What are we, goldfish? These are running backs. Running backs tend to get hurt. There’s going to be opportunities for both this season. Bigger problem is whether the Seahawks is going to be a viable offense. Most teams looked like hot garbage though so it’s not much different than most are dealing with this year.
I keep saying this but the idea of filling your starting roster spots at RB is a for the most part a weekly proposition. No matter how barren the WW looks right now, squint hard, because guys will emerge and have their weeks. There are a few guys that are both really good and will also survive both injury and competition all year. Good luck figuring out who they are. Charbonnet will get his chances at some point almost certainly. And Walker will definitely have his.
I think the question was who would produce and what the split would look like if both were healthy.
Early returns look like it will heavily lean to the better RB - K9. And that the only way Charbers get what they want is through injury. Which really was the most likely all along, but clearly not to many here.
I’m not a Charber. Nor a Walker-er. I’m just a guy looking at two RBs and considering how their roles will develop. And to me, that’s the key word…develop. There’s a lot of different ways things can go and I don’t think Pete knows himself yet. I do know you don’t spend a 2nd on a guy that you’re never going to try giving a role to. So what’s the role? No idea. Things need to run their course. I would suspect that getting blasted at home to a team everyone thought was in the mix for a top 5 pick is not a great piece of evidence for doing the same things you did in that game moving forward. Add everything I said about RBs in general to the pile and I arrive at a wait and see conclusion, but think both guys are going to get used. How much and when? No one can possibly know yet.
And if that sounds like a cop out, great, because that’s how I look at the vast majority of backfields. Like the Eagles, for example.
I believe Walker is more talented and that Pete in Seahwaks tenure has never been a real rbbc guy. In fact he has only given 10 or more carries to 2 rbs like 3 times (eta in the same game) or something silly.
And those 2 things are why I didn't get why the Charbers were thinking 60/40 or close to 50/50 split. Just never made sense.
Injury could strike and make him a solid pick just like any back up runner. I just think the people who thought pete would play a lesser RB because of what the GM did were way off base. And continue to believe that. 1 game in looks right.
If I'm wrong the sun will still come up tomorrow but I won't tiptoe around what I think is obvious in fear of a hot take being wrong like most of this board. Zfg
That’s all fine, no issue with these player takes. We all have them and yours are within reason, nothing crazy.
Mine is a roster construction take. I 100% build my dynasty teams around what I do at WR and for redraft that drops to, idk, 75% to put a number on it. Point is I don’t sweat RB in dynasty at all until the train is down the track a bit and in redraft it’s a different calculation but same trend. And I’m willing to admit the approach could be wrong on the redraft, but dynasty absolutely convinced it’s the only way to operate if you want sustained success- which are what the results I’ve experienced have seemed to confirm. With WRs you’re playing poker, which is winnable. With RBs you’re playing roulette. WRs are easier to figure out in scouting, get injured less, have much longer shelf lives of peak performance, and are way less volatile from year to year…but also have more outs. You have to be on the field to score points and there’s a whole more of them on the field than RBs. Generally it’s 3 vs 1. Those are way better odds.
So Walker who yes, certainly looks way more explosive and “better” than ZC at this stage has way too many strikes against him for me to try to acquire unless I was in position to rookie draft him last year. One, he’s a RB. Two, he’s very expensive to acquire. Three, he has holes in his game, in that he’s not much of a receiver, and is inefficient on a carry to carry basis. Four, his team just drafted another RB in the 2nd round. Five, the Seahawks look at analytics. Six, that new RB seems to in theory offer to fill some gaps that Walker has in his game.
On the flip side, ZC has working in his favor the same things I just mentioned. The one spot I got him was a startup in the 11th round, which is pretty cheap. There were several rookie WRs on the board still that I like also but already had a lot of exposure to them and wanted to go a different route. That route is to wait for his opportunity to come, hope for the value pop, and trade him for some kind of profit. He’s not a trade target for me until his value comes down. Walker isn’t until his value comes WAY down.
I only got roped into this thread because of ridiculously bad logic that someone was making as to why Walker is the guy. Even if proven correct, the logic behind it was laughably silly. I do not much care about either player. So this will be my last post on the subject for awhile, I’ve made my points and I’m really just handing out a dynasty build script that has worked quite well, but am not really concerned about it because nobody ever listens anyway lol. Cheers.