rockaction
Footballguy
Oh my. I am zipping my lips.
IIRC you were saying months ago his heath was an issue and that he had brain damage. I remember this because I hadn’t really heard him speak and really didn’t even know about the stroke.Seriously? After the stroke he was all reassuring and coherent. Now he can't put together a rehearsed sentence.After the stroke and now? He is clearly in better shape now than immediately following the stroke.Everything I post is my opinion. Feel free to share yours. You claim to have compared him after the stroke and now - so? . . .I have already. So it's just your opinion. Got it. Kind of an important thing to leave out.LOL pass. Use your own news sources. Watch the videos of him right after the stroke. Compare to recent videos. Report back.Link?Watching Biden wander around lost once again maybe somehow helps Fetterman? The problem is Fetterman himself is getting worse. If Fetterman gets elected and then steps down, who takes his spot? Who will be Lt Gov?
But why do you care?Oh my. I am zipping my lips.
I think you're recalling correctly. There was another thread - maybe about Senate races in general - where most of the discussion was about Fetterman-Oz. They didn't announce the stroke at the time and when they finally did, they really downplayed it. He was able to pull it off because he could speak mostly normally with the vary rare glitch. Now (IN MY OPINION) it's gotten worse.IIRC you were saying months ago his heath was an issue and that he had brain damage. I remember this because I hadn’t really heard him speak and really didn’t even know about the stroke.Seriously? After the stroke he was all reassuring and coherent. Now he can't put together a rehearsed sentence.After the stroke and now? He is clearly in better shape now than immediately following the stroke.Everything I post is my opinion. Feel free to share yours. You claim to have compared him after the stroke and now - so? . . .I have already. So it's just your opinion. Got it. Kind of an important thing to leave out.LOL pass. Use your own news sources. Watch the videos of him right after the stroke. Compare to recent videos. Report back.Link?Watching Biden wander around lost once again maybe somehow helps Fetterman? The problem is Fetterman himself is getting worse. If Fetterman gets elected and then steps down, who takes his spot? Who will be Lt Gov?
I haven’t really seen him talk at all until recent interviews so no real Idea how he sounded months ago.I think you're recalling correctly. There was another thread - maybe about Senate races in general - where most of the discussion was about Fetterman-Oz. They didn't announce the stroke at the time and when they finally did, they really downplayed it. He was able to pull it off because he could speak mostly normally with the vary rare glitch. Now (IN MY OPINION) it's gotten worse.IIRC you were saying months ago his heath was an issue and that he had brain damage. I remember this because I hadn’t really heard him speak and really didn’t even know about the stroke.Seriously? After the stroke he was all reassuring and coherent. Now he can't put together a rehearsed sentence.After the stroke and now? He is clearly in better shape now than immediately following the stroke.Everything I post is my opinion. Feel free to share yours. You claim to have compared him after the stroke and now - so? . . .I have already. So it's just your opinion. Got it. Kind of an important thing to leave out.LOL pass. Use your own news sources. Watch the videos of him right after the stroke. Compare to recent videos. Report back.Link?Watching Biden wander around lost once again maybe somehow helps Fetterman? The problem is Fetterman himself is getting worse. If Fetterman gets elected and then steps down, who takes his spot? Who will be Lt Gov?
No because there have been deaf representatives who have signers with them where they can contribute real time sadly a deaf person can comprehend and reply faster than candidate Fetterman who says he is fit to serve.Wait are you saying any deaf person would be incompetent as a Senator?This will be a non issue in 15 days PA Voters have to be borderline retarded to elect an official who cannot process spoken word on the fly. Will he not be in chamber when in session and business is being done or will he be in his office watching C-SPAN with closed captioning to comprehend what is being said. That should be a no go he needs to be in chamber with no special assistance like all 99 other Senators. If he cannot do the job without any captioning or other aids to comprehend what is being said he is not fit for the job.
This will be a non issue in 15 days PA Voters have to be borderline retarded to elect an official who cannot process spoken word on the fly. Will he not be in chamber when in session and business is being done or will he be in his office watching C-SPAN with closed captioning to comprehend what is being said. That should be a no go he needs to be in chamber with no special assistance like all 99 other Senators. If he cannot do the job without any captioning or other aids to comprehend what is being said he is not fit for the job.
Instead let's elect a carpet bagging, puppy killing, doctor that pushes quack "cures" to make a buck. The dude doesn't give a crap about Pennsylvania.
Neither are good choices
I didn't want Hillary Clinton any more than I want Fetterman. If the Republican party would put up a socially liberal, fiscally conservative nominee that wasn't a total whack job they would have my vote.Instead let's elect a carpet bagging, puppy killing, doctor that pushes quack "cures" to make a buck. The dude doesn't give a crap about Pennsylvania.
Neither are good choices
Hillary Clinton was a carpet bagger and you fools wanted to elect her President.
Lots of people on this board preferred HRC to Trump once it came to that, but there weren't many (timschochet was one, of course) who particularly wanted HRC to run or win the nomination.Hillary Clinton was a carpet bagger and you fools wanted to elect her President.
Lots of people on this board preferred HRC to Trump once it came to that, but there weren't many (timschochet was one, of course) who particularly wanted HRC to run or win the nomination.Hillary Clinton was a carpet bagger and you fools wanted to elect her President.
I've disliked Hillary since her days as a NY senator. But when the other option was a known conman who was already being sued for fraud, I held my nose and voted for her.Instead let's elect a carpet bagging, puppy killing, doctor that pushes quack "cures" to make a buck. The dude doesn't give a crap about Pennsylvania.
Neither are good choices
Hillary Clinton was a carpet bagger and you fools wanted to elect her President.
This was me as well, and millions of others.I've disliked Hillary since her days as a NY senator. But when the other option was a known conman who was already being sued for fraud, I held my nose and voted for her.Instead let's elect a carpet bagging, puppy killing, doctor that pushes quack "cures" to make a buck. The dude doesn't give a crap about Pennsylvania.
Neither are good choices
Hillary Clinton was a carpet bagger and you fools wanted to elect her President.
I can only speak for myself (and some others whose posts I read but forgot who posted what back then), but I would much have preferred that HRC had not run at all and other moderate Democrats had a chance.So they preferred an Independent Bernie Sanders to be the Democratic Presidential nominee? You had a carpet bagging former Senator and a Senator who isn't even a Democrat vying for the Democratic nomination. You all can take the hypocritical carpet bagging comments and shove it, we all see right through it.
Lots of people on this board preferred HRC to Trump once it came to that, but there weren't many (timschochet was one, of course) who particularly wanted HRC to run or win the nomination.Hillary Clinton was a carpet bagger and you fools wanted to elect her President.
So they preferred an Independent Bernie Sanders to be the Democratic Presidential nominee? You had a carpet bagging former Senator and a Senator who isn't even a Democrat vying for the Democratic nomination. You all can take the hypocritical carpet bagging comments and shove it, we all see right through it.
I've disliked Hillary since her days as a NY senator. But when the other option was a known conman who was already being sued for fraud, I held my nose and voted for her.Instead let's elect a carpet bagging, puppy killing, doctor that pushes quack "cures" to make a buck. The dude doesn't give a crap about Pennsylvania.
Neither are good choices
Hillary Clinton was a carpet bagger and you fools wanted to elect her President.
Lots of people on this board preferred HRC to Trump once it came to that, but there weren't many (timschochet was one, of course) who particularly wanted HRC to run or win the nomination.Hillary Clinton was a carpet bagger and you fools wanted to elect her President.
So they preferred an Independent Bernie Sanders to be the Democratic Presidential nominee? You had a carpet bagging former Senator and a Senator who isn't even a Democrat vying for the Democratic nomination. You all can take the hypocritical carpet bagging comments and shove it, we all see right through it.
Can we at least keep the puppy killing and pushing quack medicines comments?
"That was different!" TMHillary Clinton was a carpet bagger and you fools wanted to elect her President.
Hillary wasn't "carpet bagging" the presidency. I didn't have a vote when she ran for NY Senate. Hell, I don't even have a vote for the PA senate, but I can understand why PA residents wouldn't want a carpet bagger representing them. You're conflating the Hillary's run as a senator vs. her run as president. The two aren't equal.I've disliked Hillary since her days as a NY senator. But when the other option was a known conman who was already being sued for fraud, I held my nose and voted for her.Instead let's elect a carpet bagging, puppy killing, doctor that pushes quack "cures" to make a buck. The dude doesn't give a crap about Pennsylvania.
Neither are good choices
Hillary Clinton was a carpet bagger and you fools wanted to elect her President.
Bernie Sanders could have been the nominee. Hillary Clinton was so ingrained in the Democratic party it's hard to take anyone seriously who brings up carpet bagging as a reason not to vote for someone.
Hillary wasn't "carpet bagging" the presidency. I didn't have a vote when she ran for NY Senate. Hell, I don't even have a vote for the PA senate, but I can understand why PA residents wouldn't want a carpet bagger representing them. You're conflating the Hillary's run as a senator vs. her run as president. The two aren't equal.I've disliked Hillary since her days as a NY senator. But when the other option was a known conman who was already being sued for fraud, I held my nose and voted for her.Instead let's elect a carpet bagging, puppy killing, doctor that pushes quack "cures" to make a buck. The dude doesn't give a crap about Pennsylvania.
Neither are good choices
Hillary Clinton was a carpet bagger and you fools wanted to elect her President.
Bernie Sanders could have been the nominee. Hillary Clinton was so ingrained in the Democratic party it's hard to take anyone seriously who brings up carpet bagging as a reason not to vote for someone.
Lots of people on this board preferred HRC to Trump once it came to that, but there weren't many (timschochet was one, of course) who particularly wanted HRC to run or win the nomination.Hillary Clinton was a carpet bagger and you fools wanted to elect her President.
So they preferred an Independent Bernie Sanders to be the Democratic Presidential nominee? You had a carpet bagging former Senator and a Senator who isn't even a Democrat vying for the Democratic nomination. You all can take the hypocritical carpet bagging comments and shove it, we all see right through it.
Can we at least keep the puppy killing and pushing quack medicines comments?
Yes, that was the same. But I didn't vote for her then. I didn't care about the carpet bagging when she ran against Trump. I found that to be much less of a concern at that time.Hillary wasn't "carpet bagging" the presidency. I didn't have a vote when she ran for NY Senate. Hell, I don't even have a vote for the PA senate, but I can understand why PA residents wouldn't want a carpet bagger representing them. You're conflating the Hillary's run as a senator vs. her run as president. The two aren't equal.I've disliked Hillary since her days as a NY senator. But when the other option was a known conman who was already being sued for fraud, I held my nose and voted for her.Instead let's elect a carpet bagging, puppy killing, doctor that pushes quack "cures" to make a buck. The dude doesn't give a crap about Pennsylvania.
Neither are good choices
Hillary Clinton was a carpet bagger and you fools wanted to elect her President.
Bernie Sanders could have been the nominee. Hillary Clinton was so ingrained in the Democratic party it's hard to take anyone seriously who brings up carpet bagging as a reason not to vote for someone.
She was elected as a NY Senator, buying a house in NY for the sole purpose of running. They're exactly the same.
Will Oz continue to sell miracle snake oil pills and drink urine while serving in the Senate? Time will tell!
Fetterman has a record working in his state. Oz is let's just say...malleable. Very odd guy whose candidacy is exhibit A for people simply pulling the lever for the letter behind the name.Will Oz continue to sell miracle snake oil pills and drink urine while serving in the Senate? Time will tell!
Will Fetterman even show up at Senate and be able to understand what people are saying when they speak to him? Time will tell!
Fetterman has a record working in his state. Oz is let's just say...malleable. Very odd guy whose candidacy is exhibit A for people simply pulling the lever for the letter behind the name.Will Oz continue to sell miracle snake oil pills and drink urine while serving in the Senate? Time will tell!
Will Fetterman even show up at Senate and be able to understand what people are saying when they speak to him? Time will tell!
Lots of people on this board preferred HRC to Trump once it came to that, but there weren't many (timschochet was one, of course) who particularly wanted HRC to run or win the nomination.Hillary Clinton was a carpet bagger and you fools wanted to elect her President.
So they preferred an Independent Bernie Sanders to be the Democratic Presidential nominee? You had a carpet bagging former Senator and a Senator who isn't even a Democrat vying for the Democratic nomination. You all can take the hypocritical carpet bagging comments and shove it, we all see right through it.
I would take that over Oz, TBH.Fetterman has a record working in his state. Oz is let's just say...malleable. Very odd guy whose candidacy is exhibit A for people simply pulling the lever for the letter behind the name.Will Oz continue to sell miracle snake oil pills and drink urine while serving in the Senate? Time will tell!
Will Fetterman even show up at Senate and be able to understand what people are saying when they speak to him? Time will tell!
Yeah, here's his record: https://wpde.com/news/nation-world/...oral-tenures-documents-show-john-pennsylvania
I see a lot of his yard signs around lol. People are nutsfetterman/oz aside
no one is really voting for mastriano for governor are they?
I've seen more Mastriano signs in my neighborhood than I'm comfortable with but at least now I know where the crazies live.fetterman/oz aside
no one is really voting for mastriano for governor are they?
THISInstead let's elect a carpet bagging, puppy killing, doctor that pushes quack "cures" to make a buck. The dude doesn't give a crap about Pennsylvania.
Neither are good choices, just like our recent presidential candidates. The two parties suck
Fetterman had this stroke a couple days before he won the Dem primary he beat another good candidate (Conor Lamb) pretty easily in the primary. If not for this he'd be winning this election very easily I believe.THISInstead let's elect a carpet bagging, puppy killing, doctor that pushes quack "cures" to make a buck. The dude doesn't give a crap about Pennsylvania.
Neither are good choices, just like our recent presidential candidates. The two parties suck
Having these 2 choices on my ballot is almost as insulting as having the choice of Trump or Biden
Trump endorsed, same with Mastriano.No clue why people on the Republican side selected Oz as no one seems to care for the guy.
It's two sides of the same coin. Fetterman was more extreme than Lamb, Oz is more Trumpian than McCormick. Either Lamb or McCormick would be walking away with it.Fetterman had this stroke a couple days before he won the Dem primary he beat another good candidate (Conor Lamb) pretty easily in the primary. If not for this he'd be winning this election very easily I believe.THISInstead let's elect a carpet bagging, puppy killing, doctor that pushes quack "cures" to make a buck. The dude doesn't give a crap about Pennsylvania.
Neither are good choices, just like our recent presidential candidates. The two parties suck
Having these 2 choices on my ballot is almost as insulting as having the choice of Trump or Biden
No clue why people on the Republican side selected Oz as no one seems to care for the guy.
fetterman/oz aside
no one is really voting for mastriano for governor are they?
Because he is a sleaze ball.Oz comes off as a sleaze ball. Yeesh
Putting up the directly conflicting quotes by both on fracking is fantastic schtickOz supports fracking in PA, drilling, pipelines, etc.
Fetterman supports fracking as well. Wants energy independence. Moderators called out Fetterman who in 2018 said he didn't support fracking. Fetterman didn't really explain the difference in opinions.
Oz comes off as a sleaze ball. Yeesh
I don’t like Oz, but he is 100 times better in this debateOz comes off as a sleaze ball. Yeesh
Oz is owning Fetterman. Fetterman is doing nothing but trying to attack Oz's wealth. Fetterman is terrible.
Fetterman can't get out a complete sentence. I can't imagine him trying to filibuster in the Senate.I don’t like Oz, but he is 100 times better in this debateOz comes off as a sleaze ball. Yeesh
Oz is owning Fetterman. Fetterman is doing nothing but trying to attack Oz's wealth. Fetterman is terrible.