I’d say they might be somewhat concerned about White and may limit him in short yardage. Vaughn is a better blocker but Tucker is a better runner.Any significance to Vaugh being inactive while Tucker seemingly not?
Ha, not at all. Just curious since I'd thought Tucker was at the bottom in prior weeks.I’d say they might be somewhat concerned about White and may limit him in short yardage. Vaughn is a better blocker but Tucker is a better runner.Any significance to Vaugh being inactive while Tucker seemingly not?
They may plan to give him some Carrie’s today that White would normally get.
Just speculating though. Don’t hinge your fantasy day on it and then get upset at me!
what was the injury to Baker?Baker down
It looks like he’s coming back in.what was the injury to Baker?Baker down
Let's go with your post@Ministry of Pain
I’m not saying Baker is the guy or anything, but he has at least been serviceable.
Todd Bowles has no interest in the future of this franchise. He thought he could get a decent enough vet QB and win ugly. He’s a defensive head coach with a terrible defense that has lost 6 of 7 games.
Bowles already chose to move away from giving a young QB that’s on the roster (Trask) a chance. Bowles can develop DBs, but that’s about it. He doesn’t want to develop a QB. If by some miracle he’s the head coach next season it’ll probably be Baker again on a franchise tag. Likely without Mike Evans.
Until there’s a reset at the top it won’t matter.
The Bucs are paying the bill on their Super Bowl and 3 year run with Tom Brady. We knew we had $72M in dead cap to eat this year and the plan was always Trask and a cheap vet. Hope one of them emerges. What I didn't expect was Baker to actually play somewhat well, the offense to look fairly good at times under Canales, and then the defense to completely implode under Todd Bowles' watch.Let's go with your post@Ministry of Pain
I’m not saying Baker is the guy or anything, but he has at least been serviceable.
Todd Bowles has no interest in the future of this franchise. He thought he could get a decent enough vet QB and win ugly. He’s a defensive head coach with a terrible defense that has lost 6 of 7 games.
Bowles already chose to move away from giving a young QB that’s on the roster (Trask) a chance. Bowles can develop DBs, but that’s about it. He doesn’t want to develop a QB. If by some miracle he’s the head coach next season it’ll probably be Baker again on a franchise tag. Likely without Mike Evans.
Until there’s a reset at the top it won’t matter.
They'll be so thankful, you took the words out of my mouth, maybe this was the better thread to hash all this out.
Good post
Almost 0 chance Bowles is the coach next year. I’m not even sure I’d bet he’s the coach next week.@Ministry of Pain
I’m not saying Baker is the guy or anything, but he has at least been serviceable.
Todd Bowles has no interest in the future of this franchise. He thought he could get a decent enough vet QB and win ugly. He’s a defensive head coach with a terrible defense that has lost 6 of 7 games.
Bowles already chose to move away from giving a young QB that’s on the roster (Trask) a chance. Bowles can develop DBs, but that’s about it. He doesn’t want to develop a QB. If by some miracle he’s the head coach next season it’ll probably be Baker again on a franchise tag. Likely without Mike Evans.
Until there’s a reset at the top it won’t matter.
Washington doesn't need a QB. Their rookie is fine. They need an entire O-line and at least 2 LB's.As of now they'd pick 7th and every team in front of them needs a QB.
The Glazers have never fired a HC in season, but lose to Carolina at home? Yeah, I could see it.Almost 0 chance Bowles is the coach next year. I’m not even sure I’d bet he’s the coach next week.@Ministry of Pain
I’m not saying Baker is the guy or anything, but he has at least been serviceable.
Todd Bowles has no interest in the future of this franchise. He thought he could get a decent enough vet QB and win ugly. He’s a defensive head coach with a terrible defense that has lost 6 of 7 games.
Bowles already chose to move away from giving a young QB that’s on the roster (Trask) a chance. Bowles can develop DBs, but that’s about it. He doesn’t want to develop a QB. If by some miracle he’s the head coach next season it’ll probably be Baker again on a franchise tag. Likely without Mike Evans.
Until there’s a reset at the top it won’t matter.
If you think you're going to start beating Dak and Jalen Hurts with Sam Howell more power to you.Washington doesn't need a QB. Their rookie is fine. They need an entire O-line and at least 2 LB's.As of now they'd pick 7th and every team in front of them needs a QB.
Yea losing to a 1-10 team at home that just fired their coach should break precedent.The Glazers have never fired a HC in season, but lose to Carolina at home? Yeah, I could see it.Almost 0 chance Bowles is the coach next year. I’m not even sure I’d bet he’s the coach next week.@Ministry of Pain
I’m not saying Baker is the guy or anything, but he has at least been serviceable.
Todd Bowles has no interest in the future of this franchise. He thought he could get a decent enough vet QB and win ugly. He’s a defensive head coach with a terrible defense that has lost 6 of 7 games.
Bowles already chose to move away from giving a young QB that’s on the roster (Trask) a chance. Bowles can develop DBs, but that’s about it. He doesn’t want to develop a QB. If by some miracle he’s the head coach next season it’ll probably be Baker again on a franchise tag. Likely without Mike Evans.
Until there’s a reset at the top it won’t matter.
At this point just let him continue to lose. Firing him may spark them into a divisional win and another beat-down in the first round of the playoffs.Yea losing to a 1-10 team at home that just fired their coach should break precedent.The Glazers have never fired a HC in season, but lose to Carolina at home? Yeah, I could see it.Almost 0 chance Bowles is the coach next year. I’m not even sure I’d bet he’s the coach next week.@Ministry of Pain
I’m not saying Baker is the guy or anything, but he has at least been serviceable.
Todd Bowles has no interest in the future of this franchise. He thought he could get a decent enough vet QB and win ugly. He’s a defensive head coach with a terrible defense that has lost 6 of 7 games.
Bowles already chose to move away from giving a young QB that’s on the roster (Trask) a chance. Bowles can develop DBs, but that’s about it. He doesn’t want to develop a QB. If by some miracle he’s the head coach next season it’ll probably be Baker again on a franchise tag. Likely without Mike Evans.
Until there’s a reset at the top it won’t matter.
That said, there really is no reason to fire a coach mid-season.