The hype has actually been pretty quiet.It may be wishful thinking, as a Charknado owner, but this seems like one of those setups for disappointment...so much hype on this guy this week because of 11 carries vs. the worst run d in the league.
wait, what????Well I'm in with you guy's, Ware over Gurely!
(Not an easy decision and hope I don't regret it)
Me too. So far so good.Put in Ware over Lamar Miller at the last minute.
Hope i don't regret it.
Well it worked. Somebody needs to tell Miami to run the ball more. Sheesh.Me too. So far so good.Put in Ware over Lamar Miller at the last minute.
Hope i don't regret it.
West is ahead of him too.It's to bad JC is ahead of him. This guy could be really good if they rode him.
I did. Box stacked against the run and no QB? Decision made.Well I'm in with you guy's, Ware over Gurely!
(Not an easy decision and hope I don't regret it)
Ware over Ingram is a gut check move, but Gurley? Nobody respects Rams passing game anymore. The deck is tilted. I went Ware and am glad I did. This particular week, it looks like I pressed all the right buttons. Blind Squirrel.People starting Ware over Ingram and Gurley? Wow. Bold and I salute you.
Yep decided I was all in, didn't like Gurleys Matchup so he was out in both leagues I have him.wait, what????Well I'm in with you guy's, Ware over Gurely!
(Not an easy decision and hope I don't regret it)
I agree right now but Ware looks really good. He's going to cut into West workload. He could push West out of the way. It's in play.West is ahead of him too.It's to bad JC is ahead of him. This guy could be really good if they rode him.
Same here. I read that article and picked him up in two leagues. Even if West is back, it was a good one week thing regardless.Big thanks to Matt Waldman for his Ware article last week. I hadn't paid much attention to this backfield recently, and it looks like KC really likes Ware's skills. Ware + this tough defense could be productive even when West returns.
I'm not convinced Trent Richardson could score a one yard TD against a junior high school defense.I'm convinced that Trent Richardson would be a 4-5 game stud if he was lucky enough to be the lead rb in KC. This has been going on for over a decade, whoever starts puts up great #'s. Note to self, next year draft KC's #2 and 3 rb's after someone takes Charles and just wait.
Not sure why this is necessarily true. West was only in because of an injury himself. It's not like he was an established starter.West is ahead of him too.It's to bad JC is ahead of him. This guy could be really good if they rode him.
It's very easy to spot the West owners in here. They're the ones pretending Ware isn't averaging 6.5 yards per carry and hoping Andy Reid hasn't notice either.Not sure why this is necessarily true. West was only in because of an injury himself. It's not like he was an established starter.West is ahead of him too.It's to bad JC is ahead of him. This guy could be really good if they rode him.
I don't own West or Ware. West was not only in because of an injury to Charles. West was his backup, and got carries every game. He became the established starter once Charles was injured.It's very easy to spot the West owners in here. They're the ones pretending Ware isn't averaging 6.5 yards per carry and hoping Andy Reid hasn't notice either.Not sure why this is necessarily true. West was only in because of an injury himself. It's not like he was an established starter.West is ahead of him too.It's to bad JC is ahead of him. This guy could be really good if they rode him.
Well now, it seems you're being mean. Also, I believe you're lying. I'd be willing to bet that you own West. I've said a dozen times, this has all the earmarks of a RBBC. West did fine (3.8 ypc) while he was replacing Charles. But Ware ran better (6.5 ypc). West performed better in the passing game than Ware has. Reid isn't dumb. He's going to use both backs, simply because it helps the team win. In good matchups, where it looks like there will be a lot of points scored, they might end up both being good starts. In games that look like they may be lower scoring, the split may render both ineffective. I stated upthread that I could see West getting two series to Ware's one. With West playing most third and long downs and Ware getting more goal line work. But Ware isn't going to be placed back on the bench like he was pre-injury to West. He's been way too good for that.I don't own West or Ware. West was not only in because of an injury to Charles. West was his backup, and got carries every game. He became the established starter once Charles was injured.It's very easy to spot the West owners in here. They're the ones pretending Ware isn't averaging 6.5 yards per carry and hoping Andy Reid hasn't notice either.Not sure why this is necessarily true. West was only in because of an injury himself. It's not like he was an established starter.West is ahead of him too.It's to bad JC is ahead of him. This guy could be really good if they rode him.
One more thing, it's easy to spot trolls, and you are one of them. You are constantly a jerk to people every single day on this site. You add nothing positive.
Like I said, you're a jerk. Does someone have to own one or the other to have an opinion? Also, I never said they wouldn't end up splitting carries.Well now, it seems you're being mean. Also, I believe you're lying. I'd be willing to bet that you own West. I've said a dozen times, this has all the earmarks of a RBBC.
For the record, I own both and my fear is that Ware has earned a bigger role which will hurt both from a fantasy perspective. However if Reid was to go with a bell cow back (as he is wont to do), I'm fairly sure that back would be West - since he chose him originally for a reason and he was very effective during his time a starter. He's the better all around back and fits the KC system better.It's very easy to spot the West owners in here. They're the ones pretending Ware isn't averaging 6.5 yards per carry and hoping Andy Reid hasn't notice either.Not sure why this is necessarily true. West was only in because of an injury himself. It's not like he was an established starter.West is ahead of him too.It's to bad JC is ahead of him. This guy could be really good if they rode him.
There's an ignore button somewhere. Feel free to use it if you don't like my opinions. Funny that you're accusing me of being a troll when in two posts, you've attacked me twice and I haven't attacked you at all. Maybe anger management counseling would be a good option?Like I said, you're a jerk. Does someone have to own one or the other to have an opinion? Also, I never said they wouldn't end up splitting carries.Well now, it seems you're being mean. Also, I believe you're lying. I'd be willing to bet that you own West. I've said a dozen times, this has all the earmarks of a RBBC.
YPC can be a flawed stat if a guy breaks an 80 yard run and only has a handful of carries. He could have 19 straight carries with no gain and still have a 4.0 ypc, which is obviously misleading. In Ware's case, he doesn't have that super long run that skewing his stat line. He's been very consistent. He has 36 carries, not 10. I'm with you in that both guys have performed well and I think it might be a no win situation for the owners of both guys. They've both earned repetitions and are going to cut into each other's value.YPC is somewhat of a flawed stat to begin with, but in such tremendously small sample sizes it's really not even close to meaningful as you're trying to make it seem.It's very easy to spot the West owners in here. They're the ones pretending Ware isn't averaging 6.5 yards per carry and hoping Andy Reid hasn't notice either.Not sure why this is necessarily true. West was only in because of an injury himself. It's not like he was an established starter.West is ahead of him too.It's to bad JC is ahead of him. This guy could be really good if they rode him.
I have the same concern regarding the possible split eroding the value of both. I mentioned it last week but I wasn't aware of the ypc. That is a hard number to ignore. Yes, it can be misleading but under the eyeball test of watching both these guys, I think it underscores what seems to be stated to the eyeball in that West is much better in the receiving aspect and Ware is running very hard.For the record, I own both and my fear is that Ware has earned a bigger role which will hurt both from a fantasy perspective. However if Reid was to go with a bell cow back (as he is wont to do), I'm fairly sure that back would be West - since he chose him originally for a reason and he was very effective during his time a starter. He's the better all around back and fits the KC system better.It's very easy to spot the West owners in here. They're the ones pretending Ware isn't averaging 6.5 yards per carry and hoping Andy Reid hasn't notice either.Not sure why this is necessarily true. West was only in because of an injury himself. It's not like he was an established starter.West is ahead of him too.It's to bad JC is ahead of him. This guy could be really good if they rode him.
YPC is somewhat of a flawed stat to begin with, but in such tremendously small sample sizes it's really not even close to meaningful as you're trying to make it seem.
Ware had a 52 yard run against the Chargers.YPC can be a flawed stat if a guy breaks an 80 yard run and only has a handful of carries. He could have 19 straight carries with no gain and still have a 4.0 ypc, which is obviously misleading. In Ware's case, he doesn't have that super long run that skewing his stat line. He's been very consistent. He has 36 carries, not 10. I'm with you in that both guys have performed well and I think it might be a no win situation for the owners of both guys. They've both earned repetitions and are going to cut into each other's value.YPC is somewhat of a flawed stat to begin with, but in such tremendously small sample sizes it's really not even close to meaningful as you're trying to make it seem.It's very easy to spot the West owners in here. They're the ones pretending Ware isn't averaging 6.5 yards per carry and hoping Andy Reid hasn't notice either.Not sure why this is necessarily true. West was only in because of an injury himself. It's not like he was an established starter.West is ahead of him too.It's to bad JC is ahead of him. This guy could be really good if they rode him.
He didn't attack you. You are the one that made a snarky comment about how it was easy to spot the West owners. He said he didn't own either, and you told him he was lying. You do treat people like garbage on here. You seem to enjoy it.There's an ignore button somewhere. Feel free to use it if you don't like my opinions. Funny that you're accusing me of being a troll when in two posts, you've attacked me twice and I haven't attacked you at all. Maybe anger management counseling would be a good option?Like I said, you're a jerk. Does someone have to own one or the other to have an opinion? Also, I never said they wouldn't end up splitting carries.Well now, it seems you're being mean. Also, I believe you're lying. I'd be willing to bet that you own West. I've said a dozen times, this has all the earmarks of a RBBC.
It will be interesting to see how it shakes out. It could end up like the Forte/Langford situation.For the record, I own both and my fear is that Ware has earned a bigger role which will hurt both from a fantasy perspective. However if Reid was to go with a bell cow back (as he is wont to do), I'm fairly sure that back would be West - since he chose him originally for a reason and he was very effective during his time a starter. He's the better all around back and fits the KC system better.It's very easy to spot the West owners in here. They're the ones pretending Ware isn't averaging 6.5 yards per carry and hoping Andy Reid hasn't notice either.Not sure why this is necessarily true. West was only in because of an injury himself. It's not like he was an established starter.West is ahead of him too.It's to bad JC is ahead of him. This guy could be really good if they rode him.
YPC is somewhat of a flawed stat to begin with, but in such tremendously small sample sizes it's really not even close to meaningful as you're trying to make it seem.
Is this a 'if you take away his big play' deal? The 52 yard run is even more of a testament to why he's going to remain relevant. He also has three 3-yard touchdown runs, which bring down his ypc. Even without the 52 yarder, he's at 5 ypc. Adrian Peterson is at 4.9. Todd Gurley 4.8.Ware had a 52 yard run against the Chargers.YPC can be a flawed stat if a guy breaks an 80 yard run and only has a handful of carries. He could have 19 straight carries with no gain and still have a 4.0 ypc, which is obviously misleading. In Ware's case, he doesn't have that super long run that skewing his stat line. He's been very consistent. He has 36 carries, not 10. I'm with you in that both guys have performed well and I think it might be a no win situation for the owners of both guys. They've both earned repetitions and are going to cut into each other's value.YPC is somewhat of a flawed stat to begin with, but in such tremendously small sample sizes it's really not even close to meaningful as you're trying to make it seem.It's very easy to spot the West owners in here. They're the ones pretending Ware isn't averaging 6.5 yards per carry and hoping Andy Reid hasn't notice either.Not sure why this is necessarily true. West was only in because of an injury himself. It's not like he was an established starter.West is ahead of him too.It's to bad JC is ahead of him. This guy could be really good if they rode him.
Saying you can tell who the West owners are warrants being called a troll and a jerk? I didn't call him a liar until after his little hissy fit. I think it's fairly obvious in most player threads who the ones who own him are and who the ones are that own his competition. Not sure why that should make anyone so angry.He didn't attack you. You are the one that made a snarky comment about how it was easy to spot the West owners. He said he didn't own either, and you told him he was lying. You do treat people like garbage on here. You seem to enjoy it.There's an ignore button somewhere. Feel free to use it if you don't like my opinions. Funny that you're accusing me of being a troll when in two posts, you've attacked me twice and I haven't attacked you at all. Maybe anger management counseling would be a good option?Like I said, you're a jerk. Does someone have to own one or the other to have an opinion? Also, I never said they wouldn't end up splitting carries.Well now, it seems you're being mean. Also, I believe you're lying. I'd be willing to bet that you own West. I've said a dozen times, this has all the earmarks of a RBBC.
Different scenario. Bears needs to see what Langford can do if/when they ditch Forte in the offseason. They also have similar running styles.It will be interesting to see how it shakes out. It could end up like the Forte/Langford situation.For the record, I own both and my fear is that Ware has earned a bigger role which will hurt both from a fantasy perspective. However if Reid was to go with a bell cow back (as he is wont to do), I'm fairly sure that back would be West - since he chose him originally for a reason and he was very effective during his time a starter. He's the better all around back and fits the KC system better.It's very easy to spot the West owners in here. They're the ones pretending Ware isn't averaging 6.5 yards per carry and hoping Andy Reid hasn't notice either.Not sure why this is necessarily true. West was only in because of an injury himself. It's not like he was an established starter.West is ahead of him too.It's to bad JC is ahead of him. This guy could be really good if they rode him.
YPC is somewhat of a flawed stat to begin with, but in such tremendously small sample sizes it's really not even close to meaningful as you're trying to make it seem.