TampaMike19
Footballguy
RIP. Was a good run - wonder what he does in the playoffs and next year somewhere else?
RIP. Was a good run - wonder what he does in the playoffs and next year somewhere else?
James Conner (ankle) was not spotted in the portion of practice open to the media on Thursday.
Back-to-back DNPs leading off practice this week make this a tough spot for Conner's managers, who have been living a blessed life all season. Conner's tough enough to play with a questionable label and Friday's practice will reveal a bit, but it's hard to see him as anything better than truly questionable at this moment.
SOURCE: Darren Urban on Twitter
Dec 16, 2021, 1:14 PM ET
Not dead yet.RIP. Was a good run - wonder what he does in the playoffs and next year somewhere else?
Exact same decision for me. Really wish Pats game was on Sunday to have a better sense of if Conner/Chase will be active for Cards.Would you play him over Rhamondre?
I've been riding him all season. And he's bailed me out all season. But this looks like a trap.
James Conner (heel) remained sidelined at Wednesday's practice.
The heel injury is new, as it was the ankle that bothered Conner in practice last week before he eventually played through it against the Lions. Conner's snaps were way down with the return of Chase Edmonds. Conner is going to need to get in a practice Thursday ahead of Saturday's short-week date with the Colts.
Dec 22, 2021, 1:18 PM ET
James Conner (heel, questionable) is "confident" he will suit up against the Colts on Saturday.
Injured players are always confident they will play right up until the second they don't, but it is notable nonetheless. Conner said it's an issue of pain management with his heel, and that there are no lingering issues with his ankle. With the Cardinals' season suddenly headed the wrong direction, they will undoubtedly lean toward having Conner go, but there's a chance it just won't be feasible based on how he feels in pre-game warmups. Conner is a real-deal game-time call. Chase Edmonds and Eno Benjamin will form a committee if Conner sits, with Edmonds probably getting enough work to be an RB2.
SOURCE: Josh Weinfuss on Twitter
Dec 23, 2021, 5:44 PM ET
Cardinals coach Kliff Kingsbury said James Conner (heel) is considered day-to-day and will be a game-time decision for Week 17 against the Cowboys.
Kliff made the same comments about Rondale Moore, who is dealing with an ankle issue. He noted that both weren't expected to practice much on Wednedday. Conner wasn't seen in the open portion of practice so he's likely a DNP. He was initially expected to suit up in Week 16 but didn't make the necessary progress on his injury to get cleared. Given how close he was to playing, we expect him to take the field for Week 17. The Cardinals are underdogs to a surging Dallas defense, making it a difficult spot for Conner to return to. However, his role at the goal line was so immense that it's hard to fade him, even coming off the injury. If given the green light, Conner will enter Week 17 as an RB2.
SOURCE: Kevin Parrish on Twitter
Dec 29, 2021, 1:14 PM ET
James Conner (heel) did not practice on Thursday for the second consecutive day.
Contrary to earlier media reports, Conner officially did not practice on Thursday. This injury once seemed fairly benign and Conner even seemed likely to play last Saturday, but he's now missed every practice since it happened. He's going to be truly questionable against the Cowboys on Sunday. It would be reassuring if he actually practiced on Friday.
Dec 30, 2021, 4:37 PM ET
NFL Network's Ian Rapoport reports "there's optimism" that James Conner (heel) will play in Week 17 against the Cowboys.
Conner was held out of practice until Friday and was notably limited in that session. If he plays, it's likely that the Cardinals scale back his role. He will likely split the backfield with Chase Edmonds, who also figures to see the bulk of the snaps on passing downs. Conner will need to find the end zone to get the job done for fantasy managers. As an underdog to the Cowboys, he's a risky RB2 bet this week.
SOURCE: Around the NFL on Twitter
Jan 2, 2022, 9:04 AM ET
Cardinals re-signed RB James Conner to a three-year, $21 million contract.
The contract is worth up to $25.5 million and features $13.5 million fully guaranteed. Though the deal will place Conner somewhere around the top-10 mark among running backs by yearly salary, his contract makes sense for both sides. The Dolphins just signed Chase Edmonds away from Arizona and Conner is coming off a massive season. Conner also struggled with injuries and inefficient play before joining Arizona. In his first year with the Cardinals, he scored 18 touchdowns and went for 1,127 yards from scrimmage. Conner opened the year as a two-down banger but evolved into a workhorse after Edmonds went down. He perfectly fills Arizona's need at running back while staying with the team that brought his career storming back.
SOURCE: Jay Glazer on Twitter
Mar 14, 2022, 12:21 PM ET
I wouldn't pay a first - his numbers weren't actually very good if you take away the ridiculous amount of TDs. Now he should be in position to score a lot of TDs again in that offense but TDs can be a pretty volatile stat.As an owner I'd want more than a 2nd to move him, as a buyer yes I'd probably NOT give up a 1st, although I think he's worth that now.
I am sure they will bring another quality RB but that contract says they like him a good amount.Will have to see who else the Cardinals bring in here. Unsustainable TD rate and all, but it says a good thing that they prioritized bringing him back.
Danny Tuccitto@IR_DannyT
*after* regressing Conner’s rush TD rate w/ ARI to the mean, it’s still 4.89%. On 200 projected carries or so, that’s 10 rush TDs.
Hayden Winks@HaydenWinks
James Conner was 7th in expected TDs based on his usage last year, so yes, he's a regression candidate. But his TD mean is still sick. "Regression" doesn't mean he goes from 18 TDs to 6 TDs.
>>> LINK
definitely due for an insane season.Isn’t he due for an in…., nope I won’t do it to him.
James Conner Could Wreck Your Draft.
https://www.footballguys.com/article/2022-james-conner-the-early-landmine
I think we all agree he's due for TD regression. But that's already baked into his ADP. He's being drafted as RB15. If he keeps up the TD production, then he's a top 10 RB. If he does that and see passing game involvement, he's possibly top 5. But the conclusion states he needs to do both to be RB15???
Based on his performance last year the TD's are not nearly enough to help support his value, not even close and that's if he had no regression. But on the flip side he could have have a massive TD dropoff and hold his value if his role in the passing game was as large as it was when Edmonds got hurt. That's the concern with him, that his passing game role won't be nearly that size.
Before Edmonds got hurt last year, weeks 1-8, James Connor was not that great in fantasy. He was RB30 in PPR PPG.
He was on actually on a higher TD pace for rushing TD's during those first 8 games then how he finished the season. Averaged 1.25 Td's per game those first 8 games to only 1 TD per game rushing when he actually took off but he also gave you 3 TD's in the passing game during the stretch took off and was winning leagues for people.
The major difference between Conner being a middling RB3 and league winner was not the TD's and as we can see here the TD's alone was not making him a top 15 RB. What led to him being a top RB was the massive difference in his passing game role he got when Edmonds went out. He want from averaging about one measly PPG in receiving production to 12, a solid 11 point PPG swing-almost what he was averaging in total before Edmonds got hurt.
Conner basically had two seasons, pre and post Edmonds. Looking at this as PPR
8 games with Edmonds: RB30 in PPG, 11.52 PPG, 4.2 PPG for rushing yardage, 1.05 PPG for catches/receptions/receiving TD's, 7.5 PPG for rushing TD's.
So pre-Edmonds getting hurt 65% of his fantasy production was from rushing TD's. TD's were not making him a top 15 RB, they were saving him from being almost totally useless.
Post Edmonds injury:
7 games, RB2 in PPG, 23.64 PPG, 5.62 PPG for rushing yardage, 12.01 PPG for catches/recieving yardage and TD's and 6 PPG for rushing TD's.
So even when Edmonds got hurt and he took off he saw very small gain in PPG for rushing, slight dip in PPG for rushing TD's but again the difference was this involvement in the passing game.
I think some are using Edmonds departure to justify Conner at ADP (or even reaching for him) without considering that AZ let him go because they had a capable replacement in Eno Benjamin. Barring injury to Eno, I don't see Conner having a large receiving role - and given Conner's own injury history, it might be in the Cards best interest to limit Conner's touches a bit regardless.Sorry, but I just don't get this conclusion: "Conner stands as one of the riskiest early bets in fantasy ADP. To hit on his positioning, he needs to keep up his touchdown production and see a dramatic increase in passing game involvement. "
I think we all agree he's due for TD regression. But that's already baked into his ADP. He's being drafted as RB15. If he keeps up the TD production, then he's a top 10 RB. If he does that and see passing game involvement, he's possibly top 5. But the conclusion states he needs to do both to be RB15???
Great stuff, thanks. Conner seemed to do fairly well in the passing game when called upon, could this mean more involvement in this area from the start or does Eno automatically slide in to the Edmunds role? Don't think many believe Conner will be a #1 type again, but a mid-tier 2nd RB is viable, though if he loses most of his catches he's looking at #3 type numbers in all likelihood.So even when Edmonds got hurt and he took off he saw very small gain in PPG for rushing, slight dip in PPG for rushing TD's but again the difference was this involvement in the passing game.
This IMO is the key to his value as I tried to explain in my post above.I don't see Conner having a large receiving role
Actually he started to break down at the end of the season and missed some games.Plus, Conner stayed remarkably healthy last year.
yes, sorry - I meant during his extremely productive stretch of games without Edmonds.Actually he started to break down at the end of the season and missed some games.
Based on his performance last year the TD's are not nearly enough to help support his value, not even close and that's if he had no regression. But on the flip side he could have have a massive TD dropoff and hold his value if his role in the passing game was as large as it was when Edmonds got hurt. That's the concern with him, that his passing game role won't be nearly that size.
Before Edmonds got hurt last year, weeks 1-8, James Connor was not that great in fantasy. He was RB30 in PPR PPG.
He was on actually on a higher TD pace for rushing TD's during those first 8 games then how he finished the season. Averaged 1.25 Td's per game those first 8 games to only 1 TD per game rushing when he actually took off but he also gave you 3 TD's in the passing game during the stretch took off and was winning leagues for people.
The major difference between Conner being a middling RB3 and league winner was not the TD's and as we can see here the TD's alone was not making him a top 15 RB. What led to him being a top RB was the massive difference in his passing game role he got when Edmonds went out. He want from averaging about one measly PPG in receiving production to 12, a solid 11 point PPG swing-almost what he was averaging in total before Edmonds got hurt.
Conner basically had two seasons, pre and post Edmonds. Looking at this as PPR
8 games with Edmonds: RB30 in PPG, 11.52 PPG, 4.2 PPG for rushing yardage, 1.05 PPG for catches/receptions/receiving TD's, 7.5 PPG for rushing TD's.
So pre-Edmonds getting hurt 65% of his fantasy production was from rushing TD's. TD's were not making him a top 15 RB, they were saving him from being almost totally useless.
Post Edmonds injury:
7 games, RB2 in PPG, 23.64 PPG, 5.62 PPG for rushing yardage, 12.01 PPG for catches/recieving yardage and TD's and 6 PPG for rushing TD's.
So even when Edmonds got hurt and he took off he saw very small gain in PPG for rushing, slight dip in PPG for rushing TD's but again the difference was this involvement in the passing game.
100% agreed. I’m not as gloom and doom as FBG is, calling him a land mine.To me Conner is going to be a startable and good fantasy RB this year. The problem is his price tag. He likely has to hit his ceiling to return value so it's a bad draft idea because of that. No room to get value from the pick. I think he is a great RB2 to have this year but not at an RB1 price tag.
If it was that easy more backs that have done it in the past would have repeated - most did not.I would strongly disagree that his TDs are going to decrease by a large margin. Unless Kingsbury 100% changes his playcalling, Conner should hit 12+ TDs, and could very well stay in the 15-20 range.
Full disclosure: I can keep him for 2$ on a 200$ auction budget and almost certainly will.
that’s partly where you lose me. That “if” should be in flashing neon lights, as it’s doing all the heavy lifting here.Some good analysis here. I think if Conner can stay healthy,
I agree with the conclusion here, but the premise is a bit off - he’s seems like he’ll be priced as a low-end RB1.But in his price range I think he's a solid RB2/Flex guy to start the season.
that’s a bargain, and you’d be crazy to not hold at that value.Full disclosure: I can keep him for 2$ on a 200$ auction budget and almost certainly will.
I see him more as an early 3rd or (gasp!) late 2nd round pick. There are just too many other players I’d rather have thereZ
I agree. It’s hard to trust ADP right now as most of it is based on BB leagues.Best ball drafts I have done, once in a while he goes there, but usually I see him going at then end of the 3rd or early 4th. I think that's a fair price.