gianmarco
Footballguy
1). 1 of 31- Pepi/Zardez/Nips?
2- Zardes/CP/Gio/Swag
3- Zardes, CP, Nips
2). 3 of 4
3) 2 of 3
1). 1 of 31- Pepi/Zardez/Nips?
2- Zardes/CP/Gio/Swag
3- Zardes, CP, Nips
One of these days, I'll be able to type "for" on my phone.Two Ticos, including Joel Campbell, out fir the game on Wednesday fir COVID reasons. They’ve recalled Saborio and Bolanos from the Cretaceous period for the game.
I mean, Christian Pulisic and Gio Reyna played in El Salvador and we failed to create many chances there (though we still should have won that game, which we can't say for the Panama game).
Every road game is going to be hard. That's qualifying. It's easy to say that you expect better and demand accountability and all that bull####, but none of that is going to magically make this team go and do things that no other USMNT has really done with any consistency.
And you can't just point to "talent" as being something that changes these results. Nobody questions Yunus Musah's talent. But he was bad. So was Weah. Heck, Turner was pretty bad last night (and I worry that Panama has exposed him and everybody is going to pump those Olimpico style corners in now). No excuses.
Maybe LDT would have been the answer. Maybe Dest on the left (as I think Bello was the absolute worst of a bad bunch), but the problems I saw were more fundamental than tactical. The team just didn't play hard and didn't play crisp. They didn't move the ball quickly and decisively when they had it, and they didn't win the ball (with the exception of Zimm who I thought was mostly fine again) when they didn't have it. I don't know what magic button I can fault Gregg for not pressing.
Lletget equal this cycles Bradley, keep running him out there and trying to convince us we have no other options.
1- Pepi/Gio/Sarge?1). 1 of 31- Pepi/Zardez/Nips?
2- Zardes/CP/Gio/Swag
3- Zardes, CP, Nips
2). 3 of 4
3) 2 of 3
1- Pepi/Gio/Sarge?
2- Sarge/CP/Gio/Swag
3- Zardes, CP, Sarge
CR was losing at home to EL Salvador yesterday and needed some late heroics to get the three points. So I see your point there... but they also tend to step up vs the US, especially at home- so we'll see how things look on Wed.@TLEF316 lot of activity between my post and your response, so I won’t quote it, but I don’t necessarily disagree with you, or anyone who is being critical. I clearly do not think Berhalter is some guru or elite coach who is going to lead us anywhere special.
But I do expect us to qualify, rather easily, and I think I’ve seen enough evidence to feel confident in that opinion. Most of the teams in this region simply aren’t that good, and we just need to win at home. We’re also insanely young. Doesn’t excuse Berhalter’s dumb decisions, but it is what it is.
Collectively I don’t think we’ve been watching a lot of Costa Rica in this thread, as someone mentioned that @ Costa Rica is one of our 4 toughest games. I no longer believe that to be true and think Costa Roca is 6th or 7th best. I think that’s our most likely road win.
My hope is he’s done after Qatar and we go a different direction next cycle when we really do have a chance to make some noise. If Berhalter is as tactically naive as everyone seems to think he is that will be very obvious in Qatar
he had a solid year at some point... it wasn't 2019?1- Pepi/Gio/Sarge?
2- Sarge/CP/Gio/Swag
3- Zardes, CP, Sarge
Sarge isn't the answer to any of these. But I'm sure I can come up with a Sarge related trivia question just for TripItUp.
GGG made an interesting comment in his postgame which shows the heart of the problem. Effectively he's expecting us to get down one side (6 to an 8 to an OB or wing, etc) and then have the OB/wing cross in to the CF and wing making a far post run. I've pointed this out repeatedly, but that's fairly easily defended if the opposition knows it's coming and required both the 6 to get it to the 8 and the 8 to either square to an OB making a run or turn to get the ball to the wing. It's very static and requires an 8 actually willing to turn. It also isolates the other side of the field (how many times do we actually switch the field?). If we do actually get the ball into a crossing position, how many times have we actually seen that weak side wing make that far post run?I'm pretty much in this boat as well.
I'm concerned with GGG, not as much because of how he approached that game last night... it was a botched corner kick from being a point stolen against a much better squad while getting our A group rested for what was always a must win home game vs CR. Yes, we'd all like to see better guys out there and can certain quibble about Lletget vs LDLT (without knowing much of anything about the latter and his ability to play within this formation), Bello and Moore, and running Nips again after he killed himself vs Jam.
But we could argue a weaker team, including a lot of these players, got the job done all summer in the GC and got results by playing with heart, determination and enough skill... all three of which were absent last night. I yelled onto the thread- "SO STATIC" a few times last night... lack of winning second balls... all telling of a team that is playing without the desire to make things happen. And that, along with an inability to do even the fundamentals like trap and pass, is on the players.
But as you say, I'm most worried about how even our A team isn't even playing so hot- vs El Sal, Can and Honduras, and dropping points that were far easier than away to Panama. Is that on GGG? Probably. Whatever they're doing isn't really working, and yet they're still rolling with the same approach and formation that other than vs Jamaica (who someboyd mentioned they decided to forego the MF) hasn't worked at all- even in the gutted out results of the GC. Shape is consistently bad, players are isolated on both sides of the ball lacking cohesive spacing, and the US ends up chasing games instead of dictating them... even with top regional players like CP, Gio, Swag, et al.
nailed it.I also wonder if the qualifying thing (multiple games in a tight window, unlimited squad size, tons of chances to rotate) works against Berhalter and he’d be better off at the actual World Cup where you’ve got your 23 and don’t look to make too many changes from match to match. Andy has been pointing out his tendency to overthink for months now.
Reminds me of when I was in college and I’d take speed to stay up all night and cram for a big exam, and I’d end up just reorganizing my notes and smoking cigarettes the entire time instead of actually studying. I can just see Gregg emerging from some dark room Sunday morning with that team sheet in his hand thinking he’s stumbled onto something, when in reality it’s just a bunch gibberish.
Musah and Swag both have this ability and flashed it plenty vs Jam. But it also worked because Aaronson and Nips were busting their asses switching sides and finding those seams out wide or between CB and FB- not static, and that helped open up the field and the eventual FB or CMF overlaps. I'd add that by setting the defensive press higher and the CMFs doing a fantastic job with their spacing, the US was getting the ball back further up the field and putting Jam immediately on the back foot a lot of the night.GGG made an interesting comment in his postgame which shows the heart of the problem. Effectively he's expecting us to get down one side (6 to an 8 to an OB or wing, etc) and then have the OB/wing cross in to the CF and wing making a far post run. I've pointed this out repeatedly, but that's fairly easily defended if the opposition knows it's coming and required both the 6 to get it to the 8 and the 8 to either square to an OB making a run or turn to get the ball to the wing. It's very static and requires an 8 actually willing to turn. It also isolates the other side of the field (how many times do we actually switch the field?). If we do actually get the ball into a crossing position, how many times have we actually seen that weak side wing make that far post run?
Some of this is players (Llegett can't be played if he won't turn), but a lot of this is this tactical setup which almost by definition leaves guys isolated and static if the opposition is organized.
Musah and Swag both have this ability and flashed it plenty vs Jam. But it also worked because Aaronson and Nips were busting their asses switching sides and finding those seams out wide or between CB and FB- not static, and that helped open up the field and the eventual FB or CMF overlaps. I'd add that by setting the defensive press higher and the CMFs doing a fantastic job with their spacing, the US was getting the ball back further up the field and putting Jam immediately on the back foot a lot of the night.
Musah, amidst the giveaways, was doing this vs Panama last night and creating the best opportunities for the US going forward when he did. But as you say, last night the MFs were back to being static, as were the CMFs, and more often than not after beating a guy and charging into space he took 3, 4, 5 too many touches waiting for that run or space to open up, which rarely/never did. TBF, I noticed Weah make a few nice runs into space and just not get the ball- either from Musah or Acosta/Lletget.
eta: and tbf to that gameplan... how many times have we seen the person getting the ball on the wing cross the ball to the first defender and not hit their runners in the box? it's shambolic- even from our world class players.
wha? I don't know this one.Unsaid in all this is that crossing is the worst possible way to score from open play these days.
Believe it or not, Sargent has 5 career USMNT goals. 2 of them were in 2018. 3 of them in 2019. None since :(he had a solid year at some point... it wasn't 2019?
cripes. not Jozy. not some random dude like Amon.
oh... wait- JMo?
damn. if so, :( . imagine him instead of nips out there... similar work rate, a little less foot skills in general, but WAY more foot skills when it counts on the final ball, and more pace... at least it used to be that way.
that's not so hot. even with everything else he does... nope.Believe it or not, Sargent has 5 career USMNT goals. 2 of them were in 2018. 3 of them in 2019. None since :(
Yes. And he was the one with 11. :(that's not so hot. even with everything else he does... nope.
is it JMorris?
I'm blanking otherwise.
It's easy to forget how good he was for us in 2019, but I remember many arguing he should've been our POTY over Pulisic in 2019.Yes. And he was the one with 11. :(
Pulisic and Weston with 8. Zardes had 7.
wha? I don't know this one.
but especially if the cross consistently goes to the first defender.
Yup. Good CB pairing and goalie good in the air eats those up all day long. Movement in the box, through balls, counter attacks, and inside forwards cutting onto their strong foot are better xG.Unsaid in all this is that crossing is the worst possible way to score from open play these days.
As we are far enough along now....It's easy to forget how good he was for us in 2019, but I remember many arguing he should've been our POTY over Pulisic in 2019.
Man it'd be nice to have a fully healthy Morris among our wingers. He wouldn't likely start over CP and Gio, but he wouldn't be near the step down that Nips is.
It's a young, inexperienced team. We should also temper our criticism of losing a CONCACAF away game in light of that fact.As we are far enough along now....
--Jesus Ferreira has only played 65 minutes this year. In the 7-0 win in January against T&T, he bagged 2 goals and 3 assists. His rate is actually higher than Pepi's as a result.
-- Zardes has 10 career assists. Pulisic has 9. Right after those 2 is none other than....DeAndre Yedlin with 8. Beyond that, we don't have much in terms of career assists. Nips has 5. Aaronson and Ream have 4. That's your top 6. It's bare.
No doubt. And there's been a LOT of rotation.It's a young, inexperienced team. We should also temper our criticism of losing a CONCACAF away game in light of that fact.
Should've gotten that first one. I remember us all geeking out for Jesus after that game.As we are far enough along now....
--Jesus Ferreira has only played 65 minutes this year. In the 7-0 win in January against T&T, he bagged 2 goals and 3 assists. His rate is actually higher than Pepi's as a result.
-- Zardes has 10 career assists. Pulisic has 9. Right after those 2 is none other than....DeAndre Yedlin with 8. Beyond that, we don't have much in terms of career assists. Nips has 5. Aaronson and Ream have 4. That's your top 6. It's bare.
What's the deal with Jesus anyway? He's only 20. And he just did this a month agoShould've gotten that first one. I remember us all geeking out for Jesus after that game.
I'd never have guessed Yedlin, but it makes sense. Playing FB and throwing in crosses... plus he's one of our current most capped players. Man that's a sad assist leader list though.
Lletget in a nutshell. He even had TWO options on the left. Bello was coming up wide open and Weah could have received it as well. Lletget never even considered that side and immediately turned back.
Panama is not good though, ranked 68th right between Congo and United Arab Emirates. They weren't terribly impressive, the right lineup takes that game. And a good chunk of the starting line up last night was neither young nor inexperienced and that's the problem. We've seen them before.It's a young, inexperienced team. We should also temper our criticism of losing a CONCACAF away game in light of that fact.
or hit an earlier cross- not to the end line. but it always needs to clear the first defender or there's no point.Yeah simply getting to the byline by advancing down one side and crossing is a fairly low xG activity (effectively the central defense can handle that...think to what Leicester's defensive tactics during their run). Much more effective is switching the point of attack. That may lead to a cross as the final ball in, but the switching should have made space in the central defense. You want to have to make defenders make decisions. We aren't doing that (and its actually the reverse since we're relying on our "creativity" to produce non-existent space.
fifa rankings are not an accurate determiner for an away WCQ in CONCACAF.Panama is not good though, ranked 68th right between Congo and United Arab Emirates. They weren't terribly impressive, the right lineup takes that game. And a good chunk of the starting line up last night was neither young nor inexperienced and that's the problem. We've seen them before.
huh. that's a bit of a shock... Gibraltar <<<<< Panama. And those Euro minnows are nothing like Concacaf Hex/Oct games. Messi at least is up against it most games in Conmebol.Also, with all these changes to the lineup....
I just looked at Netherlands who played Gibraltar, for example. Virgil Van Dijk played the entire 90 today in their 6-0 win in the group which they are leading. He also played the full 90 3 days earlier against Latvia. And he plays for Liverpool as a full time starter with league and CL play.
I looked at Argentina and Messi also goes the full 90.
These guys are older, too.
I think GGG needs to reconsider how much he really needs to keep resting these guys. Let them play.
huh. that's a bit of a shock... Gibraltar <<<<< Panama. And those Euro minnows are nothing like Concacaf Hex/Oct games. Messi at least is up against it most games in Conmebol.
but they're both going all three games? maybe we ARE being too careful with our kids.
My response: Also a bull#### excuse, this isn't your grandfather's talent pool. We should at the very least have higher expectations than we did 20 years ago because the talent pool is twice as good.
Seriously @TripItUp, this thread, the college football thread, and the NBA thread are the only reasons I still come here. Please add something to the discussion or at least be funny every one in awhile. I don’t want to have to ignore people in this thread, it ruins the flow and I love reading this place during matches. Please be better.
Your response is bull####. It's not substantive. It offers no solutions.
I dunno man, it just reads different coming from you. Take it for what it’s worth, which I realize isn’t much. It’s all good. We all want the same thing.
It absolutely is substantive and unfortunately, it appears to be unique thought.
And I have provided a solution, it's getting a manager that can appropriately lead this incredibly talented pool of players.
What the hell is going on in this thread?
If you're hearing the same thing from multiple people, then maybe it is you. Just think about that.I don't know where this is coming from? You and a few other posters asking me to stop posting my criticism, and I give reasoning for the criticism.
Other are providing criticism...why am I any different?
Hmmm...maybe I'm a little to direct and it's perceived as abrasive or something. I find it very odd.
If you're hearing the same thing from multiple people, then maybe it is you. Just think about that.
This is not the first time.
It’s not that you are abrasive, it’s just that you don’t seem to really know what you are talking about. Which is totally fine! Definitely not a prerequisite for participation. I’m certainly no tactician and don’t pretend to be and I post in here all the time. It’s just that ignorance and confidence are usually a bad combo. Maybe ask more questions and try to learn some things from those who are more knowledgeable.Hmmm...maybe I'm a little to direct and it's perceived as abrasive or something. I find it very odd.
Yeah, I mean, I should probably look at more teams and more players, but...huh. that's a bit of a shock... Gibraltar <<<<< Panama. And those Euro minnows are nothing like Concacaf Hex/Oct games. Messi at least is up against it most games in Conmebol.
but they're both going all three games? maybe we ARE being too careful with our kids.