The General
Footballguy
Jimmy Graham HAS to retire now.
Wasn't the bigger problem those 3 points on offense???There's that worthless defense. Losers
I knew the bears would coverGame closed 11, Draftkings was -11.5.
Anyone playing NO -11 shouldnt gamble. It was 8-9 all week, went to 10 yesterday and 11 today.I knew the bears would cover
Maybe try some other crossovers too.What we learned today:
More games on Nickelodeon
21-9 = 12 or what am I missing here ?Big old fat push for those who got it at -11.
Agree, Packers have no shot.You really think the Packers are getting past Goff?
“The was no clear and obvious visual evidence to overturn the ruling, so it stands” said none of the millions who watched every single angle provide clear visual evidence it was a fumble.
Oh wow. I didn't see them miss the XP try. I just assumed.21-9 = 12 or what am I missing here ?
I'm sorry if I offended you. Yet I still have not seen any angles that show the ball breaking the plane.Razors Edge said:The pylon cam was right on the line, whats to dispute? It was too close to overturn in using the most accurate camera.
https://larrybrownsports.com/football/video-tony-romo-cracks-tip-joke-drew-brees-goal-line-play/571636
If you are gonna mock people for needing glasses, make sure you comprehend that the pylon cam is right down the line while the others are not. So again, according to the camera right down the line, not on an angled shoulder of a person. Its too close to overturn the call on the field.
I follow the rules of the league, the problem was, the refs did not in lett the play stand, they saw green from the angles as its obvious. My entire point though, was if you dont use the pylon cam, get rid of them so u cant pick and choose what cam u dont use.