Id without a doubt start Tannehill over Kaepernick this week. Not even a questionWith Brady on bye I'm going with him. Tannehill or Bortles were really the only other viable option on waivers for me.
Starting him in two leagues. Figure coming out of a bye against NO is as good a time as any.So does anyone have the nuts to roll this guy out there this weekend?
Looking at the projections from Bloom/Dodds/Tremblay C. Kaepernick is without a doubt the highest projected streamer of the week.
I've got Stafford (@MN) and R. Wilson (vs BUF) and I'm considering for both.
Am I mad?
I see Tannehill and Kaepernick similarly in terms of risk. Both could be absolute duds.Id without a doubt start Tannehill over Kaepernick this week. Not even a question
They both play horrible defenses, they both run the ball so thats where they are similar this week. Here is where they differ... Kapernick can be benched at any time. Kapernick throws to Torrey Smith, Jeremy Kerley and may be handing off the DuJuan Harris, Saints actually are terrible vs the run too. Tannehill has no risk of being benched, throws to Jarvis Landry, Parker, Stills, Jets are one of the worst pass defenses and best run defenses.I see Tannehill and Kaepernick similarly in terms of risk. Both could be absolute duds.
Would be interested in knowing why you think Tannehill is a no doubt. Especially since they seem hell bent on running Ajayi now.
This is my biggest worry but outside of that I think Kaep is the better start.They both play horrible defenses, they both run the ball so thats where they are similar this week. Here is where they differ... Kapernick can be benched at any time. Kapernick throws to Torrey Smith, Jeremy Kerley and may be handing off the DuJuan Harris, Saints actually are terrible vs the run too. Tannehill has no risk of being benched, throws to Jarvis Landry, Parker, Stills, Jets are one of the worst pass defenses and best run defenses.
I don't see him getting benched. I can see him losing the starting job, but not in the middle of the game.This is my biggest worry but outside of that I think Kaep is the better start.
The SF/NO game has a 52.5 O/U with NO -4.5. Kaep is going to have to throw where has the MIA/NYJ game has a O/U of 44 with MIA -3. From a gameflow standpoint you have to like Kaep.
Kaep also put up more points in the game before their bye than Tannehill has over the past month. His floor is substantially lower than Kaeps. Also, I'm seeing 20mph winds in MIA this week.
I had the choice and went Kaep.
I'm starting him over Stafford. I never thought I'd be starting Kaepernick this year.. but here we are.So does anyone have the nuts to roll this guy out there this weekend?
Looking at the projections from Bloom/Dodds/Tremblay C. Kaepernick is without a doubt the highest projected streamer of the week.
I've got Stafford (@MN) and R. Wilson (vs BUF) and I'm considering for both.
Am I mad?
I think alike to SSND.This is my biggest worry but outside of that I think Kaep is the better start.
The SF/NO game has a 52.5 O/U with NO -4.5. Kaep is going to have to throw where has the MIA/NYJ game has a O/U of 44 with MIA -3. From a gameflow standpoint you have to like Kaep.
Kaep also put up more points in the game before their bye than Tannehill has over the past month. His floor is substantially lower than Kaeps. Also, I'm seeing 20mph winds in MIA this week.
I had the choice and went Kaep.
Nah. I prefer my QBs completing less than 50% of their passes.Id without a doubt start Tannehill over Kaepernick this week. Not even a question
All three of Dodds/Bloom/Tremblay are projecting Kaepernick above all other streamers. In my scoring system (4 pts per TD), they are ranked 7,8, and 6th overall respectively.This is my biggest worry but outside of that I think Kaep is the better start.
The SF/NO game has a 52.5 O/U with NO -4.5. Kaep is going to have to throw where has the MIA/NYJ game has a O/U of 44 with MIA -3. From a gameflow standpoint you have to like Kaep.
Kaep also put up more points in the game before their bye than Tannehill has over the past month. His floor is substantially lower than Kaeps. Also, I'm seeing 20mph winds in MIA this week.
I had the choice and went Kaep.
hmmm. I'm currently starting Wentz but Kaep is available on the wire.Starting him this week over Winston.
Also over taylor and wentz on wire
Tough decision. I still may change my mind. Kap has higher floor. if a couple of the guys I am going against today have big games I may go wentz. I just doubt eagles can take advantage of bad gb def. this is coming from an eagles fanhmmm. I'm currently starting Wentz but Kaep is available on the wire.
I was going to ask the same question. It's difficult to rank him dynasty wise.For us dynasty folks, is Kaep showing enough that he could re emerge as a dual threat, pass+run QB for years to come? Or is SF still going to be looking for another answer at QB?
Make sure you have a real plan because if this guy is it, you are in big trouble. Ride him as long as he continues to realize that he is a horrible passer but great runner.Otis said:For us dynasty folks, is Kaep showing enough that he could re emerge as a dual threat, pass+run QB for years to come? Or is SF still going to be looking for another answer at QB?
It seems like most teams don't want to deal with the politics. He alienated a lot of coaches and owners with the kneeling; then offended still more when he said he didn't vote.johnnyboy8102 said:I was going to ask the same question. It's difficult to rank him dynasty wise.
Me too, over Wilson and Cam. For all the marbles.RenegadeRoy said:Debating on firing him up over Wilson this week.
This.. doesn't look like wind is an issue. What are we expecting the snow to do to stats in this game?Any downgrade for him now that it looks like it will be snowing moderately in game? he's good in the cold as per the historic Green Bay game, he should still run a ton.
Perhaps but this is a bad Bears team and Kap showed a lot of play vs some much better teams on the road. The bad weather is not slowing down the Bears and thief third string QB. SF mailed it in.Don't you kind of deserve what you get if you start a bad QB in bad weather?
I based starting Kaeperniick on the "Questions for Bloom" or whatever thread it is called. I should have trusted my gut feelings. Oh well, well deserved ending to a miserable year for me.ConnSKINS26 said:Don't you kind of deserve what you get if you start a bad QB in bad weather?
This is the story of the NFL, take your chances on what looks like something that is a sure thing but what ends up happening is fools gold. The play here was the Bears defense at home this year has been very good. The sucker bet was thinking that the injuries to the Bears were going to open up the 49er offense. Not in the NFL. On any given Sunday. This is why Vegas hardly loses.I based starting Kaeperniick on the "Questions for Bloom" or whatever thread it is called. I should have trusted my gut feelings. Oh well, well deserved ending to a miserable year for me.
Well stated, Power Monster.This is the story of the NFL, take your chances on what looks like something that is a sure thing but what ends up happening is fools gold. The play here was the Bears defense at home this year has been very good. The sucker bet was thinking that the injuries to the Bears were going to open up the 49er offense. Not in the NFL. On any given Sunday. This is why Vegas hardly loses.
Fantasy football is much more enjoyable when you make your own decisions, win or loseI based starting Kaeperniick on the "Questions for Bloom" or whatever thread it is called. I should have trusted my gut feelings. Oh well, well deserved ending to a miserable year for me.