biggest win since the steelers game?Gr00vus said:Biggest win for the Chargers in how many years?
They got some gifts in the Steelers game, this one they earned.biggest win since the steelers game?
Have to say, no Melvin, No Keenan, no excuses.....heck of a good win....sucks that if KC runs the table chargers lose tie breaker cuz of that boneheaded end to the Denver game.
I thought the Rivers December mystique was going to take a big hit last night. Instead he just added to it. He's got to eliminate the INTs though. He'd been doing great with that the first part of the season, but it's starting to creep back in again.Rivers is playing his best-ball ever. He's scary for anyone to face in the playoffs.
The interceptions and how he came back impressed me the most of anything from last night's game.He's got to eliminate the INTs
Week 6 was the highlight of Forrest Lamp's career. Anyone know how many snaps he was in for?Was thinking about missing key players and decided to look at it week by week:
- TE Henry, RG Lamp, DE Bosa, DT Liuget, CB Verrett
- TE Henry, RG Lamp, RT Barksdale, DE Bosa, DT Liuget, CB Verrett
- TE Henry, RG Lamp, RT Barksdale, DE Bosa, DT Liuget, CB Verrett
- TE Henry, RG Lamp, RT Barksdale, DE Bosa, DT Liuget, WLB White, CB Verrett
- TE Henry, LT Okung, RG Lamp, RT Barksdale, DE Bosa, WLB White, CB Verrett
- TE Henry, RT Barksdale, DE Bosa, WLB White, CB Verrett
- RB Gordon, RG Lamp, TE Henry, DE Bosa, WLB White, CB Verrett
- TE Henry, RG Lamp, DE Bosa, DT Liuget, WLB White, CB Verrett, CB Williams
- TE Henry, RG Lamp, DE Bosa, DT Liuget, WLB White, CB Verrett, CB Williams
- TE Henry, RG Lamp, DT Liuget, MLB Perryman, WLB White, CB Verrett, CB Williams
- TE Henry, RG Lamp, DT Liuget, NT Mebane, MLB Perryman, WLB White, CB Verrett, CB Williams
- RB Gordon, TE Henry, RG Lamp, RT Barksdale, DT Liuget, NT Mebane, MLB Perryman, WLB White, CB Verrett, CB Williams
- RB Gordon, TE Henry, RG Lamp, RT Barksdale, DT Liuget, NT Mebane, MLB Perryman, WLB White, CB Verrett
- RB Gordon, RB Ekeler, TE Henry, RG Lamp, RT Barksdale, DT Liuget, NT Mebane, MLB Perryman, WLB White, CB Verrett, CB Williams
Yes. The post is about key players. He was the starting RT entering the season, so I think he qualifies.Wasn't Barksdale released a couple of weeks ago?
No clue, seems like it won't be high scoring, but . Chargers better take care of the ball if they want to win this one.Impressive wins in tough games @ PIT and @ KC so far this month. Thought they'd beat the Bengals worse but they seemed to throttle it down after a fast start in that game. Tough matchup this week vs BAL. Sounds like they will get Gordon back and possibly Ekeler and Allen as well. How do folks see this one playing out?
The reemergence of sloppy Rivers in the first quarter against KC is concerning. They have to keep him upright to avoid the turnovers. I like Benjamin as the mvp he next several weeks on quick dump offs.No clue, seems like it won't be high scoring, but . Chargers better take care of the ball if they want to win this one.
It absolutely matters. Even if the Chargers don't have a true home field advantage in terms of fan support, they wouldn't have to travel cross country to play in opposing stadiums that do offer that advantage to their teams, and potentially in difficult weather conditions (PIT, NE, KC, BAL). There is no question it matters. It matters a lot.could possibly be the #1 seed (not that it matters they have zero home field advantage)
I agree, I have been a big Telesco critic, but he clearly deserves credit for how the team has played over the past two seasons. I think Lynn deserves a lot of credit, too. I still have some issues with both of them, but it's hard to argue with 20-6 over their past 26 games.Have to give credit to the GM
It's kind of gravy at this point now that they have made the playoffs again, but I'm preparing to have my heart broken anyway. Probably by the Patriots somehow...Maybe just maybe this is the year......
Chargers looked really good for about four or five plays at the start of the 3rd quarter.I've gotta say, now that we're all feeling optimistic, I'm a little concerned about facing Baltimore.
Wouldn't that be 3-4 and 8-0? London counted as a home game, didn't it?It is also true that the Chargers are currently 4-4 in LA this season and 7-0 outside of LA.
I said LA, I didn't say StubHub Center. They played the Rams as one of their "road" games, so they have now played 8 games in LA this season.Wouldn't that be 3-4 and 8-0? London counted as a home game, didn't it?It is also true that the Chargers are currently 4-4 in LA this season and 7-0 outside of LA.
First they will have some fun in Denver.Chargers being the Chargers....had a real chance to put some heat on KC going into SEA.....have fun in BALT....
Swearinger claimed by arizI really wish the Chargers would sign Swearinger. I don't know how long it would take him to adjust to the Chargers' defense, but he is much better than Addae, not even close. PFF currently ranks him as the 3rd best FS in the league this season, among those who played at least 250 snaps.
I think the chargers handle baltimore just fine in playoffs...do better away from "home"Chargers being the Chargers....had a real chance to put some heat on KC going into SEA.....have fun in BALT....
Gordon did not look right at all.Was it just me or did Gordon not look quite right in that game? Is Ekeler coming back any time soon?
They really stunk it up all around vs. Baltimore. Baltimore is a good team, especially that defense, but the Chargers put in a miserable showing. Not what you want to see at this point in the season.
Agree Gordon looked off. Not sure if that was because he was less than 100%, rusty after 4 weeks off, lousy playcalling, or the BAL defense... probably a combination of all of those things.Was it just me or did Gordon not look quite right in that game? Is Ekeler coming back any time soon?
They really stunk it up all around vs. Baltimore. Baltimore is a good team, especially that defense, but the Chargers put in a miserable showing. Not what you want to see at this point in the season.
They've got to clean up the offensive line play. They let up way too much pressure on Rivers.Agree Gordon looked off. Not sure if that was because he was less than 100%, rusty after 4 weeks off, lousy playcalling, or the BAL defense... probably a combination of all of those things.
Ekeler is expected back this week.
I really think that was the Chargers' worst game against Baltimore's best game, and the Chargers were in position to win the game late until Gates fumbled on a great play made by the defender. If the Chargers end up playing at BAL in the playoffs, I think they have a great chance to win the game... Ekeler will play, which helps the offense... they have film on the BAL pass rush and coverages, which (we can only hope) will help Rivers and offensive playcalling... and the defense really just needs to repeat its performance, despite the fact that they allowed a 68 yard TD pass and a 43 yard run, and they will also have film to help them tighten up.
Agreed, per PFF he was pressured on ~62% of his dropbacks in the game. But even more important is where it comes from. Rivers' lack of mobility means it is worse if it comes up the middle, and it seemed like that is where BAL got most of its pressure. They have to do something to address that.They've got to clean up the offensive line play. They let up way too much pressure on Rivers.
Yep, the pocket was collapsing immediately after snap right up the middle way too many times.Just Win Baby said:Agreed, per PFF he was pressured on ~62% of his dropbacks in the game. But even more important is where it comes from. Rivers' lack of mobility means it is worse if it comes up the middle, and it seemed like that is where BAL got most of its pressure. They have to do something to address that.
just playing devils advocate but would it make you feel better if they had the same record or even a worse one..?....either way I guess you could just say "win more games".....LAC had their opportunities including week one at home against the Chiefs....a head to head against the team they are getting ready to play....and a home loss to the hapless Broncos because Rivers didn't take the sack....win any of those and they aren't even playing this weekend, and you don't have to worry about it....so I doubt anybody really feels sorry for them....but yeah, TV and star power dictates a lot of that....with that said, I will say it is kind of surprising to see the Chiefs not get any prime time love next week either as they play the early Saturday game...Only one West Coast team has to travel to an East Coast time zone this weekend, and they schedule that as the early game. I realize that television plays a big part in what game gets played when, but that seems like a uniquely unfair advantage for a team with two more wins on the season than the team they are facing.
I could be wrong but for the playoffs the AFC teams are always the early games.Only one West Coast team has to travel to an East Coast time zone this weekend, and they schedule that as the early game. I realize that television plays a big part in what game gets played when, but that seems like a uniquely unfair advantage for a team with two more wins on the season than the team they are facing.
Yes, it would. I agree that if a handful of things fall differently that they are the #1 seed instead of the #5 seed, but arbitrarily determined divisions seems like a poor reason to force the team that tied for the best record in the conference on the road. Statistically, we know that sending a Pacific time zone team to play an early match in the Eastern time zone creates a larger disparity in likelihood of victory than virtually any other condition, so why impose it on a team when there's no need to, especially a team that's only on the road due to an arbitrary condition imposed on it by the league?just playing devils advocate but would it make you feel better if they had the same record or even a worse one..?....either way I guess you could just say "win more games".....LAC had their opportunities including week one at home against the Chiefs....a head to head against the team they are getting ready to play....and a home loss to the hapless Broncos because Rivers didn't take the sack....win any of those and they aren't even playing this weekend, and you don't have to worry about it....so I doubt anybody really feels sorry for them....but yeah, TV and star power dictates a lot of that....with that said, I will say it is kind of surprising to see the Chiefs not get any prime time love next week either as they play the early Saturday game...
I guess my thing too is that even tho maybe the "stats back it up"...I pretty much give zero credit to any type of travel/time zone/game time thing....they seem to be automatic built in excuses that people throw out there and that teams can fall back on....even before the game is even played...plenty of teams travel across country and play games in different time zones and at different times of the day and they win...these guys/ teams are professionals and this is what they do for a living, they should have stuff like this figured out by now...it's part of the business...all of the teams know how it works ahead of time (the division winners get a home game, etc)....its not a surprise....if the NFL starts trying to "be nice" to everybody and take things like this into consideration every time...which they would have to do if they even admitted to doing it one time .scheduling would be a nightmare....suck it up sally would be my response, put on your big boy pants and go win the game.....or win more games earlier and take care of it yourself...Despyzer said:Yes, it would. I agree that if a handful of things fall differently that they are the #1 seed instead of the #5 seed, but arbitrarily determined divisions seems like a poor reason to force the team that tied for the best record in the conference on the road. Statistically, we know that sending a Pacific time zone team to play an early match in the Eastern time zone creates a larger disparity in likelihood of victory than virtually any other condition, so why impose it on a team when there's no need to, especially a team that's only on the road due to an arbitrary condition imposed on it by the league?
As far as nobody else feeling sorry for them, I didn't even really consider it until I heard a sports podcast from Washington DC talking about how unfair it was to do something like this to a good team in the playoffs.
The early game for the Chiefs next week won't have nearly the impact as they aren't crossing any time zones.
my comment about the Chiefs wasn't really about the time zone thing....more the "entertainment" prime time factor....I would have thought with the Chiefs being a part of some of the more exciting game of the year type games this year, having a #1 seed, and some exciting young NFL talent, I would have thought a prime time game was a no brainer.....but I guess as the #1 seed they get to play a team with one less day of rest, so its all good for them....Despyzer said:Yes, it would. I agree that if a handful of things fall differently that they are the #1 seed instead of the #5 seed, but arbitrarily determined divisions seems like a poor reason to force the team that tied for the best record in the conference on the road. Statistically, we know that sending a Pacific time zone team to play an early match in the Eastern time zone creates a larger disparity in likelihood of victory than virtually any other condition, so why impose it on a team when there's no need to, especially a team that's only on the road due to an arbitrary condition imposed on it by the league?
As far as nobody else feeling sorry for them, I didn't even really consider it until I heard a sports podcast from Washington DC talking about how unfair it was to do something like this to a good team in the playoffs.
The early game for the Chiefs next week won't have nearly the impact as they aren't crossing any time zones.
And I'm sure they will. These are just my thoughts, not those of the players, coaches, management, or ownership.I guess my thing too is that even tho maybe the "stats back it up"...I pretty much give zero credit to any type of travel/time zone/game time thing....they seem to be automatic built in excuses that people throw out there and that teams can fall back on....even before the game is even played...plenty of teams travel across country and play games in different time zones and at different times of the day and they win...these guys/ teams are professionals and this is what they do for a living, they should have stuff like this figured out by now...it's part of the business...all of the teams know how it works ahead of time (the division winners get a home game, etc)....its not a surprise....if the NFL starts trying to "be nice" to everybody and take things like this into consideration every time...which they would have to do if they even admitted to doing it one time .scheduling would be a nightmare....suck it up sally would be my response, put on your big boy pants and go win the game.....or win more games earlier and take care of it yourself...
Why? This is a Chargers thread, we don't need anti-Chargers devils advocates in here.Stinkin Ref said:just playing devils advocate
In fairness, here is the playoff schedule:Despyzer said:Only one West Coast team has to travel to an East Coast time zone this weekend, and they schedule that as the early game. I realize that television plays a big part in what game gets played when, but that seems like a uniquely unfair advantage for a team with two more wins on the season than the team they are facing.
That would be fine and dandy but I hate the Broncos more than other team....diehard KC transplanted to CO.....lolWhy? This is a Chargers thread, we don't need anti-Chargers devils advocates in here.
Take it to the Broncos thread, oh wait, there isn't really any active Broncos thread going, is there? Well, maybe if you want to talk about who you can get to take over as head coach... and QB?
:updatesnotebook:That would be fine and dandy but I hate the Broncos more than other team....diehard KC transplanted to CO.....lol