I think
@massraider said it best that it's a tool. I shouldn't have been so dismissive of the chart itself. There's no doubt that some of the top WRs have elite spider charts. But, I honestly didn't look for many. In fact, Brown was the first and only one I looked at.
Hopkins is another guy with a poor chart.
Or Jordy. And I'm sure there are others.
Similarly, there are some freaks that are awful WRs (DHB, Stephen Hill among others showing up as comps on Julio's page).
Bottomline is that it's worth noting if a WR you like has poor measurables. And it's not a guarantee that a great spider chart will equal greatness. I was more trying to point out that his actual numbers are decent (10'2" broad, 36" vert, 4.51 speed, sub 7 second 3-cone) even though it doesn't look like it on the spider chart.
It's not a death sentence for him if you like him, IMO. And Moore does get a little bonus for his. I just think it's a tool to be taken with a grain of salt.