CeeDee Lamb caught 7-of-7 targets for 126 yards in the Cowboys' Week 15 loss to the Jaguars.
Lamb was a big play machine with catches of 18, 22, 25, and 39 yards. He also drew a defensive pass interference penalty on third down on a drive that led to a Cowboys TD. Lamb didn't lead the Cowboys in targets. Noah Brown was the surprise target leader, with nine targets on the day. But Lamb led the Cowboys in receptions and receiving yards. Although he didn't get in the end zone, he was clearly the Cowboys' best option in the passing game. Lamb will be an elite option even in a difficult matchup with the Eagles next week.
Dec 18, 2022, 4:56 PM ET
CeeDee Lamb caught 10-of-11 targets for 120 yards and two touchdowns in the Cowboys' Week 16 win over the Eagles.
Lamb led the Cowboys in targets, receptions, yards, and TDs. He was truly the engine of the offense and delivered big plays throughout the game. His first TD was a 36-yard catch in the second quarter. His second TD was a game-tying score in the fourth quarter. Lamb has been a superstar this season and gets a Tennessee pass funnel defense in Week 17. Unfortunately, the Cowboys may not need to play aggressively against the Malik Willis-led Titans. He will still be a locked-in WR1 as a bet on talent.
Dec 24, 2022, 8:40 PM ET
Catching 2 of 11 for 29 and no TD's in week 1 was scary for a dynasty owner like myself. You knew if the targets kept coming he was going to be reeling them in though.There was a decent amount of doubt that he would be able to be that Alpha WR1.
91/1207/8 with 2 games to go. Stud.
Sure. I'd be lying if I said I wasn't a little nervous after that.Catching 2 of 11 for 29 and no TD's in week 1 was scary for a dynasty owner like myself. You knew if the targets kept coming he was going to be reeling them in though.There was a decent amount of doubt that he would be able to be that Alpha WR1.
91/1207/8 with 2 games to go. Stud.
Lamb,for me, is a top 5 dynasty pick pretty easily. Heck this past offseason he was in my top 8.The people that I trust most were banging the drum hard for him during the rookie process. I was absolutely elated when the defending champ in our league was willing to trade him to me for Hunt and OBJ after the Akers offseason injury in Lamb's rookie year.
I was definitely starting to doubt that he would get to the upper echelon fantasy WR1 that I was hoping for. Obviously the QB situation was and is a big part of this. Thankfully I didn't do anything rash.
As far as young stud WR1 dynasty startups, it's starting to feel like Jefferson and Chase on a tier to themselves is turning into Jefferson up top with Lamb maybe starting to enter the conversation of being in the same tier as Chase behind that. Is that going too far?
And he played 6 games with a back up QB. If Dak was all year, no telling what his numbers would be. CeeDee is a beast.There was a decent amount of doubt that he would be able to be that Alpha WR1.
91/1207/8 with 2 games to go. Stud.
CeeDee Lamb caught 4-of-6 passes for 68 yards and a touchdown in the Cowboys' Wild Card Round win over the Bucs.
Lamb caught a 16-yard score in the fourth quarter to put any hopes of a Tamp Bay comeback to rest. Dalton Schultz drew the attention of multiple defenders, leaving Lamb open down the left side of the field for an uncontested score. Schultz paced the team in all receiving categories, but Lamb was still heavily involved in the offense. He will remain a top fantasy option versus the 49ers in the Divisional Round. Though San Francisco has an elite defense, top-end receivers have gotten the better of them at times this year. Last week, DK Metcalf beat them for 136 yards and a pair of scores.
Jan 17, 2023, 12:04 AM ET
CeeDee Lamb caught 10-of-13 targets for 117 yards in Dallas' Divisional Round loss to the 49ers.
Lamb's 46 yard play-action catch, where he slowed up and allowed Deommodore Lenoir to run into him for defensive pass interference then decided to just catch the ball anyway, was Dallas' only explosive play of the game. But it was far from Lamb's only great play. He busted through a Talanoa Hufanga tackle on an early fourth-and-1 go, and was essentially the only Cowboys receiver that could be trusted to do anything in space after Tony Pollard left the game. Lamb solidified himself as a WR1 in 2022 and gave worthwhile returns to even those who valued him aggressively. He enters 2023 as one of the best dynasty wideouts in the league off a 107/1359/9 season at just 23 years old, and Dallas may want to get extension talks going sooner rather than later as he enters his fourth season and what looks to be an easy decision to pick up his fifth-year option.
Jan 22, 2023, 10:23 PM ET
Cowboys exercised WR CeeDee Lamb's fifth-year team option for 2024.
The no-brainer move locks 24-year-old Lamb up for a fully guaranteed $17.9 million in 2024. He is set to make $2.52 million this season. Continuing to break through as one of the league's very best receivers, Lamb took a major statistical step forward in 2022 and should be in for another targets and compiling bonanza this fall even if the Cowboys follow through on their threats to get more run heavy.
SOURCE: Calvin Watkins on Twitter
Apr 20, 2023, 7:09 PM ET
Jon Machota @jonmachota
Dak Prescott on CeeDee Lamb: “I say it, I believe it, I think he can be the best receiver in this league. He’s really only scratched the surface of what he’s capable of doing. … This is just the beginning for him.”
NFL Beat Writers @32BeatWriters
Ceedee Lamb averaged a little over 9 targets per game last year. What does the arrival of Brandin Cooks mean for Lamb and the Cowboys offense?
Listen to the full interview here:
Spotify: rb.gy/3sxqw
Apple: rb.gy/guue5
Google: rb.gy/qy719
After owning cooks in multiple leagues last year. I will never draft that bum again. CD has week winning/top 3 wr upside.I like Cooks in the 8th Rd a lot more than CeeDee in the 2nd Rd
They might have similar numbers many weeks.
Cooks has reached 1,000+ yds in 6 seasons and most of them he has 5-6-7+ TDs
What is Lamb's upside in the early-mid 2nd?
Lamb's upside is he's 24 and could still be an ascendent player. He could also see a TD spike with Schultz gone. Cooks is now in his 30s and doesn't have 4 years of rapport with Dak.I like Cooks in the 8th Rd a lot more than CeeDee in the 2nd Rd
They might have similar numbers many weeks.
Cooks has reached 1,000+ yds in 6 seasons and most of them he has 5-6-7+ TDs
What is Lamb's upside in the early-mid 2nd?
I'll put it another wayAfter owning cooks in multiple leagues last year. I will never draft that bum again. CD has week winning/top 3 wr upside.I like Cooks in the 8th Rd a lot more than CeeDee in the 2nd Rd
They might have similar numbers many weeks.
Cooks has reached 1,000+ yds in 6 seasons and most of them he has 5-6-7+ TDs
What is Lamb's upside in the early-mid 2nd?
I think you learned the wrong lesson here. I don't think Brandin Cooks, guy with six 1000 yard seasons, was the problem.After owning cooks in multiple leagues last year. I will never draft that bum again. CD has week winning/top 3 wr upside.I like Cooks in the 8th Rd a lot more than CeeDee in the 2nd Rd
They might have similar numbers many weeks.
Cooks has reached 1,000+ yds in 6 seasons and most of them he has 5-6-7+ TDs
What is Lamb's upside in the early-mid 2nd?
No the lesson I learned is I'm never taking floor players again. Ever. Last year was the first time I took more floor players then high upside players and it was not a good year for me.I think you learned the wrong lesson here. I don't think Brandin Cooks, guy with six 1000 yard seasons, was the problem.After owning cooks in multiple leagues last year. I will never draft that bum again. CD has week winning/top 3 wr upside.I like Cooks in the 8th Rd a lot more than CeeDee in the 2nd Rd
They might have similar numbers many weeks.
Cooks has reached 1,000+ yds in 6 seasons and most of them he has 5-6-7+ TDs
What is Lamb's upside in the early-mid 2nd?
That’s a fair lesson for sure. I don’t think it makes Cooks a bum though. It was the Texans without a single other legit offensive threat and a platoon of career backups at QB. Their offense was pretty much a losing play regardless.No the lesson I learned is I'm never taking floor players again. Ever. Last year was the first time I took more floor players then high upside players and it was not a good year for me.I think you learned the wrong lesson here. I don't think Brandin Cooks, guy with six 1000 yard seasons, was the problem.After owning cooks in multiple leagues last year. I will never draft that bum again. CD has week winning/top 3 wr upside.I like Cooks in the 8th Rd a lot more than CeeDee in the 2nd Rd
They might have similar numbers many weeks.
Cooks has reached 1,000+ yds in 6 seasons and most of them he has 5-6-7+ TDs
What is Lamb's upside in the early-mid 2nd?
While I mostly agree with this point, I think you are underselling Dameon Pierce. He was a better RB than, say, Ezekiel Elliott has been in years.That’s a fair lesson for sure. I don’t think it makes Cooks a bum though. It was the Texans without a single other legit offensive threat and a platoon of career backups at QB. Their offense was pretty much a losing play regardless.No the lesson I learned is I'm never taking floor players again. Ever. Last year was the first time I took more floor players then high upside players and it was not a good year for me.I think you learned the wrong lesson here. I don't think Brandin Cooks, guy with six 1000 yard seasons, was the problem.After owning cooks in multiple leagues last year. I will never draft that bum again. CD has week winning/top 3 wr upside.I like Cooks in the 8th Rd a lot more than CeeDee in the 2nd Rd
They might have similar numbers many weeks.
Cooks has reached 1,000+ yds in 6 seasons and most of them he has 5-6-7+ TDs
What is Lamb's upside in the early-mid 2nd?
I want to emphasize there is NOTHING wrong with this mind set, I like it...however,No the lesson I learned is I'm never taking floor players again. Ever. Last year was the first time I took more floor players then high upside players and it was not a good year for me.I think you learned the wrong lesson here. I don't think Brandin Cooks, guy with six 1000 yard seasons, was the problem.After owning cooks in multiple leagues last year. I will never draft that bum again. CD has week winning/top 3 wr upside.I like Cooks in the 8th Rd a lot more than CeeDee in the 2nd Rd
They might have similar numbers many weeks.
Cooks has reached 1,000+ yds in 6 seasons and most of them he has 5-6-7+ TDs
What is Lamb's upside in the early-mid 2nd?
Talk more Pierce, he seems like a 5th Rd dandy this year in redraft leaguesWhile I mostly agree with this point, I think you are underselling Dameon Pierce. He was a better RB than, say, Ezekiel Elliott has been in years.That’s a fair lesson for sure. I don’t think it makes Cooks a bum though. It was the Texans without a single other legit offensive threat and a platoon of career backups at QB. Their offense was pretty much a losing play regardless.No the lesson I learned is I'm never taking floor players again. Ever. Last year was the first time I took more floor players then high upside players and it was not a good year for me.I think you learned the wrong lesson here. I don't think Brandin Cooks, guy with six 1000 yard seasons, was the problem.After owning cooks in multiple leagues last year. I will never draft that bum again. CD has week winning/top 3 wr upside.I like Cooks in the 8th Rd a lot more than CeeDee in the 2nd Rd
They might have similar numbers many weeks.
Cooks has reached 1,000+ yds in 6 seasons and most of them he has 5-6-7+ TDs
What is Lamb's upside in the early-mid 2nd?
Brandin Cooks is the same guy he's always been in my opinion. A #2 WR who sometimes has had to fill a #1 WR role, that he never was really good enough to fit into, which is why he's on team #5 in 10 years. He's clearly not as good as CeeDee Lamb is, like I can't even see an argument otherwise, but he's better than Michael Gallup is.
I'd have no problem drafting both Lamb and Cooks. Lamb as a WR1, and Cooks as a WR4, who has upside as a handcuff of sorts as he can be a WR2 in the event of as Lamb injury.
I like Pierce in round 5. He's my RB18. I think he's better than guys like Aaron Jones (Dillon>Singletary) or Miles Sanders (mediocre player) and right about on par with Mattison, who is probably my favorite 5th round RB, other than the time or 2 I've seen Walker fall that far, Walker-Sanders is my RB16-20.Talk more Pierce, he seems like a 5th Rd dandy this year in redraft leaguesWhile I mostly agree with this point, I think you are underselling Dameon Pierce. He was a better RB than, say, Ezekiel Elliott has been in years.That’s a fair lesson for sure. I don’t think it makes Cooks a bum though. It was the Texans without a single other legit offensive threat and a platoon of career backups at QB. Their offense was pretty much a losing play regardless.No the lesson I learned is I'm never taking floor players again. Ever. Last year was the first time I took more floor players then high upside players and it was not a good year for me.I think you learned the wrong lesson here. I don't think Brandin Cooks, guy with six 1000 yard seasons, was the problem.After owning cooks in multiple leagues last year. I will never draft that bum again. CD has week winning/top 3 wr upside.I like Cooks in the 8th Rd a lot more than CeeDee in the 2nd Rd
They might have similar numbers many weeks.
Cooks has reached 1,000+ yds in 6 seasons and most of them he has 5-6-7+ TDs
What is Lamb's upside in the early-mid 2nd?
Brandin Cooks is the same guy he's always been in my opinion. A #2 WR who sometimes has had to fill a #1 WR role, that he never was really good enough to fit into, which is why he's on team #5 in 10 years. He's clearly not as good as CeeDee Lamb is, like I can't even see an argument otherwise, but he's better than Michael Gallup is.
I'd have no problem drafting both Lamb and Cooks. Lamb as a WR1, and Cooks as a WR4, who has upside as a handcuff of sorts as he can be a WR2 in the event of as Lamb injury.
I like Pierce in round 5. He's my RB18. I think he's better than guys like Aaron Jones (Dillon>Singletary) or Miles Sanders (mediocre player) and right about on par with Mattison, who is probably my favorite 5th round RB, other than the time or 2 I've seen Walker fall that far, Walker-Sanders is my RB16-20.Talk more Pierce, he seems like a 5th Rd dandy this year in redraft leaguesWhile I mostly agree with this point, I think you are underselling Dameon Pierce. He was a better RB than, say, Ezekiel Elliott has been in years.That’s a fair lesson for sure. I don’t think it makes Cooks a bum though. It was the Texans without a single other legit offensive threat and a platoon of career backups at QB. Their offense was pretty much a losing play regardless.No the lesson I learned is I'm never taking floor players again. Ever. Last year was the first time I took more floor players then high upside players and it was not a good year for me.I think you learned the wrong lesson here. I don't think Brandin Cooks, guy with six 1000 yard seasons, was the problem.After owning cooks in multiple leagues last year. I will never draft that bum again. CD has week winning/top 3 wr upside.I like Cooks in the 8th Rd a lot more than CeeDee in the 2nd Rd
They might have similar numbers many weeks.
Cooks has reached 1,000+ yds in 6 seasons and most of them he has 5-6-7+ TDs
What is Lamb's upside in the early-mid 2nd?
Brandin Cooks is the same guy he's always been in my opinion. A #2 WR who sometimes has had to fill a #1 WR role, that he never was really good enough to fit into, which is why he's on team #5 in 10 years. He's clearly not as good as CeeDee Lamb is, like I can't even see an argument otherwise, but he's better than Michael Gallup is.
I'd have no problem drafting both Lamb and Cooks. Lamb as a WR1, and Cooks as a WR4, who has upside as a handcuff of sorts as he can be a WR2 in the event of as Lamb injury.
Pierce is the last of the guys I think are the centerpiece of their offenses. Hell, Pierce in the 5th, might be a good RB2 target for teams who take Lamb in round 2.
Marcus Mosher
We haven't talked about it a bunch, but #Cowboys WR CeeDee Lamb is having an incredible camp.
I think another jump from him is coming in 2023.
I will agree he "should be better" as a WR this year. But, maybe I'm wrong, seems his target share might go down. They lost Schultz, but added Cooks and Gallup should be back. Add in the want of the new playcaller to "run the ball more" it could be very similar to last year.Marcus Mosher
We haven't talked about it a bunch, but #Cowboys WR CeeDee Lamb is having an incredible camp.
I think another jump from him is coming in 2023.
I wouldn't give any weight to the "want to run more" McCarthy has been saying that every offseason since Favre was his QB.I will agree he "should be better" as a WR this year. But, maybe I'm wrong, seems his target share might go down. They lost Schultz, but added Cooks and Gallup should be back. Add in the want of the new playcaller to "run the ball more" it could be very similar to last year.Marcus Mosher
We haven't talked about it a bunch, but #Cowboys WR CeeDee Lamb is having an incredible camp.
I think another jump from him is coming in 2023.
I just can't see him going too much over 107/1350/9 which is what he had last year
Sure looked that way this week. Thrilled with his production so far.With Schultz gone, Lamb is likely the most trusted redzone option.
Seems extreme. Cowboys won’t play the 49ers every week.Going to my bench.
But the rest of you shouldn't worry, I benched ETN and Kittle this week and we all know what happened.
Seems extreme. Cowboys won’t play the 49ers every week.Going to my bench.
But the rest of you shouldn't worry, I benched ETN and Kittle this week and we all know what happened.
14 ppg is nothing to sneeze at, anyway. Obviously for a superstar-adjacent type guy, you'd like to see that up at 17 or 18, but he has been fine so far.Just need to be patient with him, I have no doubt he will come good.
It was worth the waitJust need to be patient with him, I have no doubt he will come good.