If this was the NBA, that would be good enough to get a max contract.At the conclusion of his rookie contract, he'll have appeared in 39 of a possible 80 regular-season games.
I just cut him and it felt soooooo good.
Free agent Tyler Eifert said he is back to full health.
Eifert was limited to just two games last season because of a back injury which required yet another surgery, but the tight end believes he can return to his old form. "There’s no question I can get back to where I’ve been," Eifert said. "Everything is fixed." Bengals director of player personnel Duke Tobin said the team "values" Eifert but admitted his injury history will make negotiations difficult. As it stands, Eifert looks headed toward the market.
Source: Cincinnati Enquirer
Mar 6 - 10:30 AM
Marvin Lewis was vague on Tyler Eifert's health after he missed Tuesday's minicamp session.
Per reporter Jim Owczarski, Lewis was "surprised" at Eifert's absence. "As time goes on when we start to play football then we will have an idea of where he is," Lewis said afterward. Eifert claimed he was back to full health in March, but he was limited in last month's OTAs sessions. One of the league's least-durable players, Eifert has appeared in 24-of-64 possible games over the past four years.
Source: Paul Dehner on Twitter
Jun 12 - 4:56 PM
Unless you got to cut down your roster now I don't see any harm in hanging on for more news but at this point I'm going to say if he should announce his retirement before camp I would not be surprised.He's almost dropable, even in dynasty.
I did say almostUnless you got to cut down your roster now I don't see any harm in hanging on for more news but at this point I'm going to say if he should announce his retirement before camp I would not be surprised.
Bengals.com does not expect Tyler Eifert (back) to be ready for the beginning of training camp on Thursday.
The website considers Eifert's status "as up in the air as it was six weeks ago." "Hopefully Tyler Eifert can come back and be a factor for us," executive Duke Tobin said. "I can’t predict the future on that one." Eifert's back limited him to two games in 2017. He's made just 10 appearances over the past two years and only 24 over the past four. Eifert should be considered questionable for Week 1 and beyond.
Source: bengals.com
Jul 24 - 6:22 PM
Tyler Kroft is garbaggio. I would rather take a chance on an unknown like Seals-Jones or Vannet or even just stream. Kroft played all last seasons and had how many startable games? 2? 3? No thanks.Dodds suggests that safe play is to draft Eifert, and if he turns up hurt, grab Kroft to replace him. Get both in a deep league.
The Tylerx2 strategy.
Went undrafted in my long time redraft. He’s been sitting on the wire 11 days.,I finally dropped Ebron for him. Don’t need him (have Olsen) but if he starts getting RZ looks might flex him. Don’t think we will ever see consistency from EE & he actually is a backup so why not?he is basically going as a backup TE. if he plays say 10-12 games....hes is worth the pick. looked good in pre-season too...fine dice roll at his ADP.
The answer here is Seals-Jones. With Check-down Charlie Sam Bradford, theres a strong chance he gets a fair bit of RZ and short goal line looks. (when DJ is not targeted)I would rather take a chance on an unknown like Seals-Jones or Vannet or even just stream.
Didn't the coach say he will play on less then 50% of offensive snaps? That's a no from me dawg.He seems like the ideal TE2. With an ADP of TE14, if you wait on TE, why not grab him and ride him until he's injured and then resort to your TE1? He's put up elite numbers when healthy. I don't see any reason to expect him to suddenly not be good when healthy. He's only 28 (in two days).
He's too damn cheap to risk letting someone else have a top 5 TE for that price. I hate not having him in my short roster leagues.
No. The coach said he hopes that he plays less than 50 snaps per game. And personally, I prefer that Eifert is on the sideline for running plays. Keep that man healthy!Didn't the coach say he will play on less then 50% of offensive snaps? That's a no from me dawg.
I see what you are saying but this also means less play actions and receptions. You pretty much have to get a TD if you only play 50 snaps.No. The coach said he hopes that he plays less than 50 snaps per game. And personally, I prefer that Eifert is on the sideline for running plays. Keep that man healthy!
I don’t want to hijack but in his productive 2-3 game stretch last year I posted a breakdown (in the RSJ thread? Not sure) of what they were doing with him. He was only playing 15-22 snaps a game but they would put him in the slot or motion him from the wing in RZ situations. Different year different personnel but I def don’t view him as a volume play given he can’t block & will likely see limited snap counts. But def an [interesting] situation to monitor & he’s a player to watch.The answer here is Seals-Jones. With Check-down Charlie Sam Bradford, theres a strong chance he gets a fair bit of RZ and short goal line looks. (when DJ is not targeted)
I have Eifert in one PPR (don't laugh, I waited a bit too long) but I may snag Seals-Jones myself, or Gesicki, or some new flash in the pan after week one and stream from there if Eifert doesn't come to life.
TZM
Not really. Only if Dalton audibles from a run play to a pass play would Eifert lose out on a potential reception. Remember, the coach knows when he's going to call a play action so he can put Eifert on the field in a blocking formation on those plays with the full intent of him not actually blocking.I see what you are saying but this also means less play actions and receptions. You pretty much have to get a TD if you only play 50 snaps.
I think you guys may be overestimating how many NFL TEs average 50+ snaps per game.I see what you are saying but this also means less play actions and receptions. You pretty much have to get a TD if you only play 50 snaps.
True, he was very sparsely used. But I would expect nothing else as a rookie. He did flash in the limited action he was actually involved.BobbyLayne said:I don’t want to hijack but in his productive 2-3 game stretch last year I posted a breakdown (in the RSJ thread? Not sure) of what they were doing with him. He was only playing 15-22 snaps a game but they would put him in the slot or motion him from the wing in RZ situations. Different year different personnel but I def don’t view him as a volume play given he can’t block & will likely see limited snap counts. But def an [interesting] situation to monitor & he’s a player to watch.
ETA: didn’t know Gresham is still weeks away from returning. semi-interesting!
And now it's about time he gets a hang nail and has to miss three games...I feel like he's safe to insert into lineups now. This was classic Eifert.
I watched all of his targets and he looked good, I targeted him in every league in which he was dropped. His snaps have gone 40% > 64% > 65% and target share 11%, 10%, 17%.I feel like he's safe to insert into lineups now. This was classic Eifert.