Deamon
Footballguy
You were. You said that TE was probably not the best position for him. Also stats show that he was more RB or WR than TE, so he also "never was a TE". You also said he probably should be listed as an RB.... this implies that he "shouldn't be listed as a TE".convenient you left out this part...."he is not a TE, never was a TE, and shouldn't be listed as a TE."
and I was never on "common ground" with what you said.....now you are just flailing in the wind....and making #### up to fit your narrative....
You are really stretching here to fit YOUR narrative. You clearly have a bias as you're starting him in the flex, you also said you're 90% sure he wont be the qb but said you wouldn't put money down on it, and keep moving from one point to another anytime statistics are brought up. Oh, and you think that 99% of the websites out there incorrectly define him and the ONE (espn fantasy) that has him as a TE (which you said "TE probably wasn't best for him), is the one that is correct.
Like you said in the collusion thread you realized you were wrong after being aggressive and stubborn like you are now. We'll see on Sunday if he starts at QB which you think he has under a 10% chance of doing.