So there were times during Jalen Hurts second developmental year, and Jordan Love's first developmental year that a good portion of people that weighed in thought neither would ever be franchise quarterbacks and the Eagles and Packers should start thinking about finding a future starting QB, then that all changed with more experience and a trade for AJ Brown in the case of Hurts. I just think they would be better trading #1 moving down to 2 or 3 and piling up draft picks (including a1st rounder for next year), draft Marvin Harrison Jr and roll with Justin Fields. Unless their scouts are convinced Caleb Williams is a future HOF NFL QB.f
What if the Bears had traded Fields last year and kept the #1 pick and drafted Bryce Young, they would be the worst team in the NFL.
Can you think of another qb who looked mediocre for their first 40 games and then became elite?
He's thrown 39 more TDs than Aaron Rodgers did before the age of 25.
Lol, wut?
Adding perspective for people who think a 24 year old has maxed out his NFL potential.
Sure, but you answered his question by not answering his question and also giving a horrible comparison.
I think the question may be flawed in the way it's framed. 40 games is just a line in the sand.
The same way we can say 25 years old is a line in the sand.
GB waited 3 years to make Aaron Rodgers the starting QB. He learned the same same system as a backup before being named the starter going into his 4th year in that same system and he produced a losing record that year.
Bears waited 3 games before making Fields the starter and made him learn on the field while taking Ls. Then they changed his system year 2.
Bottom line is the Bears chose the trial by fire method and then roast the guy when he isn't elite. The flip side to that coin is that he accomplied more in the NFL before the age of 25 than Rodgers did.
He asked a valid question, and by 40 games I'm assuming he meant 40 games PLAYED, which makes sense.
Question though, if the Bears had say, the #8 pick rather than #1, would they keep Fields? most likely yes.
Do they think one of the QBs is so much better (along with lower salary for a few years) that they get rid of Fields for maybe the value of a late 1st and use #1 on a QB, or do they keep Fields, pay him some sort of overpriced but not earth shattering contract, and trade #1 for a bunch of picks.
The answer is gonna be based on what they think of their top QB in the draft. Who knows.
if I was a Bears fan I would not fault them at all if they traded #1 and rolled with Fields.