Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Yeah, I'm sure Republicans are going to save the day. They had no part in the inflation in the first place, amirite?
You can call it that. It's basically the majority of voters don't want Trump or anybody that is endorsed by him;. But the republican party can't seem to figure that out and here where are with a very old man as president and possibly a guy recovering from a stoke as a senator .
Which is certainly your right, but I don't think you can ride a high horse over those voting to block another person from winning.
I guess we need to determine what makes a MAGA person. If I like a lot of the platform but hate Trump, am I a MAGA person?
If you don't vote Dems you're a MAGA
But you’re now voting for a side that is saying if they don’t the next election, it is because it’s stolen. How is that better?
You're not running for office so it's irrelevant what you are.
I'm not voting for a "side". I'm voting for a person. Whoever is saying what you've generalized, they're not getting my vote. I don't care what party they're in.
Carter, Clinton, Obama, Harris, Pelosi are all MAGA?
Our current president has called out team red voters as MAGA people on a few occasions.
Remember what Bill Maher said a few posts back - that the average voter isn’t very smart. Hillary carries some weight still.
We need a bigger bucket.
Was the primary before the stroke?
Obviously it would have to be enough to change the outcome of the election and I think the evidence needs to be such that you can prove it in court. This isn't about politics it is about being able to substantiate your claims.
Wife and I went to NYC for 4 days and used the subway extensively. Aside from one guy that appeared to be drunk, it was fine.
I will, I did in the last one.
You don’t seem like a MAGA person to me. Although it seems, on the national level, the republicans don’t have much of a platform besides supporting Trump.
I posted an article on false equivalence in the election denier thread. You should check it out.
I don't know what your point is here. You seem to be reaching for gotchas and whatabouts.
When you are going up against the likes of OZ that supports a former POTUS that tried to lie, cheat, and organize a mob to remain in power, it IS win at all costs. If he had a backbone and stood against the traitor instead of embracing him and actually lived in the state perhaps I would have considered him as a viable candidate.
The campaign rules have changed. Why give out your platform and have the other side modify it and apply it? I don’t like it and it sucks. Voting for the unknown really sucks also.
Pretty disgusted with both parties across the board as I'm sure most of us are.
No. He had the stroke on a Friday, and the primary was the following Tuesday. He and his wife/Team very much downplayed the seriousness of the stroke prior to the election.
Good luck convincing all but the most dedicated partisans that electing a legitimately brain-damaged candidate is superior to the other option.
Ugh. You guys just can't help yourselves with the false equivalence. I get it. It makes things easier to comprehend, allows you feel better about your side's sins, and shuts down the conversation. But please know it's lazy and a cognitive flaw.
She is. To be honest we were concerned about the subway but we both came away being impressed. They are clean, fast, frequent and inexpensive.
I couldn't recall, I remembered it being close. No idea what state law is on something like that. I remember years ago, wasn't Paul Wellstone already on the ballot in MN when he was killed in that plane crash? Seems like Mondale replaced him if memory serves me right. However I'm sure each state law is different and that being a death versus a type of incapacitation.
OMG! But they all do it. Totally the same thing!!!
That's why I doubt the final result is impacted by last night as much as some in the media are saying. For most of us these days, our minds are already made up. There aren't as many undecideds late. Some true swing voters have already made their choices. Even as a swing voter, if this cycle you were more influenced by anti Trump sentiment you were going to vote Fetterman anyway, if you were concerned about crime and inflation, you likely were already locked into Oz. I do think though that there is that small amount left that could be impacted or swayed, and in a tight race it might have been enough to move Oz ahead. However, Oz is running against the headwinds from a weak Mastriano campaign.
I'd rather spend a little more for gas in a democracy than get (the promise of) a discount in an autocracy.
I get it and I understood your point about how they generally still try and pass traditionally conservative policies.
I'm going to assume you shielded yourself from the January 6th hearings. Either that or you can point to actions by the Democrats you mentioned that are equivalent in severity.
