Love this app/feature.
Just a note here...I see you can switch btwn 4 difft FBG writers which is cool to see the difft outlooks...However, each one mentions "we". We like this, we don't like this etc, etc...who is "we"
Reason I am asking is because Tremblay states..
Overview:
In a competitive league, almost every team has a weakness. It's almost impossible to build a team that is strong at all three core positions (quarterback, running back and wide receiver). As you probably suspect,
we perceive your weakness to be at the quarterback position. Of all the deficiencies to have though, this is usually the easiest one to mask.
Wood states...
Overview:
We'll start by complimenting you on your strength at quarterback, receiver, and tight end. As you know, it's very difficult in a competitive league to assemble a team that is strong at QB, RB, and WR, so just about every team will have a weakness. As you probably suspect, we perceive yours to be at running back.
So should the "we" be "I" because when I see "we I think FBG as a whole...but obviously these two staffers do not agree on my QB situation.
I personnally like Woods assesement of my club as I feel pretty comfortable (16 teamDynasty League) heading into the season with Palmer & Cassell.
Thanks and great feature
:(