If he is in India though it will be harder to prove he was clean...Williams can appeal no matter what happens, and if he has stayed clean and missed a test, the league might be more lenient
But the consequences are the same and he knows it.Looks like Ricky missed taking his test as opposed to failing it.
Does he get the same year long suspension for missing the test? I guess he's not allowed to go on vacation then.
A missed test = a failed test by the NFL/NFLPA agreement. 1 year off.Where are all the RW supporters that were adamant that it couldn't happen again, that RW was a happy camper, etc? Williams gave his FF owners another half a season with shared carries. What an impact guy!Looks like Ricky missed taking his test as opposed to failing it.
Does he get the same year long suspension for missing the test? I guess he's not allowed to go on vacation then.
I know that that's the rule, but IMO it would be a lot easier to appeal a missed test than appealing a failed test.They apparently test him 10 times a month (or roughly an average of every 3 days). I'm certianly no toxicologist, but wouldn't there still be trace amounts of whatever he would have taken in his next test?A missed test = a failed test by the NFL/NFLPA agreement. 1 year off.
I guess I'll be the boards sacrificial lamb . . . . I've supported Ricky in the past.I just don't see how a failed test and missing the test are the same because he's in India. If he indeed missed the test I can see ther players union and the Dolphins appealing for him.A missed test = a failed test by the NFL/NFLPA agreement. 1 year off.Where are all the RW supporters that were adamant that it couldn't happen again, that RW was a happy camper, etc? Williams gave his FF owners another half a season with shared carries. What an impact guy!Looks like Ricky missed taking his test as opposed to failing it.
Does he get the same year long suspension for missing the test? I guess he's not allowed to go on vacation then.
Well, if his argument is he's unable to test because he's in India, then I don't see the merits in an appeal. If the secret is you run off to India/Amsterdam to smoke over the offseason, there's not much point in year round testing obligations. Unless there is some very odd fact not being reported, this is the same as a failed test.I know that that's the rule, but IMO it would be a lot easier to appeal a missed test than appealing a failed test.They apparently test him 10 times a month (or roughly an average of every 3 days). I'm certianly no toxicologist, but wouldn't there still be trace amounts of whatever he would have taken in his next test?A missed test = a failed test by the NFL/NFLPA agreement. 1 year off.
Yes, Onterrio Smith.Is there any other player in the history in the NFL that's been suspended because he missed a test?
So because he's failed tests in the past he's now a prisoner of the US for the rest of his NFL career. He can't take vacations?Can you FedEX a urine sample from India?Well, if his argument is he's unable to test because he's in India, then I don't see the merits in an appeal. If the secret is you run off to India/Amsterdam to smoke over the offseason, there's not much point in year round testing obligations. Unless there is some very odd fact not being reported, this is the same as a failed test.I know that that's the rule, but IMO it would be a lot easier to appeal a missed test than appealing a failed test.They apparently test him 10 times a month (or roughly an average of every 3 days). I'm certianly no toxicologist, but wouldn't there still be trace amounts of whatever he would have taken in his next test?A missed test = a failed test by the NFL/NFLPA agreement. 1 year off.
Per the terms of the CBA, yes, a missed test carries the same weight as a failed test.I'm not arguing your point I'm just trying to understand if a missed test is the same as testing positive?
Do you think there is some inherent right to play in the NFL? These are the rules of the league and the collective bargaining agreement. If a player doesn't want to abide by them, he can seek employment elsewhere.So yeah, if a player fails drugs tests, his behavior is restricted IF he wants to stay in the league. Apparently that's just not a top priority for Williams.So because he's failed tests in the past he's now a prisoner of the US for the rest of his NFL career. He can't take vacations?Can you FedEX a urine sample from India?Well, if his argument is he's unable to test because he's in India, then I don't see the merits in an appeal. If the secret is you run off to India/Amsterdam to smoke over the offseason, there's not much point in year round testing obligations. Unless there is some very odd fact not being reported, this is the same as a failed test.I know that that's the rule, but IMO it would be a lot easier to appeal a missed test than appealing a failed test.They apparently test him 10 times a month (or roughly an average of every 3 days). I'm certianly no toxicologist, but wouldn't there still be trace amounts of whatever he would have taken in his next test?A missed test = a failed test by the NFL/NFLPA agreement. 1 year off.
I'm not arguing your point I'm just trying to understand if a missed test is the same as testing positive?
In the NFL today you can beat your wife over and over again and get a slap on the wrist from the NFL but you can't smoke up. I am not condoning smoking pot but something does not seem right here.
Last season, LB Sedrick Hodge for the Saints missed a drug test while on vacation in the offseason. It was his third offense, but a one year suspension was triggered. He appealed the decision, and it appears as if he was not suspended and was allowed to play last season.Anyone else familiar with what happened to Hodge last year?Do you think there is some inherent right to play in the NFL? These are the rules of the league and the collective bargaining agreement. If a player doesn't want to abide by them, he can seek employment elsewhere.So yeah, if a player fails drugs tests, his behavior is restricted IF he wants to stay in the league. Apparently that's just not a top priority for Williams.So because he's failed tests in the past he's now a prisoner of the US for the rest of his NFL career. He can't take vacations?Can you FedEX a urine sample from India?Well, if his argument is he's unable to test because he's in India, then I don't see the merits in an appeal. If the secret is you run off to India/Amsterdam to smoke over the offseason, there's not much point in year round testing obligations. Unless there is some very odd fact not being reported, this is the same as a failed test.I know that that's the rule, but IMO it would be a lot easier to appeal a missed test than appealing a failed test.They apparently test him 10 times a month (or roughly an average of every 3 days). I'm certianly no toxicologist, but wouldn't there still be trace amounts of whatever he would have taken in his next test?A missed test = a failed test by the NFL/NFLPA agreement. 1 year off.
I'm not arguing your point I'm just trying to understand if a missed test is the same as testing positive?
In the NFL today you can beat your wife over and over again and get a slap on the wrist from the NFL but you can't smoke up. I am not condoning smoking pot but something does not seem right here.
These guys know the rules. If players don't like it they can give back the money, work normal 7-5 office jobs and play on the internet at work like the rest of us. Playing in the NFL and making millions is a privilege not a burden. Maybe the NFL believes that drugs will taint the product you see on the field. Been watching any baseball for the last 15 years? Laying the smackdown at home, while sad and unfortunate, has no bearing on the on-field product. Those issues are left to law enforcement and the courts.So because he's failed tests in the past he's now a prisoner of the US for the rest of his NFL career. He can't take vacations?Can you FedEX a urine sample from India?Well, if his argument is he's unable to test because he's in India, then I don't see the merits in an appeal. If the secret is you run off to India/Amsterdam to smoke over the offseason, there's not much point in year round testing obligations. Unless there is some very odd fact not being reported, this is the same as a failed test.I know that that's the rule, but IMO it would be a lot easier to appeal a missed test than appealing a failed test.They apparently test him 10 times a month (or roughly an average of every 3 days). I'm certianly no toxicologist, but wouldn't there still be trace amounts of whatever he would have taken in his next test?A missed test = a failed test by the NFL/NFLPA agreement. 1 year off.
I'm not arguing your point I'm just trying to understand if a missed test is the same as testing positive?
In the NFL today you can beat your wife over and over again and get a slap on the wrist from the NFL but you can't smoke up. I am not condoning smoking pot but something does not seem right here.
I believe Hodge appealed and argued that he was on vacation. I do not recall him receiving a yearlong suspension, so I wonder if avoided the suspension.Last season, LB Sedrick Hodge for the Saints missed a drug test while on vacation in the offseason. It was his third offense, but a one year suspension was triggered. He appealed the decision, and it appears as if he was not suspended and was allowed to play last season.Anyone else familiar with what happened to Hodge last year?Do you think there is some inherent right to play in the NFL? These are the rules of the league and the collective bargaining agreement. If a player doesn't want to abide by them, he can seek employment elsewhere.So yeah, if a player fails drugs tests, his behavior is restricted IF he wants to stay in the league. Apparently that's just not a top priority for Williams.So because he's failed tests in the past he's now a prisoner of the US for the rest of his NFL career. He can't take vacations?Can you FedEX a urine sample from India?Well, if his argument is he's unable to test because he's in India, then I don't see the merits in an appeal. If the secret is you run off to India/Amsterdam to smoke over the offseason, there's not much point in year round testing obligations. Unless there is some very odd fact not being reported, this is the same as a failed test.I know that that's the rule, but IMO it would be a lot easier to appeal a missed test than appealing a failed test.They apparently test him 10 times a month (or roughly an average of every 3 days). I'm certianly no toxicologist, but wouldn't there still be trace amounts of whatever he would have taken in his next test?A missed test = a failed test by the NFL/NFLPA agreement. 1 year off.
I'm not arguing your point I'm just trying to understand if a missed test is the same as testing positive?
In the NFL today you can beat your wife over and over again and get a slap on the wrist from the NFL but you can't smoke up. I am not condoning smoking pot but something does not seem right here.
I found some more information on Hodge. From an article dated October 13, 2005 . . .http://www.nola.com/sports/t-p/index.ssf?/...18327074430.xmlI believe Hodge appealed and argued that he was on vacation. I do not recall him receiving a yearlong suspension, so I wonder if avoided the suspension.Last season, LB Sedrick Hodge for the Saints missed a drug test while on vacation in the offseason. It was his third offense, but a one year suspension was triggered. He appealed the decision, and it appears as if he was not suspended and was allowed to play last season.Anyone else familiar with what happened to Hodge last year?Do you think there is some inherent right to play in the NFL? These are the rules of the league and the collective bargaining agreement. If a player doesn't want to abide by them, he can seek employment elsewhere.So yeah, if a player fails drugs tests, his behavior is restricted IF he wants to stay in the league. Apparently that's just not a top priority for Williams.So because he's failed tests in the past he's now a prisoner of the US for the rest of his NFL career. He can't take vacations?Can you FedEX a urine sample from India?Well, if his argument is he's unable to test because he's in India, then I don't see the merits in an appeal. If the secret is you run off to India/Amsterdam to smoke over the offseason, there's not much point in year round testing obligations. Unless there is some very odd fact not being reported, this is the same as a failed test.I know that that's the rule, but IMO it would be a lot easier to appeal a missed test than appealing a failed test.They apparently test him 10 times a month (or roughly an average of every 3 days). I'm certianly no toxicologist, but wouldn't there still be trace amounts of whatever he would have taken in his next test?A missed test = a failed test by the NFL/NFLPA agreement. 1 year off.
I'm not arguing your point I'm just trying to understand if a missed test is the same as testing positive?
In the NFL today you can beat your wife over and over again and get a slap on the wrist from the NFL but you can't smoke up. I am not condoning smoking pot but something does not seem right here.
Dale Carter-2 of his 4 positive tests were missed tests.I guess I'll be the boards sacrificial lamb . . . . I've supported Ricky in the past.I just don't see how a failed test and missing the test are the same because he's in India. If he indeed missed the test I can see ther players union and the Dolphins appealing for him.A missed test = a failed test by the NFL/NFLPA agreement. 1 year off.Where are all the RW supporters that were adamant that it couldn't happen again, that RW was a happy camper, etc? Williams gave his FF owners another half a season with shared carries. What an impact guy!Looks like Ricky missed taking his test as opposed to failing it.
Does he get the same year long suspension for missing the test? I guess he's not allowed to go on vacation then.
Is there any other player in the history in the NFL that's been suspended because he missed a test?
NBA- All Star game
Yes there would. Pot stays in the system for a bit longer than other drugs.I know that that's the rule, but IMO it would be a lot easier to appeal a missed test than appealing a failed test.They apparently test him 10 times a month (or roughly an average of every 3 days). I'm certianly no toxicologist, but wouldn't there still be trace amounts of whatever he would have taken in his next test?A missed test = a failed test by the NFL/NFLPA agreement. 1 year off.
Good info. Maybe this will quiet down some of these hardliner "missed = failed, no matter what!" people.I found some more information on Hodge. From an article dated October 13, 2005 . . .http://www.nola.com/sports/t-p/index.ssf?/...18327074430.xmlI believe Hodge appealed and argued that he was on vacation. I do not recall him receiving a yearlong suspension, so I wonder if avoided the suspension.Last season, LB Sedrick Hodge for the Saints missed a drug test while on vacation in the offseason. It was his third offense, but a one year suspension was triggered. He appealed the decision, and it appears as if he was not suspended and was allowed to play last season.Anyone else familiar with what happened to Hodge last year?Do you think there is some inherent right to play in the NFL? These are the rules of the league and the collective bargaining agreement. If a player doesn't want to abide by them, he can seek employment elsewhere.So yeah, if a player fails drugs tests, his behavior is restricted IF he wants to stay in the league. Apparently that's just not a top priority for Williams.So because he's failed tests in the past he's now a prisoner of the US for the rest of his NFL career. He can't take vacations?Can you FedEX a urine sample from India?Well, if his argument is he's unable to test because he's in India, then I don't see the merits in an appeal. If the secret is you run off to India/Amsterdam to smoke over the offseason, there's not much point in year round testing obligations. Unless there is some very odd fact not being reported, this is the same as a failed test.I know that that's the rule, but IMO it would be a lot easier to appeal a missed test than appealing a failed test.They apparently test him 10 times a month (or roughly an average of every 3 days). I'm certianly no toxicologist, but wouldn't there still be trace amounts of whatever he would have taken in his next test?A missed test = a failed test by the NFL/NFLPA agreement. 1 year off.
I'm not arguing your point I'm just trying to understand if a missed test is the same as testing positive?
In the NFL today you can beat your wife over and over again and get a slap on the wrist from the NFL but you can't smoke up. I am not condoning smoking pot but something does not seem right here.
"HODGE MIGHT BE CLEARED: Starting linebacker Sedrick Hodge believes he will be able to avoid a one-year suspension for violating the league's substance abuse policy. Hodge said he missed a drug test while on vacation during the offseason and believes the matter can be cleared up by producing proof that he was away.
Haslett said the only information he received that Hodge would be suspended was from a CBS Sports report Sunday. Hodge served a four-game suspension for violating the policy last year."
Can any Saint fans add to this? Did Hodge miss any time last year?
racist.Ricky Williams has got to be one of the dumbest people around.
This isn't really true. Pot can stay in your system anywhere from 6 hours to 30 days depending on how much you smoke and your body type.Yes there would. Pot stays in the system for a bit longer than other drugs.I know that that's the rule, but IMO it would be a lot easier to appeal a missed test than appealing a failed test.They apparently test him 10 times a month (or roughly an average of every 3 days). I'm certianly no toxicologist, but wouldn't there still be trace amounts of whatever he would have taken in his next test?A missed test = a failed test by the NFL/NFLPA agreement. 1 year off.
Really?NFLPA agreement – drug policyGood info. Maybe this will quiet down some of these hardliner "missed = failed, no matter what!" people.
This is fairly crucial information. Taking this info and viewing in light of the PFT analysis, there is probably very, very weak grounds for appeal. If it is Ricky's responsibility for telling the NFL where he'll be and when he'll be there, an unreported change in itinerary comes at his own peril. He should know that. If the NFL gets into the business of excusing unreported changed itineraries, guess what happens everytime a guy gives the NFL his itinerary? Off to Amsterdam for an unscheduled week of 'yoga.'My friend said however, that Ricky may have stayed on longer or left on a later date as he had been on the West Coast and in North Carolina and may have delayed his trip to India.
The bolded part directly violates the drug policy as I posted it from the NFLPA site. The grounds for appeal seem weak to me also, but it seems to me he's in poor standing right now.Heres the scoop from a reputable poster at Finheaven that has access to an insider. Apparantly Ricky WAS in India and missed the test. Heres the kicker - apparantly he notified the League about his vacation. Take it for what its worth.
That marijuana IS NOT involved, that they believe that the NFL random test on non specified days as certain drugs only stay in the system for a brief period of time, obviously, and that when they called, Ricky was abroad, incommunicado and thus unavailable for the test. This despite, my friend saying, that the league knew he would be away for a portion of February in India. My friend said however, that Ricky may have stayed on longer or left on a later date as he had been on the West Coast and in North Carolina and may have delayed his trip to India.
I'd comment on this, but I'm correct 100% of the time, so I don't have any reference for being wrong.Boy, was I wrong.
But it could be anything. He could have missed his connection and was therefore late returning home (theyre not going to suspend him for a year if he missed his flight). Point is, we have no idea what the circumstantial evidence is so theres no way that we can determine id his appeal claim is "weak" or not. Given that Sedrick Hodge was eligible to play this year after missing a test makes me believe that under the right circumstances, this is a case that Ricky can win.And just to remind, the NFL has not officially commented on this yet, so its still far from even being an "open case" at this point. And were already talking about appeals....This is fairly crucial information. Taking this info and viewing in light of the PFT analysis, there is probably very, very weak grounds for appeal. If it is Ricky's responsibility for telling the NFL where he'll be and when he'll be there, an unreported change in itinerary comes at his own peril. He should know that. If the NFL gets into the business of excusing unreported changed itineraries, guess what happens everytime a guy gives the NFL his itinerary? Off to Amsterdam for an unscheduled week of 'yoga.'My friend said however, that Ricky may have stayed on longer or left on a later date as he had been on the West Coast and in North Carolina and may have delayed his trip to India.
I agree that no one knows the facts, and ultimately the Medical Director will be determining if he violated the notification system. However, since there is nothing else to do on President's Day, I'm assuming what *your source* reported is true: Ricky was on the East coast when the NFL thought he was in India, or Ricky stayed in India longer than planned and was not at his U.S. address when the NFL attempted to notify him there. In either case, the first thing he should have done is communicated the changed itinerary to his agent, who could communicate the change to the NFL. But to your point, I'll agree that if he missed a connecting flight and arrived home/to india a few hours late, I jumped the gun calling his appeal grounds weak. If he missed his itinerary for a number of days (for valid or invalid reason) without reporting in, I'll stand by my statement. There's a reason the drug policy requires a place for notification "at all times" and it's because, alert the media, people who don't want to be tested give the wrong notice address and go missing for days.But it could be anything. He could have missed his connection and was therefore late returning home (theyre not going to suspend him for a year if he missed his flight). Point is, we have no idea what the circumstantial evidence is so theres no way that we can determine id his appeal claim is "weak" or not. Given that Sedrick Hodge was eligible to play this year after missing a test makes me believe that under the right circumstances, this is a case that Ricky can win.And just to remind, the NFL has not officially commented on this yet, so its still far from even being an "open case" at this point. And were already talking about appeals....This is fairly crucial information. Taking this info and viewing in light of the PFT analysis, there is probably very, very weak grounds for appeal. If it is Ricky's responsibility for telling the NFL where he'll be and when he'll be there, an unreported change in itinerary comes at his own peril. He should know that. If the NFL gets into the business of excusing unreported changed itineraries, guess what happens everytime a guy gives the NFL his itinerary? Off to Amsterdam for an unscheduled week of 'yoga.'My friend said however, that Ricky may have stayed on longer or left on a later date as he had been on the West Coast and in North Carolina and may have delayed his trip to India.
You can't seriously believe the average NFL fan is on Ricky's side here. Have you payed attention to any of these threads? About the only people on Ricky's side are people that have vested interest in him getting yards and TD's. If the NFL goes by what the average NFL fan wants, they're going to burn this guy at the stake and make an example of him, regardless of what the circumstances were.The fact is that nobody including the NFL, will want to hold to the letter of the law and kick a high profile player like Ricky to the curb for a year for missing a test.
They have every right to do it, but unless he flunks a subsequent test , there is no way the NFL doesn't let this slide. As long as Ricky has a "dog ate my homework" excuse, he's home free.
It's the offseason, the guy is travelling like crazy, he's shown himself to be clean for almost a year now, he's been a model citizen. Fan perception is everything to the NFL. There is no way they'll put themselves into a position of looking like the bad guy over a missed test.
Can't wait for the press conference to see the excuse.
On top of that, there's just no way in hades that the NFL goes lenient on a 3 time loser. Either he can justify not being where he said he could be contacted, or he can't. End of story. The last thing they are going to put up with is playing "What country is Ricky in?"You can't seriously believe the average NFL fan is on Ricky's side here.The fact is that nobody including the NFL, will want to hold to the letter of the law and kick a high profile player like Ricky to the curb for a year for missing a test.
They have every right to do it, but unless he flunks a subsequent test , there is no way the NFL doesn't let this slide. As long as Ricky has a "dog ate my homework" excuse, he's home free.
It's the offseason, the guy is travelling like crazy, he's shown himself to be clean for almost a year now, he's been a model citizen. Fan perception is everything to the NFL. There is no way they'll put themselves into a position of looking like the bad guy over a missed test.
Can't wait for the press conference to see the excuse.
I think you are underating what is happening in the world of sports today. If these reports are true and he either failed or missed the test for reasons of his own then the NFL will have no problem "kicking him to the curb". He's the perfect sacrificial lamb. He's already made a fiasco of his drug beliefs and the NFL would love to end their relationship with him. RW is not Peyton (hes the guy they wouldnt want to crack).The fact is that nobody including the NFL, will want to hold to the letter of the law and kick a high profile player like Ricky to the curb for a year for missing a test.
They have every right to do it, but unless he flunks a subsequent test , there is no way the NFL doesn't let this slide. As long as Ricky has a "dog ate my homework" excuse, he's home free.
It's the offseason, the guy is travelling like crazy, he's shown himself to be clean for almost a year now, he's been a model citizen. Fan perception is everything to the NFL. There is no way they'll put themselves into a position of looking like the bad guy over a missed test.
Can't wait for the press conference to see the excuse.
Actually, I win.Ricky knew the rules so it's tough to have much sympahty for him. Still, I think the NFL is a better product with him in the league. I guess no one really wins in this situation. Not the NFL, not the Dolphins, not Ricky, and no the fans.
They interviewed Hammering Hank on ESPN News. He said exactly that and it may be a few days until the NFL makes a comment.This from KFFL
Dolphins | Williams reportedly failed test; not missed one
Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:42:17 -0800
Updating ongoing reports, ESPN's Hank Goldberg reports sources have said Miami Dolphins RB Ricky Williams' violation of the league's substance-abuse policy was in fact a failed drug test and not a matter of a missed test.
FYI O Smith missed a test and it didnt work out to well for him.
The fans that want to see Ricky burn think he's a loon for quitting the league not because of his drug problem.I really could care less if Ricky smokes pot. The bottom line is that he has game-changing talent. He makes any NFL team he's on better and in the end gives the NFL a better product to promote on the field. The average fan should want Ricky on the field because he makes any game that he is in better than it would be without him. If he goes down because of a failed drug test, that's on him but I really doubt the NFL takes him down for missing one test because of his travel schedule.You can't seriously believe the average NFL fan is on Ricky's side here. Have you payed attention to any of these threads? About the only people on Ricky's side are people that have vested interest in him getting yards and TD's. If the NFL goes by what the average NFL fan wants, they're going to burn this guy at the stake and make an example of him, regardless of what the circumstances were.The fact is that nobody including the NFL, will want to hold to the letter of the law and kick a high profile player like Ricky to the curb for a year for missing a test.
They have every right to do it, but unless he flunks a subsequent test , there is no way the NFL doesn't let this slide. As long as Ricky has a "dog ate my homework" excuse, he's home free.
It's the offseason, the guy is travelling like crazy, he's shown himself to be clean for almost a year now, he's been a model citizen. Fan perception is everything to the NFL. There is no way they'll put themselves into a position of looking like the bad guy over a missed test.
Can't wait for the press conference to see the excuse.