No. I'm saying that QB won't be an area that Niners will address from this point moving forward absent injury. It has nothing to do with the past. 2013 is a different story, but niners QB is settled for 2012.He is saying we can cross off QB on Prico's list. Unless the 49ers sabotage Smith again.So you're saying no Luck but, in 2013, the Niners can trade up for Matt Barkley?
You're saying this before the draft. After the Peyton Manning thingy. Ok.No. I'm saying that QB won't be an area that Niners will address from this point moving forward absent injury. It has nothing to do with the past. 2013 is a different story, but niners QB is settled for 2012.He is saying we can cross off QB on Prico's list. Unless the 49ers sabotage Smith again.So you're saying no Luck but, in 2013, the Niners can trade up for Matt Barkley?
I'm saying that once the Peyton Manning situation played out and Smith was brought under contract with a solid back-up, the niners QB situation became settled, which is in response to your statement that "anything can happen." If you think that something is going to happen around the draft, that's great. I think there's an off chance that Smith will get pulled for performance at some point this season for either Johnson or Kaepernick, but the concept that they'll make a big move is extremely remote.'drummer said:You're saying this before the draft. After the Peyton Manning thingy. Ok.'johnadams said:No. I'm saying that QB won't be an area that Niners will address from this point moving forward absent injury. It has nothing to do with the past. 2013 is a different story, but niners QB is settled for 2012.'drummer said:He is saying we can cross off QB on Prico's list. Unless the 49ers sabotage Smith again.'Shrugs said:So you're saying no Luck but, in 2013, the Niners can trade up for Matt Barkley?
Well, Smith was a lock before the Manning thing happened and it seemed before the sweepstakes the QB situation was settled as far as he being the starter for next season. So the concept of they making a big move was remote even before then. They weren't even in the mix until late and was one of the final 3 choices. The "concept" of Kaep as possible trade bait due to his value is a valid one. There is not much guarantee built into Smith's contract either. So guess what? The QB situation isn't quite as settled, is it?I'm saying that once the Peyton Manning situation played out and Smith was brought under contract with a solid back-up, the niners QB situation became settled, which is in response to your statement that "anything can happen." If you think that something is going to happen around the draft, that's great. I think there's an off chance that Smith will get pulled for performance at some point this season for either Johnson or Kaepernick, but the concept that they'll make a big move is extremely remote.'drummer said:You're saying this before the draft. After the Peyton Manning thingy. Ok.'johnadams said:No. I'm saying that QB won't be an area that Niners will address from this point moving forward absent injury. It has nothing to do with the past. 2013 is a different story, but niners QB is settled for 2012.'drummer said:He is saying we can cross off QB on Prico's list. Unless the 49ers sabotage Smith again.'Shrugs said:So you're saying no Luck but, in 2013, the Niners can trade up for Matt Barkley?
We're not going to agree on this. I don't think Kaep has enough value to be a major component of a big deal. And I don't see the niners cutting Smith this year. I'll agree that the niners QB situation in 2013 is unesttled, but 2012, I just don't see any scenarios that make any sense. If you want to keep this going, I'm interested in understanding a specific scenario you see happening.Well, Smith was a lock before the Manning thing happened and it seemed before the sweepstakes the QB situation was settled as far as he being the starter for next season. So the concept of they making a big move was remote even before then. They weren't even in the mix until late and was one of the final 3 choices. The "concept" of Kaep as possible trade bait due to his value is a valid one. There is not much guarantee built into Smith's contract either. So guess what? The QB situation isn't quite as settled, is it?I'm saying that once the Peyton Manning situation played out and Smith was brought under contract with a solid back-up, the niners QB situation became settled, which is in response to your statement that "anything can happen." If you think that something is going to happen around the draft, that's great. I think there's an off chance that Smith will get pulled for performance at some point this season for either Johnson or Kaepernick, but the concept that they'll make a big move is extremely remote.'drummer said:You're saying this before the draft. After the Peyton Manning thingy. Ok.'johnadams said:No. I'm saying that QB won't be an area that Niners will address from this point moving forward absent injury. It has nothing to do with the past. 2013 is a different story, but niners QB is settled for 2012.'drummer said:He is saying we can cross off QB on Prico's list. Unless the 49ers sabotage Smith again.'Shrugs said:So you're saying no Luck but, in 2013, the Niners can trade up for Matt Barkley?
I just disagree with your absolute slam the door on the subject before the draft. I know what you're saying and it's the obvious scenario, but what you think and what could happen are two different things. Especially before the draft.We're not going to agree on this. I don't think Kaep has enough value to be a major component of a big deal. And I don't see the niners cutting Smith this year. I'll agree that the niners QB situation in 2013 is unesttled, but 2012, I just don't see any scenarios that make any sense. If you want to keep this going, I'm interested in understanding a specific scenario you see happening.Well, Smith was a lock before the Manning thing happened and it seemed before the sweepstakes the QB situation was settled as far as he being the starter for next season. So the concept of they making a big move was remote even before then. They weren't even in the mix until late and was one of the final 3 choices. The "concept" of Kaep as possible trade bait due to his value is a valid one. There is not much guarantee built into Smith's contract either. So guess what? The QB situation isn't quite as settled, is it?I'm saying that once the Peyton Manning situation played out and Smith was brought under contract with a solid back-up, the niners QB situation became settled, which is in response to your statement that "anything can happen." If you think that something is going to happen around the draft, that's great. I think there's an off chance that Smith will get pulled for performance at some point this season for either Johnson or Kaepernick, but the concept that they'll make a big move is extremely remote.'drummer said:You're saying this before the draft. After the Peyton Manning thingy. Ok.'johnadams said:No. I'm saying that QB won't be an area that Niners will address from this point moving forward absent injury. It has nothing to do with the past. 2013 is a different story, but niners QB is settled for 2012.'drummer said:He is saying we can cross off QB on Prico's list. Unless the 49ers sabotage Smith again.'Shrugs said:So you're saying no Luck but, in 2013, the Niners can trade up for Matt Barkley?
Overview: The Niners will have their work cut out for them, drafting near the bottom of each of the seven rounds pending possible trades. Don’t rule out the possibility of some deals by a team that showed its willingness to strike very aggressively, despite its surprising success last season, when it made a serious run at Peyton Manning. Niners GM Trent Baalke earned a three-year contract extension and PFW/Professional Football Writers of America Executive of the Year honors in part due to the stellar job he did in last year’s draft. Baalke hit a tape-measure home run in his first year running the draft show, with first-round OLB Aldon Smith, third-round CB Chris Culliver, fourth-round RB Kendall Hunter and seventh-round FB Bruce Miller all making very valuable contributions.
Need No. 1: Offensive guard
The Niners could use a serious challenger for second-year pro Daniel Kilgore at right guard, and depth is sorely lacking at both OG spots. The versatile Adam Snyder, who replaced Chilo Rachal as the starter at right guard about a month into the 2011 season, signed with the division-rival Cardinals. Rachal, an unrestricted free agent, looks like a long shot to return to the Bay Area. The team thinks Kilgore could blossom with the benefit of a full offseason, but his only playing time last season was one snap as an extra blocker in the Monday-night game vs. the Steelers.
Need No. 2: Wide receiver
Free agents Mario Manningham and Randy Moss figure to bolster the Niners’ WR corps. But after the wideouts failed miserably in the postseason when it counted most and had considerable trouble converting third downs all season, more help is needed at this position, especially with the popular Josh Morgan having signed with the Redskins. By all accounts, Moss still has very respectable deep speed, but there are no guarantees he will be able to regain his prior form after sitting out last season.
Need No. 3: Defensive tackle
The Niners have been blessed with a workhorse starting D-line that possesses great stamina and goes above and beyond the call of duty. That said, DRT Justin Smith is 32 years old, DLT Ray McDonald has had problems on and off with his knees, and NT Isaac Sopoaga turns 31 before the start of the 2012 season. More depth up front could come in handy, with all those things considered.
Could totally see them doing it (everyone has been jumping on the Fleener/Harbaugh Stanford connection, but I haven't heard anyone mention the the same situation with DeCastro).If they do move up to take DeCastro though, it would probably have to be in front of Seattle.ARI and DAL are right after SEA, and both need guards (especially DAL).No way ARI trades the pick to SF (IMHO, they signed Snyder, at least in part, as a defensive move),and even if SEA and ARI don't take DeCastro, there's a really good chance DAL will.In reality, there's probably a decent chance that KC nabs him at 11, so for the Niners to do this, they'd probably have to move into the Top 10.May be too steep of a price for a guard . . .If DeCastro gets past Seattle, Niners trade up to nab him.
http://www.csnbayarea.com/football-san-francisco-niners/niners-talk/Boone-expected-to-get-chance-to-compete-?blockID=686430&feedID=5936Summary of guard issues.Could totally see them doing it (everyone has been jumping on the Fleener/Harbaugh Stanford connection, but I haven't heard anyone mention the the same situation with DeCastro).If they do move up to take DeCastro though, it would probably have to be in front of Seattle.ARI and DAL are right after SEA, and both need guards (especially DAL).No way ARI trades the pick to SF (IMHO, they signed Snyder, at least in part, as a defensive move),and even if SEA and ARI don't take DeCastro, there's a really good chance DAL will.In reality, there's probably a decent chance that KC nabs him at 11, so for the Niners to do this, they'd probably have to move into the Top 10.May be too steep of a price for a guard . . .If DeCastro gets past Seattle, Niners trade up to nab him.
I went down to santa clara to hear the spiel on club seating and what the process for season ticket holders for migration. Those prices are only for club seating. I think later this month if you have season tickets and decline the club seating option you will be allocated non club seating based on your site line. This allocation is a take or leave it scenario. These allocated seats will also have SBL's but they will not nearly be as expensive as the club seating option. My current seats are in the 3rd row of the Wedge (over where the van's can drive in on the NE corner of the stick). My sales rep indicated that my equivalent SBL's when allocated at the new Stadium would be somewhere btw 6K and 9K per seat, a much easier pill to swallow than two 20K SBL's. But I'm a fool and plunked down the money for club seats. I figured this is will be the only time I can lock in club seats. Once they are gone . .. they are gone and the wait list will grow and grow. I think nosebleeds SBL's will only be 1K-2K, so there really is a price point for everyone.'5Rings said:So Fro and any other season ticket holders...you gonna pay the $30k per seat license at the new stadium? I grew up in a family with season tickets, been going since the mid 70s...but dang thats a nice chunk of change...leaning against it. :(
Congrats Fro. That is awesome to hear.I went down to santa clara to hear the spiel on club seating and what the process for season ticket holders for migration. Those prices are only for club seating. I think later this month if you have season tickets and decline the club seating option you will be allocated non club seating based on your site line. This allocation is a take or leave it scenario. These allocated seats will also have SBL's but they will not nearly be as expensive as the club seating option. My current seats are in the 3rd row of the Wedge (over where the van's can drive in on the NE corner of the stick). My sales rep indicated that my equivalent SBL's when allocated at the new Stadium would be somewhere btw 6K and 9K per seat, a much easier pill to swallow than two 20K SBL's. But I'm a fool and plunked down the money for club seats.'5Rings said:So Fro and any other season ticket holders...you gonna pay the $30k per seat license at the new stadium?
I grew up in a family with season tickets, been going since the mid 70s...but dang thats a nice chunk of change...leaning against it. :(
I figured this is will be the only time I can lock in club seats. Once they are gone . .. they are gone and the wait list will grow and grow. I think nosebleeds SBL's will only be 1K-2K, so there really is a price point for everyone.
Found a sweet Red and Gold SJ hat to go with the new stadium.'5Rings said:So Fro and any other season ticket holders...you gonna pay the $30k per seat license at the new stadium? I grew up in a family with season tickets, been going since the mid 70s...but dang thats a nice chunk of change...leaning against it. :(
Found a sweet Red and Gold SJ hat to go with the new stadium.So Fro and any other season ticket holders...you gonna pay the $30k per seat license at the new stadium? I grew up in a family with season tickets, been going since the mid 70s...but dang thats a nice chunk of change...leaning against it. :(
<<< My new avatar to continue from the old one.'5Rings said:Found a sweet Red and Gold SJ hat to go with the new stadium.So Fro and any other season ticket holders...you gonna pay the $30k per seat license at the new stadium? I grew up in a family with season tickets, been going since the mid 70s...but dang thats a nice chunk of change...leaning against it. :(
Thanks for the rundown. As a Sunnyvale, CA resident I will be scooping up a couple of tix via my buddy that's currently got 6 and will only be renewing 2 after they make the move.Congrats Fro. That is awesome to hear.I went down to santa clara to hear the spiel on club seating and what the process for season ticket holders for migration. Those prices are only for club seating. I think later this month if you have season tickets and decline the club seating option you will be allocated non club seating based on your site line. This allocation is a take or leave it scenario. These allocated seats will also have SBL's but they will not nearly be as expensive as the club seating option. My current seats are in the 3rd row of the Wedge (over where the van's can drive in on the NE corner of the stick). My sales rep indicated that my equivalent SBL's when allocated at the new Stadium would be somewhere btw 6K and 9K per seat, a much easier pill to swallow than two 20K SBL's. But I'm a fool and plunked down the money for club seats.So Fro and any other season ticket holders...you gonna pay the $30k per seat license at the new stadium?
I grew up in a family with season tickets, been going since the mid 70s...but dang thats a nice chunk of change...leaning against it. :(
I figured this is will be the only time I can lock in club seats. Once they are gone . .. they are gone and the wait list will grow and grow. I think nosebleeds SBL's will only be 1K-2K, so there really is a price point for everyone.
Baalke thought other teams were after Jenkins too. I have no reason to disbelieve him. Not everyone is working off of kiper's rankings. Trading up to get a RG, a position easily filled in later rounds, would have been a disaster.Could have gotten him a round later. Terrible pick. Should have traded up to get decastro after he started falling
Per rotoworld:The Rams reportedly had WR A.J. Jenkins rated so highly that his grade was nearly equal to Justin Blackmon's on their draft board. St. Louis appears to be the team that had Jenkins rated ahead of Michael Floyd, as reported by SI.com's Peter King. That being the case, it's hard to fault the 49ers for jumping on Jenkins. The Rams would have pulled the trigger at No. 33, No. 39, or No. 45 on Friday. Apr 27 - 8:41 AMCould have gotten him a round later. Terrible pick. Should have traded up to get decastro after he started falling
Here's the article that came from: http://www.stltoday.com/sports/football/professional/rams-miss-out-on-jenkins/article_02ddc12d-b649-5ef0-84f4-02f6487fb11d.html#.T5pPUjNBw9A.twitterPer rotoworld:The Rams reportedly had WR A.J. Jenkins rated so highly that his grade was nearly equal to Justin Blackmon's on their draft board. St. Louis appears to be the team that had Jenkins rated ahead of Michael Floyd, as reported by SI.com's Peter King. That being the case, it's hard to fault the 49ers for jumping on Jenkins. The Rams would have pulled the trigger at No. 33, No. 39, or No. 45 on Friday. Apr 27 - 8:41 AMCould have gotten him a round later. Terrible pick. Should have traded up to get decastro after he started falling
Read somewhere that Baalke had Jenkins pinned on his board the night before, so he was the 30 pick all along. Not a Franchise killing pick when you look at it. They need to overhaul the WR corp anyway. Could be a solid pick or another Jason Hill, who was a later round speedster who never caught on. Either way, nothing to beef on at 30.'thecatch said:Baalke thought other teams were after Jenkins too. I have no reason to disbelieve him. Not everyone is working off of kiper's rankings. Trading up to get a RG, a position easily filled in later rounds, would have been a disaster.'JHuber77 said:Could have gotten him a round later. Terrible pick. Should have traded up to get decastro after he started falling
They might have a RG for the next ten years already on the roster. They may draft one in the mid rounds. No reason to mortgage the farm for a guy at that spot. It's been established they couldn't have traded down and got Jenkins. He is not being blocked by any superstars on the WR depth chart. If baalke thought he was the BPA they were right to take him. You may disagree with baalke's evaluation, but I think he has earned the benefit of the doubt. Certainly other teams had similar grades on him.I wasn't suggesting anything about kipers rankings. A RG like decastro would have been huge for the 9ers. They lost Snyder in FA and really don't have anyone to fill that spot yet. Decastro would have been your RG for a decade or so, all with 1 pick. Getting someone in the 1st round who would probably be your 4th best WR or a physical mauler who could play right away? Give me the RG any day of the week. They should have traded up or down instead of taking Jenkins
I don't understand the logic here. DeCastro was taken by the Steelers at 1.24, so then you'd have to factor in losing the WR you really wanted, who by all accounts would have been taken by the Rams two picks later, plus the cost of trading up at least 7 spots in the first round, too. Maybe if they were drafting at 24 they would have taken DeCastro instead, but they weren't.I wasn't suggesting anything about kipers rankings. A RG like decastro would have been huge for the 9ers. They lost Snyder in FA and really don't have anyone to fill that spot yet. Decastro would have been your RG for a decade or so, all with 1 pick. Getting someone in the 1st round who would probably be your 4th best WR or a physical mauler who could play right away? Give me the RG any day of the week. They should have traded up or down instead of taking Jenkins
LaMichael James, come on down!Tom Rathman's on the phone with someone, Hunter owners brace yourselves!
I'm actually surprisingly content with the draft so far. We are loading up on offense since that was our weakness last season. Kyle Williams is as good as gone though, IMO. And if Ginn gets hurt, then James should be able to handle the return duties. Will be a very interesting camp.Scratches head, opens beer, turns off tv.....