They probably would have brought Choice in. Seriously. They refuse to use Felix near the goal line.And Felix prob gets those carries from the 10 if Roy doesn't fumble.
we've been hearing this for several years now . . .Patience. I believe Felix is going to be an absolute monster in 2011. He should be just about at the top of your trade targets this offseason if you need a RB. He's not a stud yet & his price will reflect that. If you find an owner willing to sell, I'd jump on it if it was at all reasonable.
Yeah why decide to look at Dez at any point in the game...so annoying..And Felix prob gets those carries from the 10 if Roy doesn't fumble.
Henderson did have 2 incredible catches in the first half.And there he is. I'll never understand why they don't feature Meachem more. He's leaps and bounds above the player that Henderson is.
Yeah, they are good at finding ways to lose..Predicing now that Buehler misses the game tying field goal... Just the way things go for Cowboys
LOLHurry Up the Simpsons movie is next.
By my count he had 5 targets, one of which was close enough for him to get a hand on. Well done, Sh(K)itna.Poor Dez. Targeted three plays in a row, none close enough to even get a hand on.
he should have gone for it - this is AFTER he passed up a chance to kick a 53 yarder earlier . . .gj Garrett . . .59 is a long way to be fair.
He had plenty of distance though. Just pushed it.59 is a long way to be fair.
post of the day . . .Roy Williams should be cut before he gets to the locker room.
Correct answer here.... that 53-yd non-attempt looms very big now, and a horrible decision at the time.he should have gone for it - this is AFTER he passed up a chance to kick a 53 yarder earlier . . .gj Garrett . . .59 is a long way to be fair.
They gave him a pink slip but he dropped it.Roy Williams should be cut before he gets to the locker room.
Didnt that 53 lead to a quick int to a quick td?Correct answer here.... that 53-yd non-attempt looms very big now, and a horrible decision at the time.he should have gone for it - this is AFTER he passed up a chance to kick a 53 yarder earlier . . .gj Garrett . . .59 is a long way to be fair.
what does the result have to do with the decision, they didn't get the INT and the TD BECAUSE they punted it - if that was the case punters would make 30 mil a year . . .the point was that he didnt have faith in his kicker from 53, so why kick it from six yards further????makes no sense . . .Didnt that 53 lead to a quick int to a quick td?Correct answer here.... that 53-yd non-attempt looms very big now, and a horrible decision at the time.he should have gone for it - this is AFTER he passed up a chance to kick a 53 yarder earlier . . .gj Garrett . . .59 is a long way to be fair.
You are right. They kick the FG, after the ensuing kick off the plays unfold EXACTLY the same...That makes more sensewhat does the result have to do with the decision, they didn't get the INT and the TD BECAUSE they punted it - if that was the case punters would make 30 mil a year . . .the point was that he didnt have faith in his kicker from 53, so why kick it from six yards further????makes no sense . . .Didnt that 53 lead to a quick int to a quick td?Correct answer here.... that 53-yd non-attempt looms very big now, and a horrible decision at the time.he should have gone for it - this is AFTER he passed up a chance to kick a 53 yarder earlier . . .gj Garrett . . .59 is a long way to be fair.
So are you saying they should go for it on 4th in 10 with 30 seconds left in the game instead of trying to tie the game?what does the result have to do with the decision, they didn't get the INT and the TD BECAUSE they punted it - if that was the case punters would make 30 mil a year . . .
the point was that he didnt have faith in his kicker from 53, so why kick it from six yards further????
makes no sense . . .