Dinsy Ejotuz
Footballguy
Agree -- if he pass blocks, hangs onto the ball and grinds out tough yards, and the team is doing OK (which might be the biggest Q) he'll be tough to unseat.it all depends on what West does with the opportunity
Agree -- if he pass blocks, hangs onto the ball and grinds out tough yards, and the team is doing OK (which might be the biggest Q) he'll be tough to unseat.it all depends on what West does with the opportunity
If Forsett re-signs he won't be the starter. He sucks and he got outplayed by West in the preseason. He would be a 3rd or 4th RB at a discounted price.I wouldn't be at all surprised if Forsett is resigned at a lower price and starts. No matter who 'starts' this has all the earmarks of being a very ugly RBBC situation all year and gets even uglier once Dixon comes back. Unless you have extra roster space no Baltimore RB is worth having at this point in time.
And hence they want to pay him that way, not as a lead back.If Forsett re-signs he won't be the starter. He sucks and he got outplayed by West in the preseason. He would be a 3rd or 4th RB at a discounted price.
There are like 9 RBs who aren't apart of a full blown RBBC in the NFL right now. There are plenty of RBs rostered in fantasy who are likely going to see very similar work as West (Hill, Crowell, Blount, Ivory and etc.).I wouldn't be at all surprised if Forsett is resigned at a lower price and starts. No matter who 'starts' this has all the earmarks of being a very ugly RBBC situation all year and gets even uglier once Dixon comes back. Unless you have extra roster space no Baltimore RB is worth having at this point in time.
Signed,If Forsett re-signs he won't be the starter. He sucks and he got outplayed by West in the preseason. He would be a 3rd or 4th RB at a discounted price.
One false pretense I always hear on this forum is how people assume a RBBC or an unclear backfield situation doesn't possess fantasy value. While the backfields in BAL, NE, and WAS may be murky now, one or two of the RBs on those teams will put up good fantasy numbers with the probiblility of one of those RB's to run away with a lead job and have a great year.There are like 9 RBs who aren't apart of a full blown RBBC in the NFL right now. There are plenty of RBs rostered in fantasy who are likely going to see very similar work as West (Hill, Crowell, Blount, Ivory and etc.).
I'd argue that the unknowns aren't even a negative as there's a non-zero chance West runs away with the lead job. I'm very confused as to how he could be considered unrosterable. I suppose 10-team PPR I could see it, but in 12-team leagues he needs to be rostered regardless of the format.
It was a non-remarkable broken arm. This isn't a Leveon Bell or Jamaal Charles situation. He was fine in 6-8 weeks when the fracture healed.I'm sorry but you don't cut the dude who led your team in rushing for two years straight just to re-sign him and give him a relevant role again. I understand that this is a business but you have to imagine this sends a very clear message as to how they value their RBs. It's not like Forsett is some stud either, he was a journyman up until he landed in BAL two years ago. At 30, coming off an injury and given his track record/declining production it doesn't surprise me that BAL is valuing him as they are. I think they are fine using Allen in a receiving role and waiting on Dixon, who is arguably the best pass catching back of his class to fully take over that role and likely more when healthy.
What is clear to me is that West is currently their best option. I'm judging this by what we've heard from the coaches and what we've seen during the preseason. He looks hungry and BAL is looking to feed him.
With all the players you named they are only splitting time with one other player. With West, he will be splitting time with Allen for sure, Forsett if resigned and Dixon when he gets healthy. The number of touches any of them will receive makes them nothing but pure desperation plays season long. I'd rather go with any of the committee guys you listed or even for someone like Rob Kelley over West or any of the Baltimore guys at this point in time. If you add in a dynasty factor Dixon might be worth grabbing but you could probably wait a couple of weeks before grabbing him.There are like 9 RBs who aren't apart of a full blown RBBC in the NFL right now. There are plenty of RBs rostered in fantasy who are likely going to see very similar work as West (Hill, Crowell, Blount, Ivory and etc.).
I'd argue that the unknowns aren't even a negative as there's a non-zero chance West runs away with the lead job. I'm very confused as to how he could be considered unrosterable. I suppose 10-team PPR I could see it, but in 12-team leagues he needs to be rostered regardless of the format.
I developed my bias and then drafted him.Signed,
Everyone who owns Terrance West
Of course you'd rather go with the committee guys I listed, so would the collective hence their substantially higher ADPs. Kelley is interesting (and I believe worth rostering as well) but also has to compete with more than one guy season long (Chris Thompson will still see work on passing downs).With all the players you named they are only splitting time with one other player. With West, he will be splitting time with Allen for sure, Forsett if resigned and Dixon when he gets healthy. The number of touches any of them will receive makes them nothing but pure desperation plays season long. I'd rather go with any of the committee guys you listed or even for someone like Rob Kelley over West or any of the Baltimore guys at this point in time. If you add in a dynasty factor Dixon might be worth grabbing but you could probably wait a couple of weeks before grabbing him.
Well the whole Browns' franchise looked a lot better in those ugly Baltimore uniforms.I think the thing that stands out most to me about West during preseason action is the fact that he's not dancing around in the backfield or trying to bounce anything outside that he shouldn't. He doesn't look like the guy I lovingly refereed to as Terrance "East to" West during his tenure in CLE.
Granted, he's had some large holes to work with and it is preseason but he looks more able and willing to grind out yards between the tackles.
I don't know, maybe it's just the uniform but he looks a bit different to me.
did you see something wrong with a little bump n grind?I dropped R. Kelley
I'm just worried he might be trapped the closet.did you see something wrong with a little bump n grind?
What was short-lived? I was under the impression West was basically the assumed #1 with Allen 3rd down and Dixon a month out with injury. Maybe I just don't get how this type of "cut and then re-sign" situation works but does the Forsett re-signing change this situation immediately in your estimation? Or just guessing this relegates West back down the depth chart?That was short lived.
I cut him the morning that Forsett was cut later in the day, to pick up Prescott. Immediately felt terrible about it obviously, but now with the Forsett re-signing, I don't even know if he's worth picking back up again. Confused by this situation totally.In a FootballGuys draft (PPR, 12 teams) over the weekend, I saw someone select West in the middle of the seventh round.
In an FFWC Main Event draft yesterday, I took West at 11.04. Hoping I didn't overpay.
It's enough to make me not want to bother with West. Too much competition short term and long term for me.What was short-lived? I was under the impression West was basically the assumed #1 with Allen 3rd down and Dixon a month out with injury. Maybe I just don't get how this type of "cut and then re-sign" situation works but does the Forsett re-signing change this situation immediately in your estimation? Or just guessing this relegates West back down the depth chart?
I was going to drop Ajayi to try and pick him up again, but maybe neither of them are particularly worth much, Ajayi has been junk pre-season. I figure West is still rosterable, depending on roster sizes etc but the situation is murky at best now so I get your perspective.It's enough to make me not want to bother with West. Too much competition short term and long term for me.
+1Forsett hurts Allen much more than he does West IMO. I believe that they're still going to give West the majority of the early down work.
Murky situations present the best value propositions.bulger2holt said:I'm staying clear from this boondoggle
It limits both to some degree, but I'm confident that West will get plenty of work. I can't believe that Forsett was cut loose with plans of featuring him Week 1. Maybe I'm wrong, we'll see on Sunday. The people invested in Forsett will contend nothing has changed at all because the teams website lists him at #1. It does add risk for anyone in a situation where you were thinking about starting him. I think there will be a lot of clarity after week 1, and until then I'm staying the course of him as a sleeper on my bench.Forsett hurts Allen much more than he does West IMO. I believe that they're still going to give West the majority of the early down work.
Forsett is starting Its the GL carries, and opportunity of being the "hot hand" that is enticing for WestAny chance Forsett just spells a starting West once in a while in Week 1? Probably just wishful thinking on my part.
His usage today will be telling for his value going forward.Forsett is starting Its the GL carries, and opportunity of being the "hot hand" that is enticing for West
I watched his touches, he wasn't dancing. He was still running north/south like he was in the preseason.I ended up swapping him in for Arian Foster last minute yesterday
I didn't catch much of the BAL game, any insight into this performance? Same old dancing?
Dixon has gotta be licking his chops.
Buffalo is a tougher match-up than the Bears. I didn't catch the game but his stat line, as I recall, was good early.I ended up swapping him in for Arian Foster last minute yesterday
I didn't catch much of the BAL game, any insight into this performance? Same old dancing?
Dixon has gotta be licking his chops.
ESPN Ravens reporter Jamison Hensley said it "wouldn't be surprising" if Terrance West took over as the starter this week.
Coach John Harbaugh talked about making changes in the backfield, and swapping out Justin Forsett for West is the most logical option. Forsett has just 98 yards on 31 carries this season with zero touchdowns. West is not lighting up the scoreboard either (33-for-119), but he has looked like a much better runner. Rookie Kenneth Dixon (knee) should also get a shot once he returns from injury.
Source: ESPN
Oct 1 - 9:52 AM
But if he had a good game (100 and a TD) he can run with itProbably going to be a short-lived starting position since Dixon is coming back next week. It's not like he's been tearing it up - he's only marginally better than Forsett at this point.
West had a good game but he's still JAG. Door is open for Dixon - I expect him to be the lead by Halloween if not sooner.