timschochet
Footballguy
You certainly seem to. You and a few others spend a heck of lot of time posting about him, following him from thread to thread. Is it hero worship, or an even more serious attraction?
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Ultra-MAGA Agenda 2022- We ❤️The Great MAGA King!!—-It was a good day! (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter HellToupee
- Start date
supermike80
Footballguy
He specifically hit reply and posted to say he didn't say something 35 times. He took that post as literal As Joe B says COME ON MAN
If youre gonna do something that silly, expect to be called out for it. I would expect it done to me as well.
Last edited by a moderator:
timschochet
Footballguy
What I expect is that no matter what @sho nuffposts you and a few others will call him out. Because this is what you do. The obsession is a little disturbing.
supermike80
Footballguy
Meh he's earned his distinctions here. As have you, as have I.....Either deal with it or leave, but it's deserved.
The Big Donkey
Footballguy
rockaction
Footballguy
We stopping COVID with bleach yet?
That would be a MAGA year.
That would be a MAGA year.
HellToupee
Footballguy
Congratulations for parroting the tech overlords and msm erroneous lies. No better way to enter 2022 than to genuflect to them. Happy New Year
This is Joe Public speaking (control)
I'm controlled in the body (C-O-N, control)
I'm controlled in the mind
Summer Wheat
Footballguy
JIslander said:
I agree.
Dems will probably lose control of both but it won`t be because of Trump. Looking in the mirror and they will find the reasons. I want Trump to go away for good.
Last edited by a moderator:
knowledge dropper
Footballguy
It’s very important to take the House to get these people removed from influential positions.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/01/10/exclusive-kevin-mccarthy-plans-to-strip-ilhan-omar-off-foreign-affairs-eric-swalwell-and-adam-schiff-off-intelligence-committee/
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2022/01/10/exclusive-kevin-mccarthy-plans-to-strip-ilhan-omar-off-foreign-affairs-eric-swalwell-and-adam-schiff-off-intelligence-committee/
dozer
Footballguy
Adam Schiff spokesperson: “It is always difficult to take Kevin McCarthy seriously. Nevertheless, allowing McCarthy to get anywhere near the Speaker’s gavel would be catastrophic — not just because of his propensity for falsehoods and smears, but because he will exist solely to do Donald Trump’s bidding — even potentially overturning the 2024 results.”
BladeRunner
Footballguy
Gosh, that would be fantastic. One can only hope!
He can relegate them to the House Committee on Bathroom Cleanliness.
dozer
Footballguy
"The election was fair — as fair as we've seen. We simply did not win the election as Republicans for the presidency."
Republican Senator, Mike Rounds
Zow
Footballguy
I'd be annoyed if I were a Chiefs fan.
I have a red Travis Matthew golf hat that I like, but it was basically unwearable because it looked similar enough to the original Maga hat (especially from the side) that I was drawing looks.
Gopher State
Footballguy
Agreed, Biden will lead the charge in helping the Dems lose both the house and senate.
Leroy Hoard
Footballguy
Agree a lot would be on Biden -- but again, history shows this happens all the time
Snotbubbles
Footballguy
I see the Democrats haven't learned from the VA elections. Still trying to tie Republicans to Donald Trump and hope that this will be enough. Voters don't care who a politician aligns with, they care about their financial bottom line and family safety. Two things that have gotten progressively worse in the past year.
EDIT: As others have said, when there is a red wave, it won't be because of Trump. If only the Democrats had a leg to stand on with their policies. Instead, they're left trying to recreate the anti-Trump 2020 turnout.
Last edited by a moderator:
Snotbubbles
Footballguy
knowledge dropper
Footballguy
Schiff, or his toadies, should never bring up lies. In pushed a lie for years in an attempt to overthrow a sitting President.
dozer
Footballguy
knowledge dropper
Footballguy
He pushed the fake dossier for years. He’s awfuldozer said:
dozer
Footballguy
BladeRunner
Footballguy
dozer
Footballguy
How about I put it this way...
What part of the dossier did Schiff say was real, that was actually.... fake.
dozer
Footballguy
The Steele Dossier is raw intelligence. By Steele's own admission, probably 70% Accurate.
The Steele Dossier was only a small part of establishing probable cause to obtain one of the FISA warrants against Carter Page.
Let me know if I get anything wrong...
As the FBI receives information establishing clandestine contact between Trump agents and Russian nationals from seven allied intelligence agencies in 2015, anti-Trump Republicans are paying Fusion GPS to investigate these very activities.
At the forefront of these activities is Carter Page, a man the FBI had previously probed as a possible Russian spy because he admitted to giving non-public information to men he knew worked for Russian intelligence.
Why did the FBI care about Page? Because he was the very first person Trump hired to his national security team in January 2016, six months before the FBI had even heard of the Steele dossier, and was one of the people the seven allied intelligence agencies that had contacted the FBI in 2015 had warned the FBI about.
--Steele sent his first intelligence reports to the FBI in mid-2016 and they detailed troubling information about Carter Page that turned out to be wholly true:
Page did indeed meet with a Kremlin official during a trip to Moscow that he made while he was working for Trump.
And he did indeed communicate with the Trump campaign the details of that contact.
And he did indeed discuss all the things with that Kremlin agent that the Steele dossier said he did.
And he did indeed lie to the media about this secretive contact as the dossier implied, he would.
All of the above is true, and none of it was provided by anyone named in Durham indictment against Danchecko.
The Steele Dossier is the most overblown document ever.
The Steele Dossier was only a small part of establishing probable cause to obtain one of the FISA warrants against Carter Page.
Let me know if I get anything wrong...
As the FBI receives information establishing clandestine contact between Trump agents and Russian nationals from seven allied intelligence agencies in 2015, anti-Trump Republicans are paying Fusion GPS to investigate these very activities.
At the forefront of these activities is Carter Page, a man the FBI had previously probed as a possible Russian spy because he admitted to giving non-public information to men he knew worked for Russian intelligence.
Why did the FBI care about Page? Because he was the very first person Trump hired to his national security team in January 2016, six months before the FBI had even heard of the Steele dossier, and was one of the people the seven allied intelligence agencies that had contacted the FBI in 2015 had warned the FBI about.
--Steele sent his first intelligence reports to the FBI in mid-2016 and they detailed troubling information about Carter Page that turned out to be wholly true:
Page did indeed meet with a Kremlin official during a trip to Moscow that he made while he was working for Trump.
And he did indeed communicate with the Trump campaign the details of that contact.
And he did indeed discuss all the things with that Kremlin agent that the Steele dossier said he did.
And he did indeed lie to the media about this secretive contact as the dossier implied, he would.
All of the above is true, and none of it was provided by anyone named in Durham indictment against Danchecko.
The Steele Dossier is the most overblown document ever.
Last edited by a moderator:
knowledge dropper
Footballguy
The General
Footballguy
I have some bad news for you if you aren't a fan of political figures who push false narratives, fake news, lies, what have you.knowledge dropper said:
shadrap
Footballguy
yea, but the people who should read it won't.
Russian collusion thread:
we got him now.
the chips are starting to fall.
just a matter of time.
sorry, I can't go on especially with certain people in here saying 70% of this smear, paid for Dem Russian dossier is true. just goes to show though, if you really want something to be true you will hang on any little thing, tidbit, or article that furthers this view.
good luck with that.
dozer
Footballguy
I don’t know man… Like, in that video with Megan McCain, He’s not lying.
She says right there, the Mueller Report found “no collusion.” She doesn’t say Conspiracy, the actual crime that Trump would have been charged with.
But that offer, acceptance, and action (The Trump Tower meeting), that’s collusion.
I fully accept that Mueller couldn’t prove conspiracy, but don’t blame me that they bungled the hand-off. Their incompetence in no excuse.
AP FACT CHECK: Trump, Barr distort Mueller report findings
Allegations of “collusion” were not “proven false” in the Mueller investigation, nor was the issue of “collusion” addressed in the report.
The Mueller report said the investigation did not find a criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, saying it had not collected sufficient evidence “to establish” or sustain criminal charges.
The report noted that some Trump campaign officials had declined to testify under the 5th Amendment or had provided false or incomplete testimony, making it difficult to get a complete picture of what happened during the 2016 campaign. The special counsel wrote that he “cannot rule out the possibility” that unavailable information could have cast a different light on the investigation’s findings.
The report also makes clear the investigation did not assess whether “collusion” occurred because it is not a legal term. The investigation found multiple contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia, and the report said it established that “the Russian government perceived it would benefit from a Trump presidency and worked to secure that outcome, and that the Campaign expected it would benefit electorally from information stolen and released through Russian efforts.”
dozer
Footballguy
I post a lot of links that I hope people read, so I've been reading most of KD's stuff lately. Now, sometimes I give up pretty quick, but I try.
shadrap
Footballguy
cripes man, coulda, shoulda, woulda, may have been, possible, not out of the realm??????????????????????????
least I know what you want to believe.
adios.
dozer
Footballguy
The Steele Dossier is raw intelligence and by its very nature has not been verified, therefore it can never be simply referred to as true. Or fake for that matter.
Also, it was initially Republicans that paid for the intelligence gathering that became the Steele Dossier. Let’s at least share the blame on that.
Also, it was initially Republicans that paid for the intelligence gathering that became the Steele Dossier. Let’s at least share the blame on that.
dozer
Footballguy
GordonGekko
Footballguy
dozer said:
Direct Headline: Adam Schiff’s false claim that ‘we have not spoken directly with the whistleblower’
"We have not spoken directly with the whistleblower," Schiff said. "We would like to. But I’m sure the whistleblower has concerns that he has not been advised, as the law requires, by the inspector general or the director of national Intelligence just as to how he is to communicate with Congress, and so the risk for the whistleblower is retaliation." The New York Times and other news organizations later reported that the whistleblower sought guidance from a House Intelligence Committee staffer before formally lodging the complaint. We rate this statement False.
By Bill McCarthy October 4, 2019
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2019/oct/04/adam-schiff/adam-schiffs-false-claim-we-have-not-spoken-direct/
*****
Point to note - The "code words" that Schiff used to try escape were, "should have been more carefully phrased" and "intended to answer the question" and "wasn't much more clear" and that he wanted to "clarify his remarks"
Schiff was the political equivalent of Frank Pentangeli. Pelosi wanted to send someone forward as a stalking horse that was expendable long term and who would trade their integrity for a higher public profile in the national daily media cycle. There's a lot to not like about Donald Trump. There are many things I find distasteful about Trump. But this is about actual due process and the principle of law and the principle of how our Republic should operate. The Republic is bigger than just one man. And yes that also includes Schiff too.
A lie is a lie is a lie.
If you find a piece of roadkill and drown it in 5 gallons of A1 Sauce, it doesn't magically turn it into a steak. Splitting hairs on Schiff is like saying if you nibble on one of the legs long enough, it will taste almost like an Impossible Burger. Then they'll say it's still not steak and then you'll shout that real meat is racist. And on and on and on and on.
Impossible Burgers are not based on real meat. That's all I have to give you.
dkp993
Footballguy
As a massive Trump supporter this is a very slippery slope and interesting hill for you to plant a flag.
GordonGekko
Footballguy
dozer said:
VIDEO: Rep. Adam Schiff On Whether There's Tangible Proof Of Russia Collusion | The View Mar 1, 2018
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcJ8_TJfUWE
VIDEO: Rep. Adam Schiff Reacts to Gosar Tweet and Discusses Steele Dossier | The View Nov 9, 2021
The congressman also tells "The View" about his hopes for the Build Back Better plan and discusses holding those involved in the Jan. 6 insurrection accountable.
https://youtu.be/UWSdiJJ8pPU?t=311
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWSdiJJ8pPU
VIDEO: 'The Five' blast Adam Schiff over bogus Trump-Russia dossier Nov 10, 2021
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKxeYSfJN1k
Direct Headline: Adam Schiff Just Made It Easier For Politicians to Make Money
The FEC ruled that Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), and therefore other politicians, can rent their campaign email lists to book publishers, further allowing politicians to capitalize...The decision allows Schiff’s publisher, Random House, to pay his campaign for access to email addresses collected over the course of the five-term Democrat’s time in office. Random House will use that list to target promotional materials to a narrowly tailored fan base, which, of course, includes supporters known to have previously given Schiff money...“It would be illegal for the campaign to use its list to promote the candidate’s book, but the FEC says it is legal for the campaign to take money from the publisher so that the publisher may use the list to promote that same book...In other words, a publisher may lawfully pour money into a candidate’s campaign so that more royalty money will go into the candidate's pocket....”
Roger Sollenberger Dec. 14, 2021 5:03AM ET
https://www.thedailybeast.com/feds-allow-adam-schiff-to-rent-email-list-to-his-book-publisher
TWEET: Adam Schiff XX@XXAdamSchiff
I just got word that Amazon has completely sold out their stock of my book, Midnight in Washington, just hours after its release. More are on their way! I cannot thank you all enough. I am so grateful. Order your copy now. (And by the way, I also narrate the audiobook!)
9:10 AM · Oct 12, 2021
https://twitter.com/adamschiff/status/1447957842770735109
TWEET: Steve Krakauer XX@XXSteveKrak
Rachel Maddow delivered a 15+ minute dramatic reading last week of Rep. Adam Schiff's new book about Russia collusion nonsense. That was BEFORE Schiff even appeared for his interview. She said she had been "devouring it" since she got a galley copy. Here's a small portion it:
8:26 AM · Oct 23, 2021
https://twitter.com/SteveKrak/status/1451933116315095049
******
Let's talk about the lie and it's strategy ( Always follow the money) Schiff goes on The View hoping to incite and sway low information voters and suburban women voters. Then he surprisingly gets hit with direct questions on the lies on his 2nd View appearance, where he is trying to promote his book. At nearly the same time, the cooked FEC literally changes it's rule book to allow Schiff to loophole through and just straight out get even more paid while the left leaning activist complicit MSM literally becomes his personal book advertising club.
"New book offers window into the Trump presidency from his chief congressional prosecutor" - CNN
"Adam Schiff: What He Saw at the Trump Revolution" - New York Times
So not just MSNBC, but also the NY Times and CNN ( Big surprise right....) Schiff lied and spread those lies far and wide and then got paid for the lie. And making sure he got paid was coordinated.
Just exactly how do you get your lunch handed to you by a guest host on The View? That's like watching your defense get shredded by a Brian Schottenheimer offensive game plan.
I give you credit Dozer, you are persistent and you source heavily. But hating Trump just isn't enough here. Two wrongs don't cancel each other out. And you are right, Schiff didn't lie for just nothing. He sold his integrity and punished America for money.
knowledge dropper
Footballguy
How so? Schiff basically attempted a coup of our elected President. As one that posts about the sanctity of our democratic process I would hope you join us in condemnation of Schiff.
dozer
Footballguy
Your biased right wing sources have you believing some crazy lies.
A coup? Trump withheld funding in exchange for political favors and Schiff is the liar?
Trumps team tries to conspire with the rooskies and your ready to forgive him and blame Schiff?
Trumps campaign manager hands over internal polling data and Schiff blah blah blah?
That’s crazy…
knowledge dropper
Footballguy
Obviously, we could go back and forth all day. You think Schiff has value because he was the carnival barker in the failed “Get Trump” scandal. I feel he behaved like a lying worm.
I don’t think all the whataboutisms in the world will change my opinion of Schiff’s place in history. Since, this is a MAGA thread let’s agree to disagree. The point is when the Republicans take the House, he’s gone.
dozer
Footballguy
Trump lost the election.
Trump lost more than 60 legal challenges to the election results.
Trump lost his efforts to get Republican State legislators to overturn the results.
Trump lost in his effort to get Vice President Pence to overturn the results.
Trump lost three separate counts in Georgia.
Trump lost an audit conducted by his allies in Arizona.
Trump lost in several efforts to get the Supreme Court to intervene.
Trump lost.
Trump lost more than 60 legal challenges to the election results.
Trump lost his efforts to get Republican State legislators to overturn the results.
Trump lost in his effort to get Vice President Pence to overturn the results.
Trump lost three separate counts in Georgia.
Trump lost an audit conducted by his allies in Arizona.
Trump lost in several efforts to get the Supreme Court to intervene.
Trump lost.
Last edited by a moderator:
sho nuff
Footballguy
I won't vote for Schiff for POTUS or support him.
But how so...because lies don't bother you when its Trump. Likes don't bother you when its your guy...that much is clear. So yes...it seems strange for you to praise Trump and others so often (and use the sources you do) if lies are so important to you.
Also...there was no attempted coup by Schiff. The Mueller investigation, the two impeachments...neither were close to a coup or hurting the sanctity of our democratic process...and none even close to as bad as Trump's behavior post-election 2020.
knowledge dropper
Footballguy
knowledge dropper
Footballguy
dozer
Footballguy
Looking forward to your pushing the truth. So much better than what you’ve been pushing…
sho nuff
Footballguy
People who push the truth don't link to GatewayPundit, PJMedia, Restate...people who push the truth don't fall in line with Donald Trump...people who push the truth don't buy into the CyberNinjas and other election lies told by Trump.
Similar threads
