matt moore (1 Viewer)

[Our Gang]

He's a ufa that could end up starting in Arizona and put up some nice numbers with that wr corps.

 

[THE FANTASY KING]

I don't think there's any chance that Arizona goes into next season with someone like Matt Moore atop their depth chart. They need to do something radical at the QB position, and Matt Moore is not it. The only scenario I see this working out is the Cardinals taking a QB at the top of the draft, and Moore, or someone like him, gets brought in for the standard "seat warmer" role.

REGARDS,

THE FANTASY KING

 

[Sabertooth]

You just never know. I could see Moore starting in AZ or KC. He's certainly better than anything those teams have.

 

[ChuckLiddell]

You just never know. I could see Moore starting in AZ or KC. He's certainly better than anything those teams have.

And he arguably is better than anyone that this draft class has to offer aside from Geno.

 

[irish eyes]

I hope this thread is a joke, you can't be serious saying this guy is starting caliber. If that were the case he already would be. And if he does end up in AZ or KC you can expect duplicate seasons from either of them next year.

 

[Our Gang]

And aside from flacco, who else is out there in free agency? And as you mentioned saber the options are not that appealing in the draft.

 

[mr roboto]

I would like to see the Vikings bring him in to push Ponder for the job. Not saying he's a very good QB but with that D and AP a serviceable QB gets them into the playoffs this year.

 

[Sweet Love]

I would like to see the Vikings bring him in to push Ponder for the job. Not saying he's a very good QB but with that D and AP a serviceable QB gets them into the playoffs this year.

...and I feel the same way about my Jets. No one thinks Matt Moore is the solution, but there have been a handful of journeymen to make it to the promised land...worse case, he could be keeping a lot of teams in the running, especially if they are built on the defensive side of the ball.

 

[Our Gang]

I hope this thread is a joke, you can't be serious saying this guy is starting caliber. If that were the case he already would be. And if he does end up in AZ or KC you can expect duplicate seasons from either of them next year.

So there has never been a journeyman qb that had had success in the NFL? Bad logic there.

 

[Our Gang]

I'm not saying he is a stud but in deep leagues he is worth a roster spot

 

[Dr. Octopus]

He's a ufa that could end up starting in Arizona and put up some nice numbers with that wr corps.

I like Matt Moore but I don't see any team going after him to be their starting QB. I also don't see all that much upside from a fantasy perspective even is some team did.

 

[Dr. Octopus]

And aside from flacco, who else is out there in free agency? And as you mentioned saber the options are not that appealing in the draft.

Mike Vick and Alex Smith are both likely to be available.

 

[saintfool]

He's a ufa that could end up starting in Arizona and put up some nice numbers with that wr corps.

I like Matt Moore but I don't see any team going after him to be their starting QB. I also don't see all that much upside from a fantasy perspective even is some team did.

Teams looking for a starter at QB next year?KC - obviousAZ - obviousNYJ - obviousJAX - likelyMN - maybe; Ponder regressed second half of the yearPHI - maybe; Foles has had one good game and it featured 50 attempts from him to manage.TN - maybe to unlikely; lack of better options likely means Locker remains the starter another yearBUF - unlikely; Fitzpatrick is inconsistent and the pressure is mounting on the front office to deliver a playoff team but there aren't many better options.

 

[Dr. Octopus]

He's a ufa that could end up starting in Arizona and put up some nice numbers with that wr corps.

I like Matt Moore but I don't see any team going after him to be their starting QB. I also don't see all that much upside from a fantasy perspective even is some team did.

Teams looking for a starter at QB next year?KC - obviousAZ - obviousNYJ - obviousJAX - likelyMN - maybe; Ponder regressed second half of the yearPHI - maybe; Foles has had one good game and it featured 50 attempts from him to manage.TN - maybe to unlikely; lack of better options likely means Locker remains the starter another yearBUF - unlikely; Fitzpatrick is inconsistent and the pressure is mounting on the front office to deliver a playoff team but there aren't many better options.

I don't see any of those teams going after a stop gap like Moore and to be honest is he really that much of a better option than Cassell, Kolb, Henne or Sanchez?

 

[saintfool]

He's a ufa that could end up starting in Arizona and put up some nice numbers with that wr corps.

I like Matt Moore but I don't see any team going after him to be their starting QB. I also don't see all that much upside from a fantasy perspective even is some team did.

Teams looking for a starter at QB next year?KC - obviousAZ - obviousNYJ - obviousJAX - likelyMN - maybe; Ponder regressed second half of the yearPHI - maybe; Foles has had one good game and it featured 50 attempts from him to manage.TN - maybe to unlikely; lack of better options likely means Locker remains the starter another yearBUF - unlikely; Fitzpatrick is inconsistent and the pressure is mounting on the front office to deliver a playoff team but there aren't many better options.

I don't see any of those teams going after a stop gap like Moore and to be honest is he really that much of a better option than Cassell, Kolb, Henne or Sanchez?

I could see Moore being brought in to compete against one the underachieving starters. A team would have to be pretty desperate to turn to him as a de facto starter. In his favor, he hasn't #### the bed with his starting gig like Cassee, Kolb, or Sanchez. If this free agency and incoming draft class of QBs underwhelm then some teams may be forced to consider a player like Moore. Of those you mentioned, only Sanchez doesn't have the complete perception of failure like the others.

 

[lod01]

He's a ufa that could end up starting in Arizona and put up some nice numbers with that wr corps.

That would be an idea landing spot. This guy may be able to fend off any QB they draft.

 

[ChuckLiddell]

I think the Jets is a good call. Sparano was the HC in Miami in '11, when Matt Moore wound up being the team's MVP. He knows what he brings to the table. If he feels it is an upgrade from Sanchez (and if he keeps his job), he could lobby for it, and possibly sell the on it.

 

[Our Gang]

Matt Moore from weeks 4-17 was ranked no worse than qb 15 in in cumulative point rankings once he became the starter. Weeks 10-17 he was 8 and was usually in the 10-12 range.

 

[Our Gang]

I think the Jets is a good call. Sparano was the HC in Miami in '11, when Matt Moore wound up being the team's MVP. He knows what he brings to the table. If he feels it is an upgrade from Sanchez (and if he keeps his job), he could lobby for it, and possibly sell the on it.

Keeping his job is a big if and if he ends up starting for nyj with sparono as the oc, forget I even posted this.

 

[Frank Costanza's Lawyer]

Matt Moore from weeks 4-17 was ranked no worse than qb 15 in in cumulative point rankings once he became the starter. Weeks 10-17 he was 8 and was usually in the 10-12 range.

NFL teams dont pick their starters based on fantasy football performance. HTH.

 

[mr roboto]

Matt Moore from weeks 4-17 was ranked no worse than qb 15 in in cumulative point rankings once he became the starter. Weeks 10-17 he was 8 and was usually in the 10-12 range.

NFL teams dont pick their starters based on fantasy football performance. HTH.

Really??? Gee, I thought they did. Are you saying that he isn't starter quality? Cause he is. Not great but starter quality.

 

[Chaka]

Matt Moore from weeks 4-17 was ranked no worse than qb 15 in in cumulative point rankings once he became the starter. Weeks 10-17 he was 8 and was usually in the 10-12 range.

NFL teams dont pick their starters based on fantasy football performance. HTH.

Really??? Gee, I thought they did. Are you saying that he isn't starter quality? Cause he is. Not great but starter quality.

Derek Anderson 2.0

 

[mr roboto]

Matt Moore from weeks 4-17 was ranked no worse than qb 15 in in cumulative point rankings once he became the starter. Weeks 10-17 he was 8 and was usually in the 10-12 range.

NFL teams dont pick their starters based on fantasy football performance. HTH.

Really??? Gee, I thought they did. Are you saying that he isn't starter quality? Cause he is. Not great but starter quality.

Derek Anderson 2.0

What ever happened to this guy?

 

[Sea Duck]

Matt Moore from weeks 4-17 was ranked no worse than qb 15 in in cumulative point rankings once he became the starter. Weeks 10-17 he was 8 and was usually in the 10-12 range.

NFL teams dont pick their starters based on fantasy football performance. HTH.

Moore had the 6th highest passer rating in the second half of the season last year.

 

[Chaka]

Matt Moore from weeks 4-17 was ranked no worse than qb 15 in in cumulative point rankings once he became the starter. Weeks 10-17 he was 8 and was usually in the 10-12 range.

NFL teams dont pick their starters based on fantasy football performance. HTH.

Really??? Gee, I thought they did. Are you saying that he isn't starter quality? Cause he is. Not great but starter quality.

Derek Anderson 2.0

What ever happened to this guy?

He was exposed as a mediocre NFL QB who does not deserve consideration as anything more than a backup. I believe he is backing up Cam Newton.