Rattle and Hum
Footballguy
Admittedly I'm not the most (or least) PC person. Seeing this comment thrown around as it relates to gun control in various verbiage: "Maybe we need more T&Ps to fix the problem" or "More T&Ps are not going to do anything to fix gun violence so just stop". It seems like projection with a bias towards rhetoric to me but some seem very serious about this being a worthwhile position when advocating for deterrents to gun violence. I'd like to get a temperature on this and maybe understand the mentality behind it. If one wishes for more gun control wouldn't it make more sense to simply advocate for that without admonishing those that offer heartfelt T&Ps? Is it now rude to share T&Ps as a form of expression or towards someone you may not know who has experienced loss?
Is it the that people don't see T & Ps as helping any way so there is no validity in sharing?
Is there a political bias towards this train of thought?
Is it the "prayer" part that's the issue?
Is it because those that some who want less gun violence don't care about the the attitudes of people who choose to share their personal T&Ps towards a tragic violent gun event, the victims, and society's pain?
Does this T&P admonishment extend to cancer, homelessness, natural death, personal losses, etc. to those who take issue with T&Ps and gun violence?
Is it the that people don't see T & Ps as helping any way so there is no validity in sharing?
Is there a political bias towards this train of thought?
Is it the "prayer" part that's the issue?
Is it because those that some who want less gun violence don't care about the the attitudes of people who choose to share their personal T&Ps towards a tragic violent gun event, the victims, and society's pain?
Does this T&P admonishment extend to cancer, homelessness, natural death, personal losses, etc. to those who take issue with T&Ps and gun violence?