To be fair, Zardes and Weah never got a chance to show they belong (tonight, that is). Otherwise, have to agree.USMNT Only @usmntonly· 1h
"I don't think any one of them showed that they should be in the starting XI."
Clint Dempsey on the 7 players rotated into the USMNT starting XI tonight from the match against Jamaica.
This used to be OUR identity.Panama really play cohesively and are very organized. A team that is definitely better than the sum of their parts.
USMNT Only @usmntonly· 1h
"I don't think any one of them showed that they should be in the starting XI."
Clint Dempsey on the 7 players rotated into the USMNT starting XI tonight from the match against Jamaica.
here goes the media putting this on the players.
Why is the media protecting Berhalter? Is everybody sucking the Federation teet?
Clint Dempsey as the “media”
Yup. This was a chance for the US to keep pace. We didn't and the tactical naivete from Berhalter is showing.“Dropped point” standings - Matchday 5:
Mexico 0
USA -1
Canada -2
Panama -3
Costa Rica -5
El Salvador -6
Honduras -6
Jamaica -7
1) no.Is it anybody's else's concern that Federation leaders are using the National team to promote MLS to the detriment of the team?
Or am I on an island in this thread? There seems to be a lot of agreement with me elsewhere on this.
Only way to rest the players that will make a difference in the 3rd game.Giving a few hours to reflect, I'm struck by the fact that in an era with 5 subs, the 3 players who I felt played the worst in the 1h - Bello, Acosta, and Lletget - all ended up playing 90.
I mean the decision to not start Adams without Swag is the start. For a team that still relies on the 6 to initiate the offense, you either need Adams or your best other 2 MFs. To have neither is negligence and if he think Llegett is the next man up, we’ll he hasn’t been for awhile now.Only way to rest the players that will make a difference in the 3rd game.
Either Berhalter wrote this game off as "maybe steal a point" or he's just really really dumb with his tactical selections.
Does anyone think Tata would have played it this way?
Bello was horrible.Giving a few hours to reflect, I'm struck by the fact that in an era with 5 subs, the 3 players who I felt played the worst in the 1h - Bello, Acosta, and Lletget - all ended up playing 90.
3 things we learned
I found this part interesting as a potential reason for him punting this game:
The truth about the new octagonal round of CONCACAF’s World Cup qualifying is this: each game (especially away from home) carries a little less weight than the former six-team format. With seven home games, anyone can qualify for the World Cup by winning all (or, maybe just most) of their home games while doing very little (or nothing) on the road.
The bolded is what frustrates me most about GGG. I think the US fan group was near unanimous in their desire to see Scally get a call up based on his play and GGG refused based on it "being hard to integrate new guys in such a short camp". Then we see the guy he did choose instead show that he has absolutely no reason to be on that field right now. I just wish GGG was more of a proactive guy than a reactive guy. Guarantee we see Scally in November no matter what form he's in.Bello was horrible.
This leads me to believe Dest is more dinged up than we thought. Nobody else to play LB... other than Acosta, I suppose... since he didn't want to bring in somebody versatile, like Scally.
that Lletget stayed in there instead of trying out LDLT when you needed to chase a goal... ugh. Hell- give Hoppe a run down a goal- why not? Somebody mentioned they saw Lletget tracking runners- I guess that's something, but I didn't really notice it, tbh- and he certainly wasn't picking up any second balls on either side of the ball.
Overthought it for sure, definitely his favorite thing to do. We just need everyone healthy so these teams start to pick themselvesI think GGG definitely needed to make some subs to ensure we were ready for Wednesday, but he absolutely went overboard. We needed 4-5 subs with some guys being ready to come off after 60. By subbing 7 guys he effectively destroyed every bit of cohesiveness that was built in the last game.
The worst part though, was not using the 5 subs quicker when it was obvious we were getting overrun in midfield. Even more egregious to keep Lletget out there when he was one of the main problems in our lack of midfield control.
I'm just not sure about this; logic would seem to dictate but it doesn't appear normal logic is being applied here. And it's not a MLS/Europe thing, Pepi/M Robinson/Turner have all turned out great performances and there is plenty of young MLS talent with potential that could be added that please all parties. We have hours of tape on the MLS "veterans" at this point and it should be glaringly obvious that they should not be starting or getting significant minutes in any games that matter.Guarantee we see Scally in November no matter what form he's in.
Man I wish I had your confidence. Fact is they've played 3 good half's out of 10 in this cycle so coach has a 30% success rate as I see it. If last night didn't open his eyes then nothing will.I resolved to not even think about the Panama match again. Our manager got cute and we lost a WCQ match on the road in a really tight window - no need to stop the presses, that’s just what happens. Not saying we can’t be critical of Gregg, he was bad, but oh well. Canada dropped points at home to the worst team in the group, stuff happens. We’ll mop up against CR, get Gio healthy and be just fine for next month and beyond.
I resolved to not even think about the Panama match again. Our manager got cute and we lost a WCQ match on the road in a really tight window - no need to stop the presses, that’s just what happens. Not saying we can’t be critical of Gregg, he was bad, but oh well. Canada dropped points at home to the worst team in the group, stuff happens. We’ll mop up against CR, get Gio healthy and be just fine for next month and beyond.
Man I wish I had your confidence. Fact is they've played 3 good half's out of 10 in this cycle so coach has a 30% success rate as I see it. If last night didn't open his eyes then nothing will.
My take is similar to Moe's. Also, from a glass half full perspective - if we concede we've played 30% good halves and we are still sitting 2nd then I'll take it.
If Gio and CP were fit for Jamaica then last night we probably see Aaronson start last night. For me the problem was the RB/LB and the midfield. We really missed Snacks and Adams. Thought the CBs and Turner were fine.
My two biggest complaints from last night (outside of questionable lineup) was the marking on that corner. Horrible and almost gifted them a goal. Second was we didn't have the intensity and didn't seem up for it. Not sure if that is more being so young or quality or mental toughness but I definitely expected more of the guys that were out there.
On the lineup I think the big mistakes were Moore over Yedlin, Bello (although are you going to play Jedi 3 full games?) and Lleget. I would have gone Adams, Acosta and Musah. But honestly nobody played great - I'm not confident if you swap out 3-4 guys in the starting lineup we don't see the same result.
Here's the issue (and has been for awhile), the only 6 we really have that can play GGGs system is Adams. If he's off we look pedestrian especially if the CBs can't help the 6 who is playing really break the press. He then proceeds to play our 2 worst passing CBs and Acosta (along with a guy in Llegett who apparently can only look backwards). To your point...of course that isn't going to work.If Panama wasn't a red country, I'm guessing Robinson would have played. But they wanted to appease Fulham by not bringing him along and forcing a 10 day quarantine upon his return to England.
I "get it". A little goodwill for the next time they need a favor.
Agree to disagree regarding swapping out a few guys. I really think there is a cumulative effect when you play multiple "no offense" guys at the same time. I honestly think even swapping out Lleget for Luca and Nips for Hoppe could have turned the tide. I think having Luca (or even Busio) in there would have made a world of difference for Musah in the first half. He had to do way too much.
I know I'm asking a lot for them to roll out guys like Richards (or Scaly, if he'd been there) for the first time in an away qualifier. But based on the lineup we picked, we weren't going for the win anyway. I'd rather lose and get those guys experience than lose with Lleget, Nips and Bello.
Agree that the CB's weren't really the problem (although I dont think McKenzie was very good)
If Panama wasn't a red country, I'm guessing Robinson would have played. But they wanted to appease Fulham by not bringing him along and forcing a 10 day quarantine upon his return to England.
I don't think that is an issue - so long as the player has been double-jabbed.
I know Spurs players who are in South America will not have to quarantine this time - but since they play late Thursday night for their countries, they will probably not make it back to England in time to play this weekend.
100% this. Especially if that player doesn't have a history of being available every game.Here's the issue (and has been for awhile), the only 6 we really have that can play GGGs system is Adams. If he's off we look pedestrian especially if the CBs can't help the 6 who is playing really break the press. He then proceeds to play our 2 worst passing CBs and Acosta (along with a guy in Llegett who apparently can only look backwards). To your point...of course that isn't going to work.
If the system only works with a near world class player (and even then it is choppy), it isn't a system you should be using.
Oh and we didn't look fantastic in that first half against Jamaica, so I only have the good halves as 20%.
Couldn't agree more. We should have come firing out of the gate and beat up on lesser teams. @ El Sal, home vs CAN and last night were lost opportunities, only got 2 pts instead of what should have been 7 minimum. Can you imagine beating CR on Wed to be at 16 pts? Could have effectively punched our ticket and used the rest of qualifying to solidify the roster and get much needed experience for younger players.I just hate the mentality of throwing away a game. Especially against a team we can and should beat.
And that's what that was yesterday. Hate it. :X
I just hate the mentality of throwing away a game. Especially against a team we can and should beat.
And that's what that was yesterday. Hate it. :X
A little USMNT trivia with our current and recent squads to take our minds off last night.
1) Brenden Aaronson currently leads all USMNT guys in combined G/A in 2021 with a number of 7 (4 G and 3 A). He's done this in 583 minutes of play, or averaging 1 G/A per 65 minutes of play.
After him there are 3 guys tied at 5 G/A. Name them and rank them in order of G/A per minute played.
2) In 2019 (2020 had very little international soccer played), there were 4 players that had at least 7 G/A over the course of the year. Those were 7, 8, 8, and 11. Name the 4 players and who led the team with 11?
3) On the current squad that have played minutes this year, there are only 3 players that have more than 5 career assists for the USMNT. One with 8, one with 9, and one with 10. Name those 3.
1) The only one I "KNOW" is Pepi and he has to be the quickest in G/A per minute. Gio second and Lletget third?
2) Gotta be Pulisic and Jordan Morris for sure... Zardes? He had a bunch of "Zardes goals we all laughed about that year." Weston would be my fourth guess. Pulisic with 11?
3)Pulisic for sure. Zardes? Feel like he's played enough games up front that I can be confident in that answer... Snacks? I don't know if he's played enough games to have that many, but I can't think of anyone else.
I mean, Christian Pulisic and Gio Reyna played in El Salvador and we failed to create many chances there (though we still should have won that game, which we can't say for the Panama game).Lots of variables but I think it's undeniable we played a very weakened side. I won't go as far as to say throw the game away because these guys are professionals and I think they rightfully wouldn't take to kindly to that. I think GGG could have played a stronger side and a slightly weaker one midweek and gotten better results than what he did. But I'm not nearly as upset as most of you. If it totally backfires and we don't get 3 points against CR then I'll say it's a huge screw-up - as it is I see it as just a pretty bad one that he didn't need to make.
One factor here may be that Panama appears to be decent to good while CR is not. Not sure how GGG sees it but he almost played it the other way around.
1- Pepi/Zardez/Nips?A little USMNT trivia with our current and recent squads to take our minds off last night.
1) Brenden Aaronson currently leads all USMNT guys in combined G/A in 2021 with a number of 7 (4 G and 3 A). He's done this in 583 minutes of play, or averaging 1 G/A per 65 minutes of play.
After him there are 3 guys tied at 5 G/A. Name them and rank them in order of G/A per minute played.
2) In 2019 (2020 had very little international soccer played), there were 4 players that had at least 7 G/A over the course of the year. Those were 7, 8, 8, and 11. Name the 4 players and who led the team with 11?
3) On the current squad that have played minutes this year, there are only 3 players that have more than 5 career assists for the USMNT. One with 8, one with 9, and one with 10. Name those 3.