Most of the plays I saw, Gio was getting hit in the backfield and still usually got a couple of yards.Haven't watched yet but the brief snippets I saw on redzone was more of the same. Patient strong running by Hill, who was clearly more effective than Gio.
Yeah I didn't see the whole game but from what I saw of Gio he looked good. Had a great run for a first down called back on a hold that obviously doesnt show up on the stat sheet.Most of the plays I saw, Gio was getting hit in the backfield and still usually got a couple of yards.Haven't watched yet but the brief snippets I saw on redzone was more of the same. Patient strong running by Hill, who was clearly more effective than Gio.
Hill is the better pure running back. I don't see how anyone could think he is going to "take the reigns back".For fantasy owners that have both Gio AND Hill, how do you feel about starting both against the lowly Tampa Bay Bucs this Sunday? I know Hill outscored Gio in week 12 (Hill had the TD), but they both had nearly equal touches. I think Gio takes the reigns back this week, particularly because he excels in the passing game.
I've got both, and you could start both if you don't have better options.For fantasy owners that have both Gio AND Hill, how do you feel about starting both against the lowly Tampa Bay Bucs this Sunday? I know Hill outscored Gio in week 12 (Hill had the TD), but they both had nearly equal touches. I think Gio takes the reigns back this week, particularly because he excels in the passing game.
I've got the same dilemma. I've probably traded Hill and Crowell in and out of my lineup several times now!I'm starting both Gio & Hill (benching Crowell). I know it's a risk, or in the very least automatically limits any upside/time on the field. I don't like Crow's matchup even though Bills haven't been a stone wall lately. I'll just hope that Cincy is in control throughout at Tampa, as they should be.
Just so you know, they had Gio ranked higher last week too. Old habits die hard, I suppose.Bloom and Dodds both have Gio rated slightly higher than Hill this week. Are they naive too?
My guess is they leaned in Gio's favor simply due to opportunities.Just so you know, they had Gio ranked higher last week too. Old habits die hard, I suppose.Bloom and Dodds both have Gio rated slightly higher than Hill this week. Are they naive too?
Considering the two "geniuses" running the offense (Hue and Marvin), that wouldn't surprise me at all.Also keep in mind that this was Gio's first game back, and the Bengals were leading wire-to-wire. It wouldn't be unreasonable to expect the disparity in snaps to grow even larger as we move forward, especially in games where they are trailing.
Gio averages like 9 yards/reception. They're going to use them both no matter how much you want a 3-down RB. These "geniuses" you refer to have the No. 8 rushing game in the NFL and are in first place in the only division in the NFL with 4 teams with a winning record.Considering the two "geniuses" running the offense (Hue and Marvin), that wouldn't surprise me at all.Also keep in mind that this was Gio's first game back, and the Bengals were leading wire-to-wire. It wouldn't be unreasonable to expect the disparity in snaps to grow even larger as we move forward, especially in games where they are trailing.
I just want a 3-down RB out of this combo. But Hill is just flat-out better.
Didn't they also rank Brandon McManus as the #1 fantasy kicker every week until the week he was cut?Just so you know, they had Gio ranked higher last week too. Old habits die hard, I suppose.Bloom and Dodds both have Gio rated slightly higher than Hill this week. Are they naive too?
A voice of reason.Also keep in mind that this was Gio's first game back, and the Bengals were leading wire-to-wire. It wouldn't be unreasonable to expect the disparity in snaps to grow even larger as we move forward, especially in games where they are trailing.
Exactly. I don't know if I can start either of them at this point. I guess "Boom" Herron it is!What a depressing situation. If one of them got to carry the load, you'd have a nice fantasy option on your hands. Instead, they are both fairly useless.
So true, especially with Dalton stinking the joint up.What a depressing situation. If one of them got to carry the load, you'd have a nice fantasy option on your hands. Instead, they are both fairly useless.
Where are all of the easy swing passes in the flat where he would pick up 20 yards in a flash? Mind-boggling how they are trying to fit a square peg into a round hole.Gio is worthless unless Hugh all of a sudden realizes he shouldn't be used to run into brick walls up the middle. Gruden found ways to utilize Gio; I am unimpressed by Hugh. EDIT: I'm assuming he won't get 20+ touches in his current usage as long as Hill is there., going forward.
I own Hill and Gio, and contemplated dropping one or both for WW pickups for the playoffs (I'm in). The only thing stopping me is if one of them gets injured this next game, the other would be solid gold. A whole lot of meh on the WW at this point anyways...but I totally understand being frustrated to the point of dropping Cincy RBs in general.I just dropped him...in a 32 team league and in a 16 team league (salary cap leagues). He was being paid WAAAAYY too much for a COP back. Hill is even getting more passes thrown his way. RBs just aren't worth much nowadays. Hell, I'm about to drop LeSean McCoy too! Guess I'll be loading up on WRs and TEs in my upcoming drafts. COP backs are much easier to find later in drafts or on waiver wires.
If Lacy doesn't play, Starks is a great start over Gio and Hill. He's going to catch a bunch of passes.On second thought, GB is @ BUF next week. No thanks.
I'll have to find some waiver-wire scrub to start at the most important time of the year over this guy I had such high hopes for. Good times.
Well I obviously wrote that before Lacy got dinged. I think he'll play, anyway.If Lacy doesn't play, Starks is a great start over Gio and Hill. He's going to catch a bunch of passes.On second thought, GB is @ BUF next week. No thanks.
I'll have to find some waiver-wire scrub to start at the most important time of the year over this guy I had such high hopes for. Good times.
Total disaster. The guy before me in the rookie draft took Lacy, and the guy after me took L. Bell."Why not Gio at 1.01" turns into "Gio, a risk in the 4th"
Have a feeling I'm not alone in drafting Gio instead of Leveon Bell (redraft). I think back to draft day, and it seemed so reasonable then. Stupid Legarrette Blount/weed bust played a big part in my thinking."Why not Gio at 1.01" turns into "Gio, a risk in the 4th"
I had the first pick 2 years ago and had Bell as my guy throughout training camp until he got his foot injury and that scared me off and I took Gio instead.Have a feeling I'm not alone in drafting Gio instead of Leveon Bell (redraft). I think back to draft day, and it seemed so reasonable then. Stupid Legarrette Blount/weed bust played a big part in my thinking."Why not Gio at 1.01" turns into "Gio, a risk in the 4th"
I don't recall anyone having Bell ranked higher. The kid just exploded this year. Nobody saw THIS kind of production coming.Have a feeling I'm not alone in drafting Gio instead of Leveon Bell (redraft). I think back to draft day, and it seemed so reasonable then. Stupid Legarrette Blount/weed bust played a big part in my thinking."Why not Gio at 1.01" turns into "Gio, a risk in the 4th"
Well said.Gio is worthless unless Hugh all of a sudden realizes he shouldn't be used to run into brick walls up the middle. Gruden found ways to utilize Gio; I am unimpressed by Hugh. EDIT: I'm assuming he won't get 20+ touches in his current usage as long as Hill is there., going forward.
This is unbelievable. Only hope for Gio now is a bad Hill injury@GeoffHobsonCin: Gio says Hill getting start and he'll do what's best for team.
Gio's value ------------>
I thought Hue was going to take Gio and take him to higher levels. So much for that. The guy is a obviously a moron. I've never seen a player get his ### jacked up so many times in one season. Gio could very well find himself the next DeAngelo Williams. A great talent, totally misused.Well said.Gio is worthless unless Hugh all of a sudden realizes he shouldn't be used to run into brick walls up the middle. Gruden found ways to utilize Gio; I am unimpressed by Hugh. EDIT: I'm assuming he won't get 20+ touches in his current usage as long as Hill is there., going forward.
Haven't like the way Hue has used him at all this year. I wonder if there's any chance the Bengals explore dealing him this year. Gio to me seems like a guy that would be best utilized in a more up-tempo offence, with a creative OC getting him the ball in space as opposed to the bolded. The kid is still very talented, very young and I think he'll have a very good career, but this year has been a disappointment without question.
Just went from a starter week 1 on the LOD to the #4 RB, passed up by Lamar Miller and the Crow, sitting on the end of the bench. Good job Hue, you suck the big one.@GeoffHobsonCin: Gio says Hill getting start and he'll do what's best for team.
Gio's value ------------>
I thought the same before the season started and traded Gio for that very reason.We should have seen the writing on the wall the minute Hill got drafted. I simply thought Gio was better.
That's why only 1 RB leagues for me.Nothing beats going into a semi-finals game with only 1 starting RB.