Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
I think Rotoworld interpeted that wrong
Also people may have Randle as one of their sleepers after he ended the season with a few strong games. Need to see if he's really turned it around though because he was also benched/lost the start a few times last year for breaking team rules.
My opinion: He is single handed-ly responsible for most of Eli's interceptions. Between not fighting for the ball when it is thrown his way, stopping his routes shorts, running the completely wrong route, etc. It is amazing how many of his targets end up poorly. See today's INT as an example.
Thanks for this. It's hard to read between the lines if you are not a fan of this team. As long as Cruz is out, which seems like the rest of the season, he keeps intriguing me to play him during bye weeks.
I'm not trying to absolve Eli for all of his throws. Today's INT was completely on Randal. Eli was throwing to a spot. Randal, at best, half heartedly tried to goto the spot. The cornerback broke faster and stronger to the spot. There have been times where Eli was leading Randal only to see him completely pull up after the ball was thrown. If he had kept running the route it is an easy catch, instead INT. It is maddening. I am not a Randal fan at all.
No in fact he's giving him less snaps. Nicks snap count has been going up and he came out in second half last week playing in two WR sets over Randle.
Even more reason not to believe that, let alone what your eye tell you all season. If healthy I look for Harris to be the big play guy if they have one and Tye to lead them in receptions.
It's funny when people think when a coach says a player will be more involved they are just playing mind games. Take your tin foil hat off... Perhaps the coach is just answering the question? Believe what you want with your eye test,,but the claim because the coach said it he doesn't mean it is laughable and it goes on in here every week.
![[icon]](/data/avatars/m/5/5167.jpg?1660313464){kind=avatar}
It's not that I thought Coughlin was playing mind games. I wouldn't doubt for a minute that they'll try to lean on Randle more than they would otherwise. I'm just skeptical that Randle can deliver, based on what I've seen previously.It's funny when people think when a coach says a player will be more involved they are just playing mind games. Take your tin foil hat off... Perhaps the coach is just answering the question? Believe what you want with your eye test,,but the claim because the coach said it he doesn't mean it is laughable and it goes on in here every week.
I guess 3 tds in 4 games doesn't pass the eye test these daysIt's not that I thought Coughlin was playing mind games. I wouldn't doubt for a minute that they'll try to lean on Randle more than they would otherwise. I'm just skeptical that Randle can deliver, based on what I've seen previously.It's funny when people think when a coach says a player will be more involved they are just playing mind games. Take your tin foil hat off... Perhaps the coach is just answering the question? Believe what you want with your eye test,,but the claim because the coach said it he doesn't mean it is laughable and it goes on in here every week.
I love the "Faust is human" element in addition to just another one of your thousand robotic posts. Thanks again for your all your constant updates Faust. Some may take your posts for granted, but it really is a huge time saver for some of us. Much appreciated.
Thanks! I should add my commentary more frequently. I was prompted to do this with Randle as I almost had him traded away until he pulled his usual lazy effort stunt in the game this week.
I wish him well. Inconsistent hands and route running ability, but he did put up some decent fantasy numbers in NYG.
