Nugget
Footballguy
At least the pre-born. In existing Americans.I do put American's first - absolutely
At least the pre-born. In existing Americans.I do put American's first - absolutely
The brutal irony is Americans should beg for EU food regulations
Is my mic broken or something?Now, if you want to say "anything approved in the EU has conditional approval in the US" then perhaps you are on to something.
As I work in the drug industry this is a topic I have more than a casual level understanding.Great question. I've been arguing for years that we should establish (in essence) regulatory reciprocity with other developed countries whose regulatory agencies align with our own. I don't trust Indian regulators, and neither should you. But I do trust EU regulators. I'm not super-familiar with their Canadian, Australian, Japanese or Korean counterparts, but those countries are all pretty solid and I would have no worries about me or my family consuming products approved for sale in those countries.
Our default rule should be that if a product is approved for sale in the EU, it should also be approved for sale in the US unless the FDA (or whoever) explicitly and affirmatively states otherwise. Right now, these products are all banned unless the FDA specifically approves them. We should reverse that and treat these products as approved unless the FDA specifically bans them.
That would more or less instantly solve our formula shortage.
Thanks.As I work in the drug industry this is a topic I have more than a casual level understanding.
What you are proposing is what the EU countries did. Here are some problems:
- There is zero chance the EU would reciprocate. and without reciprocity this would not be workable.
- While I imagine folks in this tread will snicker, the FDA is the leading regulator in the world, it would be derelict to relinquish authority in this manner
- The EU, because of the regulatory reciprocity across many nations, is notoriously slow moving - sound like you are not in favor of that. The UK, having just left the EU is now much more agile
Sounds like it has:I'm not in favor of abandoning our regulatory authority, relegating to other countries - EU, Canada, etc. That leads manufacturers to move production to which ever country will rubber stamp with the least amount of oversight - a race to the bottom. It wouldn't be long until all medicine and baby food is made in Ireland or Greece.
I am in favor of suspending labeling requirements as needed to stream-line import for emergency use. I don't understand why that hasn't happened yet.
At least the pre-born. In existing Americans.
Thanks.
I can't really comment on the second two points, but the first is getting at something a little different than what I'm arguing for. I don't care if the EU actually reciprocates or not. I just want to give American consumers the option of buying products that have been approved by responsible regulators, regardless of whether those regulators are American, European, Japanese, or whatever. I don't care what happens with European consumers in this scenario -- that's between them and their government.
As I see it, the main "drawback" of my proposal is that it lets consumers do an end-run around the FDA when the FDA is being a stick in the mud. That's a feature, not a bug IMO. For example, imagine a hypothetical in which the FDA was doing something really evil, like creating an artificial shortage of infant formula because it was irrationally worried about product labeling conventions. It would be good to let parents import infant formula from Europe so that their kids don't starve to death and so that our detention facilities don't turn into civil war POW camps, which is apparently something that we should be concerned about.
This is why we're supposed to be selective about which countries' regulators we presumptively defer to. Does the EU actually have different standards for products manufactured in Greece vs. those manufactured in Germany? If so, I can see why that's a problem. But then we can just impose a rule that says "If it's approved in Germany . . . " instead of "If it's approved in the EU."I'm not in favor of abandoning our regulatory authority, relegating to other countries - EU, Canada, etc. That leads manufacturers to move production to which ever country will rubber stamp with the least amount of oversight - a race to the bottom. It wouldn't be long until all medicine and baby food is made in Ireland or Greece.
Hello Straw man!!!!!!!!!!!!!1just how many of the worlds 3 billion in poverty would it take coming into the USA illegally to give you any worries at all?
1 million? 5 million? 50 million? 200 million?
Hello Straw man!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
I have no idea what a regulatory framework is like in the EU. It gets murky very quickly, and more layers of murkiness isn't really helpful. That's why I generally support our own regulatory agencies, as difficult as they can be.This is why we're supposed to be selective about which countries' regulators we presumptively defer to. Does the EU actually have different standards for products manufactured in Greece vs. those manufactured in Germany? If so, I can see why that's a problem. But then we can just impose a rule that says "If it's approved in Germany . . . " instead of "If it's approved in the EU."
Admittedly this is a bit of a tangent featuring a policy proposal that has zero chance of being adopted any time soon, so I'll just let it go.
Ivan, in this scenario all Food and Drugs would be approved by the EU as an end around to the FDA. One regulatory approval is easier than 2. This would essentially abandon our regulatory authority and accountability.As I see it, the main "drawback" of my proposal is that it lets consumers do an end-run around the FDA when the FDA is being a stick in the mud. That's a feature, not a bug IMO. For example, imagine a hypothetical in which the FDA was doing something really evil, like creating an artificial shortage of infant formula because it was irrationally worried about product labeling conventions. It would be good to let parents import infant formula from Europe so that their kids don't starve to death and so that our detention facilities don't turn into civil war POW camps, which is apparently something that we should be concerned about.
this is consistent with my experience as well.Ivan, in this scenario all Food and Drugs would be approved by the EU as an end around to the FDA. One regulatory approval is easier than 2. This would essentially abandon our regulatory authority and accountability.
I wonder why you think the EU regulators are more practical, less bureaucratic. They are not. They are more bureaucratic.
I was arguing in favor of products needing FDA approval or EU approval. One or the other, not both.Ivan, in this scenario all Food and Drugs would be approved by the EU as an end around to the FDA. One regulatory approval is easier than 2. This would essentially abandon our regulatory authority and accountability.
I wonder why you think the EU regulators are more practical, less bureaucratic. They are not. They are more bureaucratic.
With approval comes an ongoing relationship with the regulator, including audits as well as other filed reports and dialog.I was arguing in favor of products needing FDA approval or EU approval. One or the other, not both.
We have a responsibility to feed those we detain. That includes criminals in prison, migrants at the border, and anyone else we have locked away. If we don’t have the resources to feed them, then we have to let them go. Period.
During an inspection that spanned multiple dates in January, February and March, FDA investigators found Cronobacter sakazakii bacteria in several areas inside the plant.
Additionally, the FDA's review of company records found that Abbott had detected Cronobacter bacteria in finished formula batches produced in 2019 and 2020.
In preliminary findings, the FDA reported that Abbott did not establish a system of process controls covering all stages of processing to prevent contamination of formula with microoganisms and that all surfaces that touched the infant formula were maintained to prevent contamination.
I'm not agreeing or disagreeing - how is the white house responsible for baby formula production? I'm generally asking - I don't know enough to have an opinion one way or the other......Holy cow. I just heard a segment on the baby food shortage and it sounds like a complete case of mismanagement by the Biden Administration. Shouldn't they have anticipated this problem last Fall when the baby food plant in Michigan issue occurred? Then Biden doesn't even take accountability for it, and sounds pissed that he has to address it because it's "on the front pages". This Administration is completely incompetent.
It's FDA approved, so you know its good.https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/16/health/abbott-formula-shortage/index.html
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK
That's what people want to give their babies?
I'm a capitalist who supports free trade. As far as I can tell, this shortage exists primarily because the government is blocking American consumers from buying formula sold in the EU, which nobody seriously argues is any way unsafe or risky or anything.WTF has happened to my alleged "capitalists" around this place? I'm not sure if anyone's noticed, but every single time (in recent memory) an industry, company etc has fallen on it's face, the response is "why did the government let this happen!??!?!?!?!" Really? Can't have it both ways here guys. Either let the industry be the industry and lay blame appropriately at their feet or drop the "capitalist" moniker you claim to support and replace it with the more appropriate "socialist" moniker.
I'm speaking to both sides of this coin....it's absurd.
WTF has happened to my alleged "capitalists" around this place? I'm not sure if anyone's noticed, but every single time (in recent memory) an industry, company etc has fallen on it's face, the response is "why did the government let this happen!??!?!?!?!" Really? Can't have it both ways here guys. Either let the industry be the industry and lay blame appropriately at their feet or drop the "capitalist" moniker you claim to support and replace it with the more appropriate "socialist" moniker.
I'm speaking to both sides of this coin....it's absurd.
Didn't they ease this some early today/late last night? Allowing some imports?I'm a capitalist who supports free trade. As far as I can tell, this shortage exists primarily because the government is blocking American consumers from buying formula sold in the EU, which nobody seriously argues is any way unsafe or risky or anything.
So yeah, I do see this as an example of government failure.
Let's put to the side for a second that we basically have two providers in this country and apparently at least ONE of them has a single point of failure (that's squarely on the companies in my view). It's not like we didn't know what our FDA rules are on this. Why aren't we built to abide by those rules? It seems dishonest to lay this at the feet of the government unless we are to believe the "plan" for these companies was that if there was a problem in their US plants, they'd pivot to their EU plants and they are completely taken aback by the fact that plan is completely against the rules.I'm a capitalist who supports free trade. As far as I can tell, this shortage exists primarily because the government is blocking American consumers from buying formula sold in the EU, which nobody seriously argues is any way unsafe or risky or anything.
So yeah, I do see this as an example of government failure.
I agree with this part BTW. The folks running the plant in question should have followed whatever regulations they were supposed to follow. (I'm not very familiar with what's involved in manufacturing formula, but I assume that cleanliness is fairly important).Let's put to the side for a second that we basically have two providers in this country and apparently at least ONE of them has a single point of failure (that's squarely on the companies in my view). It's not like we didn't know what our FDA rules are on this. Why aren't we built to abide by those rules? It seems dishonest to lay this at the feet of the government unless we are to believe the "plan" for these companies was that if there was a problem in their US plants, they'd pivot to their EU plants and they are completely taken aback by the fact that plan is completely against the rules.
It's my understanding that the perceived shortages are because the product isn't in the places it needs to be most. That seems like a supply chain problem. But that's coming from a NPR segment I listened to and a reuters article I read a few days ago.
Agree 100% Where we seem to disagree on is where that responsibility lies. In my view thats up to the companies. I dont disagree that there can be circumstances that would be serious enough that government intervention would be needed. I just dont see this as one of those situations. What's happened here is covered on day one of Operations/Logistics 101 class.We need to have a little more resiliency baked into the system so that things don't immediately go sideways when one part of the system fails in a predictable way. Trade is great for stuff like this.
This seems to be the norm.Somewhat unsurprisingly, the government has protected the industry to the detriment of the consumer with this situation and now we're seeing the fallout from that. Just having a couple of companies producing a very sensitive product like this is an accident waiting to happen. The fact that one factory shutdown for one of those companies causes a shortage like this is a problem within that problem. In sensitive industries, there should be more producers, not fewer, and they should have more distributed resources, again not fewer. Oversight of industries like this are supposed to protect the consumer.
Is it the government being the problem or business trying to keep competitors out of the market? We like to always blame the government but who has the governments ear? Lobbyists and special interest groups. We don't have a government for the people by the people anymore (or did we really ever have it) but it is controlled more and more by big business.IvanKaramazov said:In case you're curious, here's a story from April 2021 describing how the government treats the importation of infant formula from overseas -- basically, it's the same way that they treat the importation of heroin.
https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/local-media-release/philadelphia-cbp-seizes-nearly-600-cases-infant-formula-unapproved
Again, we're talking here about people who are trying to buy a product that is approved for sale in Germany. This is not some sketchy vendor operating out of India or someplace like that. This is almost certainly just as safe as anything sold in the US, but the government cracks down on it anyway because government is the problem. @tommyGunZ hates it when people point that out, but yet here we are.
My take is that invoking the DPA is most likely 100% for show.Ed O'Keefe @edokeefe
JUST IN: @POTUS Biden is invoking the Defense Production Act to accelerate the production of baby formula, forcing manufacturers to make ingredients needed and sell them first to formula manufacturers. He's also ordering use of DOD planes to transport formula from to U.S.
https://twitter.com/edokeefe/status/1527046436004700161/photo/1
It must be for show since last week they told us it wouldnt do any good because it's such a specialized manufacturing.My take is that invoking the DPA is most likely 100% for show.
Flying formula could be valuable though. Obviously it’s much quicker to the shelves. Air shipping is in the order of 10x the cost of boat, so feds will absorb this cost that manufacturers don’t want to pay.
WTF has happened to my alleged "capitalists" around this place? I'm not sure if anyone's noticed, but every single time (in recent memory) an industry, company etc has fallen on it's face, the response is "why did the government let this happen!??!?!?!?!" Really? Can't have it both ways here guys. Either let the industry be the industry and lay blame appropriately at their feet or drop the "capitalist" moniker you claim to support and replace it with the more appropriate "socialist" moniker.
I'm speaking to both sides of this coin....it's absurd.
WTF has happened to my alleged "capitalists" around this place? I'm not sure if anyone's noticed, but every single time (in recent memory) an industry, company etc has fallen on it's face, the response is "why did the government let this happen!??!?!?!?!" Really? Can't have it both ways here guys. Either let the industry be the industry and lay blame appropriately at their feet or drop the "capitalist" moniker you claim to support and replace it with the more appropriate "socialist" moniker.
I'm speaking to both sides of this coin....it's absurd.
Agree 100% Where we seem to disagree on is where that responsibility lies. In my view thats up to the companies. I dont disagree that there can be circumstances that would be serious enough that government intervention would be needed. I just dont see this as one of those situations. What's happened here is covered on day one of Operations/Logistics 101 class.
Here are the Republicans who bucked the party on baby formula bills
A handful of Republican lawmakers bucked their party on Wednesday in votes on two separate bills aiming to address the nationwide baby formula shortage causing rising concern for parents across the country.
The main bill, dubbed the Infant Formula Supplemental Appropriations Act, passed in a 231-192 vote that mainly broke along party lines. Four Republicans and one Democrat did not vote.
The legislation would grant the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) $28 million in emergency funding to respond to the scarcity of baby formula.
Twelve Republicans bucked House GOP leadership and voted for the legislation: Reps. Don Bacon (Neb.), Brian Fitzpatrick (Pa.), Anthony Gonzalez (Ohio), Trey Hollingsworth (Ind.), John Katko (N.Y.), Adam Kinzinger (Ill.), David McKinley (W.Va.), Tom Rice (S.C.), Chris Smith (N.J.), Mike Turner (Ohio), Fred Upton (Mich.) and Ann Wagner (Mo.).
Earlier on Wednesday, Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) sent a memo to all House GOP offices recommending that members vote against the legislation. He argued that Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) brought up the bill “in hopes of covering up the administration’s ineptitude by throwing additional money at the FDA with no plan to actually fix the problem, all while failing to hold the FDA accountable.”
The House on Wednesday also passed the Access to Baby Formula Act in a 414-9 vote that was largely bipartisan. Five Republicans and one Democrat did not vote.
The bill calls for permanently relaxing restrictions on the kinds of baby formula that individuals in the federal low-income assistance program for women, children and infants are allowed to purchase. The program is formally known as the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children, commonly referred to as the WIC program.
The only opposition to the legislation came from the Republican Party: the “no” votes were from Reps. Andy Biggs (Ariz.), Lauren Boebert (Colo.), Matt Gaetz (Fla.), Louie Gohmert (Texas), Paul Gosar (Ariz.), Marjorie Taylor Greene (Ga.), Clay Higgins (La.), Thomas Massie (Ky.) and Chip Roy (Texas).
There was no overlap in the two groups of GOP outlier votes.
Pete Williams retiring from NBC Senate Democrats propose DOJ license requirement for gun purchases
Massie and Greene have stood out for their votes on a number of recent occasions, at times bucking the majority of their party to oppose bipartisan measures such as aide to Ukraine and sanctions against Russia.
The baby formula bills come as parents across the country are struggling to purchase formula for their children, leaving lawmakers scrambling to restock shelves and prevent the scarcity from worsening.
The U.S. has been grappling with the instant baby formula shortage since at least the week beginning April 24, when the out-of-stock percentage of the merchandise reached 40 percent, according to an analysis by retail tracking company Datasembly.
https://thehill.com/news/house/3493832-here-are-the-republicans-who-bucked-the-party-on-baby-formula-bills/
Yes, Republicans are so pro life that 192 of them voted against baby formula yesterday.
This is lazy posting.
Let's say Rep Squistion votes against the baby formula bill because it contain a provision that it's only for white babies. Is Rep Squistion now against baby formula? Maybe the baby formula bill only has enough funding to cover 50% of the babies so Rep. Squisition votes no in order to get a bill through with double the funding. Is Rep. Squistion against baby formula?
My Congressman, who seems pretty independent and not a Trump guy (as evidenced by Trump calling for him to be primaried). I would support him if he was so anti-choice with his abortion stance.Twelve Republicans bucked House GOP leadership and voted for the legislation: Reps. Don Bacon (Neb.), Brian Fitzpatrick (Pa.), Anthony Gonzalez (Ohio), Trey Hollingsworth (Ind.), John Katko (N.Y.), Adam Kinzinger (Ill.), David McKinley (W.Va.), Tom Rice (S.C.), Chris Smith (N.J.), Mike Turner (Ohio), Fred Upton (Mich.) and Ann Wagner (Mo.).
Talk about lazy posting.
There was nothing in the two bills passed yesterday that had any provision that mentioned race at all or national origin.