Jon Baldwin - premiere match-up in the dome, saw his snap counts increase by 20% last week
James Jones - if Jennings doesn't go and Cobb is limited, I think he'll redeem himself on MNF
Greg Little - MoMass could be put here as well, great match-up
Andrew Hawkins - he needs his snap count to increase, but WAS's pass rush is hurting right now, their secondary will be exposed
Avant. Maclin is out, Johnson steps in but I don't see much production out of him. I think the Cards shut down the deep passes so Eagles rely on screen game with McCoy and the TE's. I think Avant gets left open for 4-6 targets over the middle of the field. Also think they try to shut down Celek and Harbor becomes a sneaky play as well.
Great sleeper. Could be gold on MNF.James Jones - if Jennings doesn't go and Cobb is limited, I think he'll redeem himself on MNF
How about, I GOT THE ASSISTANT COACH FORUMSome of you guys are really nice. I was just going to say "I got the Assistant Coach Forum".![]()
I second the bold. Hawkins has had good numbers the last two weeks but his targets fell a lot last week.Jon Baldwin - premiere match-up in the dome, saw his snap counts increase by 20% last week
James Jones - if Jennings doesn't go and Cobb is limited, I think he'll redeem himself on MNF
Greg Little - MoMass could be put here as well, great match-up
Andrew Hawkins - he needs his snap count to increase, but WAS's pass rush is hurting right now, their secondary will be exposed
How about, I GOT THE ASSISTANT COACH FORUMSome of you guys are really nice. I was just going to say "I got the Assistant Coach Forum".![]()
day late dollar shortRamses Barden
Ramses Barden
Same, but Jones is available in more leagues than Hawkins at this point. Hawkins isn't on a single one of my WWs anymore, everyone dropped Jones after that abysmal performance last week.I'd roll with Hawkins over James Jones. He should get at least 5 receptions, 60-70 yds and a possible td vs WAS.
This is the way it is in the SP - more and more polluted every day. It's just how it has devolved into any other ff site.How about, I GOT THE ASSISTANT COACH FORUMSome of you guys are really nice. I was just going to say "I got the Assistant Coach Forum".![]()
![]()
yup :(This is the way it is in the SP - more and more polluted every day. It's just how it has devolved into any other ff site.How about, I GOT THE ASSISTANT COACH FORUMSome of you guys are really nice. I was just going to say "I got the Assistant Coach Forum".![]()
![]()
follow the posting rules if you like being a member of the forum?Who cares if it's the wrong forum? Leave if you don't want to participate.
How about, I GOT THE ASSISTANT COACH FORUMSome of you guys are really nice. I was just going to say "I got the Assistant Coach Forum".![]()
![]()
The mods used to.Who cares if it's the wrong forum? Leave if you don't want to participate.
I agree. If the Dolphins continue to get behind quickly, I expect Hartline to continue his excellent ppr performance. Opponents are giving the underneath stuff to let the Dolphins run out the game clock. Check to see if Revis is playing this week before automatically plugging Hartline into your lineup. Top 15 in NFL targets to date is the very definition of a sleeper ppr WR. Just don't expect much in the way of TDs due to the defensive schemes that have been giving him all these looks.Brian hartline.... 20 targets in 2 weeks and seems to have the wr1 rapport with tannehill... if he scored last week, he wouldn't have been on the waiver wire... get him now while you can
I usually just lurk here and rarely post, but I'm just tired of these self appointed policemen. The way I see it, this reply is what's wrong with the SP these days. This type of reply is the pollution. What I've always loved about this forum is the way we treat each other. But lately it's like "lock this" or "go to the ac" or even worse posting this quote as a reply "Threads that are asking for advice on how you should draft or manage your team belong in The Assistant Coach forum."yup :(This is the way it is in the SP - more and more polluted every day. It's just how it has devolved into any other ff site.How about, I GOT THE ASSISTANT COACH FORUMSome of you guys are really nice. I was just going to say "I got the Assistant Coach Forum".
![]()
![]()
your ok.you understand where im coming from.should have put week number 3 sleepers.there sure are alot of crybabies in here who instead of giving insight just bash threads.'SameSongNDance said:Ignore the OPs post like I did and treat this like a "Week 3 WR Sleepers" thread. I don't see the problem. #####ing about the thread inside the thread certainly isn't any more productive.
JAX has been really stingy against the pass so far this year. I like your calls though, ballsy.Donnie Avery - Talented, has a good QB that trusts him and a nice matchup
Laurent Robinson - Also like the matchup here, decent flex(or wr3) play
Mario Manningham - I think Alex Smith has a big game and Manningham could benefit
Greg Little - Still a believer in his talent, nice bounceback last week and decent matchup.
Thanks. Fair enough, I'm just not sold on their secondary at all. Ponder threw for 270 yards on them during week 1(worth noting that the game did go to OT though), but last week the Texans got up early and had a powerful run game and played a conservative game with a lot of low risk passes.JAX has been really stingy against the pass so far this year. I like your calls though, ballsy.Donnie Avery - Talented, has a good QB that trusts him and a nice matchup
Laurent Robinson - Also like the matchup here, decent flex(or wr3) play
Mario Manningham - I think Alex Smith has a big game and Manningham could benefit
Greg Little - Still a believer in his talent, nice bounceback last week and decent matchup.
This...If Hankerson is named the "X" to replace Garcon he will likely be most targeted wr against crappy secondary.....Barden like opportunityHankerson 110/TD. Put it on the board
Many people care, hence why they have the big bolded statement above.But with the name change of the thread, it is no longer isolated to one person many can take part in this thread.'thetman said:Who cares if it's the wrong forum? Leave if you don't want to participate.
Wrong thread maybe? Charles was not a topic here I believe.'packersfan said:For what it's worth I read two separate reports this week from people who watched game film of the Chiefs-Bills game (one from ESPN and the other from RotoWorld) and both people said they were impressed with how Charles looked physically. Like I said, take that for what it's worth but it's the same thing I've seen watching him too. As I posted in the other Charles thread the only concern I have with him right now is usage. Physically, he looked great in the preseason and I haven't seen anything in the first two games that has me concerned about the health of his knee.
I was just looking at the Charles thread and wondering where my post went.Wrong thread maybe? Charles was not a topic here I believe.'packersfan said:For what it's worth I read two separate reports this week from people who watched game film of the Chiefs-Bills game (one from ESPN and the other from RotoWorld) and both people said they were impressed with how Charles looked physically. Like I said, take that for what it's worth but it's the same thing I've seen watching him too. As I posted in the other Charles thread the only concern I have with him right now is usage. Physically, he looked great in the preseason and I haven't seen anything in the first two games that has me concerned about the health of his knee.
I think Lance Moore is going to have a huge game. Starting him over Jordy Nelson.-Lance Moore with Colston hobbled and playing KC-Andrew Hawkins against a poor pass defenseIm gonna need them to step up, so many injuries this week.
I'm going to start posting "real" football questions in the ACF