it is all about talent and opportunities. Morris seized the opportunities the past couple of years. But I don't think the talent is there, he could probably be replaced with any average RB in similar situation, which is why I traded him away after his brilliant rookie season.
Wow, really? I can see some bias just from trading him away, i.e. you are naturally going to think or want to believe that you made the right call. That said, if you think "any average RB" can replace him, why is it that over 2012 and 2013, Morris is #2 in rushing yards behind Peterson? He finished 53 yards ahead of Lynch both years even though Lynch had 5 more carries. He finished 91 yards ahead of Charles on 69 carries, which isn't bad considering Charles ypc is always outstanding.
I'm sorry, but as much as you try to downplay it, a RB in their first 2 seasons having 611 carries for 2888 yards on 4.7 ypc with 20 rushing TDs is not average.
I may have missed someone, but I just looked based on the best single seasons and found 7 other RBs with more rushing yards in their first 2 seasons. LT (31 more yards on 100 more carries), Edge (374 more yards on 145 carries), Peterson (better ypc), Dickerson (better ypc, insane first two years), Campbell (just about same ypc, just 59 more carries), CJ (better ypc), Portis (better ypc) and Otis Anderson (slightly less ypc). Those are some pretty talented RBs and out of those 7, 3 of them had 2000 yard seasons, which surprisingly enough also doesn't happen that often.
So, again, it is quite a hyperbole to say any average RB could replace him when only 7 other RBs, including 2 HOFers and most likely 3 future HOFers, were able to rush for more yards in their first two seasons. It seems that his first two years rushing are more of an indication of becoming a HOFer than being average. Now of course, that is a hyperbole as I don't see him as a future HOFer, at least not yet, but let's not downplay his talent.