Foster was basically an unknown at that point. Maybe the team felt that he would be great, but taking Tate in the 2nd seems like a pretty strong hedge. Saying Foster was the presumptive guy seems like revisionist history to me, as I remember a lot of folks spending top 5-6 rookie picks on Tate that year.
As a side note, the mid-firsts in that rookie draft absolutely sucked. Bradford, Hardesty, B Tate, Benn, G Tate, Gresham. Oy.
Actually that is correct. Foster started at least one game the season before but was benched for fumbling. Then Tate was drafted and was considered the front runner to be the lead RB, but got injured in the preseason and the rest (as they say) is history. The 5-6 slot was probably ballpark for Tate, but he even went earlier than that in some rookie drafts
Actually, what happened was Foster played very well against what was then a tough Miami and New England defenses at the tail end of the year he was activated.AT THAT TIME and leading up to the draft, Kubiak said several times, when asked, that he thought they had something with Foster but people (the ff people) generally couldn't accept it.
Places like Rotoworld,etc would commonly post Kubiak's comments and then throw their snarky "we don't buy it" canned response to it; and the ff boards generally echoed that thought. I remember this extremely well because I was still stinging from buying Rotoworld's ad naseum "Jamaal Charles is too small to be anything more than a 3rd down back" speech and I traded him away and was bitter, and so I was leery...LOL.
Anyway, THEN, the Vikes traded up in the draft with Houston and took Toby Gerhart, who the Texans stated later was the player they planned to take; not because they saw him as a starter but because the Texans had a train wreck of RB depth and wanted a big, durable back. So, when the Vikes grabbed Toby, they went to plan B.
The ff world saw the lack of depth in Houston and dismissed Foster as "merely an undrafted PS player" and started cranking out ROY awards for Tate.
People missed the boat big time, in general, and some people paying close attention (and some who listened to those paying close attention) panned gold out of a muddy creek on that one and it all started with watching those two games Foster played in and then actually listening to the coach and not the people trying to make a RB valuable because of his situation.
Which brings me to what I really came to say here. Watch the player and the talent and forget the perceived pecking order on this.
Michael is an extremely gifted RB that fits the team well here. He is going to shine. Its just a matter of when.