This would seem to make sense, but Washington runs the ball constantly near the goal line (not RG3 this year) and most of their tds are of the short variety.Washington is moving the ball well and RG3's fantasy stat line is not a true reflection of his play. I feel this is a good matchup (plus not on that horrible Washington turf). Fast track, poor pass D = a good game.
Same decision here. I have Foles in currently, but have a feeling I am going to make a desperation substitution at 7:59Got a few hours to decide if I should put Foles in for him. Don't know if I trust either one.
I own and start RG3 and Alf Morris every week and this has been painful to watch.This would seem to make sense, but Washington runs the ball constantly near the goal line (not RG3 this year) and most of their tds are of the short variety.Washington is moving the ball well and RG3's fantasy stat line is not a true reflection of his play. I feel this is a good matchup (plus not on that horrible Washington turf). Fast track, poor pass D = a good game.
I in the same boat, going with RG3, MN pass def is awful and now missing key starters, NO def vs the pass is very good. I need a home run this week, lets start it off with RG3. This IS the week RG3 BREAKSOUTRG3 or Romo?
NO has only allowed 8 td passes this year, so your saying Romo is going to be almost 50 percent of what they have allowed this year, and in the domeNo way I would have started him over romo this week. Romo is going to have to go for 350+ and at least three TDs to keep in that game.
3 td's in the first half---yeah--thats about right for somebody that I leave on my bench. He certainly is looking more accurate with his passing tonight--which is a huge positive in my book. I'm excited to see how he continues in the second half.Uggh--I hate Thursday games and I also hate that in the last couple washington games--guys like helu and the third string rb are getting multiple tds per game. I have to decide between cam and rg3---and even though cam plays against the 49ers..I think that I'm going to roll with him. What that means is that RG3 will be on my bench--so you call can count on him to have a monster game.
Two Well, I take back the statement based on I didn't realize how crappy the vikes were but, on your point, while the stats mean something, you have to look at each game and it's circumstances. It's like saying Riley cooper only caught two TDs all season so you are telling me he will catch two in one game? No...he caught three..because of that matchup.NO has only allowed 8 td passes this year, so your saying Romo is going to be almost 50 percent of what they have allowed this year, and in the domeNo way I would have started him over romo this week. Romo is going to have to go for 350+ and at least three TDs to keep in that game.
And will be taking the reed and garçon owners with himRG3 is going to win some FF championships as he is heating it up in the second half
30.45 points in my money league tonight, so GLAD I started RG3 over romoNo way I would have started him over romo this week. Romo is going to have to go for 350+ and at least three TDs to keep in that game.
You convinced me to go with him. Thanks!30.45 points in my money league tonight, so GLAD I started RG3 over romoNo way I would have started him over romo this week. Romo is going to have to go for 350+ and at least three TDs to keep in that game.