The truth hurts, so here it is. Warning....not going to sugar coat anything here.
The only IDP articles that are worth a read are:
1) Jene's offseason IDP tier article.
2) Norton's weekly Eyes of the Guru article.
3) Rudnicki's weekly Upgrades and Downgrade article.
The best in-season article is by far Norton's Guru article, but it's pretty much worthless for the week it comes out, because it comes out after waivers run. This gets talked about every offseason, and no matter how many people ask for it to come out on Tuesday (or at the very least Wednesday afternoon), it's never going to happen. Norton is too busy and it's too time-consuming to get it out in time. Rudnicki's article tries to fill that gap, and he does a decent job, but it just doesn't do what Norton's article does.
The rest of the IDP articles are superficial and don't provide any insight whatsoever. I'm sorry to say such a thing, and don't mean any disrespect, but come on. The IDP Dynasty sleepers article for week 16 has the following sleepers: Jamie Collins, Justin Houston, Danielle Hunter, Jamal Adams, etc... Seriously, in what universe do those players qualify as a dynasty sleeper? Larkin's matchups to exploit article is way too basic. Gives 2 teams for tackles and sacks. Yippie. How about just updating a grid that shows IDP points allowed, by position (DT, DE, LB, CB, S) and update it on a weekly basis? Settle's weekly IDP sleeper article, is never accurate. He just lists guys that you won't want to start, hoping that they "breakout". Week 16 had Brian Cushing listed as a sleeper. lol. 0-1-0. No offense intended, but it's an article that isn't needed.
And let's not even talk about the rankings. Their flaws have been pointed out in above posts, as they are just rehashed from the week prior, with little to no thought. I don't even look at them.
The bottom line, with the exception of the 3 articles above, the rest of them are just filler. Articles for FBG to show that they have IDP content. In reality, they need to take a long hard look in the mirror. FBG needs to make a decision...have excellent content, or no content at all. I'd rather see just those 3 articles next year and none of the other filler. Hard enough to weed through all the DFS articles I don't want to see, so extra IDP fluff isn't needed either.
That's my take. Take it for what it is. Can't stress enough that I don't mean to make anyone mad. But I feel like it needs to be said.