Can't underrate that youth though. Historically, older prospects (which Daniels, Nix, Penix, and Rattler all are) tend to have worse careers than younger prospects which Maye and McCarthy are.JJ has the youth. JJ has the unknown. In a very limited sample size he looks like he can do it all. He clearly has great athleticism. He seems to be a great leader. If you take him with a high pick you are projecting into the future what he could be. I've heard the league is split on what they think of him.Careful with the "general consensus". there is a lot of noise from some that is just louder. The quieter guys who are in the know and study film seem to like Penix over JJ. We don't know how it will all shake out, maybe both work out, but I think they takeaway here is Penix should get a shot to show what he can do in the NFL and some "loud" people are writing him off.I had him 4th and JJ 5th and it seems like general consensus says I'm way wrong, so I've been questioning myself a bunch.I absolutely think Penix is a top 3 qb.
I think if you have him at 7, u probably dont know ball. 4/5, sure... I think you're wrong, but he's my fave qb of this class
Maybe McCarthy has a higher ceiling, but Penix is ready to play in the league at a decent level right now IMO. Not sure he has the stuff to end up being a top 10 QB, but 11-20 is definitely possible. If he starts next year, he won't be a bottom 5 starter IMO. High floor and low ceiling is the take I guess.
Penix is a more tangible asset. He obviously has a great arm. He has lots of film for scouts to study. If coaches think his cons can be fixed or improved on then what are we doing here? This guy is pretty darn amazing. I've been nit picking him but the more film I watch I think he could be the guy.
That's not to say younger prospects are always better (Trey Lance springs to mind) but its a red flag often. Top prospects tend to ascend younger and declare earlier, and that's true regardless of position.