Nope, if he does that, then he isIts too early to tell. He's had a TREMENDOUS start, and if hey were to duplicate his first 7 years for the next 7... do you think there would be any ?
can i call premature polling???Nope, if he does that, then he isIts too early to tell. He's had a TREMENDOUS start, and if hey were to duplicate his first 7 years for the next 7... do you think there would be any ?
there are some claiming he is RIGHT NOWcan i call premature polling???Nope, if he does that, then he isIts too early to tell. He's had a TREMENDOUS start, and if hey were to duplicate his first 7 years for the next 7... do you think there would be any ?
but you're surely are smarter than those people, right?ETA: grammar correctionthere are some claiming he is RIGHT NOWcan i call premature polling???Nope, if he does that, then he isIts too early to tell. He's had a TREMENDOUS start, and if hey were to duplicate his first 7 years for the next 7... do you think there would be any ?
but you're surely are smarter than those people, right?there are some claiming he is RIGHT NOWcan i call premature polling???Nope, if he does that, then he isIts too early to tell. He's had a TREMENDOUS start, and if hey were to duplicate his first 7 years for the next 7... do you think there would be any ?
The simple answer is maybe but not yet. Favre has a leg up in the longevity categories and Montana has the post-season cache but Brady has the time and situation to make up ground on both. This post-season could give him a huge boost.Simple yes/no answer.
I thought the same thing about Kurt Warner in the "Best show on turf" days. He hasn't always had multiple Pro Bowl O-linemen.Best O-Line, yes.Any QB behind that line would look great.Von
The simple answer is maybe but not yet. Favre has a leg up in the longevity categories and Montana has the post-season cache but Brady has the time and situation to make up ground on both. This post-season could give him a huge boost.Simple yes/no answer.
We hear this supporting cast argument alot. But don't good organizations pick good players? Pioli and Belichick picked all of those great o-linemen, wide receivers, and defensive players that many like to say makes Brady better than he is, but why can't we consider that maybe Brady too is a great player the Pats selected? Why is he measured differently than his teammates?Anyway, I just think it's no coincidence that many of the great quarterbacks played for great organizations and we shouldn't marginalize them because of the skill of their supporting cast.Best O-Line, yes.
Any QB behind that line would look great.
Von
Why not? It's clear that supporting cast has a HUGE impact on how a QB is perceived. Archie Manning is considered by many to be the best QB to ever play for a terrible franchise. He had sub-7 ypa and 48 more INTs than TDs. Jake Plummer threw 24 more INTs than TDs in his six years in Arizona... and 24 more TDs than INTs in his four years in Denver. From 1983 to 1992, John Elway was a rather inefficient passer. Prior to the 1993 season, he gets a HoF left tackle, and in the next few seasons he gets some decent receivers and a running game, and all of a sudden the top 6 passer ratings of his entire career all come within his final six seasons. Heck, look at Tom Brady himself. Last year, he has no wide receivers. Result? 6.8 ypa, 24 TDs, 87.9 passer rating. This year, the only change on his offense is that he gets some stud receivers, and all of a sudden he magically transforms into a 50 TD, 4800 yard, 117 rating passer. Looks to me like his supporting cast was worth about 25 scores and 30 points of passer rating. That's the difference between "no receivers" and "Moss/Welker/Stallworth". You add 30 points to a scrub's passer rating, and suddenly he's one of the better QBs in the league. You add 30 points to an already great QB's passer rating, and suddenly he's the greatest QB to ever play. That's what kind of impact supporting cast can have.Anyway, I just think it's no coincidence that many of the great quarterbacks played for great organizations and we shouldn't marginalize them because of the skill of their supporting cast.
Actually Steve Young is. Peyton Manning is second though and who knows by the time he retires.THERE IS NO SUCH THING LIKE "THE BEST EVER"
and most important...who the F cares ???
And surrounding talent has EVERYTHING to do with your results.Nope. He's the second best active quarterback though.
Why not? It's clear that supporting cast has a HUGE impact on how a QB is perceived. Archie Manning is considered by many to be the best QB to ever play for a terrible franchise. He had sub-7 ypa and 48 more INTs than TDs. Jake Plummer threw 24 more INTs than TDs in his six years in Arizona... and 24 more TDs than INTs in his four years in Denver. From 1983 to 1992, John Elway was a rather inefficient passer. Prior to the 1993 season, he gets a HoF left tackle, and in the next few seasons he gets some decent receivers and a running game, and all of a sudden the top 6 passer ratings of his entire career all come within his final six seasons. Heck, look at Tom Brady himself. Last year, he has no wide receivers. Result? 6.8 ypa, 24 TDs, 87.9 passer rating. This year, the only change on his offense is that he gets some stud receivers, and all of a sudden he magically transforms into a 50 TD, 4800 yard, 117 rating passer. Looks to me like his supporting cast was worth about 25 scores and 30 points of passer rating. That's the difference between "no receivers" and "Moss/Welker/Stallworth". You add 30 points to a scrub's passer rating, and suddenly he's one of the better QBs in the league. You add 30 points to an already great QB's passer rating, and suddenly he's the greatest QB to ever play. That's what kind of impact supporting cast can have.Anyway, I just think it's no coincidence that many of the great quarterbacks played for great organizations and we shouldn't marginalize them because of the skill of their supporting cast.
You are forgetting Peyton Manning. Some would consider Brady the third best active QB. Myself, I give him the nod over Manning, but not by much. At this point, with all that Favre has done, I think it is absurd to consider him at Favre's level. Brady has benefitted from great coaching in addition to the supporting cast. I rank Belicheat as the greatest coach I have ever seen (never saw Lombardi). Favre had to struggle through the Sherman and Rhodes years. And lets never forget that he only beat Peyton Manning's single season TD record by running up scores, cheating, and playing specifically for the records. When talking about the greatest QB, I think you have to consider leadership and character. Favre and Manning both blow Brady away in those categories.Nope. He's the second best active quarterback though.
Yup...Brady has really suffered in both the leadership and character categories.You are forgetting Peyton Manning. Some would consider Brady the third best active QB. Myself, I give him the nod over Manning, but not by much. At this point, with all that Favre has done, I think it is absurd to consider him at Favre's level. Brady has benefitted from great coaching in addition to the supporting cast. I rank Belicheat as the greatest coach I have ever seen (never saw Lombardi). Favre had to struggle through the Sherman and Rhodes years. And lets never forget that he only beat Peyton Manning's single season TD record by running up scores, cheating, and playing specifically for the records.Nope. He's the second best active quarterback though.
When talking about the greatest QB, I think you have to consider leadership and character. Favre and Manning both blow Brady away in those categories.
http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index...t&p=8035231It's disingenuous of you to act like other people are claiming he's the best ever right now. The people who disagreed with you were disagreeing with your claim that "he's not even close". That's significantly different from your yes/no poll, and the implication that there are several people in the thread claiming that he is the best ever right now.there are some claiming he is RIGHT NOWcan i call premature polling???Nope, if he does that, then he isIts too early to tell. He's had a TREMENDOUS start, and if hey were to duplicate his first 7 years for the next 7... do you think there would be any ?
YEShe absolutely is the greatest QB ever,if they win it all this year.4 SBs in what 6 years, plus an undefeated season?Simple yes/no answer.
It appears the only talent you're concerned with are WRs and RBs. Thankfully, there's more than those 3-5 players on the field. He's never played behind a mediocre OL or for a mediocre coaching staff. That makes a difference. I won't say he is right now, but he's in the discussion the same way Bo Jackson is in the discussion for all time great RBs.there is absolutely NO comparison to any other QB NOT named Otto Graham. All Brady does is win the big gameswith mediocre talent around him..Simple yes/no answer.
this year you're finally seeing a brief example of what Brady WOULD have done , had there been a Jerry Rice, Lynn Swann, John Taylor, Reg Wayne, Marvin Harrison, Shannon Sharpe, Rod Smith, Roger Craig,playing in NE
None of the other QBs in the discussion ever played behind a mediocre OL, either. You're correct that QB stats are driven by team dynamics, but Brady's first 6 years stats are good to great, with less than sellar skill position talent, and in year 7, in his first year with elite talent, Brady breaks records.It appears the only talent you're concerned with are WRs and RBs. Thankfully, there's more than those 3-5 players on the field. He's never played behind a mediocre OL or for a mediocre coaching staff. That makes a difference. I won't say he is right now, but he's in the discussion the same way Bo Jackson is in the discussion for all time great RBs.there is absolutely NO comparison to any other QB NOT named Otto Graham. All Brady does is win the big gameswith mediocre talent around him..Simple yes/no answer.
this year you're finally seeing a brief example of what Brady WOULD have done , had there been a Jerry Rice, Lynn Swann, John Taylor, Reg Wayne, Marvin Harrison, Shannon Sharpe, Rod Smith, Roger Craig,playing in NE
IMO, the issue here is that there are so many ways to evaluate what "best ever" means. Is it best stats? Is it most wins? Is it most SB titles? Is it gettin gthe farthest with the weakest amount of supporting talent?So which is better of the following options . . .Its worth mentioning here that someone else brought this question up in the NE/Jax game thread, "Is Tom Brady the best Q ever", and the OP said, "not even close". Not even close. Huh, Not Even Close? Who's he not even close to??? Cmon, you made yourself laugh with that one. Admit it.
Now, there's probably no need to even ask the question to begin with. After all, this season is far from over not to mention the rest of Brady's career. But let's atleast recognize of the 5 or so guys on the short list of all time greats at the position, Brady's at least close to them.
Didn't Brady win a SB with an offensive line that resulted in the starting QB going down with a collapsed lung?Best O-Line, yes.Any QB behind that line would look great.Von
This might make sense if there weren't already a lot of people claiming that Brady could be the best ever BEFORE this year.You add 30 points to an already great QB's passer rating, and suddenly he's the greatest QB to ever play. That's what kind of impact supporting cast can have.
If you call Bledsoe getting nailed out of bounds the result of the OL, then sure.Didn't Brady win a SB with an offensive line that resulted in the starting QB going down with a collapsed lung?Best O-Line, yes.Any QB behind that line would look great.Von
How exactly did Brady cheat?And lets never forget that he only beat Peyton Manning's single season TD record by running up scores, cheating, and playing specifically for the records.
Brady has every bit as much character and leadership as those other two.When talking about the greatest QB, I think you have to consider leadership and character. Favre and Manning both blow Brady away in those categories.
stats, not results or level of play. His stats ( prior to this year ) range from 3500 - 4000 yds passing, 24-28 TDs, and I don't feel like looking up QB ratings, but ( i believe ) nothing in the top 10 prior to this year. I'd call his single season 4000 yard passing elite, but his TD totals have never screamed elite. None of this has anything to do with Brady's ability as a QB or his likely place among the all time greats, but rather has to do with offensive scheme, having one of the better short yardage RBs ( Dillon ) for a couple of years, being held in check by the coaching staff during his early years, and the quality of the skill players around him.lol "good to great"... people are so hard on him... how about great to elite.
For the record, he never won anything with Reche Caldwell except a trip to an AFC Championship game.im not even a brady fan but i'll give credit where credit is due... before this season he has won superbowl's with the troy browns and reche caldwells... he hasn't always had studs...
Okay, wasn't that the same offensive line that led the league in most sacks allowed the previous season?If you call Bledsoe getting nailed out of bounds the result of the OL, then sure.Didn't Brady win a SB with an offensive line that resulted in the starting QB going down with a collapsed lung?Best O-Line, yes.Any QB behind that line would look great.Von
Brady has been in the Top 10 in passer rating EVERY year since he became the starter . . . 6, 9, 10, 9, 6, 9, 1. He ranks 3rd among active QB behind Manning and Warner and 4th all time (Young is #1).Although I will be the first to say that I am not a huge fan of passer rating as a metric to compare QB from different eras.I don't feel like looking up QB ratings, but ( i believe ) nothing in the top 10 prior to this year.
oops. Thanks for the correction. I really need to be a bit less lazy on these posts.Brady has been in the Top 10 in passer rating EVERY year since he became the starter . . . 6, 9, 10, 9, 6, 9, 1. He ranks 3rd among active QB behind Manning and Warner and 4th all time (Young is #1).Although I will be the first to say that I am not a huge fan of passer rating as a metric to compare QB from different eras.I don't feel like looking up QB ratings, but ( i believe ) nothing in the top 10 prior to this year.
Easily, the knucklehead post of this thread.You are forgetting Peyton Manning. Some would consider Brady the third best active QB. Myself, I give him the nod over Manning, but not by much. At this point, with all that Favre has done, I think it is absurd to consider him at Favre's level. Brady has benefitted from great coaching in addition to the supporting cast. I rank Belicheat as the greatest coach I have ever seen (never saw Lombardi). Favre had to struggle through the Sherman and Rhodes years. And lets never forget that he only beat Peyton Manning's single season TD record by running up scores, cheating, and playing specifically for the records. When talking about the greatest QB, I think you have to consider leadership and character. Favre and Manning both blow Brady away in those categories.Nope. He's the second best active quarterback though.
It's WAY too early to hand out this award yet. This post was really bad, but someone out there will probably be inspired to outdue it.Easily, the knucklehead post of this thread.You are forgetting Peyton Manning. Some would consider Brady the third best active QB. Myself, I give him the nod over Manning, but not by much. At this point, with all that Favre has done, I think it is absurd to consider him at Favre's level. Brady has benefitted from great coaching in addition to the supporting cast. I rank Belicheat as the greatest coach I have ever seen (never saw Lombardi). Favre had to struggle through the Sherman and Rhodes years. And lets never forget that he only beat Peyton Manning's single season TD record by running up scores, cheating, and playing specifically for the records. When talking about the greatest QB, I think you have to consider leadership and character. Favre and Manning both blow Brady away in those categories.Nope. He's the second best active quarterback though.
point taken, but for the record, Ive called in the engraver and he's on standby.It's WAY too early to hand out this award yet. This post was really bad, but someone out there will probably be inspired to outdue it.Easily, the knucklehead post of this thread.You are forgetting Peyton Manning. Some would consider Brady the third best active QB. Myself, I give him the nod over Manning, but not by much. At this point, with all that Favre has done, I think it is absurd to consider him at Favre's level. Brady has benefitted from great coaching in addition to the supporting cast. I rank Belicheat as the greatest coach I have ever seen (never saw Lombardi). Favre had to struggle through the Sherman and Rhodes years. And lets never forget that he only beat Peyton Manning's single season TD record by running up scores, cheating, and playing specifically for the records. When talking about the greatest QB, I think you have to consider leadership and character. Favre and Manning both blow Brady away in those categories.Nope. He's the second best active quarterback though.
"I'm trying to be a good teammate here but lets just say we had protection problems.""This isn't basketball. I cant play both ways. All we can do as an offense is try and score points."When talking about the greatest QB, I think you have to consider leadership and character. Favre and Manning both blow Brady away in those categories.