Yeah thought that was strangeNo Sat-Mon contests on FanDuel?
Yeah thought that was strangeNo Sat-Mon contests on FanDuel?
I only ended up playing in 4 Thu-Sat games... McCoy, Maclin and Gates are 100% owned in each of themI have to believe McCoy and Maclin will be near 100% owned. Sanchez and Gates might be 80%.I typically play at least 2 lineups in cash games to hedge against one of them being a dud. I don't see that possibility for the Thu-Sat games. Outside of Sanchez, what QB do you play? RGIII, Kaep, a questionable Rivers? Ugh.
At least the did thurs-Mon games. Draftkings didn't do those at all. Now, there are Sat only or Sun-Mon contests. Horse####.Nope. And it really ticks me off.No Sat-Mon contests on FanDuel?
I don't think anybody's arguing that he will blow up. As long as he's average, he will pay off. He doesn't need to have a monster game to return value.Back to my anti-Clausen rant, Bill Barnwell agrees with me:
"Theyre handing over the starting gig to Jimmy Clausen, their 27-year-old backup, who had one of the worst seasons by a quarterback in recent history as a rookie in 2010. Clausen completed 52.5 percent of his passes, averaged 5.2 yards per attempt, threw three times as many interceptions as touchdowns, and successfully ensured that the Panthers ended up with Newton."
And:
"If Clausen can light it up against the Lions just by following the rules of the scheme to a tee, doesnt that make the scheme so incredible and valuable that the Bears should lock up Trestman and Kromer to 20-year contracts?"
I figure the Lions dial-up the pressure, and with that front against that OL I think it will be effective.
Since I'm the token Clausen defender (not sure if I will use him for Sunday games, but I've got 1/3 of my TNF lineups - honestly would be better to play him on Thursday as compared to Sunday, since some percentages of other owners will have crap QBs like Bortles and Kaep and whatever other junk there is Thursday and Saturday):I don't think anybody's arguing that he will blow up. As long as he's average, he will pay off. He doesn't need to have a monster game to return value.Back to my anti-Clausen rant, Bill Barnwell agrees with me:
"Theyre handing over the starting gig to Jimmy Clausen, their 27-year-old backup, who had one of the worst seasons by a quarterback in recent history as a rookie in 2010. Clausen completed 52.5 percent of his passes, averaged 5.2 yards per attempt, threw three times as many interceptions as touchdowns, and successfully ensured that the Panthers ended up with Newton."
And:
"If Clausen can light it up against the Lions just by following the rules of the scheme to a tee, doesnt that make the scheme so incredible and valuable that the Bears should lock up Trestman and Kromer to 20-year contracts?"
I figure the Lions dial-up the pressure, and with that front against that OL I think it will be effective.
I'm toying with Claussen in a 50-50 but really looking at Hill. Ultimately it could come down to Claussen and Graham at TE or Hill and Kelce.Warming up to a lot of Hill and McCown at QB...
IMO the matchup means Forte won't be able to run. So, turn to the passing game as well as screens and dumpoffs. Forte could have 30-40 yards rushing and over 100 receiving.The problem with Clausen is the matchup in my mind. If he was playing a worse defense Id have no issue rolling him out there. But just like I wouldnt pick a Peyton Manning vs a good defense I wouldnt pick a much worse QB vs a good def just because hes very cheap.
That being said, right now I went with Keenum only because hes had a few blow up games in the past AND Baltimore has a horrible secondary and hes the same cost as Claussen.
If Clausen was facing the Titans, Oakland, TB, etc I could see the risk being worth it. But he's facing the Lions, a team with a very good front 7. They're going to come after him. I just can't see that ending well for Clausen. Det isn't going to worry about going man on everyone except Alshon. Bennett and Forte are going to have to help block. Chicago has looked checked-out for at least 2 weeks. Detroit is fighting for the playoffs. I just can't find any reason to think Clausen won't suck.Since I'm the token Clausen defender (not sure if I will use him for Sunday games, but I've got 1/3 of my TNF lineups - honestly would be better to play him on Thursday as compared to Sunday, since some percentages of other owners will have crap QBs like Bortles and Kaep and whatever other junk there is Thursday and Saturday):I don't think anybody's arguing that he will blow up. As long as he's average, he will pay off. He doesn't need to have a monster game to return value.Back to my anti-Clausen rant, Bill Barnwell agrees with me:
"Theyre handing over the starting gig to Jimmy Clausen, their 27-year-old backup, who had one of the worst seasons by a quarterback in recent history as a rookie in 2010. Clausen completed 52.5 percent of his passes, averaged 5.2 yards per attempt, threw three times as many interceptions as touchdowns, and successfully ensured that the Panthers ended up with Newton."
And:
"If Clausen can light it up against the Lions just by following the rules of the scheme to a tee, doesnt that make the scheme so incredible and valuable that the Bears should lock up Trestman and Kromer to 20-year contracts?"
I figure the Lions dial-up the pressure, and with that front against that OL I think it will be effective.
-as a rookie (or whatever he was, 2nd year), on an absolutely atrocious Panthers team almost completely devoid of weapons... what relevance does this have to an older Clausen, on a different team, in a different scheme, years later?
-Josh McCown, Josh McCown, Josh McCown. He was a less-highly drafted version of Clausen prior to his revival last year.
-Clausen was a high draft pick, and one of the consensus top QB picks as a college player. There could be some talent there and was obscured by being on the panthers
-Trestman is coaching for his job. If he can put together a few wins with Clausen, he can say "see, look, it wasn't my problem, it was Cutler for the last two years!" As correctly pointed out, if he can get production out of McCown and Clausen, they get rid of Cutler and build around literally any other QB.
-The change happened early in the week so he gets a full week of reps and practice, after having been in the system since the off-season.
It's certainly higher risk than Anderson last week, but worth a shot. "QB whisperer"
He burned me last week so I'm gun shy, but I agree. No TY + Dallas Def = gotta roster Moncrief.thinking about putting moncrief in all my lineups with the news Hilton will most likely be out
Took the chance in quite a few Thu-Mon lineups and I'm rejoicing at the low ownership percentages before everyone caught on this morning that Hilton won't be playing. I expect his Sun-Mon ownership is gonna be sky high.thinking about putting moncrief in all my lineups with the news Hilton will most likely be out
He will more than likely take the place of Floyd on my Sun-Mon double up rosters.Took the chance in quite a few Thu-Mon lineups and I'm rejoicing at the low ownership percentages before everyone caught on this morning that Hilton won't be playing. I expect his Sun-Mon ownership is gonna be sky high.thinking about putting moncrief in all my lineups with the news Hilton will most likely be out
Biggest is actually Bowe...Listening to Rodgers this week talk about how The Packers need to resign Cobbs has me thinking..
After a sinker of a week last week, Rodgers is due and with him pimping Cobbs this might be the week to go with them..
So far came up with this, using Randle as a hope and pray at RB:
Aaron Rodgers
LeVeon Bell
Joseph Randle
Randall Cobb
Kenny Stills
Dwayne Bowe
Travis Kelce
Shayne Graham
Detroit Lions
Biggest is Randle.. May have swap up and downgrade at TE and/or WR..
He's not the first person I've seen on the Bowe train this week, what am I missing?Biggest is actually Bowe...Listening to Rodgers this week talk about how The Packers need to resign Cobbs has me thinking..
After a sinker of a week last week, Rodgers is due and with him pimping Cobbs this might be the week to go with them..
So far came up with this, using Randle as a hope and pray at RB:
Aaron Rodgers
LeVeon Bell
Joseph Randle
Randall Cobb
Kenny Stills
Dwayne Bowe
Travis Kelce
Shayne Graham
Detroit Lions
Biggest is Randle.. May have swap up and downgrade at TE and/or WR..
PIT pass defense is bad... but Alex Smith can't throw further than 10 yards.He's not the first person I've seen on the Bowe train this week, what am I missing?Biggest is actually Bowe...Listening to Rodgers this week talk about how The Packers need to resign Cobbs has me thinking..
After a sinker of a week last week, Rodgers is due and with him pimping Cobbs this might be the week to go with them..
So far came up with this, using Randle as a hope and pray at RB:
Aaron Rodgers
LeVeon Bell
Joseph Randle
Randall Cobb
Kenny Stills
Dwayne Bowe
Travis Kelce
Shayne Graham
Detroit Lions
Biggest is Randle.. May have swap up and downgrade at TE and/or WR..
Insane due factor?He's not the first person I've seen on the Bowe train this week, what am I missing?Biggest is actually Bowe...Listening to Rodgers this week talk about how The Packers need to resign Cobbs has me thinking..
After a sinker of a week last week, Rodgers is due and with him pimping Cobbs this might be the week to go with them..
So far came up with this, using Randle as a hope and pray at RB:
Aaron Rodgers
LeVeon Bell
Joseph Randle
Randall Cobb
Kenny Stills
Dwayne Bowe
Travis Kelce
Shayne Graham
Detroit Lions
Biggest is Randle.. May have swap up and downgrade at TE and/or WR..
True.. But number of targets he sees + Pit D + @$5500 just seemed good value..PIT pass defense is bad... but Alex Smith can't throw further than 10 yards.He's not the first person I've seen on the Bowe train this week, what am I missing?Biggest is actually Bowe...Listening to Rodgers this week talk about how The Packers need to resign Cobbs has me thinking..
After a sinker of a week last week, Rodgers is due and with him pimping Cobbs this might be the week to go with them..
So far came up with this, using Randle as a hope and pray at RB:
Aaron Rodgers
LeVeon Bell
Joseph Randle
Randall Cobb
Kenny Stills
Dwayne Bowe
Travis Kelce
Shayne Graham
Detroit Lions
Biggest is Randle.. May have swap up and downgrade at TE and/or WR..
He's averaged <5 targets and <3 catches per game over the last 5True.. But number of targets he sees + Pit D + @$5500 just seemed good value..PIT pass defense is bad... but Alex Smith can't throw further than 10 yards.He's not the first person I've seen on the Bowe train this week, what am I missing?Biggest is actually Bowe...Listening to Rodgers this week talk about how The Packers need to resign Cobbs has me thinking..
After a sinker of a week last week, Rodgers is due and with him pimping Cobbs this might be the week to go with them..
So far came up with this, using Randle as a hope and pray at RB:
Aaron Rodgers
LeVeon Bell
Joseph Randle
Randall Cobb
Kenny Stills
Dwayne Bowe
Travis Kelce
Shayne Graham
Detroit Lions
Biggest is Randle.. May have swap up and downgrade at TE and/or WR..
Agreed not a "dream" WR.. Just looking to fill that last WR spot at $5500 or lower..He's averaged <5 targets and <3 catches per game over the last 5True.. But number of targets he sees + Pit D + @$5500 just seemed good value..PIT pass defense is bad... but Alex Smith can't throw further than 10 yards.He's not the first person I've seen on the Bowe train this week, what am I missing?Biggest is actually Bowe...Listening to Rodgers this week talk about how The Packers need to resign Cobbs has me thinking..
After a sinker of a week last week, Rodgers is due and with him pimping Cobbs this might be the week to go with them..
So far came up with this, using Randle as a hope and pray at RB:
Aaron Rodgers
LeVeon Bell
Joseph Randle
Randall Cobb
Kenny Stills
Dwayne Bowe
Travis Kelce
Shayne Graham
Detroit Lions
Biggest is Randle.. May have swap up and downgrade at TE and/or WR..
I hear you on Moncrief.. Seems no matter what Combo I want to put together I end up having him in the lineup.. Of course my lineups right now are "All in" on Bell so I have a feeling I'll have to re-look them over and move someone in Bell's spot for a lineup or two before Sunday and use that money to upgrade Moncrief..With TY likely out/limited... I'm feeling Moncrief. I have him in almost all my lineups. That being said, he's obviously far from a sure thing. Do I hedge a few lineups with Wayne (same price) or Bowe (cheaper)... or just go balls out with Dante in all of them?
Either way, experienced players tend to not play as much in week 17 with unstable playing time scenarios. Don't know who's resting for playoffs, etc.I have a odd question.
Does the entries of new comers increase next week once most fantasy leagues are done? The reason I ask.. I figure everyone has seen all these damn commercials for FD and DK and once they win, they figure they are experts at this. My first year doing FD, but my return money wise and entertainment has been worth it.
Appears MT is taking a wider stance on some of the injury decision points, which I like.When I plug many of my iterations into the interactive FD value chart, I'm getting a huge disparity between Maurile and Bloom projections -- like 18-20 difference. I'm not sure what to make of that. Anyone else seeing that this week?
threw in Julius too. Bronco super stack. Too many people way too down on Peyton IMOI did a Peyton/Demarius stack in a gpp because fbgs has said that Denver is a run first team like 70 times this week. Obvious set up IMO
D IMOWhere's everyone at with VJaX vs DJax?
Peyton now questionable...can't believe that crud.threw in Julius too. Bronco super stack. Too many people way too down on Peyton IMOI did a Peyton/Demarius stack in a gpp because fbgs has said that Denver is a run first team like 70 times this week. Obvious set up IMO