Franknbeans
Footballguy
no one. I briefly picked him up and then sent him packing. I just couldn't do it. Thanks for letting me share.
What’s changed is the dude on the line they got from Houston in the trade last week, and that this is the first game all season without Lacy and Carson to split carries. Game flow looks to me like Seahawks jump to an early lead and run out the clock with Rawls. Plus he’s likely to get any/all goalline work. I like his chances better this week than at any time all season. It’s now or never.Thinking of picking up and starting over Crowell and Cohen... but not sure I can bring myself to do it. he's always run like garbage behind this OL. What's going to change against a fairly good AZ run defense?
Against AZ Rawls averages for his career (2 games) a blistering 10 carries for 13.5 yards
Good points. Not sure if 1 OL is going to make a huge difference (it certainly helps). AZ has the 11th best rushing defense. Just screams another 10/35 effort from Rawls with McKissic getting like 8 receptions... Goal line is an obvious plus. I can see how it's attractive. Certainly more than Cohen this week for me who is a backup used less and less over the last few weeks. Or even Crowell who has had 1 good game so far. Not sure where I stand here TBH. Right now I like Crowell more.What’s changed is the dude on the line they got from Houston in the trade last week, and that this is the first game all season without Lacy and Carson to split carries. Game flow looks to me like Seahawks jump to an early lead and run out the clock with Rawls. Plus he’s likely to get any/all goalline work. I like his chances better this week than at any time all season. It’s now or never.
Don't forget who is the starting QB for Arizona. Should keep the score close or a lead for SEA. That should be a positive game script for Rawls.Good points. Not sure if 1 OL is going to make a huge difference (it certainly helps). AZ has the 11th best rushing defense. Just screams another 10/35 effort from Rawls with McKissic getting like 8 receptions... Goal line is an obvious plus. I can see how it's attractive. Certainly more than Cohen this week for me who is a backup used less and less over the last few weeks. Or even Crowell who has had 1 good game so far. Not sure where I stand here TBH. Right now I like Crowell more.
One OL jumped them from 31st to 11th in offensive line according to PFF.Good points. Not sure if 1 OL is going to make a huge difference (it certainly helps). AZ has the 11th best rushing defense. Just screams another 10/35 effort from Rawls with McKissic getting like 8 receptions... Goal line is an obvious plus. I can see how it's attractive. Certainly more than Cohen this week for me who is a backup used less and less over the last few weeks. Or even Crowell who has had 1 good game so far. Not sure where I stand here TBH. Right now I like Crowell more.
If in doubt, don't choose a Thursday night player. That is my rule. They always seem to burn me.Debating putting him in at flex instead of Chris Thompson in PPR. Talk me off that ledge.
Thinking about picking him up to do this same thing.Over Abdullah and Dion Lewis.
Scratch that, I have Baldwin and Graham going tonight...not going 3 deepThinking about picking him up to do this same thing.
Arizona is going to win this gameDon't forget who is the starting QB for Arizona. Should keep the score close or a lead for SEA. That should be a positive game script for Rawls.
Yeah this is where I'm at. Sure, their OL has a much better player on it. Sure he has no one but mckissic to complete with for touches. Sure AZ looks horrid.There hasn't been one decent game for a sea rb yet this season. Not one.
It won't start tonight on a Thursday vs a good arz def
Prob the right playYeah this is where I'm at. Sure, their OL has a much better player on it. Sure he has no one but mckissic to complete with for touches. Sure AZ looks horrid.
But at the end of the day, this is still a Seattle RB.
Not biting on this one. If I get burned, fine, but I feel better about Crowell and Abdullah ( :X I know, I have Ajayi and Collins on bye) than I do about putting in Rawls
carson still leading the team with regards to fantasy points.There hasn't been one decent game for a sea rb yet this season. Not one.
It won't start tonight on a Thursday vs a good arz def
I'm in a similar boat. Hilton was added to the injnury report due to a groin injury, and Dez is still in the air. I need one to play this week... if neither do I'm kind of screwed and then maybe I'd wish I had played Rawls. I just can't trust a Seattle RB when the trend has been terrible...In a bit of a quandary actually here. With bye's piling up plus injuries, my only options are Martin, Forte, Dez and this guy and I need to pick two. Forte and/or Dez may not even play this week. Hate being forced to start a dude I don't feel like I can trust yet.
History favors the bold.I'm in a similar boat. Hilton was added to the injnury report due to a groin injury, and Dez is still in the air. I need one to play this week... if neither do I'm kind of screwed and then maybe I'd wish I had played Rawls. I just can't trust a Seattle RB when the trend has been terrible...
If you start Rawls and he sucks, you're kicking yourself wondering what the heck, of course, all SEA RBS have been terrible
If you bench Rawls and he goes off I think you can live with that decision a bit more, as history would support it
Have to agree, i'm likely keeping him benched. If he does play well, there's hope for the remainder and some decent matchups to come. If he sucks, at least he didn't pollute your lineup.I'm in a similar boat. Hilton was added to the injnury report due to a groin injury, and Dez is still in the air. I need one to play this week... if neither do I'm kind of screwed and then maybe I'd wish I had played Rawls. I just can't trust a Seattle RB when the trend has been terrible...
If you start Rawls and he sucks, you're kicking yourself wondering what the heck, of course, all SEA RBS have been terrible
If you bench Rawls and he goes off I think you can live with that decision a bit more, as history would support it