Ned should be 87 minutes.As a refresher, here's the relevant data Steve had compiled a few years ago regarding the correlation of HMs to marathon times. (I updated Juxt's and my data.) Steve had concluded that 2.15-2.20 is a reasonable target.
Group 3: A bunch of 2:20-2:40 friends/rivals:
1) 65:45 / 2:21:30 (2.15)
2) 68:57 / 2:29:54 (2.17)
3) 69:01 / 2:27:30 (2.14)
4) 70:54 / 2:31:00 (2.13)
5) 71:30 / 2:31:00 (2.11)
6) 75:30 / 2:44 (2.17)
7) 78:30 / 2:48:30 (2.15)
Group 4: A few samples from this thread:
1) Juxt – 82:36 / 2:58:20 (2.16)
2) Gruecd -87:01 / 2:59:48 (2.07)
3) Ned - 92:53 / 3:09:02 (2.17)
4) pbm – 1:28:12 / 3:07:23 (2.12)
5) Tri - 91:32 / 3:28:59 (2.28)
6) Worrier - 1:42 / 4:02 (2.37)
I'm right there with Tri. 1:31:57 / 3:28:36 (2.26)As a refresher, here's the relevant data Steve had compiled a few years ago regarding the correlation of HMs to marathon times. (I updated Juxt's and my data.) Steve had concluded that 2.15-2.20 is a reasonable target.
Group 3: A bunch of 2:20-2:40 friends/rivals:
1) 65:45 / 2:21:30 (2.15)
2) 68:57 / 2:29:54 (2.17)
3) 69:01 / 2:27:30 (2.14)
4) 70:54 / 2:31:00 (2.13)
5) 71:30 / 2:31:00 (2.11)
6) 75:30 / 2:44 (2.17)
7) 78:30 / 2:48:30 (2.15)
Group 4: A few samples from this thread:
1) Juxt – 82:36 / 2:58:20 (2.16)
2) Gruecd -87:01 / 2:59:48 (2.07)
3) Ned - 92:53 / 3:09:02 (2.17)
4) pbm – 1:28:12 / 3:07:23 (2.12)
5) Tri - 91:32 / 3:28:59 (2.28)
6) Worrier - 1:42 / 4:02 (2.37)
Definitely think it's smarter to run the half marathon because the recovery is so much shorter and your training doesn't really have to take a hit.question for you BQers.
If my goal marathon is December 10th, would it generally be better to run a half marathon November 12th or a trail 50k/40M/50M on November 19th? All are local.
Figure if I do the longer race less than a month prior, I'd basically do a 3 week taper afterwards. If I did the HM, I'd go long the next weekend then taper. Main different would be that the 19th wouldn't be quite as long or hard as the race would be. Or maybe do the trail race but not overdo it?
thanks. That's what I think I'm going with, just kind of want to do the dizzy fifties too. Maybe in 2017.Definitely think it's smarter to run the half marathon because the recovery is so much shorter and your training doesn't really have to take a hit.
Sounds like the decision is in, but I agree with the HM logic. Race it hard ...break down the muscles; let them heal stronger.In addition to the recovery aspect that Hang 10 mentions, there is a great training benefit (physical and mental) of running a half and holding that faster-than-marathon pace for an extended duration of 90 minutes or so.
It's your goal marathon, but what is the goal for that marathon? If you're trying to BQ, there's no way in hell I'd run an ultra 4 weeks beforehand. I agree with the others - race the HM.question for you BQers.
If my goal marathon is December 10th, would it generally be better to run a half marathon November 12th or a trail 50k/40M/50M on November 19th? All are local.
Figure if I do the longer race less than a month prior, I'd basically do a 3 week taper afterwards. If I did the HM, I'd go long the next weekend then taper. Main different would be that the 19th wouldn't be quite as long or hard as the race would be. Or maybe do the trail race but not overdo it?
@pbm107 - quick favor, GB. Don't race a HM this spring. I want to savor having a better HM PR for as long as I can.FWIW, an updated list of our guys ...pending updates through the spring and beyond.
Group 4: A few samples from this thread:
1) pbm – 1:28:12 / 2:59:08 (2.03)
2) Gruecd – 1:27:01 / 2:59:48 (2.07)
3) Juxt – 1:22:36 / 2:58:20 (2.16)
4) Ned – 1:27:10 / 3:09:02 (2.17)
5) Hang 10 – 1:26:51 / 3:08:44 (2.17)
6) FUBAR – 1:31:57 / 3:28:36 (2.26)
7) Tri – 1:31:32 / 3:28:59 (2.28)
8) Worrier - 1:42 / 4:02 (2.37)
Goal probably 3:10ish, too early for me to set a firm goal.It's your goal marathon, but what is the goal for that marathon? If you're trying to BQ, there's no way in hell I'd run an ultra 4 weeks beforehand. I agree with the others - race the HM.
A nasty 24hr stomach bug is running through our house. Tue night thru Wed was my turn. Now I know why I was so sluggish on my Tuesday run. Ugh. :X Not sure if I'll run today or not even though I feel like nothing has happened. Crazy how these things can leave as quickly as they hit.
I don't remember how old you are. What's your qualifying time? Do you want to run Boston or just reach the qualifying mark?Goal probably 3:10ish, too early for me to set a firm goal.
I'll be 40, so 3:15I don't remember how old you are. What's your qualifying time? Do you want to run Boston or just reach the qualifying mark?
I have to be honest. That 19 seconds mildly pisses me off.Yes, I'm digging having the 2nd best HM on the list.
Nice workout. What was rest/recovery in between?9 miles with 6 x 1000 today. Boy did that workout suck but the results were solid. Ran the first 5 @ a 5:50-5:53 pace. Last rep into wind sucked but was still right at 6:02 pace. Glad that's over with.
love it.I have to be honest. That 19 seconds mildly pisses me off.
Aren't they both older than you? Father time is on your side...love it.
You know what pisses me off? How am I ever going to get faster than Juxt and PBM if they keep getting faster?
The workout scheduled 50-90% of the duration of the interval for rest. So I went in the idea that I'd run about 3:40-3:45, so I'd take 2 minutes rest. I took 2 minutes between reps 1-2 and 2-3. Then I took 2 1/2 between 3-4 and 4-5. I took 3 minutes between 5-6 just because it just worked out better because there was an intersection at one of the roads. I'm no sure the extra rest really helped that much.Nice workout. What was rest/recovery in between?
I think PBM is the same age unfortunately. :(Aren't they both older than you? Father time is on your side...
I'm looking forward to their showdown in Philly. I'll get a front row seat to it for the first 1/4 mile.
Unless pbm has a different idea, my plan is to tie -- no showdown. (Although maybe I could lag a second behind him at the start....)I'm looking forward to their showdown in Philly. I'll get a front row seat to it for the first 1/4 mile.
Tie?Unless pbm has a different idea, my plan is to tie -- no showdown. (Although maybe I could lag a second behind him at the start....)
Good, there is hope for you yet.I have to be honest. That 19 seconds mildly pisses me off.
I was hoping we could work together, but we do have different racing styles. You like to go out faster than me.Unless pbm has a different idea, my plan is to tie -- no showdown. (Although maybe I could lag a second behind him at the start....)
That's usually accidental! What strategy would you like? Even splits? I'm not sure I'm crazy about negative splits unless there's more downhill in the second half (haven't looked).I was hoping we could work together, but we do have different racing styles. You like to go out faster than me.
Ideally I'd like to run even splits. There is a lot of time between now and then but it is likely our goal is going to be a bit of a stretch for both of us. Who really knows what is going to happen after miles 6-7, but before that it would be great if we work together.That's usually accidental! What strategy would you like? Even splits? I'm not sure I'm crazy about negative splits unless there's more downhill in the second half (haven't looked).
don't worry about me. I'll turn it back on.Good, there is hope for you yet.
If you couldn't hold that pace for an hour than you ran too fast.Could I get a refresher on tempo runs? I think i did mine too fast today.
I'm finding I like a mix of speeds, which results from a variety of distances. For current marathon training, I'll do tempos in the range from 3 to 12 miles. I'd say mine end up being at about 80-85% of max HR (more towards the higher end) ...comfortably uncomfortable ...somewhere in the 10K to HM pacing range (similar to what Hang 10 states).Could I get a refresher on tempo runs? I think i did mine too fast today.
What these guys said. I like making mine progression tempo runs, dropping the pace as I go. I did 3 mile tempo yesterday and dropped the pace :15 for mile 2 compared to mile 1 and mile 3 was :12 faster than mile 2.tri-man 47 said:I'm finding I like a mix of speeds, which results from a variety of distances. For current marathon training, I'll do tempos in the range from 3 to 12 miles. I'd say mine end up being at about 80-85% of max HR (more towards the higher end) ...comfortably uncomfortable ...somewhere in the 10K to HM pacing range (similar to what Hang 10 states).
Fortunately I don't think there is harm in running too fast on a tempo as long as you don't bail, don't hurt yourself, and realize it might take you a little longer to recover from.I was fairly sure I ran that too fast yesterday, but apparently I ran that way too fast.
Good talk, fellas. Live and learn...
Agree. If you aren't sucking wind or HR going up dramatically to run the same or slower pace as you progress, seems all good. Maybe the tempo wasn't too fast, MAC. Maybe you got faster.Fortunately I don't think there is harm in running too fast on a tempo as long as you don't bail, don't hurt yourself, and realize it might take you a little longer to recover from.
Good luck! I think you're ready for that. Last time I tried a year plus ago I was in low 18s. And you are in better shape than I was.Hell no! Just trying to be around 18:00.
That's why I don't like running with a pace being the focus (I'll do it on occasion but it's flexible), HR is better, maybe PE but that's easy to lie to yourself. For me, thinking of it as "10 seconds faster than HM" is less effective than setting a HR goal. Not to mention elevation messes that up even more. Though recently I've preferred running with an effort in mind.Agree. If you aren't sucking wind or HR going up dramatically to run the same or slower pace as you progress, seems all good. Maybe the tempo wasn't too fast, MAC. Maybe you got faster.