Thunderlips
Footballguy
I'm one who actually thought the ending to the original show was good and that it is kind of lame that they just retconned the Dan thing.
Agreed, gratuitous sesquipedalian flourishes do not enhance or exalt one's position over the same thought expressed in the idiomatic vernacular of the proletariat.These kinds of statements come off better without any made-up words.
It is not all over the news, at least not the angle you are pushing here. A google search of Roseanne Barr "new america" brings up this thread at the top.it’s all over the news. And I’m not outraged
John Podhoretz- the Roseanne revival is a wake up call forAmerica. Hollywood
This is very good advice, not just for timscochet, but for all of us.OK, how about cutting back on the political punditry then?
and Raising ArizonaHe was great in Barton Fink. Cohen brothers movie.
I don't know how you came up with that from anything he has said.Let's be honest here tim, you are upset that they are humanizing a trump voter. Anything outside of representing all trump voters as people that despise gays and minorities and want to carry around bazookas is just ridiculous to you.
All right, you broke me down, I admit it. I am a John Goodman fan. There, you happy. I admit it, oh Lord, I aaaaadmitttt ittt.and Raising Arizona
I was never an original Roseanne fan (before my time anyway) and I don't intend to watch this show. Maybe he wouldn't be much without those Coen Brothers movies either.All right, you broke me down, I admit it. I am a John Goodman fan. There, you happy. I admit it, oh Lord, I aaaaadmitttt ittt.
The made-up words are no obstacle to my understanding, but metaphors are. I tend to be overly literal to my own detriment. What foxes and henhouses are we talking about? Regulatory capture? What excuses for what corruption are we talking about?These kinds of statements come off better without any made-up words.Didnt argue it then, wont argue it now - far as i could see, the foxes were running more henhouses when he left than when he came. An eloquent excuse factory for greater proliferance of corruption & fecklessness was and is my assessment of the Obama White House.
https://www.google.com/search?q=fox+in+a+hen+house&rls=com.microsoft:en-US:IE-Address&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwizo9r7t5TaAhUY3GMKHbYaBuYQsAQITg&biw=1280&bih=915#imgrc=j6JUuVVrHhqRaM:&spf=1522426322669The made-up words are no obstacle to my understanding, but metaphors are. I tend to be overly literal to my own detriment. What foxes and henhouses are we talking about? Regulatory capture? What excuses for what corruption are we talking about?
I didn't know this dumb show/Roseanne being a mutant was newsworthy. Consider me corrected.Don't get why anyone is complaining about this thread existing. This was blaring, red-font headline news on Drudge a couple of days ago. I also saw a headline this morning that Roseanne (the person) has fallen big in to the QAnon conspiracy crap.
I have spent plenty of time in this subforum defending Trump voters from the sort of stereotypes you just named. But that being said, you have come close to what’s bothering me.Let's be honest here tim, you are upset that they are humanizing a trump voter. Anything outside of representing all trump voters as people that despise gays and minorities and want to carry around bazookas is just ridiculous to you.
Defending? Come on.I have spent plenty of time in this subforum defending Trump voters from the sort of stereotypes you just named. But that being said, you have come close to what’s bothering me.
I don’t think it’s OK to be a Trump supporter. Being a Trump supporter doesn’t make you a bigot or a racist or a sexist, but it does mean you condone those things in the person you have chosen to support. I don’t think that’s OK, and I don’t think that it’s a good that a popular TV show should make these people feel better about themselves. They’re not bad people, but in my very firm opinion they made a bad decision and they should feel awful about it, not good. I strongly disagree with the take that we as a society should accept Trump supporters as part of our normal give and take between liberals and conservatives and independents. They’re not. They’re an anomaly, and I sincerely hope that they disappear soon, fading into history the way the Joe McCarthy supporters did after 1955 or so.
That was your intro here. You lump them into all sorts of groups, as a whole. Nobody is saying that you have to accept them as normal give and take, you simply cant dismiss them completely from the conversation. Plenty of them are much better people than people that voted for Hillary. You(and many others) speak as if that is impossible.Are we all supposed to become anti-free trade? Nativist? Anti-immigrant?
There was a study a while back that Goodman (at least of a few years ago) added more value as a supporting actor than any other person in Hollywood. I can see it.I liked him in Big Lebowski and in O Brother Where Art Thou, otherwise I can take him or leave him.
I never saw the original and have no desire to see this one. Other than this past week's 60 minutes I have not watched network T.V. for a non-sporting event in many years. As for her, the voice causes an aversion reaction in me. I simply cannot listen to that. It is painful. I will never have an informed opinion on the shows content.There was a study a while back that Goodman (at least of a few years ago) added more value as a supporting actor than any other person in Hollywood. I can see it.
As for the show Roseann nails that character and the ensemble was always funny. The reason it's getting such huge numbers is that the rest of the flat comedies on network TV are, by and large, absolutely horrible.
I think you are mixing her up with Rosie O'DonnellNever a fan of fat slovenly woman has contempt for life shtick. Never found her remotely amusing and feel the same for Melissa McCarthy, this generations Roseanne Barr.
I am disturbed that the President of the United States spends any time with his attention on her.
Me. I cannot take her even in limited doses in the commercials for her show. When one comes on my hands, of their own volition it seems, automatically change the channel. I like that about my hands.
I was responding to you about Goodman. The other was an aside in general comment.I never saw the original and have no desire to seed this one. Other than this past week's 60 minutes I have not watched network T.V. for a non-sporting event in many years. As for her, the voice causes an aversion reaction in me. I simply cannot listen to that. It is painful. I will never have an informed opinion on the shows content.
This is horrible. She shouldn't be on tv.
She's Jewish.This is horrible. She shouldn't be on tv.
No matter what you've done in the past say good things about Trump and you get a phone call congratulating you...with Trump, flattery will get you everywhere.
Gives me the HEEBie jeebies.
I thought that was how Roseanne self described the family portrayed in the show. Maybe white trash is too harsh, certainly blue collar with parents who had a ton of flaws themselves which was the crux of many of the jokes.To be fair, they're not white trash. They're a moderately realistic representation of a huge swath of working class America.
How is this different than the Kathy Griffin pic? Tasteless, obviously missed the comedy, sure. Anything else, though?
I figured there had to be some context for this that explained the Roseanne as Hitler picture (or attempted to).
This is exactly why it bothers the crew in here.There are only two things about the reboot that bothers people here....
1. It was centered around a "pro-Trump" character and...
2. It wasn't totally rebuked by the public.
It messed up the acoustics in the echo chamber.
I watched it. The only thing that really bothered me was the laugh track.There are only two things about the reboot that bothers people here....
1. It was centered around a "pro-Trump" character and...
2. It wasn't totally rebuked by the public.
It messed up the acoustics in the echo chamber.
Is that a yes or no for letting him come on your hands?I liked him in Big Lebowski and in O Brother Where Art Thou, otherwise I can take him or leave him.
Sorry, should have kept reading - that’s a yes then.All right, you broke me down, I admit it. I am a John Goodman fan. There, you happy. I admit it, oh Lord, I aaaaadmitttt ittt.
I don’t know if the reality of the deed is worse, or being Eskimo brothers with Tom Arnold.Roseanne when she was younger...would you?
This is exactly why it bothers the crew in here.There are only two things about the reboot that bothers people here....
1. It was centered around a "pro-Trump" character and...
2. It wasn't totally rebuked by the public.
It messed up the acoustics in the echo chamber.
She is awful though, I refuse to believe people actually watch her garbage.
The trolling in general is serious and dangerous.Maybe she’s trolling at this point.
Roseanne's show has always been a representation of America. She is showing, through comedy, what most of America is going through within families. Trump should not be congratulating her nor should other Trump voters feel vindicated or anything. Same goes for Hilary voters. I don't think anyone is bothered by anything about the show, politically. People, Trump supporters, are grasping at anything to prop their puppet up. Vindication? Yeah, okay.This is exactly why it bothers the crew in here.
She is awful though, I refuse to believe people actually watch her garbage.