Spookytooth
Footballguy
Peterson could have more rb1 years left than people think.
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think Hill is a top 5 RB so I suppose that's the difference. When it comes to RB in dynasty I really just go year by year. Forsett and Hill are pretty close to me, and I got a couple strong assets. To me thats a win. Holding onto a guy whose in a split backfield just because he's young doesn't really make sense to me. Even if Hill himself gets better as a player, I'm not sure that will correlate to fantasy value just because of the usage.You guys valuing a short-term RB and a mid-1st (Parker? Abdullah? Yeldon?) over a top-5 RB are nuts.
Overpay for Hill. Nice starters though.12 team PPR
Gave:
Melvin Gordon
Dorial Green-Beckham
Donte Moncreif
Got:
Jeremy Hill
Now I'm starting:
Rivers
Hill, Lacy, Anderson
DT, Hilton, Cooks
Kelce
I'll take a first over Crowell. 3-headed RBBC on a mediocre at best offense. No thanks.Kree said:Pretty much only person willing to bite on a RB trade...Team A sendsTeam A sent12 team PPR, return yards, QRRWWT + Flex + SuperFlex + SuperFlex + IDP, All TDs 6 points
Martellus Bennett
Team B sent
2.03 (Phillip Dorsett), 4.03
Completely trading for talent rather than need (WRs Brown-Calvin-Hopkins-Sanders-Parker-C Johnson-Jennings-Richardson, TEs now Reed-Green-Cook), but I'm a fan of the talent.
2016 1st (hopefully late)
Team B sends
Crowell + pick 30 (Cameron Artis-Payne)
Offensive line up
QB - Wilson (Fales)
RB - Anderson/Stewart (Crowell/CAP/Michael/Khiry/TRich/Taliaferro)
WR - Brown/Calvin (Sanders/Parker/Dorsett/Jennings/Johnson)
TE - Reed (Green/Cook)
Flex - Hopkins
SuperFlex - Kaepernick/Bradford
IR - Paul Richardson
I like it if the pick stays in that range but it's a pretty even deal. I like A-Rob but not his QB.BostonRob said:I just traded the thing I posted earlier...
A Rob
For
1st next year (projected 1.03 to 1.05)
What you guys think?
I'll take side A despite being someone who isn't super high on Hill and usually prefers the side getting the best player.ChuckLiddell said:12 team, no PPR:
A gets - AP, Cobb, J.Hill, 1.6
B gets - L. Bell, VJax, Fitz
Big haul for LeVeon
Tough one, most will prefer Hill here but to me Green is the intriguing part. I would go with Forsett and the picks though. Bold move, I like it.Gave: Jeremy Hill and Ladarius Green
Received: 1.07, Forsett, 2016 2nd
1.05Team A gives: Josh Hill, Crabtree, d. Herron, Bruce Ellington, 2016 2nd, 2016 3rd.
Team B gives: 1.05, shonne greene, Chris Johnson, Donnie Avery, Travis Benjamin
Hill doesn't really need to get better, so much as keep doing what he's shown. The second half of the season especially he was a monster. He's much better than Gio, and I wouldn't be surprised at all if HE steals more receptions from Gio than Gio steals early down/GL work from him.I don't think Hill is a top 5 RB so I suppose that's the difference. When it comes to RB in dynasty I really just go year by year. Forsett and Hill are pretty close to me, and I got a couple strong assets. To me thats a win. Holding onto a guy whose in a split backfield just because he's young doesn't really make sense to me. Even if Hill himself gets better as a player, I'm not sure that will correlate to fantasy value just because of the usage.You guys valuing a short-term RB and a mid-1st (Parker? Abdullah? Yeldon?) over a top-5 RB are nuts.
So the biggest piece you lost was a mid first devy pick in exchange for a top 2 TE in 1.5ppr? Looks good to me.Devy Superflex, Tiered PPR (.5/1/1.5) Start 1QB/RB/WR/TE 1 SuperFlex 4 Flex
Gave:
Breshad Perriman
Late 2016 1st (see as 2.03 to 2.06)
Mid 2016 Devy (1.05 to 1.08)
Late 2016 Devy (1.09 to 1.12)
2016 3rd (see as 3.10 to 4.04)
Got
Jimmy Graham
Joseph Randle
Darren McFadden
Malcolm Brown (own Gurley/Mason)
Gave away future assets but I'm going for the title this year, roster now looks like this:
Ryan/Big Ben/Geno
Charles(Davis)/Gurley(Mason)/Duke(Crowell/West)/Randle(DMC)
Antonio/Jeffery/Tate/Maclin/Sanders/Floyd/Strong
Graham/Bennett
Devys: Zeke, Cardale, Clement
Remaining Devy Picks: One Late 2016, No rookie picks!
I just think long term planning at RB is futile. Gio was a top 15 RB as a rookie and then they brought in Hill. Theres no guarentee Hill lasts long either, nature of the position. If you took Hyde last year expecting him to take over for Gore, are you really happy now that the Niners project to be much worse than they were a couple years ago, and have a passing down back and a rookie in the fold? I think you constantly buy and sell RB in dynasty. If Forsett is having an RB1 season in October, he'll be very easy to move and much more valuable than he is in June when all anyone is thinking about is longevity and age.Hill doesn't really need to get better, so much as keep doing what he's shown. The second half of the season especially he was a monster. He's much better than Gio, and I wouldn't be surprised at all if HE steals more receptions from Gio than Gio steals early down/GL work from him.He's 22 years old. You're trading him for a short-term starter at best and a pick that you really really hope turns into what you already had in Hill--a young elite player. And if you're REALLY lucky, he'll turn into that plus have a situation you like more. That's not likely.I don't think Hill is a top 5 RB so I suppose that's the difference. When it comes to RB in dynasty I really just go year by year. Forsett and Hill are pretty close to me, and I got a couple strong assets. To me thats a win. Holding onto a guy whose in a split backfield just because he's young doesn't really make sense to me. Even if Hill himself gets better as a player, I'm not sure that will correlate to fantasy value just because of the usage.You guys valuing a short-term RB and a mid-1st (Parker? Abdullah? Yeldon?) over a top-5 RB are nuts.
I'm also someone that, until I'm right on the doorstep of being a top contender, ignores the RB position mostly, just filling the hole year to year. But if you're valuing Hill near Forsett, there's something very wrong with that. Just my opinion.
Really poor value for 1.05. Basically a 2016 2nd and 3rd, and a TE that is so far all hype. I love all the extra junk that team A managed to work in, haha. If that was 1.05 for every other piece in the trade, including the stuff team B gave up, it still wouldn't be close.Team A gives: Josh Hill, Crabtree, d. Herron, Bruce Ellington, 2016 2nd, 2016 3rd.
Team B gives: 1.05, shonne greene, Chris Johnson, Donnie Avery, Travis Benjamin
i don't think Hyde's value has declined much if at all. They thought enough of him to not re-sign Gore. They brought in Bush a receiving back and drafted a guy in the 5th round. None of that was unexpected and the same moves probably would've been made if Gore was the starter. I will grant they're O-line isn't as good but he's still a top 15-20 back.I just think long term planning at RB is futile. Gio was a top 15 RB as a rookie and then they brought in Hill. Theres no guarentee Hill lasts long either, nature of the position. If you took Hyde last year expecting him to take over for Gore, are you really happy now that the Niners project to be much worse than they were a couple years ago, and have a passing down back and a rookie in the fold?I think you constantly buy and sell RB in dynasty. If Forsett is having an RB1 season in October, he'll be very easy to move and much more valuable than he is in June when all anyone is thinking about is longevity and age.Hill doesn't really need to get better, so much as keep doing what he's shown. The second half of the season especially he was a monster. He's much better than Gio, and I wouldn't be surprised at all if HE steals more receptions from Gio than Gio steals early down/GL work from him.He's 22 years old. You're trading him for a short-term starter at best and a pick that you really really hope turns into what you already had in Hill--a young elite player. And if you're REALLY lucky, he'll turn into that plus have a situation you like more. That's not likely.I don't think Hill is a top 5 RB so I suppose that's the difference. When it comes to RB in dynasty I really just go year by year. Forsett and Hill are pretty close to me, and I got a couple strong assets. To me thats a win. Holding onto a guy whose in a split backfield just because he's young doesn't really make sense to me. Even if Hill himself gets better as a player, I'm not sure that will correlate to fantasy value just because of the usage.You guys valuing a short-term RB and a mid-1st (Parker? Abdullah? Yeldon?) over a top-5 RB are nuts.
I'm also someone that, until I'm right on the doorstep of being a top contender, ignores the RB position mostly, just filling the hole year to year. But if you're valuing Hill near Forsett, there's something very wrong with that. Just my opinion.
Great methodology debate here, always excellent to discuss.
Jeffery/SpillerQb/2rb/3wr/te/flex. Ppr scoring
Team A gave up Spiller, C.J. NOS RB;Jeffery, Alshon CHI WR;Thomas, Julius JAC TE; Year 2016 Round 3 Draft Pick
Team B gave up Yeldon, T.J. JAC RB;Funchess, Devin CAR WR;Perriman, Breshad BAL WR;Hill, Josh NOS TE; Year 2016 Round 2 Draft Pick
Julio12 Team PPR Dynasty QRRWWTKD + Flex + SuperFlex, 3 year contracts, no salary.
Gave: Melvin Gordon, Sammy Watkins
Got: Julio
DorsettTeam A sent12 team PPR, return yards, QRRWWT + Flex + SuperFlex + SuperFlex + IDP, All TDs 6 points
Martellus Bennett
Team B sent
2.03 (Phillip Dorsett), 4.03
Completely trading for talent rather than need (WRs Brown-Calvin-Hopkins-Sanders-Parker-C Johnson-Jennings-Richardson, TEs now Reed-Green-Cook), but I'm a fan of the talent.
Allen easyGave the #23 rookie pick (which was on the clock, not much left) and J Stew
Got Keenan Allen, the #41 and #43 rookie picks
Bryant/Floyd12 Team PPR
Team A trades Jordan Matthews and Knile Davis
Team B trades Martavis Bryant and Micheal Floyd
I didn't want to part with Matthews as he never was discussed but when he sent me this offer I accepted immediately. I was trying to deal 1.12 Knile Davis and Duron Carter in a deal for Martavis but I guess he preferred Matthews.
I will take GrahamDevy Superflex, Tiered PPR (.5/1/1.5) Start 1QB/RB/WR/TE 1 SuperFlex 4 Flex
Gave:
Breshad Perriman
Late 2016 1st (see as 2.03 to 2.06)
Mid 2016 Devy (1.05 to 1.08)
Late 2016 Devy (1.09 to 1.12)
2016 3rd (see as 3.10 to 4.04)
Got
Jimmy Graham
Joseph Randle
Darren McFadden
Malcolm Brown (own Gurley/Mason)
Gave away future assets but I'm going for the title this year, roster now looks like this:
Ryan/Big Ben/Geno
Charles(Davis)/Gurley(Mason)/Duke(Crowell/West)/Randle(DMC)
Antonio/Jeffery/Tate/Maclin/Sanders/Floyd/Strong
Graham/Bennett
Devys: Zeke, Cardale, Clement
Remaining Devy Picks: One Late 2016, No rookie picks!
HillGave: Jeremy Hill and Ladarius Green
Received: 1.07, Forsett, 2016 2nd
I might swing on Harvin for that in a return yards leagueDeep Dynasty - PPR league kr/pr points
Team A - Sends Percy Harvin
Team B - Sends 2.3 and 2016 2nd (projected 19 to 24 overall)
1.12, Knile, and Carter would have been an overpay for Bryant. The big question is whether Floyd can do anything. If he puts up another WR40 season or whatever he had, I'd much prefer Matthews + Knile. I like Matthews better than Bryant straight up by a decent amount, and if Floyd isn't at least a WR3, I'd rather have the best handcuff in the league12 Team PPR
Team A trades Jordan Matthews and Knile Davis
Team B trades Martavis Bryant and Micheal Floyd
I didn't want to part with Matthews as he never was discussed but when he sent me this offer I accepted immediately. I was trying to deal 1.12 Knile Davis and Duron Carter in a deal for Martavis but I guess he preferred Matthews.
Matthews for me12 Team PPR
Team A trades Jordan Matthews and Knile Davis
Team B trades Martavis Bryant and Micheal Floyd
I didn't want to part with Matthews as he never was discussed but when he sent me this offer I accepted immediately. I was trying to deal 1.12 Knile Davis and Duron Carter in a deal for Martavis but I guess he preferred Matthews.
Steal for Matthews.12 Team PPR
Team A trades Jordan Matthews and Knile Davis
Team B trades Martavis Bryant and Micheal Floyd
I didn't want to part with Matthews as he never was discussed but when he sent me this offer I accepted immediately. I was trying to deal 1.12 Knile Davis and Duron Carter in a deal for Martavis but I guess he preferred Matthews.
Agreed, and the funny thing is Im the person on the other end of this deal! Bit of context:We were in a dispersal draft last off-season and I only came away with three strong assets and no 2015 rookie 1sts/devys. I had some productive pieces around them, but ultimately was a mid pack team with no desirable assets to trade outside of Cam/Graham/Hilton, and Graham/Hilton's values are dropping (even though I don't think they should be). Decided to blow the roster up and acquire as many assets as I could and even though I won't compete this year, I am pretty happy with what I have now:jmo87usc said:So the biggest piece you lost was a mid first devy pick in exchange for a top 2 TE in 1.5ppr? Looks good to me.JonB86 said:Devy Superflex, Tiered PPR (.5/1/1.5) Start 1QB/RB/WR/TE 1 SuperFlex 4 Flex
Gave:
Breshad Perriman
Late 2016 1st (see as 2.03 to 2.06)
Mid 2016 Devy (1.05 to 1.08)
Late 2016 Devy (1.09 to 1.12)
2016 3rd (see as 3.10 to 4.04)
Got
Jimmy Graham
Joseph Randle
Darren McFadden
Malcolm Brown (own Gurley/Mason)
Gave away future assets but I'm going for the title this year, roster now looks like this:
Ryan/Big Ben/Geno
Charles(Davis)/Gurley(Mason)/Duke(Crowell/West)/Randle(DMC)
Antonio/Jeffery/Tate/Maclin/Sanders/Floyd/Strong
Graham/Bennett
Devys: Zeke, Cardale, Clement
Remaining Devy Picks: One Late 2016, No rookie picks!
I mean, I agree with your general philosophy in regards to the RB position for sure. Last year I won a championship with Brees, stud WR's across the board, Gronk, and only Fred Jackson at RB lol.amicsta said:I just think long term planning at RB is futile. Gio was a top 15 RB as a rookie and then they brought in Hill. Theres no guarentee Hill lasts long either, nature of the position. If you took Hyde last year expecting him to take over for Gore, are you really happy now that the Niners project to be much worse than they were a couple years ago, and have a passing down back and a rookie in the fold? I think you constantly buy and sell RB in dynasty. If Forsett is having an RB1 season in October, he'll be very easy to move and much more valuable than he is in June when all anyone is thinking about is longevity and age.ConnSKINS26 said:Hill doesn't really need to get better, so much as keep doing what he's shown. The second half of the season especially he was a monster. He's much better than Gio, and I wouldn't be surprised at all if HE steals more receptions from Gio than Gio steals early down/GL work from him.He's 22 years old. You're trading him for a short-term starter at best and a pick that you really really hope turns into what you already had in Hill--a young elite player. And if you're REALLY lucky, he'll turn into that plus have a situation you like more. That's not likely.amicsta said:I don't think Hill is a top 5 RB so I suppose that's the difference. When it comes to RB in dynasty I really just go year by year. Forsett and Hill are pretty close to me, and I got a couple strong assets. To me thats a win. Holding onto a guy whose in a split backfield just because he's young doesn't really make sense to me. Even if Hill himself gets better as a player, I'm not sure that will correlate to fantasy value just because of the usage.ConnSKINS26 said:You guys valuing a short-term RB and a mid-1st (Parker? Abdullah? Yeldon?) over a top-5 RB are nuts.
I'm also someone that, until I'm right on the doorstep of being a top contender, ignores the RB position mostly, just filling the hole year to year. But if you're valuing Hill near Forsett, there's something very wrong with that. Just my opinion.
Great methodology debate here, always excellent to discuss.
I like your Hill trades.I mean, I agree with your general philosophy in regards to the RB position for sure. Last year I won a championship with Brees, stud WR's across the board, Gronk, and only Fred Jackson at RB lol.amicsta said:I just think long term planning at RB is futile. Gio was a top 15 RB as a rookie and then they brought in Hill. Theres no guarentee Hill lasts long either, nature of the position. If you took Hyde last year expecting him to take over for Gore, are you really happy now that the Niners project to be much worse than they were a couple years ago, and have a passing down back and a rookie in the fold?I think you constantly buy and sell RB in dynasty. If Forsett is having an RB1 season in October, he'll be very easy to move and much more valuable than he is in June when all anyone is thinking about is longevity and age.ConnSKINS26 said:Hill doesn't really need to get better, so much as keep doing what he's shown. The second half of the season especially he was a monster. He's much better than Gio, and I wouldn't be surprised at all if HE steals more receptions from Gio than Gio steals early down/GL work from him.He's 22 years old. You're trading him for a short-term starter at best and a pick that you really really hope turns into what you already had in Hill--a young elite player. And if you're REALLY lucky, he'll turn into that plus have a situation you like more. That's not likely.amicsta said:I don't think Hill is a top 5 RB so I suppose that's the difference. When it comes to RB in dynasty I really just go year by year. Forsett and Hill are pretty close to me, and I got a couple strong assets. To me thats a win. Holding onto a guy whose in a split backfield just because he's young doesn't really make sense to me. Even if Hill himself gets better as a player, I'm not sure that will correlate to fantasy value just because of the usage.ConnSKINS26 said:You guys valuing a short-term RB and a mid-1st (Parker? Abdullah? Yeldon?) over a top-5 RB are nuts.
I'm also someone that, until I'm right on the doorstep of being a top contender, ignores the RB position mostly, just filling the hole year to year. But if you're valuing Hill near Forsett, there's something very wrong with that. Just my opinion.
Great methodology debate here, always excellent to discuss.
I just think you're wrong in this particular instance. I don't see any correlation between Hyde and Hill because Hill has already shown what he can do, and his situation hasn't changed except that the Bengals invested even more into their OL than they already had, unlike Hyde who seems to be the only promising young fantasy asset on a crumbling roster.
I'm with you, I'm constantly buying and selling RB's when necessary, I just don't generally value the position. I try to "downgrade" to less sexy RB names all the time in order to avoid the risk and acquire value that I can invest elsewhere on my roster, usually at WR.
But in this specific case, I personally value Hill higher and I've seen Hill go for more in trades and in start-ups.
Good chatting with you about this, this is the kind of stuff that makes the Shark Pool valuable.
that's because it is.I know that I've been overpaying for Hill in trades, but this seems like horrible value for him.Gave: Jeremy Hill and Ladarius Green
Received: 1.07, Forsett, 2016 2nd
Pick 5 for free?? Well, for a 2nd and 3rd anywayTeam A gives: Josh Hill, Crabtree, d. Herron, Bruce Ellington, 2016 2nd, 2016 3rd.
Team B gives: 1.05, shonne greene, Chris Johnson, Donnie Avery, Travis Benjamin
Get a new Calculator. No idea what that calculator must say about pick 7 and/or Forsett, or what rankings you used for it, but no, bad value for HillYou think so? I thought it was pretty good. But I also think Hill's value is at his highest. Trade calc I used liked it tooI know that I've been overpaying for Hill in trades, but this seems like horrible value for him.Gave: Jeremy Hill and Ladarius Green
Received: 1.07, Forsett, 2016 2nd
Then trade HIll for a WR, not an old RB and a draft pick that probably nets you a far lesser RB than Hill.amicsta said:I just think long term planning at RB is futile. Gio was a top 15 RB as a rookie and then they brought in Hill. Theres no guarentee Hill lasts long either, nature of the position. If you took Hyde last year expecting him to take over for Gore, are you really happy now that the Niners project to be much worse than they were a couple years ago, and have a passing down back and a rookie in the fold?I think you constantly buy and sell RB in dynasty. If Forsett is having an RB1 season in October, he'll be very easy to move and much more valuable than he is in June when all anyone is thinking about is longevity and age.ConnSKINS26 said:Hill doesn't really need to get better, so much as keep doing what he's shown. The second half of the season especially he was a monster. He's much better than Gio, and I wouldn't be surprised at all if HE steals more receptions from Gio than Gio steals early down/GL work from him.He's 22 years old. You're trading him for a short-term starter at best and a pick that you really really hope turns into what you already had in Hill--a young elite player. And if you're REALLY lucky, he'll turn into that plus have a situation you like more. That's not likely.amicsta said:I don't think Hill is a top 5 RB so I suppose that's the difference. When it comes to RB in dynasty I really just go year by year. Forsett and Hill are pretty close to me, and I got a couple strong assets. To me thats a win. Holding onto a guy whose in a split backfield just because he's young doesn't really make sense to me. Even if Hill himself gets better as a player, I'm not sure that will correlate to fantasy value just because of the usage.ConnSKINS26 said:You guys valuing a short-term RB and a mid-1st (Parker? Abdullah? Yeldon?) over a top-5 RB are nuts.
I'm also someone that, until I'm right on the doorstep of being a top contender, ignores the RB position mostly, just filling the hole year to year. But if you're valuing Hill near Forsett, there's something very wrong with that. Just my opinion.
Great methodology debate here, always excellent to discuss.
I like the Benjamin side. I guess if you like Funchess the return isn't bad depending on where that devy pick projects14 team PPR devy league (one round per year)
Gave:
Kelvin Benjamin
Got:
Devin Funchess
2016 devy pick
2016 2nd
Assuming you have some RB's to start I like the deal for you10 tm start 2 QB/1R/1W/1T/3F, tiered PPR, 1 point per 5 carries
I have a team that on paper is really good but has underachieved every year. Just paid a hefty price for Gronk to try and put me over the top....
Jeremy Hill
Taliaferro
Edelman
Julius Thomas
2017 1st
2017 2nd
for
Gronk
Ivory
Ridley
Garcon
2016 second
Makes sense.10 team qqrrwwww
Robert Turbin
For
Zac Stacy (to Ivory owner)
I think both trades favor your side quite nicely.12 team PPR, flexible lineups 1-3 rb, 1-4 wr, 1-3 te
Trade 1
Gave: Jarvis Landry
Received: 2016 1st round pick (likely 3-8)
Trade 2
Gave: Jordan Cameron and Marqise Lee
Received: Allen Robinson
This is an orphan team (contender) I took over during the offseason and I'm trading around to get my guys. Based on current values the first trade is quite even and the second may favor me slightly.
Both are great trades for you.12 team PPR, flexible lineups 1-3 rb, 1-4 wr, 1-3 te
Trade 1
Gave: Jarvis Landry
Received: 2016 1st round pick (likely 3-8)
Trade 2
Gave: Jordan Cameron and Marqise Lee
Received: Allen Robinson
This is an orphan team (contender) I took over during the offseason and I'm trading around to get my guys. Based on current values the first trade is quite even and the second may favor me slightly.
Not sure I'd pay this price for Gronk unless it was a 1.5ppr TE. Even then, is Gronk worth Jeremy Hill, Edelman, and a 1st rounder more than Julius Thomas? Would have to see your remaining roster before I can say for sure, but it looks like you created a hole at two starting spots in order to upgrade one. That usually doesn't work well.10 tm start 2 QB/1R/1W/1T/3F, tiered PPR, 1 point per 5 carries
I have a team that on paper is really good but has underachieved every year. Just paid a hefty price for Gronk to try and put me over the top....
Jeremy Hill
Taliaferro
Edelman
Julius Thomas
2017 1st
2017 2nd
for
Gronk
Ivory
Ridley
Garcon
2016 second
It says tiered PPR so we can assume TE premium in some format.Not sure I'd pay this price for Gronk unless it was a 1.5ppr TE. Even then, is Gronk worth Jeremy Hill, Edelman, and a 1st rounder more than Julius Thomas? Would have to see your remaining roster before I can say for sure, but it looks like you created a hole at two starting spots in order to upgrade one. That usually doesn't work well.10 tm start 2 QB/1R/1W/1T/3F, tiered PPR, 1 point per 5 carries
I have a team that on paper is really good but has underachieved every year. Just paid a hefty price for Gronk to try and put me over the top....
Jeremy Hill
Taliaferro
Edelman
Julius Thomas
2017 1st
2017 2nd
for
Gronk
Ivory
Ridley
Garcon
2016 second
Good point about Edelman, but to me that means you should hold him, not sell him for a good bit below his real worth. He finished as like the WR #15 or 17 or so in 1 PPR last year, yeah? He and JT are definitely not just throw ins. Together they're worth at least another 1st round pick, and probably a decent 1st round pick at that. Still could be worth it for Gronk and the other pieces, just wanted to disagree a little about how you framed the dealIt says tiered PPR so we can assume TE premium in some format.Not sure I'd pay this price for Gronk unless it was a 1.5ppr TE. Even then, is Gronk worth Jeremy Hill, Edelman, and a 1st rounder more than Julius Thomas? Would have to see your remaining roster before I can say for sure, but it looks like you created a hole at two starting spots in order to upgrade one. That usually doesn't work well.10 tm start 2 QB/1R/1W/1T/3F, tiered PPR, 1 point per 5 carries
I have a team that on paper is really good but has underachieved every year. Just paid a hefty price for Gronk to try and put me over the top....
Jeremy Hill
Taliaferro
Edelman
Julius Thomas
2017 1st
2017 2nd
for
Gronk
Ivory
Ridley
Garcon
2016 second
The problem with Edelman is he performs like a 1st round guy but you will never get that in a trade. JT is a ? in JAX so really Hill and the 1st are the 2 solid assets you give up.
In a 10 team league even if it is an overpay studs are easily worth an overpay of some sort to have them starting.
I am not going to blow a deal for a stud haggling over the price on Edelman or JTGood point about Edelman, but to me that means you should hold him, not sell him for a good bit below his real worth. He finished as like the WR #15 or 17 or so in 1 PPR last year, yeah? He and JT are definitely not just throw ins. Together they're worth at least another 1st round pick, and probably a decent 1st round pick at that. Still could be worth it for Gronk and the other pieces, just wanted to disagree a little about how you framed the deal
I'm probably a little higher than average on Freeman, but I'd take the picks. Good trade.12 Team PPR Dynasty QRRWWTKD + Flex + SuperFlex, TE Premium, 3 year contracts no salary
Gave: Freeman, 2017 2nd (could be anywhere) - this was to the Coleman Owner
Got: Two 2016 2nd rounders. Both project as early/mid second rounders, if it makes a difference.
I'm not high on him and think that's selling low. Even if you had removed the 2017 2 I'm probably on the Freeman side ever so slightly.I'm probably a little higher than average on Freeman, but I'd take the picks. Good trade.12 Team PPR Dynasty QRRWWTKD + Flex + SuperFlex, TE Premium, 3 year contracts no salary
Gave: Freeman, 2017 2nd (could be anywhere) - this was to the Coleman Owner
Got: Two 2016 2nd rounders. Both project as early/mid second rounders, if it makes a difference.
Early/mid 2nd rounders are pretty valuable in Superflex + TE premium leagues though. I like the value, personally.I'm not high on him and think that's selling low. Even if you had removed the 2017 2 I'm probably on the Freeman side ever so slightly.I'm probably a little higher than average on Freeman, but I'd take the picks. Good trade.12 Team PPR Dynasty QRRWWTKD + Flex + SuperFlex, TE Premium, 3 year contracts no salary
Gave: Freeman, 2017 2nd (could be anywhere) - this was to the Coleman Owner
Got: Two 2016 2nd rounders. Both project as early/mid second rounders, if it makes a difference.
Problem is that's the only way I was making this deal. Been trying to get Gronk in this league for 2 years. He finally beat me down to giving up all this. FTR, Edelman finished 17th in this league last year in PPG... but I think his future production is pretty volatile. His ceiling was probably last year, and while I think he can hit that again many times I don't think he'll hit Welker's prime, and I think he could fall off. What makes it easier to give him up is that I am acquiring another Patriot catcher in the trade and I have Dez/Calvin/Jordy already. FTR, here is my lineup...Good point about Edelman, but to me that means you should hold him, not sell him for a good bit below his real worth. He finished as like the WR #15 or 17 or so in 1 PPR last year, yeah? He and JT are definitely not just throw ins. Together they're worth at least another 1st round pick, and probably a decent 1st round pick at that. Still could be worth it for Gronk and the other pieces, just wanted to disagree a little about how you framed the dealIt says tiered PPR so we can assume TE premium in some format.Not sure I'd pay this price for Gronk unless it was a 1.5ppr TE. Even then, is Gronk worth Jeremy Hill, Edelman, and a 1st rounder more than Julius Thomas? Would have to see your remaining roster before I can say for sure, but it looks like you created a hole at two starting spots in order to upgrade one. That usually doesn't work well.10 tm start 2 QB/1R/1W/1T/3F, tiered PPR, 1 point per 5 carries
I have a team that on paper is really good but has underachieved every year. Just paid a hefty price for Gronk to try and put me over the top....
Jeremy Hill
Taliaferro
Edelman
Julius Thomas
2017 1st
2017 2nd
for
Gronk
Ivory
Ridley
Garcon
2016 second
The problem with Edelman is he performs like a 1st round guy but you will never get that in a trade. JT is a ? in JAX so really Hill and the 1st are the 2 solid assets you give up.
In a 10 team league even if it is an overpay studs are easily worth an overpay of some sort to have them starting.
You need to pass on the AP potential with Gurley and make a lateral move for a "lesser" stud RB if possible.Problem is that's the only way I was making this deal. Been trying to get Gronk in this league for 2 years. He finally beat me down to giving up all this. FTR, Edelman finished 17th in this league last year in PPG... but I think his future production is pretty volatile. His ceiling was probably last year, and while I think he can hit that again many times I don't think he'll hit Welker's prime, and I think he could fall off. What makes it easier to give him up is that I am acquiring another Patriot catcher in the trade and I have Dez/Calvin/Jordy already. FTR, here is my lineup...Good point about Edelman, but to me that means you should hold him, not sell him for a good bit below his real worth. He finished as like the WR #15 or 17 or so in 1 PPR last year, yeah? He and JT are definitely not just throw ins. Together they're worth at least another 1st round pick, and probably a decent 1st round pick at that. Still could be worth it for Gronk and the other pieces, just wanted to disagree a little about how you framed the dealIt says tiered PPR so we can assume TE premium in some format.The problem with Edelman is he performs like a 1st round guy but you will never get that in a trade. JT is a ? in JAX so really Hill and the 1st are the 2 solid assets you give up.Not sure I'd pay this price for Gronk unless it was a 1.5ppr TE. Even then, is Gronk worth Jeremy Hill, Edelman, and a 1st rounder more than Julius Thomas? Would have to see your remaining roster before I can say for sure, but it looks like you created a hole at two starting spots in order to upgrade one. That usually doesn't work well.10 tm start 2 QB/1R/1W/1T/3F, tiered PPR, 1 point per 5 carries
I have a team that on paper is really good but has underachieved every year. Just paid a hefty price for Gronk to try and put me over the top....
Jeremy Hill
Taliaferro
Edelman
Julius Thomas
2017 1st
2017 2nd
for
Gronk
Ivory
Ridley
Garcon
2016 second
In a 10 team league even if it is an overpay studs are easily worth an overpay of some sort to have them starting.
Rodgers/Flacco/Foles
Gurley/Mason/Ingram/Martin/Lottery tickets
Dez/Jordy/Calvin/Floyd/Whatever
Gronk/Cameron
I'm gonna struggle to fill WR4 and RB will be spotty... hoping Gurley hits big as a rookie. This team is stacked and has yet to win a playoff game.. getting frustrated.
You're probably right.You need to pass on the AP potential with Gurley and make a lateral move for a "lesser" stud RB if possible.Problem is that's the only way I was making this deal. Been trying to get Gronk in this league for 2 years. He finally beat me down to giving up all this. FTR, Edelman finished 17th in this league last year in PPG... but I think his future production is pretty volatile. His ceiling was probably last year, and while I think he can hit that again many times I don't think he'll hit Welker's prime, and I think he could fall off. What makes it easier to give him up is that I am acquiring another Patriot catcher in the trade and I have Dez/Calvin/Jordy already. FTR, here is my lineup...Good point about Edelman, but to me that means you should hold him, not sell him for a good bit below his real worth. He finished as like the WR #15 or 17 or so in 1 PPR last year, yeah? He and JT are definitely not just throw ins. Together they're worth at least another 1st round pick, and probably a decent 1st round pick at that. Still could be worth it for Gronk and the other pieces, just wanted to disagree a little about how you framed the dealIt says tiered PPR so we can assume TE premium in some format.The problem with Edelman is he performs like a 1st round guy but you will never get that in a trade. JT is a ? in JAX so really Hill and the 1st are the 2 solid assets you give up.Not sure I'd pay this price for Gronk unless it was a 1.5ppr TE. Even then, is Gronk worth Jeremy Hill, Edelman, and a 1st rounder more than Julius Thomas? Would have to see your remaining roster before I can say for sure, but it looks like you created a hole at two starting spots in order to upgrade one. That usually doesn't work well.10 tm start 2 QB/1R/1W/1T/3F, tiered PPR, 1 point per 5 carries
I have a team that on paper is really good but has underachieved every year. Just paid a hefty price for Gronk to try and put me over the top....
Jeremy Hill
Taliaferro
Edelman
Julius Thomas
2017 1st
2017 2nd
for
Gronk
Ivory
Ridley
Garcon
2016 second
In a 10 team league even if it is an overpay studs are easily worth an overpay of some sort to have them starting.
Rodgers/Flacco/Foles
Gurley/Mason/Ingram/Martin/Lottery tickets
Dez/Jordy/Calvin/Floyd/Whatever
Gronk/Cameron
I'm gonna struggle to fill WR4 and RB will be spotty... hoping Gurley hits big as a rookie. This team is stacked and has yet to win a playoff game.. getting frustrated.
Judging by the thread in the Asst Coach forum, at least 50% of owners would take Gurley for Jeremy Hill.
You do that and I'd feel much better about a playoff run. Gurley is a great prospect, but you need great production. I'm not saying to move him for an aging RB1 or anything, but if you can make a lateral move to a less hyped young stud...do it.