Anarchy99 said:
I don't have as much love for Fuller as you. He's missed significant time each of the last 5 seasons. He did next to nothing for the Dolphins but collected a check for $10.63M.
It's a lot easier to get open when you are playing opposite of Hopkins and Cooks. It's also easy to maintain a higher yards per game number when other receivers play when they are dinged and into the dog days of December. Add it all together, and Fuller has averaged 57 yards per game over his career.
Since Fuller entered the league, for players that have played 50 games, that ranks as the #25 WR in terms of yardage/gm. Dropping the games played requirement to WR that have played in 30 games since , he drops to WR #35.
Sure, he's shown flashes. But he struggles to stay on the field. He was the 11th highest paid receiver last year. Given the crazy contracts that receivers have been getting, I don't see him signing someone for low dollars. I personally don't think he is worth a multi-year contract with a big signing bonus and a chunk of guaranteed money.
If I were a GM, I'd probably over a one-year deal worth $6M and incentives. He'd be a decent #2 receiver . . . except he will want WR1 money. I am not sure he can be a WR1, so unless a team has a star #1 receiver, I am not sure he would be that impactful as a player. It also depends on the QB and the offensive system. A run centric offense that features short underneath routes and dump offs wouldn't be a good fit.
I agree with much of this. I'd argue Cooks was the #2 and not Fuller in 2020. Cooks didn't really take off until Fuller was gone, and I'd argue Fuller was a very different WR 2018-2020 than he was in 2016-2017. Those first 2 years he was mostly just running low percentage routes. During his 3 year peak though, he was running everything, and showed #1 traits, although again, it was never for a full season.
I think he's almost certainly in 1 year deal territory, which is why I think he'll end up being cheaper, that injury history is scary, but it also reaches a point where even if you only get 11 games out him, he's too hard to pass up. I fully agree he's a #2 WR because you can't trust him, but for as long as he is on the field, he'll be a top notch #2.
When he's been on the field, he's basically been Tyler Lockett. What would 11 games of Tyler Lockett be worth?
@Hot Sauce Guy and I have both been thinking pairing with Watson will be the best and most likely fit, but I'm trying to brainstorm some others that would make sense and came up with 5 good ones.
1. Arizona=Reunites with Hopkins, and when on the field is likely an upgrade from Kirk/Green, and clears a lot of room underneath for Moore/Ertz.
2. Dallas=Replaces Cooper, and allows them to keep Lamb in the slot. Also, allows them to ease Gallup back in.
3. Green Bay=Huge upgrade from MVS as a deep threat, though they may be more likely to look toward the draft for a WR.
4. Kansas City=Also might look toward the draft, but his presence opposite Tyreek would be terrifying and cause teams to basically commit multiple guys deep every single play. Kelce would feast, and maybe the running game too.
5. Las Vegas=They missed Ruggs deep speed a ton down the stretch last year, and likely would prefer not to spend another 1st on a WR. Again, helps clear space for Waller/Renfrow.
Every one of those teams has at least 1 option ahead of Fuller, but would have a sizeable role for him, and each team has a quality QB.