of you superior decision-makers with virtually zero information. Ego, maybe?
Wait, are you saying that guys with the football savvy of Lane Kiffin and Jack Del Rio are actually open to criticism on an Internet message board? EVEN when they're paid millions??it would also be pretty boring if all of these inept franchises and coaches all of a sudden started making the right decisions. but since most nfl coaches and front offices have proven to be imbecilic button mashers, theres plenty to criticize.I might be going out on a limb here, but I'm going to say it's because this...is a...football message board. You see, football message boards are places where people with..."zero information"... gather to give their opinions about...football. If being an NFL coach was the prerequisite for posting, FBG would be an awfully lonely place.It's pretty clear that these football people, who are paid millions, believe that McCown is better than Manziel as of 9-22-15. Don't know what makes any of you superior decision-makers with virtually zero information. Ego, maybe?
Which one is better at reading defenses?theres plenty of information. mccown sucks at nfl football. manziel, may or may not suck at nfl football. the logic from there is pretty simple.It's pretty clear that these football people, who are paid millions, believe that McCown is better than Manziel as of 9-22-15. Don't know what makes any of you superior decision-makers with virtually zero information. Ego, maybe?
i dont know. and neither do the browns. thats the point.Which one is better at reading defenses?theres plenty of information. mccown sucks at nfl football. manziel, may or may not suck at nfl football. the logic from there is pretty simple.It's pretty clear that these football people, who are paid millions, believe that McCown is better than Manziel as of 9-22-15. Don't know what makes any of you superior decision-makers with virtually zero information. Ego, maybe?
How can you know what the Browns know? Mind reader? Suck it up and admit they know more than you.i dont know. and neither do the browns. thats the point.Which one is better at reading defenses?theres plenty of information. mccown sucks at nfl football. manziel, may or may not suck at nfl football. the logic from there is pretty simple.It's pretty clear that these football people, who are paid millions, believe that McCown is better than Manziel as of 9-22-15. Don't know what makes any of you superior decision-makers with virtually zero information. Ego, maybe?
How do you know if he knows what the Browns know?How can you know what the Browns know? Mind reader? Suck it up and admit they know more than you.i dont know. and neither do the browns. thats the point.Which one is better at reading defenses?theres plenty of information. mccown sucks at nfl football. manziel, may or may not suck at nfl football. the logic from there is pretty simple.It's pretty clear that these football people, who are paid millions, believe that McCown is better than Manziel as of 9-22-15. Don't know what makes any of you superior decision-makers with virtually zero information. Ego, maybe?
Good point on the schedule. I lost TT today (swapped Bortles for Tannehill a week ago) and I've been mulling over adding him.VandyMan said:McCown has a rough stretch of games coming up - DEN, STL, ARI, CIN - then the schedule opens up later - PIT twice, BAL, SF, KC.
I'd kind of like to have him later, but due to his recent production some point-chasers will probably snag him up immediately.
I pulled my claim after Taylor's injury. It was one thing to have him as my backup while I see if he's for real. It's another thing to have to actually start him the next few weeks against that brutal slate of opponents. I think I'll take my chances with Peyton. If he's still available in a few weeks, I'll revisit.Am seriously considering submitting a waiver claim to drop Peyton for him. Literally the only thing holding me back right now is if it all goes bad, I will be sitting there saying, "I can't believe I dropped Peyton Manning for Josh Freakin' McCown!"
Josh McCown exited Week 7 against the Rams with a shoulder injury in the fourth quarter.
Johnny Manziel is in with just under four minutes to play with the Browns trailing 24-6. McCown appeared to hurt his shoulder when his arm was hit attempting a deep sideline pass. He stayed in the game for the next play, but was sacked and lost a fumble. McCown appeared to be in a decent amount of pain on the sideline before holding his arm close to his side as he walked to the locker room. Before leaving, McCown completed 26-of-32 passes for 270 yards, zero scores, and zero interceptions. McCown lost two fumbles on the day.
Oct 25 - 3:52 PM
The Browns' official site reports Josh McCown (right shoulder) will be a game-time decision.
Multiple ESPN reporters have reported McCown will start, but coach Mike Pettine did not sound as convinced Friday when he said he was prepared to play both McCown and Johnny Manziel. "It’s still truly day to day, we’ll see where he is tomorrow," Pettine said. "Quarterbacks typically do some light throwing on Saturdays but the passing time is helpful with him but it’ll still likely go right up to the game." Even if he suits up, McCown has a tough matchup against Arizona and cannot be trusted to make it through the whole game. He should be benched in most formats.
Related: Josh McCown
Source: ClevelandBrowns.com
Oct 31 - 9:28 AM
Cleveland Plain Dealer's Terry Pluto believes the Browns will only trade Josh McCown if they receive a "tremendous offer."
Pluto added "McCown was the best quarterback on the field" in the practices he watched. That is likely true, but the Browns seem committed to Robert Griffin III as their Week 1 starter. Even so, Griffin has a long injury history and may not be effective even when healthy. Unless they trust third-rounder Cody Kessler or Austin Davis to make starts, keeping McCown around makes sense.
Source: Cleveland Plain Dealer
Jul 2 - 12:45 PM
ESPN Cleveland doesn’t project Josh McCown to make the final roster.
McCown was "best quarterback on the field" this spring, but his spot isn't assured with the Browns rebuilding. Cleveland can save $2.71 million from releasing McCown.
Source: Tony Grossi on Twitter
Jul 2 - 8:10 PM
His Base Salary for this year is 4.375M of which 1M is giaranteed. No other bonuses this year$2.71m doesn't seem bad for a fairly reliable backup does it?
Is that a lot for a backup? Serious question. With the insane amount of dollars being thrown at these guys nowadays, I have no idea what a normal scale looks like.His Base Salary for this year is 4.375M of which 1M is giaranteed. No other bonuses this year
Fixed.Cleveland can hold him and trade himHe can goto Dallas when Romo gets hurt and get a pick out of it.and backup Romo if Cle doesn't want him
Would he be a #2 or a #3? They just spent a 3rd on Kessler and have a lot of draft capital next year so wouldn't they be much more likely to evaluate Kessler than turn to the 37yo QB they inherited? This regime brought in the other two guys so that may speak to how well they think the new(younger) guys can fit into the offense.... and how they feel about McCowns future with the team.Is that a lot for a backup? Serious question. With the insane amount of dollars being thrown at these guys nowadays, I have no idea what a normal scale looks like.
I would imagine that would depend a lot on their situation at the time. If by some miracle they were in the middle of the playoff hunt and RGIII went down, I doubt they'd turn to the rookie. If they were 2-8, then maybe.Would he be a #2 or a #3? They just spent a 3rd on Kessler and have a lot of draft capital next year so wouldn't they be much more likely to evaluate Kessler than turn to the 37yo QB they inherited? This regime brought in the other two guys so that may speak to how well they think the new(younger) guys can fit into the offense.... and how they feel about McCowns future with the team.
The Cleveland Plain Dealer confirms the Browns won't part with Josh McCown unless a team is willing to give up a "high pick."
That price tag is rumored to be in the third round, although it's perhaps gotten steeper with multiple NFL teams losing quarterbacks recently. Ultimately, the Plain Dealer says the Browns are "unlikely" to part with McCown. As the Plain Dealer notes, McCown may be needed to make starts this year if Robert Griffin III gets hurt. (Griffin was sacked five times in one half of the Browns' third preseason game.) The Browns also view McCown as a valuable "mentor" to rehab project Griffin and third-round rookie Cody Kessler.
Source: Cleveland Plain Dealer
Aug 31 - 2:16 PM
Josh McCown (collarbone) said Monday he believes it's "realistic" he could play in Week 6 against the Titans.
So it sounds like McCown will be healthy enough to potentially back up Cody Kessler. McCown fractured his left collarbone on September 18. He is a competitor and obviously wants to play, but the Browns are riding Kessler for now.
Source: Nate Ulrich on Twitter
Oct 10 - 4:01 PM
NJ Advance Media's Connor Hughes said Josh McCown has been "far and away" the best quarterback at Jets OTAs.
Hughes qualifies the statement by pointing out he has only been allowed to watch two practices so far, but the comment is not at all surprising because McCown is actually an NFL quarterback. Unfortunately, McCown has struggled to stay healthy in recent years, meaning we will likely see Christian Hackenberg or Bryce Petty at some point this season.
Source: Connor Hughes on Twitter
ESPN New York's Rich Cimini believes it's not a "done deal" that Josh McCown is the Jets' Week 1 starter.
The New York Post shared a similar sentiment in mid-June, and it's not the first time Cimini has questioned if McCown will be the starter. A 38-year-old journeyman who is always hurt and only sporadically effective, McCown certainly shouldn't be gifted starting duties. The problem is the ineptness of the young quarterbacks behind him. Christian Hackenberg isn't a legitimate NFL prospect and Bryce Petty blurs the line between No. 2 and 3. McCown is the favorite, but won't come close to making 16 starts.
Source: ESPN New York
Jul 8 - 9:18 AM
Thanks for the link. Interesting.