What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

[DYNASTY] Top 22 Rookies for 2013 NFL Draft (1 Viewer)

tdmills

Footballguy
The seasoned dynasty owner pays close attention to the NFL Scouting Combine in Indianapolis. Correct player sizes, drills, and the all-important testing numbers. However, those 40 yard dash times tend to skew our thoughts and forget how players perform on the field. I decided to release my top 22 players before the combine to give you a baseline to form your own conclusions.

My rankings are based on standard PPR leagues and are for FF production because upside is very important.

Tier One



1) Keenan Allen WR Cal

6-3 210

2010: 46 receptions, 490 yards, 10.7 5 TD

2011: 98 receptions, 1343 yards, 13.7 6 TD

2012: 61 receptions, 737 yards, 12.1 6 TD

-Also has one passing, two rushing, and one return TD at Cal.

Comparison: Larry Fitzgerald

Notes:

-Turned down a scholarship at Alabama to play FS to play WR at Cal with his half-brother QB Zach Maynard.

-Foot surgery in spring of 2012, MCL tear which ended his 2012 campaign.

Analysis:

- Very athletic for a guy his size. He can spin, juke, jump over defenders and makes plays in the open field. Good burst and speed. Don't think of him as a burner, but we're not talking about Alshon Jeffery here. Probably a 4.45 type of player on the field. Good route runner that uses his frame to box out defenders and is knowledgeable enough to settle into zones. Good hands, but body catches more than I would like. High points the football and comes up with some very clutch receptions when Cal needed him most.

FF wise:

-Keenan Allen is going to be a #1 WR in the NFL. He has the size to get those red zone TDs, the agility to break a big play, and the consistency to get receptions/yards week in and week out. He will be the 1.1 in most rookie drafts.



2) Eddie Lacy RB Alabama

5-10 220

2010: 56 carries 406 yards 7.3 6 TD, 2 receptions, 18 yards, 9.0 0 TD

2011: 95 carries 674 yards 7.1 7 TD, 11 receptions, 131 yards, 11.9 0 TD

2012: 184 carries 1182 yards 6.4 16 TD, 20 receptions, 172 yards, 8.6 1 TD

Comparison: Poor Man’s Frank Gore

Notes:

-Bothered by turf toe injury for 2 years.

Analysis:

- Big RB, 5-10 220(I’d guess he goes 230), with a bowling ball type of frame (think of a taller MJD or Doug Martin type of frame), lots of muscle on the bottom half. He bounces off defenders due to his frame. Strong runner that finishes off his runs very well and carries defenders for more yardage. Great feet for his size, which allows him to make good cuts to find a hole. Doesn’t possess great agility, but a very effective spin move and a solid jump cut. Tough to bring down in the open field, due to more decisiveness than making defenders miss. Very good vision and hits the hole hard, breaks through arm tackles with ease. Tough player, he has taken some shots but returns to action. While being a power runner, he’s an effective edge runner as well. Good hands, needs to have better technique in pass protection, although he has the size and willingness to be very effective in this area. Has had a few fumbles, mostly due to effort at the end of runs.

FF wise:

-Lacy has everything needed to be an every down RB at the next level and be an effective FF player. Situation and usage will be very telling. He won’t be a RB1(top 12) without a ton of touches, just doesn’t have the ability. But he has every bit the opportunity to be a RB2.

3) Cordarrelle Patterson WR Tennessee

6-3 205

2010(Hutchinson CC): 52 receptions, 908 yards, 17.5 9 TDs

-Patterson also added over 600 return yards with 3 TDs.

2011(Hutchinson CC): 61 receptions, 924 yards, 15.1 15 TDs

-Patterson also added almost 500 return yards with 3 TDs and almost 400 rushing yards with 6 TDs.

2012: 46 receptions, 778 yards, 16.9 5 TDs

-Patterson also added almost 800 return yards and 300 rushing yards in 2012.

Comparison: Taller Percy Harvin

Notes: Didn’t play football as a freshman or sophomore in high school. After a good final two seasons in high school, Patterson didn’t qualify academically and was forced to go to a Junior College. Transferring from a JUCO makes Patterson an unknown even though he had a good 2012 season in Tennessee.

Analysis:

I initially didn’t like Patterson, but I couldn’t ignore his potential. What makes Patterson special? He’s the most elusive 6’3 or taller player I’ve ever seen. It’s hard to believe how many defenders he made miss in the SEC this past season at his size. Patterson is athletic: 39 inch vertical and 10.33 100 meter dash. Very explosive and gets to top speed quickly. Not a true burner, probably a 4.45 type player, but it’s deceptive. High points the football very well and is a threat to score on every play. Playmaker is an understatement. He’s also a strong player that can overmatch DBs. Doesn’t explode out of his breaks very well and body catches way too much. The only time he extends his hands out to catch the football is when it’s outside of his framework. Needs to work on selling his routes more, at times he tips off his breaks which doesn’t help with separation. Patterson is raw and has many things to work on.

FF wise:

Patterson has the highest ceiling of any WR in this class and therefore is someone to obtain in your FF drafts. He also may not develop and be a player that constantly shows flashes, which can be frustrating. If you’re a gambler, Patterson is your guy.

Tier 2

4) DeAndre Hopkins WR Clemson

6-1 200

2010: 51 receptions, 626 yards, 12.3 4 TDs

2011: 72 receptions, 978 yards, 13.6 5 TDs

2012: 82 receptions, 1405 yards, 17.1 18 TDs

Comparison: Larry Fitzgerald/Reggie Wayne(later in his career)

Notes:

Analysis:

The best route runner in the class hands down. Hopkins runs great routes by setting up defenders, changes speeds, explodes in/out of breaks, uses hands well, and consistently keeps routes within his frame. Hopkins does a good job of settling down in zones and doesn’t fade into coverage. Makes himself a big target by squaring his body and coming back to the QB. Attacks the football in the air and is very good at high pointing the football. Hopkins has great body control which helps in his route running and catching the football in traffic. Great hands catcher, didn’t see one standing body catch, and is great at snagging the ball out of the air(my ball mentality). Great sideline awareness, he gets his feet down and makes some wow plays. Not a burner, but doesn’t waste his speed due to his route running. Good acceleration and gets vertical quickly after the catch. Can make defenders miss, but it isn’t his forte. Should’ve made more plays this season, had a few drops. Sometimes he doesn’t win the battle with physical DBs.

FF wise:

Hopkins isn’t a flashy player, so he may drop in rookie drafts. But don’t be mistaken, you want him on your team. He could turn out to be that boring player that gets 1,000 yards every season and people keep waiting for another WR to replace him. Highest floor of any WR in this class because he’s consistent in everything that he does.

5) Giovani Bernard RB North Carolina

5-10 205

2010: Redshirted after tearing the ACL in his right knee

2011: 239 carries 1253 yards 5.2 13 TD, 45 receptions, 362 yards, 8.0 1 TD

2012: 184 carries 1228 yards 6.7 12 TD, 47 receptions, 490 yards, 10.4 5 TD

-Also has two return TDs, one was very clutch that won a game.

Comparison: Poor Man’s Brian Westbrook

Notes:

-Older brother, Yvenson Bernard, played RB at Oregon State in the mid 2000's.

-Torn ACL in 2010, missed 3 games due to a knee injury in 2012.

Analysis:

- Compact frame at 5-10 205, but isn't the burner that is normally associated with his size. Probably a 4.5 player and also doesn't possess great burst. He excels by using good vision, agility, and toughness. Not afraid to lower his shoulder or run between the tackles. Wastes very little movement, the anti Kevin Smith, which helps his efficiency. Good hands and patience getting into his routes. Dangerous in the open field due to build/agility.

FF wise:

-Bernard will be solid in PPR leagues, he caught a ton of passes in college(not normal). He's not an elite athlete, but he can be productive at the next level. Situation and health will be very telling. Only going to command attention due to a poor RB class, keep this in mind when drafting.



6) Tavon Austin WR West Virginia

5-9 174

2009: 15 receptions, 151 yards, 10.1 1 TD

2010: 58 receptions, 787 yards, 13.6 8 TD

2011: 101 receptions, 1186 yards, 11.7 8 TD

2012: 114 receptions, 1289 yards, 11.3 12 TD

-Over 1,000 career rushing yards and over 2,500 return yards.

Comparison: More explosive Randall Cobb with less strength. Think Jahvid Best like excitement with the football in his hands.

Notes:

Analysis:

Playmaker is his middle name because everything at West Virginia turned into big plays, including a successful stint at RB. Electric with the ball in his hands, he has a huge arsenal of ways to make defenders miss. One on one in the open field is a nightmare for any defender; I’m including All-Pro players too. Austin is going to be limited at the next level, due to his size. Can he withstand the punishment in the NFL? Austin does use his size to his advantage by getting skinny when he needs to get by defenders. More quick than fast and yet is still a 4.3 player. Good hands and can come down with passes in traffic. Needs to develop more as a route runner, but is good at creating separation due to his acceleration out of breaks. Would like to see him use his hands more against defenders because the physicality may be too much for him to be effective in the NFL.

FF wise:

Austin will go in the first half of rookie drafts because he could be a FF point machine. Situation and usage will be key to how valuable he will become in FF. Could be anywhere from WR1 to WR4, but I don’t see any way Austin flops outside of injury.

7) Tyler Eifert TE Notre Dame

6-6 251

2010: 27 receptions, 352 yards, 13.0 2 TDs

2011: 63 receptions, 803 yards, 12.7 5 TDs

2012: 50 receptions, 685 yards, 13.7 4 TDs

Comparison: Jason Witten

Notes:

Analysis:

Eifert possesses a huge frame that he utilizes well in catching the football. He is quick for his size and is a matchup nightmare for LBs. Eifert does a good job of boxing out defenders and high pointing the football in traffic. Shows a willingness to go across the middle and take a hit as well. Not a good blocker yet, although he has the size.

FF wise: Eifert could emerge as a mid TE1 in FF. He has the athleticism, size, hands, and toughness to get it done.

8) Cobi Hamilton WR Arkansas

6-3 209

2009: 19 receptions, 347 yards,18.3 3 TDs

2010: 32 receptions, 630 yards, 19.7 6 TDs

2011: 34 receptions, 542 yards, 15.9 4 TDs

2012: 73 receptions, 1149 yards,14.8 4 TDs

Comparison: Poor Man’s Julio Jones

Notes:

Analysis:

Great body structure for a WR to do anything at the next level at 6-3, 209 lbs with good strength. Hamilton is a good athlete, explosive vertically. He rarely dances, decisive runner, which helps him create big plays. Has the size and leaping ability to make plays on the ball. Could run the forty in the high 4.3s. Good body control allows Hamilton to adjust to the ball in the air. Solid hands, but will drop some passes. Good route runner and gets solid releases off the line. Cobi Hamilton has been a solid WR in the SEC, but he's taken his game to the next level this season. It's tough for him to excel because the Arkansas offense was struggling, however he performed well.

FF wise: If Hamilton tests well at the combine, I expect him to be a late riser going into the NFL draft. I could see Cobi Hamilton as a WR2 at best in FF. Very underrated at this point in the evaluation process

9) Marquess Wilson WR Washington State

6-4 183

2010: 55 receptions, 1006 yards, 18.3 6 TD

2011: 82 receptions, 1388 yards, 16.9 12 TD

2012: 52 receptions, 813 yards, 15.6 5 TD

Comparison: Chad “Ochocinco” Johnson

Notes:

-Quit the team with 3 games left in 2012, due to problems with HC Mike Leach.

Analysis:

Long frame, but also skinny (6-4 183). Great natural hands catcher, but will drop some easy passes at times. Good ability to high point the football and battle a DB, has a "my ball" mentality. 4.4ish type speed and has burst with the football in his hands. Great sideline awareness to keep his feet in bounds and make lot of plays in tight areas. Will make spectacular receptions very few players can make, reminds me of Brandon Lloyd in that fashion. Good route runner that can set up defenders. Great technique to get off the LOS, uses his hands and pad level well. Wilson needs to add muscle to his long frame if he wants to take his game to the next level. He's more of a technician than physical specimen, but he’s a good athlete. Has a good natural instinct for the WR position.

FF wise:

- Very little to dislike about his game, just unsure of how his off the field decisions will affect his draft status. Wilson can be a WR2 in the NFL and in FF if he improves his attitude.

10) Da’Rick Rodgers WR Tennessee Tech

6-3 205

2010: 11 receptions, 167 yards, 15.1 2 TDs

2011: 67 receptions, 1040 yards, 15.5 9 TDs

2012: 61 receptions, 893 yards, 14.6 10 TD

Comparison: Terrell Owens

Notes:

-Kicked off of University of Tennessee football team and transferred to Tennessee Tech.

Analysis:

Big strong WR that can overpower/bully defenders, uses his frame to box out defenders. Good athlete; Rogers is a high 4.4's to low 4.5's type of WR, but speed isn't his game (he isn't slow by any means, just not a blazer). Difficult to bring down in the open field due to his strength; he will run through and drag defenders for extra yardage. Good body control and is enough aware of the sideline to get his feet down. Good hands, but body catches too much. Led SEC in receiving as a true sophomore.

FF wise: Da’Rick Rodgers physically belongs in the NFL. If he gets his head on straight, he can be an NFL #1 WR and FF factor. How good? Depends on his attitude because he has a WR1/2 ceiling in FF.



11) Justin Hunter WR Tennessee

6-4 200

2010: 16 receptions, 415 yards, 25.9 7 TD

2011: 17 receptions, 314 yards, 18.5 2 TD

2012: 73 receptions, 1083 yards, 14.8 9 TD

Comparison: Julio Jones/Randy Moss at best, flop at worst.

Notes:

-Torn ACL in 2011.

Analysis:

Long frame, but lean (6-4 200); still needs to fill out. Great athlete (in the Julio Jones area of being a special athlete at WR); you can see the burst and explosiveness in his game and an ability to separate from defenders on routes and in the open field. Has a very impressive vertical, good spring in his legs. Very good body control which allows him to win jump balls. Elite 4.3ish speed, on the track team at Tennessee which shows his athletic ability. Average route runner and really needs to improve technique to be successful at the next level. Tries to make the big play too often in the open field, instead of taking what’s given to him. Didn’t elevate his game this season like many expected, he had four 100 yard games in 2012 vs Georgia State/Akron/Troy/Missouri, not impressive.

FF wise:

Justin Hunter has the physical tools to be special in the NFL and a top FF WR. He is ranked low because he hasn’t been same player since his injury and isn’t the technician needed to excel at the next level. Will it come in time or will he never reach his potential? If I had to guess, he’s just a tease.



12) Markus Wheaton WR Oregon State

6-0 182

2009: 8 receptions, 89 yards, 11.1 0 TDs

2010: 55 receptions, 675 yards, 12.3 4 TDs

2011: 73 receptions, 986 yards, 13.5 1 TDs

2012: 91 receptions, 1244 yards, 13.7 11 TDs

-Wheaton also has 5 career rushing TDs.

Comparison: Desean Jackson

Notes:

Analysis:

Very explosive player that uses his speed well. Wheaton runs by defenders with ease and gets to top level quickly due to great acceleration. He almost teases DB’s when running routes and just blows by them or breaks back to the ball when they’re bailing out because they fear his speed. Reminds me of how Desean Jackson messes with DB’s on the edge. Solid runner after the catch that is a threat to score on every touch. However, he lacks the strength to break tackles after the catch. Doesn’t explode out of his breaks and need to work on his route running. Let’s too many passes get into his body and doesn’t always attack the football. Looks like some DB’s can overpower him; this could be a large concern at the next level.

FF wise: Wheaton really came into his own during his senior season and now the NFL will take notice. I expect him to be a late riser going into the draft. The problem is not a ton of small, speedy WRs are FF factors. Could be a boom-bust player(Lee Evans, Mike Wallace, Torrey Smith, etc) from game to game at the next level. Late 1st to early 2nd round rookie pick.

Tier three



13) Le’Veon Bell RB Michigan State

6-2 244

2010: 107 carries, 605 yards, 5.7 YPC, 8 TD; 11 receptions, 97 yards, 8.8 0 TD

2011: 182 carries, 948 yards, 6.3 YPC, 13 TD; 35 receptions, 267 yards, 7.6 0 TD

2012: 382 carries, 1793 yards, 4.7 YPC, 12 TD; 32 receptions, 167 yards, 5.2 1TD

Comparison: Looks like LeGarrette Blount physically but possesses much better agility and hands.

Notes:

Analysis:

- Huge frame, 6-2 244, with a big bottom half. Bell runs very hard and defenders don’t have much of a chance with his powerful leg strength. Bell’s combination of size, speed, agility is freak-like. Finishes off runs well and has a good stiff arm, especially on the perimeter. Lacks top end speed, may be a 4.6 type of player. Great agility for a player his size: spin moves, jump cuts, even jumps over defenders(it will remind you of Blount). Patient runner, that uses his blockers well; very good vision and finds holes in the defense to exploit. Good hands and an asset in the passing game.

FF wise:

-Bell has a freakish skill-set, however will an NFL team force feed him the ball to be effective? The NFL has somewhat lost a place for the huge RB and they don’t give them a lot of touches. Yes BJGE/Ridley/Greene have roles, but Bell is bigger and has better agility. The last RB in the same area is Jerome Bettis, not many are utilized. Bell will be a GL RB and have a good role in a RBBC, but his touches will dictate his FF success.

14) Marcus Lattimore RB South Carolina

6-0 218

2010: 249 carries, 1197 yards, 4.8 avg. 17 TD; 29 receptions, 412 yards, 6.7 2 TD

2011: 163 carries, 818 yards, 5.0 avg. 10 TD; 19 receptions, 182 yards, 9.6 1 TD

2012: 143 carries, 662 yards, 4.6 avg. 11 TD; 26 receptions, 173 yards, 14.2 0 TD

Comparison: More powerful but less athletic Matt Forte

Notes:

-Tore ACL in 2011

-Tore other ACL + LCL + another ligament in one of the worst injuries seen in recent memory.

-Active in community service with his church and youth groups(show character).

Analysis:

-Great vision, although he may cut back a little too often. High effort player; doesn't go down easy and finishes off his runs. Knowledgeable player that gets the correct yardage on short yardage plays. Great agility for a player his size; breaks lots of tackles due to his agility, effort, and vision. Won't win many speed contests, 4.5-4.55 type of a back. Good hands and used often in the passing game. Uses his blockers well and is patient running the ball. He isn't the sexiest runner, but efficient.

FF wise:

-If you're looking for the next unbelievable athlete at RB, keep looking. However, if you want a hard-working player with great character then Lattimore is your guy. He does many things very well and makes defenders miss, although he simply doesn't possess great speed. Pre-first knee injury Lattimore projected to be a NFL 1st round pick. Pre-second knee injury he projected to be a late first-early second round pick. Now he looks to be a mid-round pick at best. How high should you take him? Depends on how well you believe in modern technology and if you like to gamble.

15) Stepfan Taylor RB Stanford

5-9 215

2009: 56 carries 303 yards 5.4 2 TD, 3 receptions 43 yards 14.3 0 TD

2010: 223 carries 1137 yards 5.1 15 TD, 28 receptions 266 yards 9.5 1 TD

2011: 242 carries 1330 yards 5.5 10 TD, 25 receptions 182 yards 7.3 2 TD

2012: 322 carries 1530 yards 4.8 13 TD, 41 receptions 287 yards 7.0 2 TD

Comparison: Poor Man’s Brian Westbrook

Notes:

Analysis:

Thickly build player with most of his weight in the lower body. Highly productive and consistent player throughout his career at Stanford. Tough inside runner, also fighting for extra yardage. Patient runner that uses his blockers well and good vision to find running lanes. Doesn’t possess good agility, although he has strung together some good moves to create some outstanding plays. Not overly quick and has limited speed. Solid hands, he can be counted on in the passing game.

FF wise:

Taylor has a limited ceiling due to his athleticism, probably RB15 in standard leagues, but he will be a consistent player in the NFL. If a team has an injury, he could fill in to be a solid starter. I don’t expect him to be a long term answer and is likely to be a backup.



16) Robert Woods WR USC

6-1 190

2010: 65 receptions, 792 yards, 12.2 6 TD

2011: 111 receptions, 1,292, yards, 11.6 15 TD

2012: 73 receptions, 813 yards, 11.1 11 TD

Comparison: Lance Moore

Notes:

-Got demoted to the #2 option when Marqise Lee emerged late in 2011.

Analysis:

Woods has a small frame, I wouldn't be surprised if he ends measuring under 6'0” at the NFL Combine. Great hands catcher, rarely drops passes. Very quick player, possesses elite quickness. Only average speed when compared to his quickness (perhaps a 4.48/40 type of a player). Not a great YAC player. Sometimes he makes defenders miss and sometimes he goes down very easily versus a college DB. Not a very physical player, can get manhandled. Ran many short routes and gimmick type plays at USC.

FF wise:

-Woods has some flaws to his game and he might be limited to slot duty in the NFL. However, some WRs have excelled at the next level in the slot. If he can gain strength he might be able to play outside. In a perfect scenario, WR2 in FF; more than likely a WR3 at best. I would probably look elsewhere in your rookie drafts.

17) Montee Ball RB Wisconsin

5-11 212

2009: 98 carries, 391 yards, 4.0 YPC, 4 TDs; 9 receptions 92 yards, 10.2 0 TD

2010: 163 carries, 996 yards, 6.1 YPC, 18 TDs; 16 receptions, 128 yards, 8.0 0 TD

2011: 307 carries, 1,923 yards, 6.3 YPC, 33 TD; 24 receptions, 306 yards, 12.8 6 TDs

2012: 332 carries, 1730 yards, 5.2 YPC, 21 TDs; 9 receptions, 65 yards, 7.2 0 TD

Comparison: Curtis Martin

Notes:

-Assaulted just prior to training camp this year and suffered a concussion as a result.

-Lost weight as career progressed at Wisconsin(lost babyfat).

Analysis:

- Not a great athlete, but gets the most out of his abilities. Has only one gear, but gets to that speed quickly. Very smooth runner, could classify him as a glider, 4.55 speed. Good agility, jump cuts very well; occasional spin move, but Ball doesn't lose as much speed as the average runner using agility (he can't afford to). Patient runner that uses his blockers very well. Physical runner that will finish his runs to get extra yardage, especially near the goalline or near a 1st down marker; beware of his stiff arm. Solid hands and route runner.

FF wise:

-Montee Ball has a solid overall game, although the main issue with Ball is that he isn't truly special at any one thing. To be a difference maker at the next level you need either an ideal situation or have great athletic ability at the next level and Ball is already an average athlete for an NFL RB. Wait until the second round to draft Ball in your rookie drafts.

18) Stedman Bailey WR West Virginia

5-10 188

2010: 24 receptions, 317 yards, 13.2 4 TDs

2011: 72 receptions, 1279 yards, 17.8 12 TDs

2012: 114 receptions, 1622 yards, 14.2 25 TDs

Comparison: Golden Tate/Steve Smith with less strength

Notes:

Analysis:

Bailey is a sudden athlete with an explosive first step, still a notch below his teammate Tavon Austin. This allows Bailey to set up defenders with his sneaky route running. He uses his burst well to gain separation and is a natural hands catcher. Good body control allows Bailey to come down with many contested passes despite his size, kind of like Steve Smith and Golden Tate. However, unlike those two WRs, Bailey lacks upper body strength; he needs to improve in this area. Solid after the catch, he will make defenders miss to make plays. More of a limited athlete in comparison to the rest of his WR class.

FF wise:

Bailey could be a productive FF WR if matched up with a good QB. If not, I wouldn’t bother because I worry about him succeeding despite not his measurable.

19) Terrance Williams WR Baylor

6-2 205

2009: 3 receptions, 61 yards, 20.3 0 TDs

2010: 43 receptions, 484 yards, 11.3 4 TDs

2011: 59 receptions, 957 yards, 16.2 11 TDs

2012: 97 receptions, 1832 yards, 18.9 12 TDs

Comparison: Roy Williams

Notes:

Analysis:

The thing that jumps off the screen with Williams is "average" - he doesn't seem like a special player at the next level. 4.5 speed and average athlete (he's at least a tier behind Cobi Hamilton/Da'Rick Rodgers athletically). Good size and uses his frame to his advantage, catching over/around/boxing out defenders. Doesn't make many defenders miss and goes down easy. Solid hands and comes up with some big plays, but also misses some as well. Terrance Williams lost fellow WR Kendall Wright and his QB RGIII to the NFL. He's since produced very well in their absence.

FF wise: I don’t see Williams being productive at the next level, only chance if he’s in a great situation with one of the best QB’s in the NFL and he develops more skills. Low ceiling player.

20) Eugene “Geno” Smith QB West Virginia

6-3 215

2009: 32 of 49 65.3%, 309 yards, 6.31 YPA, 1 TD 1 INT

2010: 241 of 372 64.8%, 2763 yards, 7.43 YPA, 24 TD 7 INT

2011: 346 of 526 65.8%, 4385 yards, 8.34 YPA, 31 TD 7 INT

2012: 369 of 518 71.2%, 4205 yards, 8.12 YPA, 42 TD 6 INT

Comparison: Aaron Rodgers

Notes:

Analysis:

Good athlete, but don't let his race fool you; most people associate African American QBs with being running QB. Geno Smith is not a runner (he only runs when he absolutely has to and he has enough athleticism to get it done). Solid frame at 6-3 214, but he's not a huge QB like Cam Newton and is smaller than Andrew Luck. Good arm strength, but he doesn't have a cannon. Good pocket presence, Smith had some issues with pressure(as do most QBs) but I feel it won’t hinder him in the NFL. Amazing at reading the defense and throwing WRs open; Smith can anticipate when WRs will get open and throws the ball early, hence his low INT numbers. Very good accuracy; his completion percentage is off the charts. Smith is a humble guy, but a perfectionist; he wasn't satisfied after his Baylor performance. Highly recruited - Smith was an Elite 11 attendee and his cousin is former "U" of Miami star Melvin Bratton. I’m a huge fan of quarterbacks that have lots of experience and continue to improve statistically throughout their college careers - Geno Smith has both of those boxes checked

FF wise: Smith has the highest floor from this QB class. At best, he could become a low end QB1 after a handful of seasons.

21) Zac Stacy RB Vanderbilt

5-11 195

2009: 107 carries 478 yards 4.5 3 TD, 7 receptions, 72 yards, 10.3 0 TD

2010: 66 carries 331 yards 5.0 3 TD, 9 receptions, 32 yards, 3.6 0 TD

2011: 201 carries 1193 yards 5.9 14 TD, 20 receptions, 106 yards, 5.3 0 TD

2012: 207 carries 1141 yards 5.5 10 TD, 10 receptions 205 yards 20.5 0 TD

-Also has two return TDs, one was very clutch that won a game.

Comparison: Smaller Mark Ingram

Notes:

Analysis:

One of my favorite RBs to evaluate because he’s a big time competitor that produces at a low end SEC school. Stacy lacks top end speed and isn’t a great athlete. However, he makes good decisions, shows good agility, and toughness as a RB.

FF wise:

Stacy is a limited athlete, so don’t expect big things. However, if I had guess one RB you could draft in the second round of rookie drafts that could produce big…it’s Zac Stacy.

22) Zach Ertz TE Stanford

6-6 252

2010: 16 receptions, 190 yards, 11.9 5 TDs

2011: 27 receptions, 346 yards, 12.8 4 TDs

2012: 69 receptions, 898 yards, 13.0 6 TDs

Comparison: Heath Miller/Owen Daniels

Notes:

Analysis:

Ertz is a tier behind Tyler Eifert in athletic ability. However, Ertz is a much better blocker. This will likely keep him on the field more and possibly more opportunities in the NFL. Ertz is still athletic enough to be a solid TE and has a large frame. He isn’t afraid to go across the middle and high point the football. Will work the seam and can even line up in the slot.

FF wise: Ertz could be a low end TE1 in FF, I just don’t see a high ceiling to be a top tier player.

Other QBs of note: Matt Barkley USC, Ryan Nassib Syracuse, Mike Glennon NC State, Tyler Wilson Arkansas, Tyler Bray Tennessee, EJ Manuel Florida State

Other RBs of note: Joseph Randle Oklahoma State, Andre Ellington Clemson, Jonathan Franklin UCLA, Mike Gillislee Florida, Christine Michael Texas A&M, Jawan Jamison Rutgers, Kenjon Barner Oregon, Ray Graham Pittsburgh, Robbie Rouse Fresno State, Dennis Johnson Arkansas(not invited to combine)

Other WRs of note: Quinton Patton Louisiana Tech, Kenny Stills Oklahoma, Aaron Dobson Marshall, Ryan Swope Texas A&M, Conner Vernon Duke, Aaron Mellette Elon, Josh Boyce TCU, Marquise Goodwin Texas, Tavarres King Georgia, Chris Harper Kansas State

Other TEs of note: Travis Kelce Cincinnati, Jordan Reed Florida, Vance McDonald Rice

Hope this is helpful for when you’re watching the combine, thanks for reading.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
2) Eddie Lacy RB Alabama-He won’t be a RB1(top 12) without a ton of touches, just doesn’t have the ability. But he has every bit the opportunity to be a RB2.
You should trade him to me then; I'd be happy to pay RB2 prices. ;)Thanks for the rankings. Solid list.
 
My top 2 is the same guys. At this point I feel pretty comfortable saying that Lacy and Allen will be the two names in my first tier. They're the only guys in this draft that have the right combination of reasonable upside and zero bust risk. Beyond that things get really ugly. I am probably in the minority here, but I really don't see a massive gap between the 1.03 and the 1.12 this year. That could change if someone like Bernard or Taylor lights up the combine and lands in a great spot on draft day, but overall there's a lack of distinction amongst these guys. Just a whole bunch of mediocrity, which actually makes it a fun challenge for us drafters.

 
which actually makes it a fun challenge for us drafters.
I play in one league where we draft two weeks before the NFL draft, so this is especially true. As someone who plays in devy leagues, I'm sure you can relate. I can't wait to draft my guys and then watch the NFL draft for their landing spots.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I like Lacy but am a little suspect on Allen after watching footage. I'm sitting on the the 1.1 in my league, don't want to go Lacy that high.EDIT: Like Tavon Austin.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I like Lacy but am a little suspect on Allen after watching footage. I'm sitting on the the 1.1 in my league, don't want to go Lacy that high.EDIT: Like Tavon Austin.
Lacy and Allen have the highest floors. I don't see either as bombing in the NFL because they have the size, athletic ability, and proven NCAA experience.Tavon Austin and Patterson could both sky rocket or flounder.
 
Your measurables for Cobi Hamilton is wrong. At Senior Bowl, he was only 6'2", 199 lbs. That's a significant difference. He looked very sluggish off the line. I highly doubt he runs a 4.3. He's very close in size to Corey Fuller, and I like Fuller more than Hamilton.

 
Your measurables for Cobi Hamilton is wrong. At Senior Bowl, he was only 6'2", 199 lbs. That's a significant difference. He looked very sluggish off the line. I highly doubt he runs a 4.3. He's very close in size to Corey Fuller, and I like Fuller more than Hamilton.
I used ESPN measurements, I'll adjust them after the combine. I base the 40 "guess" times off of tape, he seemed very explosive on tape. Haven't looked closely at Corey Fuller, I will have to now. Thanks
 
My top 2 is the same guys. At this point I feel pretty comfortable saying that Lacy and Allen will be the two names in my first tier. They're the only guys in this draft that have the right combination of reasonable upside and zero bust risk. Beyond that things get really ugly.

I am probably in the minority here, but I really don't see a massive gap between the 1.03 and the 1.12 this year. That could change if someone like Bernard or Taylor lights up the combine and lands in a great spot on draft day, but overall there's a lack of distinction amongst these guys. Just a whole bunch of mediocrity, which actually makes it a fun challenge for us drafters.
I agree with you and in fact I don't think much difference between 1.01 and 1.12, at least not as there normally is. I'm not even sure any of these guys would have been a top 7 pick in last year's rookie draft but I'm very impressed with the amount of depth. I like the 2nd rounders this year better than last year.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm an amateur, but I just did something with the receiver position that some may find interesting. Instead of providing a "long winded" explanation, I'll just post a link:

https://docs.google....SHFIF5m899E/pub

To keep it simple, I used the following to get my results:

1 - Mass (Weight & Height)

2 - 40 Time (and 10 Yard Split)

3 - 3 Cone Drill Time

4 - Broad & Vertical Jumps

5 - Production (Final Season of production as a % of their teams total receiving yards & TDs)

I used Combine data where available, and pro day data when I didn't have anything else. I ran 780 receivers through the filters that were in the 2000 - 2012 drafts. At the bottom of the document, I've included the Production Ratios for this years crop of players.

I broke the results into 3 categories:

1 - Top Prospects

2 - Solid Prospects

3 - High Risk Prospects

Anyway, it's just another way to look it, but I've was pleased with the findings.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm an amateur, but I just did something with the receiver position that some may find interesting. Instead of providing a "long winded" explanation, I'll just post a link:https://docs.google....SHFIF5m899E/pubTo keep it simple, I used the following to get my results:1 - Mass (Weight & Height)2 - 40 Time (and 10 Yard Split)3 - 3 Cone Drill Time4 - Broad & Vertical Jumps5 - Production (Final Season of production as a % of their teams total receiving yards & TDs)I used Combine data where available, and pro day data when I didn't have anything else. I ran 780 receivers through the filters that were in the 2000 - 2012 drafts. At the bottom of the document, I've included the Production Ratios for this years crop of players. I broke the results into 3 categories:1 - Top Prospects2 - Solid Prospects3 - High Risk ProspectsAnyway, it's just another way to look it, but I've was pleased with the findings.
I thought the high risk group was the most interesting. What stood out is that there were quite a few successful guys in the first 95 picks, but basically none after that (I believe Breaston is the only to hit 1000 yards).
 
Your measurables for Cobi Hamilton is wrong. At Senior Bowl, he was only 6'2", 199 lbs. That's a significant difference. He looked very sluggish off the line. I highly doubt he runs a 4.3. He's very close in size to Corey Fuller, and I like Fuller more than Hamilton.
:goodposting:
 
I'm an amateur, but I just did something with the receiver position that some may find interesting. Instead of providing a "long winded" explanation, I'll just post a link:https://docs.google....SHFIF5m899E/pubTo keep it simple, I used the following to get my results:1 - Mass (Weight & Height)2 - 40 Time (and 10 Yard Split)3 - 3 Cone Drill Time4 - Broad & Vertical Jumps5 - Production (Final Season of production as a % of their teams total receiving yards & TDs)I used Combine data where available, and pro day data when I didn't have anything else. I ran 780 receivers through the filters that were in the 2000 - 2012 drafts. At the bottom of the document, I've included the Production Ratios for this years crop of players. I broke the results into 3 categories:1 - Top Prospects2 - Solid Prospects3 - High Risk ProspectsAnyway, it's just another way to look it, but I've was pleased with the findings.
Awesome stuff :thumbup:
 
I am always interested in things like that, but as I've said elsewhere, I think any measure that relies too much on workout numbers will be prone to missing out on players who play much better than their numbers would suggest. Chad Johnson is the poster boy for this. Ran a 4.57 at the combine at just 191 pounds. 33" vert and 9' broad jump. Terrible time in the three cone. Everything you look at says "horrible athlete," yet when you pop on the games he's running by everybody. Kendall Wright and Rueben Randle were a bit like this for me from last year's class. Especially Randle. Very ordinary workout numbers. 4.55 speed. Only a 31" vertical leap. Nothing in the numbers says he's a good athlete. And yet you pop on the games and he's wide open on every play. He can effortlessly separate on a comeback route (a hard thing for a tall receiver). He can run by people downfield. He can catch the ball in traffic and make people miss after the catch. With a guy like this, I don't think the workout numbers really do him justice. I'd say the same about guys like Randall Cobb, Justin Blackmon, and Michael Crabtree. They all have some standout traits that might show up on the workout sheet, but they also have a lot of natural football ability. They're much more effective on the field than you would just think by looking at the physical metrics. Keenan Allen is another guy like this. Pretty ordinary strength and speed. Very instinctive and effective player though.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the feedback guys. I didn't mention it before, but it's an ongoing project. You probably already know this, but finding data before 2003 is extremely difficult to do. Since I wrote this a week ago, I've got my hands on about 50 other guys. I agree with you EBF. It's not a perfect system. But then again, I can't think of anything that is. At the Texas vs Nation game, I had the pleasure to spend the day with some Houston Texans scouts. I assume it's the same for other teams, but they told me they were assigned specific players to scout during the process. By the time the draft starts, they told me they'd collectively have around 600 to 700 draftable grades assigned to players. I thought that what an interesting comment. I'm currently working on an addition to this study by adding "inside" type WR's.The WR is not easy to analyze for all the facts that EBF mentioned. I'm almost finished with the pass rush group, and the results, thus far, seem to be far more consistent.Again, thank for the comments. It's appreciated. If anyone has an idea how to improve it, I'd appreciate a heads up.

 
Thanks for the feedback guys. I didn't mention it before, but it's an ongoing project. You probably already know this, but finding data before 2003 is extremely difficult to do. Since I wrote this a week ago, I've got my hands on about 50 other guys. I agree with you EBF. It's not a perfect system. But then again, I can't think of anything that is. At the Texas vs Nation game, I had the pleasure to spend the day with some Houston Texans scouts. I assume it's the same for other teams, but they told me they were assigned specific players to scout during the process. By the time the draft starts, they told me they'd collectively have around 600 to 700 draftable grades assigned to players. I thought that what an interesting comment. I'm currently working on an addition to this study by adding "inside" type WR's.The WR is not easy to analyze for all the facts that EBF mentioned. I'm almost finished with the pass rush group, and the results, thus far, seem to be far more consistent.Again, thank for the comments. It's appreciated. If anyone has an idea how to improve it, I'd appreciate a heads up.
So where did AJ Green end up on your list?
 
If you're going to hijack a thread, that's the way to do it, impressive work. Good stuff from both of you guys. Thanks.

 
'EBF said:
I am always interested in things like that, but as I've said elsewhere, I think any measure that relies too much on workout numbers will be prone to missing out on players who play much better than their numbers would suggest. Chad Johnson is the poster boy for this. Ran a 4.57 at the combine at just 191 pounds. 33" vert and 9' broad jump. Terrible time in the three cone. Everything you look at says "horrible athlete," yet when you pop on the games he's running by everybody. Kendall Wright and Rueben Randle were a bit like this for me from last year's class. Especially Randle. Very ordinary workout numbers. 4.55 speed. Only a 31" vertical leap. Nothing in the numbers says he's a good athlete. And yet you pop on the games and he's wide open on every play. He can effortlessly separate on a comeback route (a hard thing for a tall receiver). He can run by people downfield. He can catch the ball in traffic and make people miss after the catch. With a guy like this, I don't think the workout numbers really do him justice. I'd say the same about guys like Randall Cobb, Justin Blackmon, and Michael Crabtree. They all have some standout traits that might show up on the workout sheet, but they also have a lot of natural football ability. They're much more effective on the field than you would just think by looking at the physical metrics. Keenan Allen is another guy like this. Pretty ordinary strength and speed. Very instinctive and effective player though.
Agree, but numbers have no bias. I think the numbers are a great way to come up with a list to dig deeper into, and he does take into account productivity on the field. Frank at fantasydouche.com has a lot of interesting statistical analysis that makes for a great read.I rely on my own eyeball test, and I have had above average success with that, but I recognize that I favor some attributes over others, introducing bias. My opinion is the most important (to me), but I really like reading other people's opinions and processes to see what I may be missing.
 
Nice stuff tdmills, I think you got Cordarrelle Patterson too high (his almost complete lack of WR skills scare me), but at the same time, I'm starting to come around on him as a NFL prospect more and more as the draft nears. I think it's very likely that he won't do anything in fantasy for 2 full seasons, but if he's a coachable kid and the NFL team that drafts him is willing to spend time on developing him, by year 3 or so he could be a dangerous WR. I'm thinking it'd be best to let someone else draft him and hope they get disenchanted with him after he does nothing for a year or two and then pick him cheaply.

 
Black Dot indeed!I think the comparisons are a bit bullish, but overall love the analysis and discussion here. I'm having such a tough time figuring out tiers this year. Thanks so much!

 
'audiolover said:
'Whitney26 said:
Thanks for the feedback guys. I didn't mention it before, but it's an ongoing project. You probably already know this, but finding data before 2003 is extremely difficult to do. Since I wrote this a week ago, I've got my hands on about 50 other guys. I agree with you EBF. It's not a perfect system. But then again, I can't think of anything that is. At the Texas vs Nation game, I had the pleasure to spend the day with some Houston Texans scouts. I assume it's the same for other teams, but they told me they were assigned specific players to scout during the process. By the time the draft starts, they told me they'd collectively have around 600 to 700 draftable grades assigned to players. I thought that what an interesting comment. I'm currently working on an addition to this study by adding "inside" type WR's.The WR is not easy to analyze for all the facts that EBF mentioned. I'm almost finished with the pass rush group, and the results, thus far, seem to be far more consistent.Again, thank for the comments. It's appreciated. If anyone has an idea how to improve it, I'd appreciate a heads up.
So where did AJ Green end up on your list?
I noticed the same omission.btw, great thread to everyone involved.
 
Very well done and a great read. Thank you for the time you put into this.My top 3 is the same, but in a different order.1. Lacy2. Patterson3. AllenIt's also nice to see M. Wilson hasn't been forgotten by everyone. A lot of the mocks and draft sites I see out there don't even mention him anymore, which is foolish.

 
'Whitney26 said:
I'm an amateur, but I just did something with the receiver position that some may find interesting. Instead of providing a "long winded" explanation, I'll just post a link:https://docs.google....SHFIF5m899E/pubTo keep it simple, I used the following to get my results:1 - Mass (Weight & Height)2 - 40 Time (and 10 Yard Split)3 - 3 Cone Drill Time4 - Broad & Vertical Jumps5 - Production (Final Season of production as a % of their teams total receiving yards & TDs)I used Combine data where available, and pro day data when I didn't have anything else. I ran 780 receivers through the filters that were in the 2000 - 2012 drafts. At the bottom of the document, I've included the Production Ratios for this years crop of players. I broke the results into 3 categories:1 - Top Prospects2 - Solid Prospects3 - High Risk ProspectsAnyway, it's just another way to look it, but I've was pleased with the findings.
Why is AJ Green not on this list?
 
What sources are you using for your data, Whitney26?When I've done similar projects, these have been my sources: combine data, college stats 1, college stats 2.My impression is that, for WRs, college stats are more important than combine numbers (the reverse is true of RBs). The stats I put the most weight on for WRs are long gains and TDs (here's the leaderboard for this draft class).
I use the same sites, but I also use a few others.1 - NFLDraftScout2 - NCAA.org http://web1.ncaa.org/mfb/mainpage.jsp?year=2012 for the stats. Unfortunately, the majority of my work is for defensive players. After 2005, you have to look somewhere else. I typically look through the archives at whatever school a guy went to. Yes, it's a painful process, and I wish I could find a different resource.3 - The WayBackMachine is my favorite resource for the old data http://archive.org/index.php. For instance, here is the map for NFL.com http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.nfl.com
 
'Whitney26 said:
I'm an amateur, but I just did something with the receiver position that some may find interesting. Instead of providing a "long winded" explanation, I'll just post a link:https://docs.google....SHFIF5m899E/pubTo keep it simple, I used the following to get my results:1 - Mass (Weight & Height)2 - 40 Time (and 10 Yard Split)3 - 3 Cone Drill Time4 - Broad & Vertical Jumps5 - Production (Final Season of production as a % of their teams total receiving yards & TDs)I used Combine data where available, and pro day data when I didn't have anything else. I ran 780 receivers through the filters that were in the 2000 - 2012 drafts. At the bottom of the document, I've included the Production Ratios for this years crop of players. I broke the results into 3 categories:1 - Top Prospects2 - Solid Prospects3 - High Risk ProspectsAnyway, it's just another way to look it, but I've was pleased with the findings.
I really like this sort of stuff, great work. A couple observations:- I realize setting cutoffs are always going to be arbitrary to a large degree, but be weary of overfitting, or setting cutoffs just to get the players you want to fit in a particular category, as it can result in the exaggeration of minor fluctuations in data. For example, if Reggie Williams and Robert Meachem's ExPwr stat increased by just .01 from 0.84 to 0.85, they jump up two tiers from being High Risk Prospects to being Top Prospects. Also, another problem associated with overfitting is that it inhibits it's predictive performance in favour of more accurately representing past data.- I'm not convinced that the 3 cone drill is a particularly important stat. Only 6 players on that entire list have a 3-Cone time over 7.15, and plenty of the players on that list who have gone on to be successful NFL players have 3-Cone times over 7.00, which is a time that looks to be below the average. - The Production Ratio stat appears to heavily favour players who went to non-BCS schools, or players from schools that don't have much talent. 7/15 Top prospects came from non-BCS schools, and just about all the players listed that went on to have successful NFL careers who aren't listed as Top Prospects went to big name schools in BCS conferences. I can't readily think of a better production measure at the moment, but I think it's probably important to point out the bias.
 
Fantastic write up tdmills. I'd be ticked if it got jacked like this. Good stuff though.
Thank you, it took a lot of work.Jacked eh, in the end it is what it is. I feel like my post will stay relevant for discussion purposes.
 
Some guys who would be higher on my list:RB Christine Michael, Texas A&M - Could be this year's Morris/Ballard/Bolden. An unheralded back who can step in and produce immediately. Not a very flashy talent and has some durability concerns in his past, but he has the right dimensions for the pro game. I have him at RB4 in my latest pass.RB Spencer Ware, LSU - My pick for most underrated RB in the draft. He is sloppy in the second level of the defense, but he has quick feet behind the line of scrimmage. Rock solid at about 5'10" 220 with good ability as a pass blocker and above average receiving skills. Kind of a poor man's Marion Barber III. WR Quinton Patton, Louisiana Tech - Productive in college and named as one of the standouts of the Senior Bowl practice week by most accounts. Average size and speed means he's likely just a #2 WR in the NFL or a low end #1, but he's a better bet to be useful than most of the receivers in the draft. WR Chris Harper, Kansas State - The most physically imposing WR in the draft with his strength and wing span. Good leaper and shows some real potential after the catch. I have him in the third tier along with Patton and others. Might not have the explosiveness to be a #1 receiver, but has a lot of traits that should translate.

 
'tdmills said:
21) Zac Stacy RB Vanderbilt

5-11 195

2009: 107 carries 478 yards 4.5 3 TD, 7 receptions, 72 yards, 10.3 0 TD

2010: 66 carries 331 yards 5.0 3 TD, 9 receptions, 32 yards, 3.6 0 TD

2011: 201 carries 1193 yards 5.9 14 TD, 20 receptions, 106 yards, 5.3 0 TD

2012: 207 carries 1141 yards 5.5 10 TD, 10 receptions 205 yards 20.5 0 TD

-Also has two return TDs, one was very clutch that won a game.

Comparison: Smaller Mark Ingram

Notes:

Analysis:

One of my favorite RBs to evaluate because he’s a big time competitor that produces at a low end SEC school. Stacy lacks top end speed and isn’t a great athlete. However, he makes good decisions, shows good agility, and toughness as a RB.

FF wise:

Stacy is a limited athlete, so don’t expect big things. However, if I had guess one RB you could draft in the second round of rookie drafts that could produce big…it’s Zac Stacy.
I'm also intrigued by Stacy (I have him as RB9 in my rankings), but I don't see the Ingram comparison. What stood out for me was his shiftiness & quick feet - I didn't see all that much power from him (especially for his size - which is 5-9 214 according to the Shrine Game weigh-ins).
 
9) Marquess Wilson WR Washington State

6-4 183

2010: 55 receptions, 1006 yards, 18.3 6 TD

2011: 82 receptions, 1388 yards, 16.9 12 TD

2012: 52 receptions, 813 yards, 15.6 5 TD

Comparison: Chad “Ochocinco” Johnson

Notes:

-Quit the team with 3 games left in 2012, due to problems with HC Mike Leach.

Analysis:

Long frame, but also skinny (6-4 183). Great natural hands catcher, but will drop some easy passes at times. Good ability to high point the football and battle a DB, has a "my ball" mentality. 4.4ish type speed and has burst with the football in his hands. Great sideline awareness to keep his feet in bounds and make lot of plays in tight areas. Will make spectacular receptions very few players can make, reminds me of Brandon Lloyd in that fashion. Good route runner that can set up defenders. Great technique to get off the LOS, uses his hands and pad level well. Wilson needs to add muscle to his long frame if he wants to take his game to the next level. He's more of a technician than physical specimen, but he’s a good athlete. Has a good natural instinct for the WR position.

FF wise:

- Very little to dislike about his game, just unsure of how his off the field decisions will affect his draft status. Wilson can be a WR2 in the NFL and in FF if he improves his attitude.

10) Da’Rick Rogers WR Tennessee Tech

6-3 205

2010: 11 receptions, 167 yards, 15.1 2 TDs

2011: 67 receptions, 1040 yards, 15.5 9 TDs

2012: 61 receptions, 893 yards, 14.6 10 TD

Comparison: Terrell Owens

Notes:

-Kicked off of University of Tennessee football team and transferred to Tennessee Tech.

Analysis:

Big strong WR that can overpower/bully defenders, uses his frame to box out defenders. Good athlete; Rogers is a high 4.4's to low 4.5's type of WR, but speed isn't his game (he isn't slow by any means, just not a blazer). Difficult to bring down in the open field due to his strength; he will run through and drag defenders for extra yardage. Good body control and is enough aware of the sideline to get his feet down. Good hands, but body catches too much. Led SEC in receiving as a true sophomore.

FF wise: Da’Rick Rodgers physically belongs in the NFL. If he gets his head on straight, he can be an NFL #1 WR and FF factor. How good? Depends on his attitude because he has a WR1/2 ceiling in FF.
These are two players that are coming in off the radar and performed well today.Da'Rick Rogers: 6-2 217, 4.52(official), 39.5 vertical, 11 foot broad jump, 6.71 3 cone, 4.06 Short Shuttle. Only area he struggled was bench press 10 reps.

-Rogers will be under the radar because of character concerns. The good news is that he's a great buy low and your FF locker room doesn't care about his character.

Marquess Wilson: 6-3 194, 4.51(official), 34.5 vertical, 10 feet 1 inch broad jump, 6.65 3 cone, 4.33 Short Shuttle

Wilson was never going to be one of the best WR athletes at the combine, but he showed he wasn't far off. He's one of the more natural WRs in this class and looked great in a gauntlet. He quit the team with 3 games to go, which allows him to be a buy low as well.

 


16) Robert Woods WR USC

6-1 190

2010: 65 receptions, 792 yards, 12.2 6 TD

2011: 111 receptions, 1,292, yards, 11.6 15 TD

2012: 73 receptions, 813 yards, 11.1 11 TD

Comparison: Lance Moore

Notes:

-Got demoted to the #2 option when Marqise Lee emerged late in 2011.

Analysis:

Woods has a small frame, I wouldn't be surprised if he ends measuring under 6'0” at the NFL Combine. Great hands catcher, rarely drops passes. Very quick player, possesses elite quickness. Only average speed when compared to his quickness (perhaps a 4.48/40 type of a player). Not a great YAC player. Sometimes he makes defenders miss and sometimes he goes down very easily versus a college DB. Not a very physical player, can get manhandled. Ran many short routes and gimmick type plays at USC.

FF wise:

-Woods has some flaws to his game and he might be limited to slot duty in the NFL. However, some WRs have excelled at the next level in the slot. If he can gain strength he might be able to play outside. In a perfect scenario, WR2 in FF; more than likely a WR3 at best. I would probably look elsewhere in your rookie drafts.
Woods had a very disappointing combine. While I didn't agree with others that thought he was very athletic, I expected him to be quicker.Woods: 6-0 3/8 201, 4.51, 33.5 vertical, 4.4 short shuttle, 7.15 3 cone, 9'9 broad jump

 
'cstu said:


16) Robert Woods WR USC

6-1 190

2010: 65 receptions, 792 yards, 12.2 6 TD

2011: 111 receptions, 1,292, yards, 11.6 15 TD

2012: 73 receptions, 813 yards, 11.1 11 TD

Comparison: Lance Moore

Notes:

-Got demoted to the #2 option when Marqise Lee emerged late in 2011.

Analysis:

Woods has a small frame, I wouldn't be surprised if he ends measuring under 6'0” at the NFL Combine. Great hands catcher, rarely drops passes. Very quick player, possesses elite quickness. Only average speed when compared to his quickness (perhaps a 4.48/40 type of a player). Not a great YAC player. Sometimes he makes defenders miss and sometimes he goes down very easily versus a college DB. Not a very physical player, can get manhandled. Ran many short routes and gimmick type plays at USC.

FF wise:

-Woods has some flaws to his game and he might be limited to slot duty in the NFL. However, some WRs have excelled at the next level in the slot. If he can gain strength he might be able to play outside. In a perfect scenario, WR2 in FF; more than likely a WR3 at best. I would probably look elsewhere in your rookie drafts.
Woods had a very disappointing combine. While I didn't agree with others that thought he was very athletic, I expected him to be quicker.Woods: 6-0 3/8 201, 4.51, 33.5 vertical, 4.4 short shuttle, 7.15 3 cone, 9'9 broad jump
Honestly not as bad as I thought it might be. His game isn't built on speed so 4.51 is decent for him.
I've read scouting reports talking about his HS sprinter background, maybe that was the issue. But vert/short shuttle/3 cone/broad were pathetic for a 6-0 player with hype IMO. Justin Hunter had a better short shuttle and he's 4 inches taller/not a very quick guy.I'll let someone else draft Woods in my rookie drafts.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top